IUC Breaking News: Angie Not Preggo – Only Thing She’s Expecting FROM BRAD is Walking Papers

Posted on April 17th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive
There's been much ballyhoo this week about Angelina being pregnant
(READ THE BREAKING STORY). My sources in Camp Brangie call these
reports complete rubbish. "It's impossible," declares one employee.
"She and Brad haven't slept together in months. That doesn't rule out
an affair, of course, but Angie has been more interested in women than
men lately and I don't think you can get pregnant eating pussy."  Developing...
****UPDATE**** Friend who had dinner in NYC with Angie recently dishes all to IUC next week!
****UPDATE**** Big Coverup to be revealed next week!
****Ian's not backing down.  He will come out of hiding early next week
with an installment of his IUCTV Show, Talk Royalty.  R U all ready?****
  1. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    The plot thickens. How’s she gonna spin it? Good work Nine.

    Stay safe Ian. Hitting a nerve, no doubt.

    Reply
  2. adtwah said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    LMAO! Don’t mince any words!

    Reply
  3. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    I dont know why but something Sugar said in the Big Deception about emphasizing an old rule made me wonder if AJ was seeing Jenny S again? And then last night SR mentioned her when he said they did a lot of drugs together. Coinkydink?? jmo

    Reply
  4. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    Someone just posted that The National Ledger picked up the pregnancy story. Now what is AJ gonna do? This is really intriguing. I liked that Ledger story because it showed all the inconsistencies of the Brangie press in the past few weeks. Spin, Angie, Spin.

    Reply
  5. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @Tamara:Could be. I think the “old rule” means use a pregnancy to try to control things. Now the Ledger has reported this pregnancy. It’s not just a tabloid saying it (granted, the Ledger sourced the Star, but still, this is a pretty credible news source printing a pregnancy story. To me, this means Angie better be telling the truth, or she better be prepared to be caught in her lies. I’m hoping. JMO.

    Reply
  6. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @knowone:They will just deny deny deny imo

    Reply
  7. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    This is shaping up to be a very big messy spilt.

    Reply
  8. Selenite said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    I’m guessing if she doesn’t deny she will claim an early miscarriage due to stress.

    Reply
  9. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @Tamara:Yep. Denial, the first line of defense.

    Reply
  10. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @knowone:Ah yes, I don’t know why I thought that, it just seems like they had a very intense relationship and Jenny has said she has never gotten over her, and they were together right before she hooked up with BP so maybe AJ has been missing her, IDK, jmo

    Reply
  11. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    On an entirely unrelated topic my puppy is fighting wolves in her sleep, little legs going, yelping! hahaha Thought I would just share that! LOL

    Reply
  12. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    Well, Ima gunna do what I should have been doin all morning—clean my pigsty. Check back later, dudes.

    Reply
  13. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    This is getting even better. Has Brad wised up?

    Reply
  14. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @Tamara:Cute. My doggy (older) also chases rabbits in her sleep, the twitching and little yelps.

    Reply
  15. Jezzy said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @Tamara:
    aww…my kitten just farts in her sleep..alot.

    Reply
  16. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    Notice Ian says “declares one employee”, so we know its someone on her payroll that would probably know more then most imo

    Reply
  17. LMC123 said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    Does anyone know if Ian has given any indication as to when all hell’s gonna break loose publicly?

    Reply
  18. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    @knowone:Have a good day!! “See ya” later!!

    Reply
  19. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    @Jezzy:HAHA!!!

    Reply
  20. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    @LMC123:No, but when it does, we’re all gonna sit back, examine our fingernails, YAWN!! Old news!! hahaha

    Reply
  21. LMC123 said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    @Tamara:

    Dang! I wish he knew. Anyone heard from “Me”? I’d like to get their take on this.

    Reply
  22. Jezzy said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    I wonder if JS is the lady friend the limo driver take to harlem to pick up interesting packages?

    Reply
  23. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    @Jezzy:Maybe not, she would be so recognizable I would think

    Reply
  24. Jezzy said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    I don’t know, I’ve seen her picture before, but if I saw her on the street I would’nt have a clue who the hell she was

    Reply
  25. Deeca said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    I think its strange how they have not immediately denied any rumor so far because they used to do that every time something would come out about them.

    Reply
  26. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    @LMC123:
    Just an observation, I get the feeling that Me is not always or currently in the mix, per se.
    Me alluded that they are not a celebrity, more of an everyday type person. With Brangie on the move so much, they may not have any current insider info, if they truly have any at all.

    Reply
  27. stinky-inky said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    In other news, what the hell happened to Rupert Everett?

    Reply
  28. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    @Jezzy:
    Yeah, same here. In “context” I would recognize her, but not as a stand alone.

    Reply
  29. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    @stinky-inky:
    A sad mutilation, that’s what!

    Reply
  30. stinky-inky said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    @McDooks:
    That’s not an improvement. He doesn’t even look like the same person.

    Reply
  31. LMC123 said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    @McDooks:

    True. A little OT, but what’s your take on Holly? She really did just disappear right after the twins were born. I hate to jump on that crazy train, but that whole pregnancy coincidence has always made me suspect that AJ was never really preggo and Holly was a surrogate. BTW, I really love reading all the posts and theories here. You guys are amazing.

    Reply
  32. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    Have you guys heard the rumor about Angelina crying to Jon Voight about Brad in the National enquirer?

    Reply
  33. Bear said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    I’m confused. One close source said if Angie was preggers, then she’d better get a few guys to take a blood test. Another source says that she has a few men on the side. Ms. Nine says she has a younger man and an older man.

    Now we read today’s posts that says she more interested in women, so there’d be no way she’d be preggers. From what we’ve been reading, sounds like her interest is more towards men.

    Something doesn’t jive…..

    Reply
  34. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    @LMC123:
    I don’t really know anything about Holly. I was like “Holly who?” until yesterday, I think. I never really paid much attention to Brangie, they annoyed me so with their phoniness. When Scrangie started saving the world, right on the heels of being a dark-sided limo-ride-sex-having-telling-the-whole-world dipshit, she instantly became ridiculous.
    And when Brad hooked up with her, he lost all appeal to me.
    So I really don’t have any familiarity with Holly.
    I ignored them until pretty recently.

    Reply
  35. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    I just read that a little while ago. She is so lame. She knows her daddy wants to be a part of her life. Whether it is true or not she gives him the time of day, I don’t know. But she doesn’t have any friends, so maybe she is just using him for sympathy. Who knows.
    I think I would give her an ounce of respect if she grew the hell up and moved past what ever she holds against him. I think she is a dumb-ass hypocrite so I won’t hold my breath.

    Reply
  36. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    No, what does it say?

    Reply
  37. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    @Kate:
    I think it said she is calling him up a lot (only a little at first) and crying her eyes out to him about Brad. John is supposedly unhappy about the problems they are having but is letting her do all the reaching out so as not to drive her away. Let her come to him on her own terms in her own time. Sounds like he is being a patient and hopeful father that things will work out between him and his spawn.

    Reply
  38. Susanna said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @LMC123:

    I definitely think something was suspicious with the stories that some woman was posing as Holly Goline, Angelina’s old assistant, and feeding false information to ET when they announced the birth of the twins early.
    The stories just don’t ring true. How could someone pose as Holly for one year without being caught? I think the “fake Holly” was probably a cover up. It makes sense if one of the twins was actually Holly’s that this could happen. She announced that Angelina’s baby had been born…perhaps the story was true if she gave birth at that time to the baby she would give to Brangie. Also, this article lists Angie’s attorneys as Lavely & Singer.

    http://www.hollyscoop.com/angelina-jolie/angelinas-fake-assistant-feeding-media-lies_16266.aspx

    Interestingly, Holly and Angelina look a lot alike, and here is proof that they were both pregnant and expecting to give birth at the same time.

    http://www.bigpicturesprintstore.com/pictures_1319904/detail.html

    This could certainly count as the big fraud referred to in yesterday’s post.

    Reply
  39. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    Considering SR said last night Angelina made Brad dress up in womens clothes against his wishes and she seems to be going back to women pretty strongly it sure looks like he was just a challenge, a game to her, you know, does anyone believe she has ever loved this man? I know many have said they will not give Brad a pass on this and I felt that way for awhile to, but after all that has come out, her drugging him, painting his toe nails , this guy has been taken to the real demons and dungeons imo, and has paid his dues in terms of Karma. Jen has forgiven him for what he did.

    What I can not quite figure out though, is does he still love her to some degree? Ian said they were going to adopt two more kids until this all fell apart, and I am guessing that was until he hired the PI and found out she was doing the bunnies and BBT and Oliver and who knows whatever else? Was Brad willing to overlook this batshit crazy woman and put up with this wierdness as long as it was just between the two of them? The dog, Sugar Ray said he never really recovered from that..did he see that as part of her illness and he was trying to be a bleeding heart. She said at one point that real love is when someone can just hold you and let you cry. When I heard the dog story I thought of that comment. Her mom was dying, she was alledgely back on Heroin, met up with Marilyn Manson, and now fucking dogs, one messed up chick. She had come full circle from the person he met on MAMS just 2 years before when he said she was so misunderstood, and that he too had thought she was wierd. Wonder if he would like to take that back?

    I don’t think Brad will ever say a bad word about her because she is the mother of his children, and that in his mind imo will take precedent. I think his parents will advise him to not talk against her publicly. These kids have to live with this shit. She on the other hand seems not to care, a restraining order, trying to say he is not the father with DNA tests, challenging the adoptions..how much can he really take?

    So when did he have enough, he went through all of this, the dog,the drugs, her deceptions, and knows about all of it, allowed her to dress him up like a woman so she could feel like she was with a woman, that must have made him feel loved. She said, “Brad is more man than I have ever known” that came out of no where, I wonder if she said that during that time. She said she made many comments about BBT because he wanted her too, it made him happy. She strokes Brad in public for a reason, but not because she is in love with him imo.

    Many of us always felt she would go back to women one day and just raise the kids and have men around her, and I think that is what she will do. Josephine Baker lived her life like that to an extent. Angelina said at the end of 2004 that she would rather raise Mad as a single mom with many men friends and her brother as role models than a dad that is not there all the time, yet here she is trying to take sole legal custody.

    Why, because she is bored as a horse that does not know it is dead? Brad my be an old coot to her, but she knew he was a bit of a home body, ever person he has ever lived with has said that about him, all of them, and some left because that is why they did not connect. He tried ,it seems to live her lifestyle, and look what it has done to this man. Can’t say he does not deserve that, but he will be linked with this nutcase for the rest of his life, and that is enough punishment. So my question is, doe she still love her, but just can not take it anymore, because he sure allowed her to strip his soul?

    Reply
  40. Susanna said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    The more I think about it, what if Angelina wasn’t really pregnant with the twins? What if Holly was really carrying them? I know we have discussed that here before…Look at this article in the LA Times. It implies that Holly was in fact the real mother.

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedishrag/2008/06/where-is-angeli.html

    Reply
  41. WOW said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    Wasn’t she moving in on the Prez last week when I was last here, or her bro. Or wasn’t Brad sleeping on the couch. This stuff is so freaking over the top, it is laughable. Maybe the dog or plant made her preggers. Jeez Louise, gulable much. BTW, who was the black and white couple that were supposed to come “out”, that is when I first looked on here. Never happened either, the big reveal by this site or the actual couple happening, much like all of this nonsense. I am in awe. LOL

    Reply
  42. Susanna said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    Here is another one! Funny, I didn’t pay much attention to this story at the time. But something is not right here…

    http://bauergriffinonline.com/2008/05/angelina-jolies-pregnant-assis.php

    Reply
  43. N'other Name said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    On the ‘other topic’ Rupert Everett, does he not look like Charlie Sheen in this new picture??!!! WOW, most times it’s much better to stay away from plastic surgery!

    Reply
  44. LurkeyLoo said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    I know! Rupert has jacked his face UP!!!!! @McDooks:

    Reply
  45. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @Kate:
    I know that after SR wrote those things about the drugging and dragging, I felt soooo bad for BP. It seems that he sincerely gave that woman the benefit of the doubt and she turned him into a toy. He was her plaything and nothing else. If it makes her happy to be with a woman, then perhaps she should pursue a meaningful relationship with a woman. The kids will have two steady parents and she will be happy. I guess it must truly be that complicated to be bisexual… wanting and loving both sexes.

    There are so many different types of families. It doesn’t have a to be a nuclear family, you know. It could be her, her life partners man&woman, her brother, and her father. This is the idealistic side of me… I just want everyone to be happy, including AJ.

    Reply
  46. Susanna said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    @Kate:

    I think that Brad believed that Angelina was someone that she was not, and fell in love with the idea of herself that she put forth early in the relationship. People are always on their best behavior in the early stages. Angie presented herself as a devoted mother who was interested in humanitarian causes. I think that is why Brad came out and said she was the most misunderstood woman in the world. It was not until much, much later that she showed her true colors to him. By that time, it was too late.

    I think that Angie might have also used this humanitarian mommy image that she had going on to say to Brad, look at me, my life is so full and meaningful, and all that Jen does is drink margaritas, get a suntan, and work out. Brad really fell for the act hook, line and sinker. Underneath it all, despite his flaws, I get the sense that he is a down to earth guy. He was raised by a good family with traditional values. A family life and up-bringing that was the exact opposite of Angelina’s. God only knows what else happened to her to make her so screwed up…almost makes me feel sorry for her. If you read that Esquire article I posted yesterday, I thought that was quite illuminating about who she is deep down inside…disturbed.

    BTW I really enjoyed your post!

    Reply
  47. claea said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    Really and does this Brangie source sleep inside Jolie`s bedroom? Because how else would he/she know?

    PS:: And what about the walking papers? They were never married so why would there be any papers involved?

    PPS: I am surprised – didn`t Ian just claim that Jolie had an affair with TWO MEN? But -it is WOMEN she sees now! No it her her dog,no her plant and what what about her brother? Bawahahah. Really Jesus how can anyone be that stupid to believe this utter garbage!

    PPPS: While I have always stated that a split (not divorce) wouldn`t surprise me after months of fighting rumors by the gossip mags all these outragious details contradict each other! This is not investigative journalism – that is Ian`s vendetta against an actress who he has nothing to do with but who he is abusing as the target for his defamation campaign!

    Reply
  48. mandy said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    Does anyone remember the story a couple of years ago where Angie was overheard telling someone that Brad spends too much money and said that he should just “shut up and look pretty” ? I remember thinking: that pretty much sums it up. She has zero respect for him and just used him for attention and money. I just wonder when he found out and how. It had to have been very early on in their relationship because it has been so obvious to most people for a while now. I think he has just been trapped by the kids. He is probably a good father and the fact that he as stayed with that evil woman is proof of that.
    I also remember at the LA premiere of Benjamin Button when his parents were there. In an interview his mother said that she was not only proud of what he did for a living but also proud of the person he had become. I believe he has known of her problems since before or right after Shiloh’s birth and has stuck around to try and do the right thing by the other kids. I think that is what his mother meant by the person he had become. If he hasn’t adopted the other children then he will have to leave them alone with her and her craziness. He must have something good on her at this point if he is ready to leave.

    Reply
  49. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    @claea:
    The term “Walking Papers” does not necessarily mean, divorce papers or actual papers. It can mean, I’m getting the hell out or why don’t you get the hell out.

    Reply
  50. Claire allitt said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    @WOW i totally agree. Nothing ever comes of ANY of the ’stories’ on here (apart from the michael jackson auction which had already been reported elsewhere)

    Reply
  51. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    @ Kate – AJ is essentially immature – she is in love with herself and her own image more than she ever could be with anyone else. Maybe her brother is her greatest love because he is the nearest thing on earth she can find to her own image. She falls in love with men and women, not for who they are but what they are. She likes famous, powerful people, she falls for their image not them. Remember when she was (supposedly) pregnant with the twins at the screen actors guild awards was it, when she was looking all smug and loved up for the cameras? Word was she was gazing adoringly at Daniel Day-Lewis while he was accepting his award. She falls in love with the image of someone: Antonio Banderas, Clive Owen, Colin Farrell, Brad Pitt, Clinton maybe, Obama, Madonna, its all a fantasy she has about who they are and who she would be if she hooked up with them. Like a 13 year old schoolgirl. Its like she got emotionally stunted around her teenage years for some reason. Who knows why.

    Reply
  52. Susanna said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    Here is the firm that is noted to be handling Angelina’s litigation. They represent a large number of stars, including Arnold Schwarzenegger. Defamation law is listed in the first spot on their areas of expertise.

    http://www.lavelysinger.com/profile.html

    And check out this article about them being the elite “clean up squad.” No doubt they have been hard at work for Angie! It was written of Martin Singer: “I’ll make one call to a publicist to check out a tip,” growls New York Post Page Six editor Richard Johnson, “and pretty soon I get a hand-delivered letter from Singer threatening all sorts of disasters and financial damages.”

    http://www.lavelysinger.com/ragingbulls.html

    Reply
  53. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    Thanks Susanna-

    Well he married her, and it will be interesting to find out exactly when they got married and what country that was and who those two witnesses were. If it was anytime prior to her adopting Pax that presents a huge problem for her. If it was after then it does not, but then that would be a problem in her trying to adopt again because many countries do require you be married anywhere from 1-5 years, and you have to prove it.

    I think the fact that they have not been sharing the same room, sometimes not even the same home for months now is very telling. I wonder what made him suspicious enough to hire the P.I and if the P.I got the sex tape that is going to be released, who is on it, if that is the BBT sandwich? If Brad has that sex tape I can’t see him allowing it to be released except for custody, but I could see the P.I selling it. lol

    I would like to know more about why she is trying to say that his adoption of the adopted kids was not legal, that could just be a tactic she is using like BBT trying to get Mad, she could be in on that. Just throw it all against the wall and see what sticks. I guess if I thought I was going to loose my kids and I was that famous and could not just get them out of the country and change their names (lmao not joking here) I would do the same, I would try everything I could to keep them, but I don’t think I would keep them from Dad unless he was a bad Dad. So I don’t understand her motive except she is crazy..and she does not want him to dictate to her where she can live with them, and if she does not have sole legal he can. just my thoughts.

    Reply
  54. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @pookiedoll:
    Pookie Ian has confirmed they got married in another country with witnesses, so yes he will be handing her walking papers if it is legal in the US as well. I would be that Brad has hired another “crisis manager” right now and is bunkered down in France trying to figure the best way to break this to the press.

    IAN or M9- Did you ever find out if that source who said they were in New Orleans together was feeding you info and if so is that the same source that said they would make one more pulbic appearance to calm the news of a split..because the storm is raging on…………???? Is he still in FRANCE

    or SR any of you available… Cheers!

    Reply
  55. WOW said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @claea: Too funny, huh…we were supposed to be shocked when she was outed as a “quatro” sexual. You are right, who is this person in her bedroom revealing her sexual activities. And then he other person that tells of her obsession with prez. Then there is BBT and her own brother. And some yound dude a couple of days ago. Now it is all woman lately…AY YAY YAY!!! You know, she might collapse from exhaustion, if she keeps this busy schedule up, with men, women, plants, animals, ex husbands, brothers. Oh and she films a movie and is on smack or meth. Dang, how does she so it all. Maybe she is super human!! And I like Brad, but peeps, he is not a victim, please, he is a grown man that makes his own choices.

    Reply
  56. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    claeae – for the first and last time – defamation refers to the spoken word, something said on the radio or television, when we’re talking about the written word, it is libel. Try looking up the definitions of words before you throw them around in your postscripts thinking you are God’s gift to truth and wisdom and then perhaps you won’t sound quite so much like a drivelling, jibbering reject from the lunatic asylum.

    P.S. You bring new meaning to the phrase “thick as pig shit”.

    P.P.S. I have never in my life encountered a person more pleased with themselvess with as little (or nothing in fact) as you have to base it on. You truly are a revelation to me. I’m beginning to think someone has made you up for a gag.

    P.P.P.S. Writing numerous postscripts like a 6 year old trying to write its very first love letter does not improve your case. Truly, can you really not see how utterly ridiculous and stupid you look? Actually stupid would be a compliment for you, I really think you must have just hatched out of an egg. No human being can be so utterly inane as this surely?

    Reply
  57. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @ WOW – when you’re complimenting claea/caea on her theories, its time to hang up your keyboard and go home girlfriend. If c/c just hatched out of an egg you must be an amoeba.

    Reply
  58. WOW said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    about Brad, if any of this nonsense is true, like the possible break up. He is a man who can handle himself.

    Reply
  59. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    @claea:You know, I dont think its the topic of Brangie that upsets you as much as the fact that Ian is reporting it imo. Your comments all end with some contemptuous remark against him. I don’t expect you to answer me but I would really like to know what he has done to you that makes you lash out at him this way. Not trying to start anything with you its jmo and a noticeable thread connecting every (I’d have to go back and check) so let me say most of your comments. jmo you know, nothing worth sparring over I assure you.

    Reply
  60. WOW said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    Wahtever, people, get a life, I can’t even bother to read your posts, they are too long. Love to hear yourself think, huh. Well I can’t be bothered with your theories. It is hysterical that you believe it like a kool aid drinker. Very entertaining.

    Reply
  61. claea said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    @Tamara:

    You know I just really want to know what Jolie has done that makes Ian lash out at her in this way. All his threads start, center and end with her.

    Clear now?
    PS: I used your own words on purpose in order to make my statment more obvious. I hope you don`t mind.

    Reply
  62. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    @Susanna:
    That is actually the attornies that Brad and she have always used while together. She has hired the divorce attorney Laura Wasser who was the one who handled her attorny with BBT, and is handling Robyn Gibsons divorce, unless that has changed. Did you hear a new announcement? These other attornies are the ones the loons always contact…lol

    Reply
  63. WOW said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    Buying a gossip mag with Angelina and Brad on the cover $2.95
    Going to a movie starring Angelina or Brad $10.00
    Reading all the blabber on this site PRICELESS

    Reply
  64. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    Folks , just a suggestion, but can we just ignore and scoll on past claea, and not allow this troll to deflect from our debates, just asking humbly? Seems to be intent on turning this into FF, and I hope we can just ignore these type posters.. Cheers since we have given this one more than one chance..thanks..jmho

    Reply
  65. Susanna said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    @Kate:

    I haven’t heard about who might be handling the divorce. I guess I was just trying to put all of the pieces together in my mind of HOW Brangie has perpetrated this fraud on the public for so long. I’m sure it was through paying off blogs and magazines so that they wouldn’t write anything negative, but also hiring some litigation “pit bulls” to go after anyone who dared to question anything. The firm that I posted about is who went after Holly Goline or her “imposter” when she began to leak stories about the twins’ birth. I think that was probably really Holly giving the stories, and Lavely & Singer went after her with a vengeance. A lot of times litigation is about who has more money. If you make $100K a year and you get sued for talking about your boss, who has a fortune of 100’s ofr millions of dolalrs, and that lawsuit claims damages of $20 million, well, your a$$ is going to back down and just STFU.

    I’m also really interested in hearing what you all think about the twins being birthed by Holly. This story line intrigues me for some reason.

    Reply
  66. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @mandy:
    Hey Mandy I do remember that, and thought at the time, would love to be a fly on that wall. Of course she went into major damage control after that..stroke stroke lol

    Reply
  67. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @Kate:
    Thanks Kate. Wow! Why the lies about not being married? I don’t understand.

    Reply
  68. Mememe said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    I’m reluctant to post on any of the Brangelina posts since they became so ridiculous but i have to say it’s becoming rather contradictory. One post says she’s seeing a much younger man and another says she’s not slept with brad for months because she’s more into women. Doesn’t make much sense to me.

    Reply
  69. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    @Kate:
    I’m with you. No more replies.

    Reply
  70. another me said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    On the comments on the bauergriffin link there is a Suzie Q defiantly defending the brange, and the comments were from back in ‘08… didn’t we have our very own Suzie Q?

    Reply
  71. WOW said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    I thought this was a “comment” section, to comment on what you think about the story on the website. It does not say you must agree to comment here.

    Reply
  72. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    @WOW:
    You are not commenting, you are insulting posters because they believe the story, that is rude. If you do not believe it fine, your choice, but we are here because we support Ian in this investigation of the Brange Deception. It is one thing to comment intelligently to why you can accept this or not, and another to just bash and be rude . Everyone is welcome to comment, but trolls are tiresome and you know that.

    Reply
  73. Anonymous said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    @Memene: It could make sense, as the post mentioned says she has not been sleeping with Brad for months (that doesn’t rule out an affair, according to the source, but she was more into women at that time, 2 1/2 months ago), but is seing a younger/an older man NOW.

    Reply
  74. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    @Mememe:
    I think it would help if people would remember this is like a puzzle with various sources -

    Sources

    1-from Brads camp
    2-from Jens camp
    3-from BBT camp
    4-from those who have worked for Brange and do
    5-from those who Ian talked to undercover and they blabbed too much
    6-from Angies camp, those who want to help the kids
    7-from Angies camp those that are playing Ian and SR has warned are spinning things in circles.

    Now if you remember that list you will begin to understand why things get reported in pieces and not as a whole piece and why one may not sound complete. I think the New Orleans and Priest came from S7 and maybe the Obama and Prez as well.

    Now on top of that we have sources from Sugar Ray as well, and then Miss Nine which could be using Ians or not.

    The first 5 lines or so of Sugars last blog on deception was about Angie infilterating this blog . Looking back it is pretty easy to see who they were. jmo

    Reply
  75. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    Ange you’re getting pretty desperate, I wonder why you feel I’m such a threat to you. Or is it just a case of one-upmanship, I made you look stupid and so you’re getting your own back? What is being done on your behalf is illegal and I have called the police. I will make further calls tomorrow. You are turning this into a story now.

    @ Everyone else – don’t worry everything is fine, Ange and I are just having a little convo.

    Reply
  76. tyin said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    i dont know laws about adoption in us, why there could be troubles with pax adoption?

    Reply
  77. WOW said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    When so many inconsistities are being reported (why are 7 sources all blabbering at the same time with different stories), along with a person named SR who reports in comple gibberish, in which you could walk away with so many ways to take what is being written, I just decided to comment my disbelief in these theories all lining up in making any kind of sense. Just my comment…not being rude or mean, just in awe.

    Reply
  78. WOW said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    BTW, I am not Maddox

    Reply
  79. WOW said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    Bye, have fun deciphering nonsense, this place is sure lacking a sense of humour.

    Reply
  80. Mememe said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    @kate @anonymous i understand where you’re coming from but it’s extremely confusing!

    Reply
  81. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    Would love to know what is developing.

    Reply
  82. justathought said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    “>@Keane: that is great keene! did you call thepolice about her threatening ian with physical harm and so he is in hiding with a bodyguard. that part should be easy for ian to prove….good job…class=”replyTo” href=”#comment-12056

    Reply
  83. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    @Keane:LOL no worries Im finding you so amusing keep up the good work! LOL

    Reply
  84. Unknown said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    I keep trying to tell ya… angie & brad are sitting back right now, laughing their asses off at all of you fools. There is a reason why nothing makes sense, and it is all over the top. ha. hahaha.

    Reply
  85. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    @ justathought and Tamara – no this is with regards to myself. She (or whoever is operating on her behalf) has committed a crime against me and the UK police are dealing with it. Its nothing too serious at the moment but if it goes any further it will be. I’m sure you understand what I mean Ange. You are incriminating yourself, you have already done so. Think before you do any more. I’ll be calling a different type of newspaper tomorrow. Night all.

    Reply
  86. Mint Tulip said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    Go Keane Go! yeah, call the police! …

    Reply
  87. Anonymous said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    @Keane: What is going on? Hope you are fine.

    Reply
  88. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    @ Mint Tulip – don’t worry I already have my friend. You will be hearing from them in due course.

    Reply
  89. Mint Tulip said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    This is all so interesting… I can’t wait for the next update. I am telling everyone about this website!

    Reply
  90. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    @ Anonymous – all is fine, but a crime has been committed against me so I have reported it and it is being investigated. Its nothing major, but it is a crime nonetheless. Internet crime.

    Reply
  91. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    Before I go, can anyone read what that update says above the big cover up?

    Reply
  92. Anonymous said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    ******UPDATE*****Friend who had dinner in NYC with Angie recently dishes all to IUC next week!

    ****UPDATE**** *Big Coverup to be revealed next week!

    Reply
  93. Anonymous said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    ****Ian’s not backing down. He will come out of seclusion early next week with an installment

    his IUCTV Show, Talk Royalty. R U all ready****

    Reply
  94. JJ said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:27 pm

    Jesus! I just discovered this website today, and I have spent the whole day here (I know, I should go get a life). The posts are so interesting, and I believe them because there has always been something that turned me off about Angelina. Something demonian and evil about her. I hope these posts are true- i do not think Brad is a bad guy (he just thinks with his penis, but overall he is not evil), and those kids deserve much better than Angelina. Everything has been an act with her, even the relationship with Brad (she was nobody before she was with him, and now everyone knows her). Everything was calculated to the smallest detail and in this world, fortunately, what goes around comes around.

    Reply
  95. Unknown said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    yuv ben PUNK’D. <3333

    Reply
  96. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    WAAAAAAATTTTT? is that?????

    Reply
  97. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    @Keane:Oh God Keane! I didn’t know, be careful, Im glad you’ve got a friend with you!

    Reply
  98. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    I just wrote a long question to Constant Gardner about h/her take on the above post, and when I submitted my question, instead of it posting, I get the “Punked” message. What’s that about?

    Reply
  99. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    @knowone:Oh nooooo

    Reply
  100. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    @ knowone – Angelina’s people are all over this site doing anything they can to fuck with it and the people posting on it. Including criminial activity. I’ve been in touch with a reporter friend to get his take on it. Catch you all tomorrow.

    Reply
  101. Unknown said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    you will all be apart of a documentary about the way gossip spreads, and what evil it causes. keep going, makes the documentary more interesting. Bet you didnt know angie has her sites on directing, did ya ? ;)

    Reply
  102. Chaka said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    @Keane:

    I’m not sure which country you live in, but in the US, “defamation” can be either libel or slander. It’s the general term.

    Reply
  103. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    @ Unknown – hilarious hun. As someone who makes documentaries as part of the most prestigious strands on the most prestigious UK TV channels, I hate to break it to you but you can’t make a documentary without footage of people. So far this doc involves your supposed “director” sitting at a computer writing stuff and reading their responses. FAIL. No-one’s buying that doc loser, take it from someone whose docs actually get sold and broadcast. You’ve tried your its an academic study on gossip angle before and everyone laughed their asses off then, its all the more hilarious now. The only doc Angelina is capable of making involves her on the floor naked with a variety of animals, vegetables and minerals and a camcorder trained on her. In fact I believe Angelina’s got a little home made doc in the pipeline if SR’s report is to be believed. Sorry loser, but there ain’t no doc if there ain’t no contributors and Ange might fancy herself as a director but all she’ll ever be is the one getting fucked every which way on camera.

    Reply
  104. QuiteOne said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:10 pm

    Hello everyone –

    I’ve been lurking for over a week now and I must say, I too, am captivated with Ian’s blog. I was saddened when BP hooked up with AJ. Anyway, I just want to add an interesting tidbit. I apologize if this has already been discussed. I know that someone on another thread thought AJ may suffer from Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). And I strongly agree. I took a psychology class last fall and my professor was a Psychologist (makes sense). We briefly touched on BPD and I remember him saying that individuals with BPD either love you or hate you. When they love you, they really, really love you and when they hate you, they really, really hate you. BPDs always swing from one extreme to the other. My professor emphasized how he did NOT like treating BPDs.

    This is the description of BPD quoted from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/borderline-personality-disorder-fact-sheet/index.shtml

    “While a person with depression or bipolar disorder typically endures the same mood for weeks, a person with BPD may experience intense bouts of anger, depression, and anxiety that may last only hours, or at most a day.5 These may be associated with episodes of impulsive aggression, self-injury, and drug or alcohol abuse. Distortions in cognition and sense of self can lead to frequent changes in long-term goals, career plans, jobs, friendships, gender identity, and values. Sometimes people with BPD view themselves as fundamentally bad, or unworthy. They may feel unfairly misunderstood or mistreated, bored, empty, and have little idea who they are. Such symptoms are most acute when people with BPD feel isolated and lacking in social support, and may result in frantic efforts to avoid being alone.

    People with BPD often have highly unstable patterns of social relationships. While they can develop intense but stormy attachments, their attitudes towards family, friends, and loved ones may suddenly shift from idealization (great admiration and love) to devaluation (intense anger and dislike). Thus, they may form an immediate attachment and idealize the other person, but when a slight separation or conflict occurs, they switch unexpectedly to the other extreme and angrily accuse the other person of not caring for them at all. Even with family members, individuals with BPD are highly sensitive to rejection, reacting with anger and distress to such mild separations as a vacation, a business trip, or a sudden change in plans. These fears of abandonment seem to be related to difficulties feeling emotionally connected to important persons when they are physically absent, leaving the individual with BPD feeling lost and perhaps worthless. Suicide threats and attempts may occur along with anger at perceived abandonment and disappointments.

    People with BPD exhibit other impulsive behaviors, such as excessive spending, binge eating and risky sex. BPD often occurs together with other psychiatric problems, particularly bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety disorders, substance abuse, and other personality disorders.”

    I apologize for the long post. Just thought you may be interested in the similarities. This would explain the relationship with JH and all her wild behavior. BP never stood a chance, nor does any future relationships. Of course, all the above is jmo.

    Reply
  105. carrie said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:19 pm

    @JJ:What Brad did to Jen and allowed to happen to her in the media was evil and there is no other way to slice it. He hooked up with AJ because she appealed to a side of him that was already there. A side that was selfish cruel and narcissistic. I won’t forget how he treated Jen and he owes her a PUBLIC apology for all of the public humiliation and pain she suffered because of his actions. AJ couldn’t do anything she let him and I’m tired of men being excused for their bad behavior.

    Reply
  106. susanna said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:21 pm

    I think Angie has her lawyers on this site now. Ian, your readers are ready for the scoop next week! Keep it coming!

    Reply
  107. Astro said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    BlaBlaBla…The credibility of Ian Halperin is ZERO. Don’t believe this kind of garbage.

    Reply
  108. QuietOne said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:25 pm

    @carrie:
    I agree 100%. BP is certainly not innocent and this is the perfect example of KARMA.

    Sorry about that. I mistyped my name above. It should be QuietOne.

    Reply
  109. Unknown said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    @Keane:
    Keane, how can you have any time to make any doc when you are obsessed with idle gossip? Guess what Keane – U are the weakest link ~

    Reply
  110. QuietOne said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    @knowone:
    That’s rather interesting. It just happened to me too. I submitted a long post that initially posted, now it’s gone.

    Reply
  111. ceegee said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    I saw this on the cover of the Globe at the checkouot counter and it’s also online.

    Angelina Wants Her Brother’s Baby
    BABY hungry Angelina Jolie wants her brother’s child – and her live-in love Brad Pitt is stunned, sources tell GLOBE in a shocking exclusive. In this week’s issue, friends reveal all the stunning details of the movie beauty’s plan to expand her family after Pitt nixed new adoptions. You won’t want to miss it.

    Reply
  112. Gr8 said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    “I keep trying to tell ya… angie & brad are sitting back right now, laughing their asses off at all of you fools.”

    Do you honestly think that they know anything about these Ian-spread rumors which have only been reported here and a few random blogs? Oh that’s right, Angelina is Ian’s most devoted fan sitting on his site 24/7 just to read about herself. Does Ian write for Weekly World News?!

    Reply
  113. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    @Unknown:
    just curious, did any reason any of your doc workers would come on here and call me a twat? lol

    Seemed kind of angry, not at all professional, and if it is all in the name of research, no hard feelings eh, especially if all these nasty stories are being given to Ian by Ang? What do you think?

    Reply
  114. moo moo said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    to the poster that just said Angie had nothing to do w Jens humiliation… It was Angie who said (I linked to it weeks ago) that brad was upset bc he wanted to be a father and that hasn’t happened for him. She also said she provided a shoulder to cry on. Go back to Ians earlier history of angelina posts. It lays it out.

    Reply
  115. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    @Keane:
    I think c/c is the amoeba and wow is the second half when c/c sliced themself down the middle. Single celled, single purposed (shit stirring stupidity), and NO BRAIN.

    Reply
  116. dina said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    Yay! New IUC tv show. You rock Ian. Keep up the good work!

    Reply
  117. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:11 pm

    @Susanna:
    As to Holly birthing the twins- I threw a crackpot theory out there last night, don’t know if anybody saw it or pondered it:
    In one of the newspaper links further up on this thread that discussed the fake Holly debacle, they did note in a rather thinly veiled observational way that it is interesting how Holly spends almost ALL of her time traveling with Brangie (at the time of the pregnancy) and yet, oddly and COINCIDENTALLY, they had the SAME due date. It said that Holly is married and has a residence in Georgia. The impression I got was that it was extremely bizarre that she could be pregnant and due at the SAME time as Scrangie. I agree, what are the odds?
    Having said that, my crackpot theory was about JAMES HAVEN being the father of Scrangie’s twins, but with a woman other than Scrangie herself. Possibly James Haven and Holly, for the sake of giving them to Brangie???
    Now having tossed all of THAT out there, why the HELL would anybody go through all that trouble and farce?
    I don’t know.
    Just something to think about.
    I think it is farfetched, just having fun. But on the remote chance there is any possibility of that, it could explain the Voight trait the babies possess.

    Reply
  118. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:20 pm

    I forgot to add that it is odd that Holly would be pregnant at the same exact time as Scrangie simply because the impression was that Holly was NEVER home and quite likely hardly ever with her husband.

    Reply
  119. joanne said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    @Susanna:
    The woman was anorexic, her body didn’t heal from the last pregnancy and she pushed herself to the limits trying to “be everything to everyone”. If she was pregnant I doubt those twins where healthy. Her hormones have to be out of whack.

    Reply
  120. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    @McDooks:

    IAN, can’t Jolie figure out from what you put up there just who that person is, and go after them they same way they that she did the limo driver? Did not think she had a friend other than Holly.

    Doesn’t that make them a bit vulnerble at this point? Or are they under some sort of protection?

    Little confused on quite how this might work out?

    Reply
  121. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    @joanne:
    Here is a pic of Jolie with her parents and James when she was 2 years old.
    http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20258141,00.html

    Shiloh looks more like Pitt to me, but Knox does have that Voight look.

    Reply
  122. Tigerlilly said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    @WOW:
    Yeah, duh! I knew you were Zahara all along….
    See, not ALL of us lack a sense of humor….

    Reply
  123. Different Guest said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:06 pm

    Let me preface this with I’ve never been pregnant, but the photo looks off to me, my sister was pregnant with twins, there’s something about the way AJ is standing that doesn’t look “real” pregnant. Maybe she’s leaning back too far?

    Reply
  124. Unknown said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:08 pm

    `2vgfr

    Reply
  125. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    @Different Guest:
    I wonder if that has to do with that “cover up” that is going to be revealed next week. Since none of us have figured out what exactly the Brange deception is besides they are just fake to begin with, and we all have always thought there was something screwy about that pregnancy, maybe..did Ian put that picture up there to say, no she is not pregnant and she is just getting her divorce papers, or is there more to it than that, is that also part of the cover up..

    Are we going to be guessing until next week….any shout outs from the boys and girls upstairs ? cause I think we are probably in 25 different directions on SR ’s..lastet..lol

    Reply
  126. Different Guest said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:19 pm

    If there was something hinky about the twins births, it means the Mayor of Nice was in on it as well as Lenval Hospital, I wonder if they reneged on a promised donation?

    Reply
  127. StatingMyOpinion said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    Is Brad still in France?

    Anyone??

    Reply
  128. AnonymousAnonymous said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    ****UPDATE***** *****UPDATE*****

    Brad and Angie and all the kids, and BBT, and her brother, and the Prez and wife, and the plant and dog, and the H and meth, and the younger man, and the 2 women Brad is with, and George C, along with the nanny and driver, are all in the Hampton’s this weekend enjoying the beach and the spring weather here in New York. Bill & Hill & Jen in a limo on the way to join the party.

    Reply
  129. Peri said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:33 pm

    Okay, I’ve been reading here for a few days now (btw, hi everyone, good to meet you)… I’ve poured over all the information and the thus far guessed at/deciphered riddle clues (not knowing what else to call them)… and something keeps coming back at me constantly. It’s AJ’s relationship with her brother, James, and the eerie closeness they have, the quote made by that friend saying they were so close they wouldn’t be surprised if AJ & James had children… and then there’s the posts made by “Me” stating AJ had done something inhuman. Okay, given we don’t know if Me is legitimate or not, he/she still presented suggestion for thought. So I’m wondering… what if the cover-up is that AJ used her brother James’ sperm when she had the IVF done without BP’s knowledge, either completely or mixed both (BP’s and James both) (again without BP’s knowledge)? Could be the hint given about “unique barcodes” meaning DNA. And now that BP has left the marriage, AJ is wanting full custody of the children, I read somewhere that she’s saying his adoptions were fraudulent and she wants DNA tests on all the children… now why would she do that unless she thought there was a chance he would NOT be the father which would further enhance her ability to get full custody… and think about this… the DNA testing would only prove BP’s NOT the father, not who IS, so her little secret would be safe unless someone exposed the whole thing. And how sick is it? Perhaps AJ & James may not have had sex, but this would give her the perfect way to have her brother’s children, carry them in her own womb (and I DO believe she was really pregnant with the twins… her facial and breast swelling is just too real), to allow her to act out the fantasy of her and brother being “mum and daddy”. (Remember how she wanted James in the delivery room? BP wouldn’t allow it. Again, my theory is that he’d have no clue.) Perhaps the disease and pain clues could be about some genetic disease that is passed on in incestuous births… and when applied to this situation, something was passed to one or both of the children, such as aplastic anemia (which requires blood transfusions or even blood marrow transfusions… extremely painful for a baby). What could be more inhuman and if found out, would totally humiliate someone? I might allow that possibly she may not have used her own eggs, but then she would just be a carrier of her brother’s baby/ies in that instance and that wouldn’t humiliate her. I think incestuous children would. And the emotional pain would be devastating for everyone, especially those children growing up.

    I think I’m done rambling now. Thoughts?

    Reply
  130. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:42 pm

    There have been reports over the past couple days that Angelina Jolie is trying to adopt a baby from the Philippines. However, there have also been reports denying that Branjelina have even been at an airport that news reports claimed that they arrived at. However, sources tell me that after looking at Angelina’s adoption history, particularly one in Cambodia, Brangelina’s request for adoption was turned down.

    Back in 2002, the Cambodian government alleged that Maddox was bought from his destitute mother and that his adoption was fast-tracked after substantial bribes were paid to senior government officials. After Angelina’s nasty deeds, adoption has been banned in Cambodia. Angelina Jolie blamed the fiasco on an agency whose director is now in prison. But a representative from a local agency here in Southern California believes Angelina was behind this all the way.

    “There is no way that Angelina didn’t know anything about the agency that helped her adopt this kid. I believe both she and Billy Bob Thornton knew everything and this is one of the reasons they divorced.”

    Another adoption representative told me, “Angelina has no right to go around and parade herself as some kind of saint. She not only homewrecked Jennifer Aniston’s home, but homewrecked possible homes for thousands of kids in Cambodia.” She goes on to tell me that in the Philippines, they have very strict adoption codes and believes Brangelina was turned down because of the Cambodian adoption of Maddox.

    Angelina and Brad have been upset by the news, but that isn’t stopping them. Brad has always wanted and Indian baby, but Angelina has always found a fascination with the Middle Eastern culture and thinks a Middle Eastern baby would blend in very well with her other kids. They would like to adopt from the United States but several adoption insiders note that there is too much red tape involved, especially with a celebrity.

    http://www.examiner.com/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner

    This is what totally cracks me up. Everyone is bagging on Ian, including the gang at FF and the gang a E and yet they do not question this fool who says his souces told him blah blah..why don’t these reporters check out these countries and their rules for adoptions before they announce that this couple has applied there for adoption? Anyone can go on the State Department web site and see instantly they would not be considered for adoption. This is not the first time, just about every time a country comes up and is listed they are not eligible.

    Now , the whole, Brad wants a Indian baby, so is that part of Sugar Rays puzzle, at what point did he decide to hang up the adoptions with Angelina, this guy makes it sound like it was April 3, which was when apparently those in the know say this trip was for. Now, hard to believe since the PI had to go down before then, something is just a bit off about all this adoption stuff.

    Ian said that it is true they were trying to adopt 2 more before this split happened, but that was what, back before December? yet they went overseas seeking a baby just 2 months ago? None of it makes

    Reply
  131. Peri said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:43 pm

    test

    Reply
  132. Different Guest said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    I think their adopting days were over as soon as the twins were born. She got away with Pax adoption by claiming it was in the pipeline before she got pregnant with Shiloh and Shiloh was what 9 months old when he was purchased. Now, they have six children including twins under a year old, no reputable organization will give them an infant unless s/he is disabled when you already have 3 biological children. Older children require time and attention, and it doesn’t look like they given that to Pax.

    Reply
  133. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:10 pm

    @Different Guest:
    Exactly, I am so glad you pointed that out, and yet these dumb dumb reporters that keep saying they were devasted when they were turned down do not have the sense to just look that basic fact up. Brad also at 45 is on his last year for many countries to adopt, so , old coot has got to go…lol

    Madonna and Jolie do not need any more kids, damn just set up a Foundation with funds that make it possible for all the other families in the US that would adopt international that can not adopt domestic to adopt, if they had the $20K they needed and the travel funds. Some are afraid to adopt domestic and have to give the baby up later, some it is too long a wait. Just make it possible for others. How difficult is that?

    Reply
  134. Different Guest said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:47 pm

    @Kate:The real reason most people don’t adopt in the U.S. is that U.S. babies are more likely to have been exposed in utero to drugs and people don’t want to deal with the potential disabilities. And many of the US kids available for adoption are minorities or mixed race, again things white parents don’t want to deal with. Whole different ballgame adopting a child from a “different culture”.

    Reply
  135. carrie said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:48 pm

    So does this mean Z won’t get her bookend? It’s going to suck being the only black kid. Or at least it will according to Jolie. She sure seemed bothered about Shiloh being the only white kids before the twins. She said she wanted to balance the races. Well they are not balanced are they?

    Reply
  136. Different Guest said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:53 pm

    Well if she’s going to balance them she needs another asian ( the Chinese have turned her down, Phillipines has turned her down, Japan doesn’t do adoption, India has turned her down, Russian has turned her down, Cambodia turned her down for a 2nd child, Myanamar turned her down, State Department isn’t allowing adoptions from Vietnam) two more Africans, and three hispanics (by the way wasn’t there rumor she was turned down by a Latin American country?)

    Reply
  137. Z said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:30 am

    @Tamara:
    We just got a puppy, too, Tamara. Yours is adorable!! We got a little Lab girl. I love her.

    Reply
  138. p said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:41 am

    @Kate: . You sure they are not in fact reading this site and adapting stories from it? The 1st 3/4 of the article sounds more realistic than the usual… at least for a tab.

    Reply
  139. tinitina said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:56 am

    Ok so, I took a break from this site for a couple of days, can’t sleep so I checked in and now I don’t even think it’s about bad sources. I think Ian is a straight fraud. He knows how riled up people are about Brangelina and he’s taking advantage, he’s an opportunist. He went into hiding? Whatever. In this day age where does one go into hiding? where they can’t use a computer and blog?

    I think a lot of his friends comment on this site to add legitimacy to his stories and work to rile the readers up.

    Any source(s) so close to Angelina dishing so much dirt would be found out and shut down by now, and ejected from the inner circle.

    Reliable tabloids would have picked it up by now, and paying Ian and his sources big bucks if there was any truth to all this, without a doubt.

    All is quiet in Brangelina world, which means something is happening, may be a break up, may be a family vacation, MAY BE A FAMILY CRISIS, but it’s def not the sordid things reported here.one thing about this couple they decide when they will be in the public.

    Ian is gaining by luring people that hate Angelina to his site, so now, I don’t think he’s being played, but you’re being played, by all of this. Hollywood has evil deception going on, including so called reporters thriving on peoples thirst for dirty gossip.

    The truth always reveals itself, all that’s in the darkness will come to light.

    No one in Brangelina world is threatening ANYONE. Made aware of this site, they are MOST DEF laughing at the allegations.

    Ian will keep this evil Angie stunt going for the next twenty years whether or not they stay together. There will never be any proof. It will be a hobby to you all to figure out her EVILNESS, and he will get the clicks, advertising and money.

    And you’ll get a pass time, because you want to believe Angelina is a weird voodoo which women. You people make me want to like her, and I hate it.

    In my last post His (self proclaimed)Highness, responded to me and said many have tried to discredit him.

    In truth he has discredited himself by sinking this low, I can smell the desperation flowing out of him.

    If he proves himself and names his sources and has this picked up and confirmed by legit media, I’ll eat my shoe and send you all the video.

    Reply
  140. tinitina said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:00 am

    Why so much joy in them breaking up? everyone is so concerned about the children, but are wet and hard in the pants for this couple to break up. Why? Why do you guys feel this way about them/him/her?

    I’m not naive just confused, clarify, please.
    Have a good night morning.
    Thanks

    Reply
  141. Jaguar said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:11 am

    @tinitina:
    I can’t speak for anyone else, but for me reading this site is about the possibility of uncovering the truth. If someone is out there projecting themselves to be a certain way and that projection is far from the truth (especially if they’re a public figure) people want to know what’s really going on. It’s human nature, unless you live with your head in the sand.

    Unveiling a fraud is right, isn’t it? OR if you are going to insist on being a public figure, don’t be a fraud in the first place! That’s the problem after all, people being afraid to be real (or refusing to be real) and then wondering why they’re exposed in the end.

    Reply
  142. dina said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:30 am

    I’m a little confused. Are they still adopting?

    Can’t wait to see what the blockbuster is.

    Reply
  143. Z said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:32 am

    @Jaguar:
    I agree….it is the whole charade. The false face……I want them exposed.

    Reply
  144. claea said on April 18th, 2009 at 3:43 am

    It is good to hear that Jolie`s friends are her biggest enemies! How much did you have to pay this particular creep in order to turn him/her around Ian?

    PS: what cover-up. Jolie hasn`t said a word in months. If you wanted to reveal a cover-up Ian why didn`t you expose Mel Gibson`s break up 2,5 years ago? Or Aniston when she lied about still being together with Vince when they had already broken up? Or LeAnn and her husband who act like nothing happened after the wife has been caught cheating by US Weekly? Really your obsession with Jolie makes you miss every major story in hollywood Ian!

    PPS: A Brangie break up has been predicted for 4 years now. This fact alone i could believe but the one fact remains: This is not YOUR exclusive see INTOUCH, STAR etc!

    Reply
  145. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 4:58 am

    @ Unknown – just the same way Angelina manages to bang every thing that moves within a 100 mile radius of her my friend, I just move damn quickly. And you I’m afraid wouldn’t know the first thing about making a documentary…. or maybe you would like to impress us with your knowledge by explaining to us exactly how this documentary you speak of is being made. And I’ll be able to tell straight away whether you are a fraud or not. Except I already do because what you are talking about is not technically possible. You must think the people reading this site were born yesterday. And as for “idle gossip” well we both know that this site has gone way beyond gossip in the last few days. Its now a STORY baby, so I’m having conversations and making plans. And re “the weakest link”, what makes you say that my friend?

    @ tinitina – if Ian was such a fraud then I’m sure people would not have needed to hack in to his e-mail account and mine. I now have proof that whoever did this to me comes from this site. Its is being inestiagted by the UK police. Internet crime is no joke, and it makes this site more than just a gossip site, this is news.

    Reply
  146. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 5:04 am

    @ tinitina – what do you mean by “reliable tabloids” my friend, name one. Celeb stories in tabloids or gossip mags are 90% made up by a star’s PR. If you had worked in the media before you would know this. Which one of these tabs/mags would you then consider reliable in the light of this. Our best chance to get a reliable story printed is to go to an independent broadsheet. These will not enter in to deals with celebs, print PR stories or be swayed by public opinion. The New York Times article calling Brangelina out was a good example. If you want to talk about legitimate media than lets talk about these publications, lets talk to them in fact and see what they think. I certainly already have personal grounds to do so.

    Reply
  147. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:19 am

    @ Astro – those are stories planted by Brangelina’s PR’s I’m afraid, how on earth would you know that a story printed in UK “Now” magazine = truth? Wake up and smell the coffee my friend, you are part of the world’s greatest confidence trick. Open your eyes.

    Reply
  148. claea said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:27 am

    @Keane:

    So ALL stories about Brangie are planted by Jolie`s PR team? Does that include all the fighting and break-up stories that make her look weak and pathic and controlling? Bwahahah.

    Reply
  149. Astro said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:32 am

    @Keane:

    Friend…Same comments apply to you. Who has the true?…Ian?…You?…Open your eyes too!!!…IAN has the worst credibility in US!!!!….OPEN YOUR EYES….CLEAR YOUR VISION!!!!…CLEAR YOUR EARS…and to be impartial with all the comments.

    Reply
  150. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:49 am

    @ claea – absolutely – they all come from either Brad’s PR or Angelina’s PR, subtly making one or the other of them look bad or to sell a certain type of image. Brad’s PR team are doing “good daddy” PR, Ange’s are doing “poor Angie” PR. I have discussed this at length, you are far too stupid to even begin to understand this very basic PR principle though my dear.

    @ Astro – according to who my dear? I assume you are a respected journalist yourself who would be a good authority on these things am I right? And if Ian has such terrible credibility to the point that we can’t believe anything he says, why has his site been sabotaged twice, he and I have both had our e-mail accounts hacked into by people using this site (I have proof of this and the UK police are investigating it), Ian has had legal threats from both Brad and Angelina’s lawyers and now death threats which he has also reported to the police. Why all this and yet no concrete legal action if Ian’s credibility is so laughable hm? I would have thought all this would have just been laughed off or appropriate legal action would have been taken wouldn’t you? But neither thing has happened. And in opposition you give the bastion of investigative journalism Now magazine. Woah, when it comes to wisdom, insight and judgment you are a master. Keep dreaming babe.

    Reply
  151. Ingbot said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:11 am

    @claea:

    AlthoughI don’t comment on this site, I read it daily and I must say that it makes more sense than any other site. Just because some of Ian’s findings appear to contradict eachother, don’t think that they can’t be true. He rarely gives a timeline and he is not stating exactly when they happened in the JP’s relationship. Just that they occurred. A LOT can happen in 4 years. It appears that you are assuming that if is reported on this site that it happened just before Ian heard about it.

    Reply
  152. Astro said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:13 am

    @Keane:

    The same comments for you baby….Keep dreaming with these kind of stories, threads and all of this garbage.

    Reply
  153. claea said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    @Keane:

    You are quite the arrogant snob Keane! By the way what is so special about the fact that there may be someone with hacker skills among the readers of this site (someone who obviously doesn`t like Ian`s freakshow)? The one thing that surprises me is that the police of your hometown wastes ressources with your case instead of dealing with serious crimes were people get harmed or property damaged or stolen!

    PS: What makes you think that Ian`s claim that he was threatened by Brangie`s lawyers is true? He also claimed that Jolie monitored his site for hours (how would he know?). Ian obviously suffers from persuit ilusion. Poor chap! Bwahaha.

    Reply
  154. Phoebe said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    Angelina Jolie – Golden Retriever causes trouble for her on movie set
    April 17, 8:09
    Daryl D
    LA Gossip Examiner

    Angelina Jolie and Golden Retrievers don’t mix

    A Golden Retriever has been a major cause of Angelina Jolie’s problems on the set of her new film,Salt, for the past couple days. Angelina and the dog are required to do four scenes together but the dog, who goes by the name of Bingo, is not cooperating with Ms. Jolie. But some people say it’s the other way around.

    “Bingo is a very loving dog and everybody on the set is falling in love with him,” the source tells me. “But Angelina Jolie, who doesn’t like dogs, hasn’t been very nice to him. Bingo would go up to Angelina so she could pet him and she would say, “Please get this thing away from me!” In one scene today, Bingo was supposed to come running to Angelina when she fell off a ladder. Instead, Bingo ran right past Angelina and into the arms of an audio technician. It was obvious Bingo wanted nothing to do with Angelina.

    “Bingo is very well trained and has been in several movies. But golden retrievers can sense if someone is fake and cold, like Angelina Jolie,” a production assistant told me.” Rumor has it that Bingo will be getting his pink slip this weekend.

    This story makes me sick. Angelina Jolie may be the very first person that a golden retriever doesn’t like. Anyhow, I would like to thank the extras and production assistants who are feeding me information directly from the set. Just remember to be careful and don’t get yourself fired. But judging from all the stories from the past week, I think it’s Angelina Jolie who should be fired.

    Examiner

    Reply
  155. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:33 am

    @ claea – and you my dear are the most stupid, inane waste of space I have ever encountered on the internet and that really is saying something. You are young, stupid and have very little experience of the world of work or life. You have no knowledge of or insight into anything that has been written here and yet throw your weight around with your pathetic little arguments and diatribe like you are God’s gift to truth and journalism. You have made yourself sound so utterly foolish, ignorant and retarded on this site that I truly am embarrassed for you. Most people would have got the hint by now and fucked off back to where you belong, but not you, you still think you’re on to something although you haven’t got a fucking clue about anything. Hate to break it to you love but hacking is a serious crime, someone has gained access to my personal information and if caught they will be arrested for that. The UK police are fantastic and do not ignore smaller crimes to concentrate on murders and assaults. They investigate and convict people for everything and internet hacking is considered a very serious crime in the UK. I am not surprised you are surprised about this however cos a dumb-as-shit little freak like you wouldn’t have the first clue how the police operate. Ian knows that Jolie follows the site because his sources are her associates and staff who TELL him you fucking dumbfuck. And lord have mercy on this retard, who persists on saying Ian obviously suffers from “persuit ilusion”, again 2 words that do not exist or have any meaning.

    @ Astro – oh thanks genius, now keeping those copies of Now magazine won’t you? You’ll find all the answers to the world’s mysteries there I can assure you. Now run along to Perez or JJ or wherever the hell you came from, there’s a dear.

    Reply
  156. Phoebe said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:35 am

    @claea:
    On the Brangelina threads at JustJared there are several big fat Brangeloon attack hens who must be on the J-P propaganda payroll. I guess that you are too.

    Perhaps Ian will install an ‘IGNORE’ button so that we don’t have to watch you ply your greasy trade.

    Reply
  157. p said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:38 am

    @Phoebe: . I don’t know if this is true or not but it’s the funniest fucking thing I’ve read all week! And poor Angie wanted to adopt a dog of every coat from every culture…what now?

    Reply
  158. claea said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:44 am

    @Keane:

    You are right Keane I am not like you and your buddy Kate. I certainly don`t blindly swallow all the crap that Ian puts out just because I don`t like the actress whom Ian has made the center of his defamation campaign. But thanx I see it as a compliment not to be associated with freaks like Ian and yourself!

    Reply
  159. Bingo said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:49 am

    That Jolie bitch really is fake and cold.

    Reply
  160. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    @ claea – oh but you are dear, by lingering around here like the bad fart that you are. Now please fuck off back to your own kind, you are about as welcome here as scabies and twice as ugly. Get lost.

    Reply
  161. stinky-inky said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:55 am

    @Phoebe:
    Hmmm. So I guess this mean AJ won’t be signing up for Marley & Me, Too!

    Animals can sense evil.

    Reply
  162. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:55 am

    @ p – check out my interpretation of SR’s post right at the bottom of the thread, I think I am on to something and have made it sound more coherent. Please have a look and tell me what you think.

    Reply
  163. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    @Keane:
    @stinky-inky:
    Morning , ok not only can I not go to work this week, apparently I shouldn’t go to sleep either , I have a feeling something big is going to happen sooner than later, I admire Ian’s tenacity, with all these stories popping up, something’s got to give.
    My take is that she will alledged miscarry, baby never 7 never made it out of Brad’s pants, and I stiil think her alleged abortion was her and James.’s
    @claea: I see your up bright and early,
    R we playing nice today??
    Eveyone else mornin’ , it’s a beautiful day, hope it is where you’re all at.

    Reply
  164. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:03 am

    @Mama San:
    number 7

    Reply
  165. section9 said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    Keane, Kate: I’m still convinced that the keys to the kingdom are to be found within the walls (so to speak, it’s all vaporware) of the Jolie-Pitt Foundation. But it’s only a door. You have to open that door and look inside.

    People haven’t asked the question of why people would willingly give money to a foundation run, in part, by such an unstable woman with delusions of grandeur and, in part, by a man who reads lines for a living.

    Time to walk back the cat, imho.

    Reply
  166. Mint Tulip said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:21 am

    Claea … GET LOST ALREADY!!! YOU BORE ME TO TEARS! … PLEASE PLEASE If you don’t like this site … DON’T COME BACK!!! I am sick of you!

    Reply
  167. section9 said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:24 am

    One other thing: what this blog is doing is very new to the Hollywood culture. It’s called swarming. The talents of literally hundreds of people are thrown at a problem at one single moment and all the old methods and scams that Hollywood built up since the time that Joe Kennedy was banging Gloria Swanson are somewhat helpless to fight it off. Hollywood doesn’t quite get this when swarming is used against the institution.

    Reply
  168. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:25 am

    @section9: One reason could be is that giving to charities is a tax-write off.

    Reply
  169. Mint Tulip said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:26 am

    Sorry folks, I just had to say it. I am sick of these loons…

    Claea if you don’t like what is being discussed here, why on earth do you waste your time arguing with these people? You are not gonna change their minds so please please enough already!

    Reply
  170. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:34 am

    JJ’s site is also reporting the ghost pregnancy.
    Nothing from eonline.
    I found this http://www.actressarchives.com/news.php?id=15834 not exactly flattering .

    Reply
  171. LurkeyLoo said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:38 am

    Keane and claea….would you BOTH please chill the fuck out with each other! It is getting old and takes up too much space, time and energy. You are both just feeding into each other’s bullshit. Get over yourselves. This is a gossip blog and not a place for your catfight. Geez…. @Keane:

    Reply
  172. susanna said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:39 am

    Morning all! Section9 you are so right. Clea, tinituna astro and the others on here are paid PR people, lawyers or management on here trying like hell to run is commenters and readers off. They have successfully done that at other sites so let’s stand our ground. No one is trying to ruin anyone, but its like a spoiled child. Give it everthing it want a and it turns into a monster. The public have brangie unbridled adoration which brought them fame. Now they are “above the law” so to speak. A lawyer at my old firm ia now in the state senate and he informed me of that. A different set of rules applies to us, is what h/she said. I think it scares all of these people working for brangie that intelligent perple read this site and comment here. Anyway, if brangie wouldn’t be such famewhores, acting increasingly above it all and trampling others feelings, perple would ignore them. But they have literally shoved themselves down the publics throat. The antics at the past awards shows also was inidacative of how they feel so above it all.

    Reply
  173. susanna said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:47 am

    I think we should take a look at the charities as section9 suggested. Another poster copied the tax info from the JP foundation, yesterday I think. Something is up there. And yes it is a huge tax write off to give to charities. Lord knows I understand that right after I stroked a huge check to the IRS this week. I probably pay a higher percentage of tax as related to my income than most stars, bc I can’t afford to donate millions to charity! Not that donating is a bad thing, but its not a 100 percent altruistic act, bc there are huge benefits. Now if the public found out that the allegedly 20 million Brangie got paid for pics of the twins didn’t go to charity they would be outraged.

    Reply
  174. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:48 am

    @ LurkeyLoo – I am more familiar with what this blog is about I have been here from near the start. Caea/claea is a persistent idiotic irritant who has fucked off everyone on here including Ian, but she really won’t take the hint and fuck off. I am hoping she will now, there are far more interesting things going on here than the musings of a retard.

    @ Section – can you check my interpretation of SR’s post at the bottom of the thread and let me know what you think if you haven’t already please? Its all starting to come together for me.

    Reply
  175. BigApplette said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:53 am

    @Mama San:
    Or a source of profits. Setting up a non-profit foundation is a very basic and well-known way to avoid taxes, especially if there are “administrators” who charge hundreds of thousands to run it. Just because a foundation doesn’t report a profit on its books, doesn’t mean that people can’t be employed by it. Also, many, many expenses can be charged to it related to the allegedly charitable pursuit. For instance, if a certain person travels to a war torn area to make a brief appearance related to the charitable endeavors of the foundation, all those expenses are covered by the foundation. So, if one is creative, one may find a way to make all his/her trips, meetings, etc., tangentially related to the foundation. Get it?

    Reply
  176. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:56 am

    @Phoebe:
    Thanks for that. I do think that is telling about animals sensing no-good. Dogs aren’t the only one, horses get spooked easily with humans they don’t like. Little trivia for ya, horses see humans 10x’s our normal size.
    Dogs are pretty easy to befriend, maybe the dog read IUC’s blog and wants nothing to do with her , either.JMO

    Reply
  177. LurkeyLoo said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:57 am

    @Keane:
    I’m not saying this person is not a fucktard and I’m not discounting your knowledge of the blog…but you guys, please, give it a rest already! Don’t you know the best way to get rid of someone like that is NOT it give them the attention…I’m just not that into reading all of the insults you are throwing at one another.

    Reply
  178. my2cents said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    test

    Reply
  179. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    @BigApplette:
    Where I come from that’s called “cooking the books”, and or money laundering, either way, that’s the FBI’s territory, if their pulling a stunt like that. Thanks for the info.

    Reply
  180. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    @ Everyone – to summarise it here, Richard Gere, Bill Clinton and Madonna are all heavily involved with AIDS research charities. Then the stuff about “unique barcodes” etc is obviously about DNA and genetics. This is something to do with these companies using African AIDS sufferers to experiment on to find a cure, something has gone wrong and it has resulted in deaths. The “velvet boxes” visible from the highway which are “incriminating evidence” are their graves. There is some link to AJ.

    The bit about Sudanese supper, lunch and breakfast could not be about their PR strategy at all, it could be about the long-term goal of the US govt to invade Sudan on the pretext of humanitarianism to exploit their considerable oil reserves as they have in Iraq. Only they have overstretched themselves and can’t do it right now as they are over-committed elsewhere so they are keeping the civil war going by advising the govt not to come to a deal for peace (this is not in the post, it has been talked about by a previous poster). Once they can, they will be in there under the pretext of peace-keeping to gain control of oil reserves. Celebs are being used to front and highlight the sudan campaign to get public opinion ready to go along with the action. Check out the words “another coal-fire” and “abundant and inexpensive”, they are talkng about the oil reserves in sudan. They are trying to “fix the grid” to maintain US supremacy in the world against the threat of rising super powers china and india which threaten to dwarf them in years to come. JMO.

    Reply
  181. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:01 am

    @ LL – I know but she is all over this board, won’t give it a rest and is annoying the shit out of us all, Ian included, he’s been deleting a lot of her posts. I hope he bans her next, she’s just pointless and annoying.

    Reply
  182. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    @Keane:
    Hi ya, did you see my post yesterday, I found that G.C. , R.G. and B.P. all went to went to Washington around the same time to talk to Nancy Pelosi{ the possible R.G., and A.J& B.P. connection}. I find it disturbing myself, that these ACTORS are going to Washington and speaking and behalf of the world as if I voted for them. They are F*CKING actors, that rightly pisses me off. I would love to have a little sit-down with Nancy P., sheesh, not in my lifetime., and not as a regular ol’ joe.

    Reply
  183. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:12 am

    @Peri:
    Very interesting, Peri. And welcome to the fray.

    Reply
  184. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:31 am

    @Phoebe:
    This reminds me of a time when I had set up an acquaintance from work with a friend of mine. Long time friend but short time acquaintance. They came over to my house, and my 2 dogs (one of which is my avie) were following her and basically stalking her everywhere she went. My female Dane (who is the NICEST and most affectionate dog to everybody) was growling at this woman.
    Turned out that this woman who I did not know very well (and was the first and LAST matchmaking attempt of my life) is the most malignant and sociopathic piece of garbage I have ever known. Straight evil, absolutely nothing redeeming about her at all, save for the fact that she is not a KNOWN murderer or child molestor.
    Boy, that was an education in human nature, and a nightmare. She caused so many problems for me at work, all just for pure fun on her end.
    DOGS KNOW.

    Reply
  185. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:31 am

    @ Section 9 – so are you saying that you think people could have been laundering money through the J-P foundation because they are of limited brain power and haven’t got a clue what they are doing? Is that your theory?

    Reply
  186. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:33 am

    @Keane:
    That was HILARIOUS! Bad fart is RIGHT.

    Reply
  187. tinitina said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:46 am

    @Keane:

    Pardon me, I meant reliable publications, I shouldn’t have said tabloid. I do and have for a long time worked in the media. I come from a newspaper family, we’re talking generations, and I know a lot of people in the biz too. When journalism is your life, just like a cop, you develop your instincts and intuition, you get a hunch about stuff, and my gut tells me this is nonsense, even quite sinister on Ian’s part and manipulative.

    I’m not trying to insult anyone but I just think this whole movement Ian created is a fraud, just like you feel brangelina needs to be exposed, I feel the same way about Ian, it irritates me. At first I thought it was just a journalist with wacky sources, but now I see a clearer picture.(after the in hiding thing)

    When Jolie and Pitt hooked up it struck a negative chord in some, especially women. And the Team Aniston/Team Jolie Era began. The media is making a fortune off of this triangle and now it’s just gone awry. I think it’s horrible.

    @Mama San:
    I met Nancy Pelosi at a conference a few weeks back and she’s cool as hell, very strong ideas about how women can come together and change the world. I was beyond excited.

    I wish I saw the kind of commitment to causes of women and children around the world, that I see from all of you trying to expose a hollywood couple.

    Reply
  188. Anonymous said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:52 am

    @Mama San: I found that G.C. , R.G. and B.P. all went to went to Washington around the same time to talk to Nancy Pelosi.

    I assume BP wants some bailout money for his NOLA project. :)

    Reply
  189. joanne said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:57 am

    @Keane:
    If they are using children charities to maintain their lavish lifestyle they should be exposed. People magazine was a decent rag until these two got together. These two fakes would probably have gotten away with this charade if they didn’t try to drag Aniston down. Didn’t star once have an article about Holie going to a fortune teller and was told this would happen and won’t end until she publically apoligizes? This was before they went with the earth mother do gooder charade.

    Reply
  190. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    @Anonymous:
    I know that was a fiasco, and BS, only 100 houses c’mon, with his money and power, that whole city could have been renovated. It was a PS stunt for CCOBB, he should be called out on that. I seen buildings, malls, houses , apartment complexes built in a matter of weeks, compared to the snail’s pace his project is taking.
    @tinitina:
    Not to be rude, but that is a generalization, and I resent it, you don’t know me, or what I do in my free time in my commitment to help woman and children. other than that, I think that is very cool, that you met her, I hope you made good use of the time.

    Reply
  191. Ingbot said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:06 am

    Didn’t Angelina say that she donates 1/3 of her salary to charity? If that is the case, why do JP’s combined donations are only reported as 8 million for 2008??? Hmmmm

    http://showhype.com/story/brad_pitt_angelina_jolie_gave_8_mil_to_charity/

    Reply
  192. Sal said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:07 am

    Just out of curiosity, what would it take for the devotees here to believe that the two AREN’T splitting up? It appears that no matter what they may do in public or how they may act together in the future, most here will classify such acts as fake PR and nothing more–yet we have no confirmation yet of these breakup rumors and there have been such reports amongst gossipers for years, a trend which may continue for years to come. So, I’m curious what it would take for y’all to believe otherwise?

    Reply
  193. Ingbot said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:11 am

    Such an interesting pic for this topic. Angelina looks like she is majorly sticking her belly out. It looks as if she is actually arching her back in order to look bigger. Has anyone seen pics of Holly’s babies? I looked and found nothing.

    Reply
  194. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:13 am

    @Mama San:
    Yes! Isn’t it LUDICROUS how people who play-act just like my 2 and 4 year old kids, get paid HUGE sums of money to do so, these same actors are NOT curing cancer, making the world a better safer place, or anything other than enhancing their own pockets, are now getting all this credence just because their faces are beautiful. Like suddenly they are authorities on serious subjects. It is ridiculous, it is like Cover Girl makeup spokespeople gone too far.
    I understand using appealing people to bring light to important causes, but shit is getting OUT OF HAND.

    Reply
  195. Ingbot said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    I know I have read in several articles that Angelina has stated that she makes a rediculous amount of money for what she does and that is why she donates 1/3 of her income to charity. I find it interesting that the JP’s together only donated 8 million for 2008. hmmmm….

    http://showhype.com/story/brad_pitt_angelina_jolie_gave_8_mil_to_charity/

    Reply
  196. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:19 am

    @tinitina:
    Thank you for making your point respectfully. I can see your side of all of this.
    And I can appreciate your sentiment for wishing you saw as much energy expelled on “meaningful” things as is being spent here by all of us dissecting this (in the end) frivolous topic.

    Reply
  197. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:25 am

    @McDooks:
    It is and it’s dumbing down our society. I didn’t vote for these numbnuts to speak on my behalf. I got a congressman , governor, and a senator, to do that . Unfortunatery even government officials are “starstuck” by these individuals.

    Reply
  198. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:26 am

    @ tinitina

    “I think a lot of his friends comment on this site to add legitimacy to his stories and work to rile the readers up.” – such as who, name usernames, I’ve been posting on this site from practically word go, I haven’t noticed a single friend of Ian stopping in to support his theories. Just s regular commenters.

    “Any source(s) so close to Angelina dishing so much dirt would be found out and shut down by now, and ejected from the inner circle.” – no human being can ever fully control the mouths of the many, many people around them. Once one starts talking and gets the ball rolling, everyone else who wanted to say something and have been too frightened/worried/lazy come forward. She can’t possibly plug every hole, try as she might, some people are more concerned with principles and can’t always be bought.

    “Reliable tabloids would have picked it up by now, and paying Ian and his sources big bucks if there was any truth to all this, without a doubt.” – not true at all, the papers I’ve contacted were not aware of this site at all, journos are mostly too busy completing their stories to deadlines to go around looking into every new website on the internet. As was the case with watergate, stories can take a very long time to be reported by the wider media.

    “All is quiet in Brangelina world, which means something is happening, may be a break up, may be a family vacation, MAY BE A FAMILY CRISIS, but it’s def not the sordid things reported here.one thing about this couple they decide when they will be in the public.” – how would you know ANYTHNG about the couple for definite? Nobody does except them and those closest to them, the rest of us can not say categorically about anything.

    “Ian is gaining by luring people that hate Angelina to his site, so now, I don’t think he’s being played, but you’re being played, by all of this. Hollywood has evil deception going on, including so called reporters thriving on peoples thirst for dirty gossip.” – I don’t hate any celeb in particular, but I do hate deception and wish to always know the truth about a situation and not be duped, that’s what brings me here, and no I don’t just believe every word that Ian says like gospel. I use it, like any source, with circumspection.

    “The truth always reveals itself, all that’s in the darkness will come to light.” – absolute bullshit, there are very serious things that have been (and still are) covered up for decades, serious things that involve numerous deaths of innocent people and to which no-one has ever been held accountable. I know, I have investigated these things in the course of my work.

    “No one in Brangelina world is threatening ANYONE. Made aware of this site, they are MOST DEF laughing at the allegations.” – who would you say then committed the serious crime of hacking into my e-mail account? I have solid proof that this person is posting on this site and it is being investigated by the police.

    “Ian will keep this evil Angie stunt going for the next twenty years whether or not they stay together. There will never be any proof. It will be a hobby to you all to figure out her EVILNESS, and he will get the clicks, advertising and money.” – God no, no-one will stick with this site for 20 years, I won’t stick with it for 20 weeks if it was all shown to be BS, you underestimate people’s intelligence.

    “And you’ll get a pass time, because you want to believe Angelina is a weird voodoo which women.” – I think black magic is the least of Angelina’s problems and I just see that element of her as immature and a total joke.

    “I come from a newspaper family, we’re talking generations, and I know a lot of people in the biz too. When journalism is your life, just like a cop, you develop your instincts and intuition, you get a hunch about stuff, and my gut tells me this is nonsense, even quite sinister on Ian’s part and manipulative.” – yep, I am similarily well-connected in the media and am now using my contacts and friends to sound all this stuff out. We’re talking the chief foreign correspondent for one of the UK’s leading news channels and reporters on the most prestigious documentary strands who report on war, corruption and exploitation around the world, that sort of thing. Plus, I am going to talk with lawyer friends and possibly politicians. A serious crime has been committed against me so now I am makng sure I know what is going on.

    “When Jolie and Pitt hooked up it struck a negative chord in some, especially women. And the Team Aniston/Team Jolie Era began. The media is making a fortune off of this triangle and now it’s just gone awry. I think it’s horrible.” – Couldn’t care a less about Jennife Aniston to be honest, there are much greater issues at stake here than her. She’s been used as a smoke screen to cover the real issues up IMO.

    Reply
  199. Phoebe said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:27 am

    This is just far-out speculation — But…

    What say you to the possibiity that the J-P twins are the result of not only IVF but also state-of-the-art genetic engineering — i.e., designer babies!

    Reply
  200. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:29 am

    @ tinitina –

    “I wish I saw the kind of commitment to causes of women and children around the world, that I see from all of you trying to expose a hollywood couple.” – and don’t play the holier-than-thou card either, women, children (and men) are exactly what we care about too. Don’t be so arrogant as to assume a superior intention, I don’t really give a fig about Angelina’s sex life but I do care about people who may be suffering at the hands of her activity.

    Your posts and arguments are HIGHLY suspect by the way, heard them about a million times on here from people who were obviously working for Angie.

    Reply
  201. Anonymous said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:34 am

    @Mama San:
    It would be a shame if tax money was used to compensate his losses.

    A bit OT, but very telling:

    A Golden Retriever has been a major cause of Angelina Jolie’s problems on the set of her new film,Salt, for the past couple days. Angelina and the dog are required to do four scenes together but the dog, who goes by the name of Bingo, is not cooperating with Ms. Jolie. But some people say it’s the other way around.

    “Bingo is a very loving dog and everybody on the set is falling in love with him,” the source tells me. “But Angelina Jolie hasn’t been very nice to him. Bingo would go up to Angelina so she could pet him and she would say, “Please get this thing away from me!” In one scene today, Bingo was supposed to come running to Angelina when she fell off a ladder. Instead, Bingo ran right past Angelina and into the arms of an audio technician. It was obvious Bingo wanted nothing to do with Angelina, who has some dogs of her own for the sake of her kids, but generally doesn’t like them.

    “Bingo is very well trained and has been in several movies. But golden retrievers can sense if someone is fake and cold, like Angelina Jolie,” a production assistant told me.” Rumor has it that Bingo will be getting his pink slip this weekend.

    This story makes me sick. Angelina Jolie may be the very first person that a golden retriever doesn’t like. Anyhow, I would like to thank the extras and production assistants who are feeding me information directly from the set. Just remember to be careful and don’t get yourself fired. But judging from all the stories from the past week, I think it’s Angelina Jolie who should be fired.

    http://www.examiner.com/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner~y2009m4d17-Angelina-Jolie–Golden-Retriever-causes-trouble-for-her-on-movie-set

    Reply
  202. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:35 am

    @Mama San:
    Yes. It is to some degree human nature, to be awed or humbled in the presence of fame and beauty. But there’s no excuse for letting these people be on a pedestal for important and governmental things, like a Maury Povich show guest I agree one thousand and ten percent, yo!

    Reply
  203. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    This is what pisses me off about “starstruck” government officals….. Nambia anyone.? This country’s officials basically closed down it’s borders for these two scumbags, and went so far to harass, and arrest the free press while doing it. Remember no press could get into this country without the specific ok from AJ and BP. If that wasn’t BS I don’t know what is. Is it my understanding that two AMERICAN citizens effectively shut down a small country , based on their star status. This is why I blow a gasket with these two.
    And this is why I think she went to other countries to bear her brood, she had a STD and or them bio’s are not BP’s, she would have never had gotten that much security and secrecy as she did over there {Nambia&Nice}, like that in the states. This chick pisses me off with her “entitlement complex”, and that’s why peeps like me want to slap the faux “earth mother” BS right out of her.

    Reply
  204. joanne said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    @Mama San:
    It makes me angry too.

    Reply
  205. Alissa said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    @Phoebe:
    More likely the spawn of Satan

    Reply
  206. tinitina said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    Lol…I wish I could get paid for my opinion, that’d be great. No feelings of superiority here, just writing my thoughts as they come, like the rest of you.

    Reply
  207. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:47 am

    @ tinitina – BTW I don’t believe for one minute that you’re a journo, if you were you’d know that there is no way on God’s earth that Ian could get away with saying all of this without being sued to within an inch of his life if none of it were true. That’s what every journo I’ve spoken to about it has said. You don’t fool me for one second. Sorry.

    Reply
  208. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:50 am

    @ tinitina – yeah I’m sure. If you’re really “just giving your opinions” then I’m sure you’ll see how utterly offensive was to accuse every other poster of being more concerned with idle gossip than human rights. Angie has been using the smokescreen of “charity” to deflect people’s attention from her bad behaviour for a long ass time now. You would know.

    Reply
  209. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:52 am

    @McDooks:
    You said that right, my anger towards these two clowns is not rooted in anything other than outrage, on how shallow this world has become that we worship and idolize, basically high school drop-out’s, that give good face, and can remember lines, and then have them shove it down their face on the do-gooding BS. It’s not only that but these fuckers{yes I did} tell US the general public how to conduct our lives, and how to spend our money, but they speak for us as well. If that bitch writes another article about the refugee’s, I am going to make it my life’s mission ,on this blog or anywhere else to call her out.No offense that ain’t my responsibilty regarding the refugees’ and I am tired of a celebrity telling me I should care. Maybe I’m just a shallow fuck myself that just wants to take care of her own backyard maybe I don’t give a shit about the refugee’s, Sorry , but what am I to do, take care of my own{country} first. Charity and good will starts at home. Nothing is stopping this one-woman show from putting up or shutting up. I want her to take a year off and go live in these third world countries she sponser’s and put her money when her mouth is.

    Reply
  210. dina said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:53 am

    @Phoebe:
    I think animals can sense evil!

    @everyone. I’d love to see their charities investigated too. You never know what shady business is going on. As far as Brad’s “Make it Right”, has even one house been built yet? This “charity” has been going on for years now and I haven’t even heard of one house being built, one family moving in..ect..Where is the money going?

    Reply
  211. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    @Phoebe:Or maybe Bingo is afraid if she gets her hands on him she’ll want to have her way with him. Smart dog, run like hell.

    Reply
  212. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    @Mama San:
    Woooorrrd.

    Reply
  213. heavensinyou said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    @Ingbot:

    Yeah, I saw them. On the cover of People magazine, posing w/the Holie-Shitts.

    Reply
  214. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    @Different Guest:
    On the flip side of that- you know how it is said men are like dogs, they’ll screw anything that moves…
    Well, what does it mean when even a dog don’t want nothin’ to do with her???

    Reply
  215. omgwtflol said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    Keane you are starting to sound like you’re coming unhinged. You think everyone who challenges Ian’s story is a troll or angie or one of her minions. The namecalling, thesis long rebuttals/insults along with your apparant belief that you own this comments section and can toss out anyone who annoys you is feeling like delusions of grandeur. As is your constantly insisting how well connected you are, how in the know, how much more superior to everyone else. Perhaps it’s time for a break from this site. Get some fresh air, have a drink and try not to think about Angie for a few hours.

    Reply
  216. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    What if the genocide in Darfur isn’t genocide but deaths from research gone awry?

    Reply
  217. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    @McDooks:
    LOL, you know what the bottom line is this, this shit won’t stop until WE the people say so, we got them numbnuts where they are and we the people can take them down.Yeah, I paid for this bitch’s salary at one point in time and the same with Brad. I ain’t doing it no more. I am not throwing my hard earned money after bad. She{AJ} can suck a big fat one, and I ain’t talking about a joint either, through she could use one, lord knows she needs to eat, Anyway, whatever shady deal her and Brad did, it will surface. Just like how everyone jumped on their bandwagon and tooted their horn, it will be the some ferocity to bring them down. JMO.

    Reply
  218. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:13 pm

    @Mama San:
    ITA.

    Reply
  219. tinitina said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    I have no reason to lie, I grew up in the newspaper business, now I am an editor and writer. I’ve also done some book editing. Believe it or not. I don’t believe you’ve talked to any journalists, so we’re even. I think you’re trying to turn everyone on me by calling me a liar and claiming I’m being paid by jolie, because you’re threatened by some of the things I pointed out. And you don’t want your bubble busted.

    Blog world, is not real journalism and there are far less repercussions than if this was printed in a magazine or a newspaper. Even then, as you pointed out earlier, 90% of what’s in the gossip mags are made up stories, and they rarely face consequences, unless it messes with their ability to make money or their children, celebs tend to ignore them.

    If they are threatened by him, they may try to shut down his blog, I’ve seen that happen to other blogs that gunned for a particular celeb. To be honest, I don’t think Ian is even on Brangelina’s radar screen.

    Sorry if I offended the board, it was just my opinion. Obviously I don’t spend every waking hour contributing
    to bettering the society.

    Reply
  220. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    The bigger they are, the harder they fall. Pride goeth before a fall.

    Reply
  221. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    @ Different Guest – the genocide is pretty well documented, I’ve seen plenty of docs on it which had footage of villagers running from attacks etc and interviews with the militia. Plus an old college friend of mine works for the U.N. out there. It would be interesting to speak with her. She’s one person I will hopefully get round to contacting but it may take some time.

    Reply
  222. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    @tinitina:
    “I wish I saw the kind of commitment to causes of women and children around the world, that I see from all of you trying to expose a hollywood couple.”
    “Sorry if I offended the board, it was just my opinion. Obviously I don’t spend every waking hour contributing
    to bettering the society.”
    Why not?? Then you should be sorry, that’s for generalizing for the rest of us.
    You can’t have it both ways, .

    Reply
  223. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    @Keane:I’m not doubting people are being attacked and killed, I meant perhaps the reason they are being killed is not ethnic. It’s funny, I remember a comment Bill Cosby made about AIDS in the Reagan era along the lines of his belief that AIDS was a government conspiracy to wipe out Africans and people of African descent.

    Reply
  224. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    @Keane:
    Hey Keane,
    I read the thought process on the other thread that you and CG and S9 have been discussing in relation to SRRC, and it is mind boggeling, but imo, I don’t think that has anything to do with what SR is telling us (not saying that is not happening, just that is not what he is telling us) and here is why. I will use something DG posted up above when we were discussing an article that claimed Brad always wanted a Indian baby and how devastated they were to be turned down in the Phillipines. Here is here post-

    Different Guest said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:53 pm

    Well if she’s going to balance them she needs another asian ( the Chinese have turned her down, Phillipines has turned her down, Japan doesn’t do adoption, India has turned her down, Russian has turned her down, Cambodia turned her down for a 2nd child, Myanamar turned her down, State Department isn’t allowing adoptions from Vietnam) two more Africans, and three hispanics (by the way wasn’t there rumor she was turned down by a Latin American country?)

    IF that reporters sources are right then imo the reference to Richard Gere was Angelina trying to get that Indian baby in a last ditch effort, talking to Madonna about adoption, not sure about Clinton. I want to point out that Trevor worked for Clinton in his admin, so they are all one big happy family, and she on the board for the GCI so that may be nothing.

    However, this is where we are getting contradictions, because this trip was scheduled for April 3rd. Ias said he did confirm that two more adoptions were definitely in the works before Brad walked, but when, because we are getting they have not slept together for 2-3 months, they were in NY in Nov 08 and that could have been when they hired the stripper they shared and things began to unravel, then he hired Slim. Then she got Bunny the pole dance on Feb the 20th or around there, but still , for him to still be considering adoption this late in the game he had to be still trying to make it work.. that makes no sense to me, maybe iAN can clear that up.

    Next on the Sudanese, she is sueing Brad, that is the word, so he is over there in France trying to deal with that nightmare, did not work out like he planned, now SR did not put that out there, but that is what has been said , so imo that means he is Dinner, Lunch, Breakfast, he did this backwards,for a reason, he is not getting any sleep, but he other one coal in fire, which yes also represents another grid, I believe is another pregnancy because he says that one is abundant, and is not causing him financial problems.

    Look at the whole riddle, it is about a sex tape, about Brad and pregnant woman, I don’t think anything has been thrown right into the middle of it about AIDs. jmho but that is not normally how SR has done it in the past.

    I may be completely wrong lol but this is just how I see it. :)

    Reply
  225. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    @tinitina:
    I just wanted to comment some of Ian’s friends have stopped in to support him, you just may not recognize their names, I know who they are. They have only used their first names.

    Reply
  226. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    @Kate:The Clinton connection is the most obvious re:adoption Kate – HC is Secretary of State – the State Department- all foreign adoptions must be approved by the State Department.

    Reply
  227. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    @Different Guest:
    So maybe he was trying to get it pushed through and could not and that is why she fell apart on the set, maybe she thinks if she gets one more Brad will come back.

    Reply
  228. section9 said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    @Keane:

    That’s my suspicion. One of many front charities. Jolie and Pitt are the patsies, only I suspect that Jolie is the “Hitler smart” one. The notion of her and Brad Pitt on the Council on Foreign Relations must be a howler behind closed doors. How it works I haven’t a clue, but that’s what my bullshit detector tells me. Instant foundation as a tax writeoff and everyone on WS is donating to it?

    Nose, meet smell test.

    Reply
  229. p said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    @omgwtflol: . Someoone takes time exhaustively post under multiple handles (yeah I know, but you are) on a site they claim is idle, malicious gossip, and KEANE is unhinged?
    @Keane: . The liable laws in the US do give decidely more wiggle room that those in the UK, but not THIS much.

    Reply
  230. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    @Kate:Exactly, especially if they were trying to push through 2 at once. If HC still has presidential aspirations, allowing her to adopt again could come back and bite HC in the ass. If Brangie had kept the kids out of the spotlight, there wouldn’t be near the degree of animosity.

    Reply
  231. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    @ tinitina – what on earth do you mean by saying “I don’t believe you’ve talked to many journalists – so we’re even”. I’ve talked to more journalists than you’ve had hot dinners babe. I’ve worked with many, used them to get stories, called them up to run all this past them etc and carried out journalistic research such as tracking down the parents of teenage murderers and so on and much MUCH more. But I do not describe myself as a “journalist”, even though I have plenty of experience in that field. So not sure what you mean by “I don’t believe you’ve talked to any journalists”. My friends are journalists dearie, I talk to journalists all the time.

    “I think you’re trying to turn everyone on me by calling me a liar and claiming I’m being paid by jolie, because you’re threatened by some of the things I pointed out. And you don’t want your bubble busted.” – nope just calling out the massive holes in what you’re saying and who you say you are. A journo would know much better than to say some of the things you’ve said. The only person who should feel threatened here are the people who these stories are about. And if you think I would be threatened by someone with as little significance as you, you are utterly delusional. I play with the big boys tinitina most of the time, I’ve crossed swords with many a seasoned and infamous newspaper editor on the most sensitive (to them) subjects. You think I’m cowed by you?! And I have no bubble here, just an ongoing interest in the stories that are coming out and a desire to see whoever has committed a crime against me brought to justice. You still neglected to tell me who according to your journalistic experience and knowledge that would be likely to be?

    “Blog world, is not real journalism and there are far less repercussions than if this was printed in a magazine or a newspaper” – almost correct there, blog world is not THE SAME as MORE MAINSTREAM FORMS OF JOURNALISM because it is not necessarily governed by commercial pressures. First lesson I learnt on my uni journalism module, a newspaper’s advertiers or funders can and will prevent a negative story being printed. Even on local newspapers and about serious things, cases of negligence etc. My ex-journo tutor – a relative of one of the biggest journalistic household names in the UK – made that very clear from her own experience from word go. She was very disillusioned. But Ian does not have to answer to his advertisers. So you are partially right, the blog world is diferent from the newspaper/television world which is comprised by pressure from its advertisers and funders (with one exception, thankfully).

    “Even then, as you pointed out earlier, 90% of what’s in the gossip mags are made up stories, and they rarely face consequences, unless it messes with their ability to make money or their children, celebs tend to ignore them.” – that is because sweetheart, they come directly from that celeb’s PR, they have no need to sue their own employees.

    “If they are threatened by him, they may try to shut down his blog, I’ve seen that happen to other blogs that gunned for a particular celeb. To be honest, I don’t think Ian is even on Brangelina’s radar screen.” – Ian says he has had many legal threats, one of his sources had an e-mailed threat direct from Angelina, he says he has had death threats, the site has been sabotaged and interfered with several times, we know, we have witnessed it, and both Ian and my e-mail accounts have been hacked into. What part of that don’t you call trying to shut a blog down?

    Reply
  232. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    @section9:
    Brad is not on it is he, just her….

    Reply
  233. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    @Different Guest:

    Yes, exactly, the only thing missing is the timeline…lol

    Reply
  234. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    @ omgwtflol

    “Keane you are starting to sound like you’re coming unhinged. You think everyone who challenges Ian’s story is a troll or angie or one of her minions. The namecalling, thesis long rebuttals/insults along with your apparant belief that you own this comments section and can toss out anyone who annoys you is feeling like delusions of grandeur. As is your constantly insisting how well connected you are, how in the know, how much more superior to everyone else. Perhaps it’s time for a break from this site. Get some fresh air, have a drink and try not to think about Angie for a few hours.

    Nope, just superior to caea/claea, as is the rest of the human and animal race. Don’t need delusions of grandeur babe, I am who I say I am, nothing more and nothing less. I have contacts in the media, law, politics etc because I come from a college that churns out high achievers and world leaders as standard. I don’t know them because of what they do, I know them because they’re friends. Useful ones at some times. And thanks for the advice but I’ve got about a hundred and one things done today in between commenting on this site, so now walkies for me. And maybe I wouldn’t have to think about Angie so much if she didn’t just get someone to hack into my e-mail and access my private information. Crime does not pay Ange, you will see.

    Reply
  235. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    @ Kate – then what do you make of all those references to genetics, scientific experiments, the velvet-lined boxes visible from the highway, incriminating evidence etc? Plus the links to Ms Nine Cents’ post about devastation and disease? How would you interpret that? Because to me the only thing that seems to fit it all is AIDS and experiments to find a cure….

    Reply
  236. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @Keane:
    I think you guys are reaching way too deep,,if you go back and look at some of SR’s past blogs you will see some medical terms just as complex it is just no one bothered with them , no one tried to figure out what they meant, no one. They are there only to point the direction that is all. That is how he does it, and I think SR uses these blogs to report the rumors and then Ian reports the stuff the he can definitely back up with a source. Unless SR comes on in the comments and yes, yes, that is right. Ian said it is rumored Brad is being sued by this woman, but he has not put it out there because it is a rumor, see, SR is putting it out there , so the way this reads is that fix the grid, (he got a call while in NYC, he was suppose to go to the award show for James, but something came up, he left suddenly, have to go to Sudanese), then Sudanese Breakfast, he continues trying to reason with her Sudanese Lunch, same thing, then it is Dinner but not Sudanese dinner it is Dinner Coal -fire more abundant smarter grid., so this is now about the next pregnancy which is not a problem, he was smarter about it.

    The rest IDK got to go back over that, but this part is not about oil. imo but maybe I am wrong but I am going on what Ian said…

    Reply
  237. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    I want to add, maybe going to the award show with her was the outing they were going to do to calm everyone down to make them think they are still together. He left suddenly. They are still in contact working through all this shit, but they are living separate lives..regardless of the rest, Remember they each have other people in their lives, she a older man and a younger one, Brad two babies on the way, but still think that is not the other person in his life..someone else. He looked very sad and depressed at the airport. Not a happy camper on his way to France, and is he back yet??? Has he fixed the grid???

    Reply
  238. Tamara said on April 18th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @Kate:Wikipedia doesnt list either one as a notable member.

    Reply
  239. Tamara said on April 18th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @Kate:It is interesting tho that most of SR’s comments were lifted directly from Wired Magazine, a kind of techy on line mag. I dont know if that is significant, but it might be

    Reply
  240. tinitina said on April 18th, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    @Keane:

    Thanks your response and your attempt at condescension. I haven’t said one thing that no journalist would ever say. I was covering the UN for my pub by the time I was 24 (accredited by the UN). That was 10 years ago, I travel about every six weeks to anywhere from Washington to Tanzania, leaving for Egypt in three weeks.

    My grandfather and father are both publishers and I work on my own for an international news agency, so I feel comfortable in my own skin, and I don’t feel intimidated or stung by your comments.

    I’m not going to list all my credentials and connections, because who I am is who I am.

    Everyone is suppose to believe you are who you say you are, but I’m a liar because I disagree with you. If I came in here supporting Ian’s theories you wouldn’t be jumping down my throat right now.

    I’m certainly just a guest on this board, and I’m trying to be a good guest, but I will state my opinion until someone bans me which I’m sure may happen.

    I just kind of bumped into this site and it did intrigue me. Most legitimate investigative reporters don’t have gossip blogs that glorify them. Journalist with integrity are a dying breed, it’s not just Ian, many have taken the route of sensationalism over substance. (this is like Geraldo Rivera back in the 80’s style)

    So for me, it’s like if I was a doctor and walked in seeing another doctor botching someone up, I wouldn’t stay quiet. So I’m just calling him out, and if he proves me wrong I’ll be the first to say it, I’ll stand proudly with egg on my face, and like I said before, I’ll eat my shoe.

    Ms. Keane have marvelous day, continue to lead your followers into the bastion of light, your work here will not be forgotten.

    Reply
  241. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    @Different Guest:
    I have a feeling HC won’t do anything to jeapordize her chances at the office, she’s a barracuda and won’t go down for the likes of Holie, that’s for sure.

    Reply
  242. Tamara said on April 18th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    @McDooks:
    HI McDookyDook! how are you today? Couldnt get a word in earlier and just wanted to say hi!!

    Reply
  243. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    @Tamara:
    Fine, how are you? What happened to your pup?!

    Reply
  244. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    @Tamara:
    It’s funny, I used to call him DookDooks or DookyDook, too! He had a bunch of different nicknames and knew them all.

    Reply
  245. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    @Tamara:
    It isn’t he uses all kinds of things like that, in the past he has used medical lingo.

    Reply
  246. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @ tinitina – you started it with the condescension babe with your “I do not believe you have spoken to any journalists” comment, very condescending. You can’t then be surprised and outraged that I reply in the same tone. If you can give it out you better be able to take it. And you’ve already told us all that we should be worrying about the rights of women and children, not gossiping about Brange as you put it. Unfortunately many people don’t seem to recognise how condescending they are themselves, so feel put out when its reciprocated but you only brought it on yourself. You also came on this board, not knowing any of us and after we have been reading and posting here for weeks if not months now, assuming you know better than any of us when you have only just jumped in. Or are you going to tell me you’ve been reading all along like so many? I’m sure you can quickly fill us in on everything that’s been said then. And if you are or were a journo it seems you were not a very good one, no journo wold make an assumption like “I believe you haven’t spoken to any journos” when you don’t know me from Adam. Your stories would be extremely accurate. Plus you don’t know that 90% of celeb stories in mags and tabloids are leaked y PRs, if you were a journo you would have known that. Or maybe you are VERY long out of the game?

    I have no desire or intention to intimidate you with stating my credentials or who I know, I was merely responding to your misassumption that “I had never spoken to any journos”, which you based on what exactly? I think you are making or have made a lot of misassumptions. And just to clarify I am not doing any “work” here merely responding to what I am reading from Ian and from other posters.

    But before you go please could you answer the question I have asked three times now, why if this is all a big fraud perpetrated by Ian, was my personal e-mail account hacked into by someone using this site who now has access to my personal information, which I have cast iron proof of and had to report it to the police? Answer me that, show me some logic and maybe we’ll be getting somewhere.

    Reply
  247. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    @ Kate – so you think all the last part is about adoption then or drug use? Just trying to get a handle on what its about….

    Reply
  248. Tamara said on April 18th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    @Kate:Ohhhh well geez, here I was trying to figure out how that corresponded, like the patch and did it have to do with blood diamonds etc etc. Puts a whole new perspective in my mind!

    Reply
  249. Tamara said on April 18th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @McDooks:took off my real email address, ha!

    Reply
  250. p said on April 18th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    @Kate: . You think SR is putting it out there? I don’t know, to me it’s vaguer than Ian’s original post, though there’s certainly a thread of continuity w Sudanese-something . And I don’t remember anything about a 2nd Sudanese woman getting pregnant, who said that?

    Reply
  251. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    @p:

    No not two Sudanese women, that is not what I am saying, Ian said the first one is French, that is on the Split Blogging, and then later he updated it that he confirmed it, first he was not sure. he said children and I asked him in the comments if that was two and he said yes. We do not know where that one lives. Now the part about Brad being sued is not on here , but Ian told me that was a rumor , he has not put it on the board, and it is my guess because he has not gotten another source to back that up, but that was before SR posted this, which seems to support that Brad got the call he needed to get his ass to France and deal with this before this woman goes public, and off he went, and looking very unhappy. So imo, SR is saying Brad fix the grid bud, with this one, who he has made a mess of things with, the other one, is not giving him a problem, we do not know who, now we also know he is talking to another A + star, he is involved with someone else, and he has met with Jen for advice. So…

    You guys what do you think? Is he back in the states>? Did they have a easter egg hunt lol?

    Reply
  252. tinitina said on April 18th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    @Keane:

    I feel quite privileged to be a journalist and proud of my body of work. I don’t normally bring up my profession on an entertainment blog, but I did this time because I think I look at things with a different eye and perspective. I’m sorry my point of view doesn’t gel with yours. I just think this is BS and I have pretty good record for smoking out frauds, so I feel as confident in what I believe as you do. I think it’s a good thing that neither of us can be swayed.

    If I came across as condescending, I apologize, I just feel certain about what I’m saying. I made the comment to you, to show how ridiculous your comment to me was, something about me not being a real journalist, so let’s get that one clear. And when I came on this board, I was flabbergasted, I just wrote bluntly how I felt.

    I absolutely question everything, it’s Ian’s job to prove himself to the reader, I have every right to ask questions. I’m sure he can handle it.

    In terms of of your e-mail accounts being tapped into, Brangelina has some pretty fierce and resourceful fans that don’t like people talking shit about them. I mean they actually have worshippers.

    And I’m sure some of these folks have the technical savvy to do a lot of things. If it is someone directly from the Brangelina camp they may (and please don’t take this as an insult, I don’t think you would ever do anything) may want insight into people that are going so vehemently after their client, for fear of their personal safety and the safety of their family.

    I’m not a Brangelina worshiper I just think people don’t understand her, so they demonize her and add to that the man stealer title. So it’s easy to build up this kind of story about her. Just as it would to build up a story about Michael Jackson, because everyone thinks he’s a weird already.

    If I were to tell you that Mickey Rourke is a pedophile, you’d be more likely to believe that, than if I told you Matt Damon was one. I just think Angie is an easy target because of her past.

    Don’t personally attack me and I won’t personally attack you, it just takes away from the real discussion.

    Reply
  253. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    @Keane:
    I am not sure if it is adoption, drugs, or diamonds.

    Reply
  254. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    @Tamara:
    Same here Tam..

    Reply
  255. dina said on April 18th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    Has the poster “Me” been back?

    Reply
  256. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @Tamara:
    I don’t blame you in light of the fuckery afoot with jacking email accounts and liabilities and such.
    Mabye I should do the same thing…

    Reply
  257. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    @McDooks:
    LOL, fuckery, I love it, that word is priceless.

    Reply
  258. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    @ tinitina – that’s fine let’s make a truce then and start over. I actually appreciate having another journo here to weigh the evidence and add their perspective, even if it does not agree with mine. We could do with a few more I think. You have to understand that people like Kate, myself and Section have been reading and posting here extensively for quite some time. We are all intelligent people with connections in totally different areas of the industry, different politics and different views so we don’t always agree. But we all keep an open mind as to what is being said and what we think. You have to understand that I have considered Angelina Jolie a fraud for quite some time because of what I know about her manipulation of the media world. There are all the pre-arranged supposedly “candid” shots of her with her young, vulnerable (especially the orphans) children, which she does because she, like a lot of celebs has a deal with the pap agency for making millions off the picture sales of the shots. I am convinced this is her main source of income. I personally find her exploitation of her children for cash disgusting, it has nothing to do with her past, she hasn’t done anything that I haven’t done in that regard (well apart from the incest, cutting, witchcraft & pets etc). Then there is the NY Times article exposing the way she made a deal with People mag for picture sales of the twins in return not only for millions of dollars but for “guaranteed positive future press coverage”. She also put it out there that all of the money would be donated to charity when in fact Brange later said they gave a percentage and have always refused to say how much. Rather fraudulent would you not say? Then there was the time at the press conference when she tried to get all the journos to sign an agreement to only ask certain pre-specified questions which they all said screw you to, and she blamed on her “overprotective lawyer”. Then there was all the business in Namibia where her bodyguards beat up journos and photographers who tried to get anywhere near them (the region, not them personally), and how they got the Namibian govt to say only journos ok-ed by Brange could enter the borders of the country. They effectively hijacked Namibia for the birth of Shiloh. Does this not ring alarm bells to you? Then there was the PR strategy after she hooked up with Brad, say she was a “shoulder to cry on” because Jen didn’t want children which as Kate will attest was bogus and shameless. Blame the woman whose husband you stole for your selfishness and lack of morals by saying it was her fault for not wanting children? Are you picking up on my dislike for her here.

    There has also been a lot of crazy stuff going on on this blog from early on in terms of posters trying to dissuade people from reading here. They are not loons, I am more than familiar with them from my years tackling them on JustJared and Dlisted, they are all of a very easy to characterise type. They worship Jolie and by association Brad and have a disgusting, vitriolic hate for Jen Aniston because she is not as pretty, is 40 y/o, single and childless. The things they say about her any woman would agree are vile. And I believe Ange stirred this up with the PR tactics she employed to save her own image when she hooked up with Brad. Anyway, these posters were not remotely like these people and didn’t have a clue about how to sound like a convincing poster on the internet. There were only a few legit posters posting at the time so they were very easy to spot. Kept popping up with different usernames but carrying on the previous one’s argument and knowing everything that had been said before and everything abotu Kate and I. But they all said some rubbish along the lines of they’d just found the site. And this has been going on for weeks, months even. So occasionally I mistake a legit poster for one of them until they talk enough to convince me otherwise which you and a couple of others have. The difference is legit people stick around or come back, these others just disappear.

    Anyway, this is the context with which I was reading your posts. There are in fact next to no loons posting on this site, they just don’t seem to want to come here, and besides they are all characterised by sounding very stupid and very young, and I am not convinced a single one of them would have the first clue about hacking into my e-mail account. This is someone far more intelligent than any of the internet loons have proven themselves to be. And I am taking it very seriously because they have proven they know at least one thing about me, and intention or not, it is a crime and I am very angry about it and will be pursueing it at the highest level – police, lawyer friends, journo friends, MPs even. And I don’t talk about these people to show off I promise you, more to demonstrate that the people who are fucking with me should be very careful indeed. I have been employed by amongst many others, one of the most reputable broadcasters in the world, and did a major, potentially explosive doc with them involving one of the biggest selling newspapers in the UK, a major tragedy involving the loss of many lives, a mjaor cover up of the causes of this tragedy which persists to this day and is actually all over the news right now, and lots of dodgy responses about what we were doing from newspapers worried about losing their business. This is what I mean about knowing that the truth most certainly does not “always come to light”, in fact in this case it has remained buried for 20 years, it takes people and indeed journos to bring it out. Anyway, I was back at this broadcaster for a meeting this week so its another avenue I’m going to pursue about why someone is hacking into my e-mail account.

    Anyway, must go as hands are dropping off from typing, hope this goes some way to explaining my position. Its just that I have had to do this so many times to people coming on here reacting in the way you reacted that I don’t have the time or energy to do it any more. I need someone else to take up the mantle. Time for me to go to bed, catch up with you tomorrow.

    Reply
  259. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    @ tinitina – plus may I just add, Ian has written a book on Kurt Cobain and the theories surrounding his death; he has one about to come out about MJ which he put together through posing undercover (some filmed) and was on one of the two main British breakfast tv shows to promote it. He has done an undercover doc on scientology, and he has got his stories on Brange by also going undercover. He is trying to establish a reputation for himself as a gossip blogger who actually gets real scoops from first-hand experience. He does live chats and comes across as a genuine, reputable and straight down the line guy. When he is not sure of something he tells us, when he has been duped he tells us. I have no reason to mistrust him so far. If this was all a big hoax or fraud as many have suggested then he would effectively be screwing his career. If you think logically, what on earth would be in it for him in doing that? Back tomorrow x

    Reply
  260. p said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    @tinitina: . You’re talking like a troll..if you had no agenda, it would be impossible to ignore the evidence against people w that background–suicide attempts, extreme drug and depression history–adopting at all, ESPECIALLY given the discussion on perspective adoptive parents a few weeks ago. Not to mention the all mag layouts w the kids, given the undeniable contrast to greats like Depp and De Niro and the way they handle the THEIR private lives. But you didn’t need to be told the latter, John Bon Jovi already called out celebs that did this shit as a smking gun. So did the NY Times. Keane’s already said the hacker was traced to this board versus a random Brang worshipper, so that parts pointless.

    The smoking gun is once you said your peace you stuck around. No one does that unless they have an agenda, a post or two at most, and they’re gone. They don’t reemerge as yet another poster, w a slightly different tack, making the same assy arguments over and over. No one would waste that much time on a board they thought was worthless, and mean-spirited, awash w delusional half-wits.

    You been outed.

    ……….}…………………..}…..}}….}}}…}}}}..}}}}}TWOMP!{{{{{..{{{{…{{{….{{…..{{…..{……….{………………{…….

    Be gone.

    Reply
  261. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    Did I mention that I love that word fuckery?
    LOL, C’mon guys, there is no need to even acknowledge the trolls, or even give them the time of your day.

    Reply
  262. McDooksInCognito said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    Testing…

    Reply
  263. McDooksInCognito said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    Aw drat, I had to forgo my avie, but that’s okay. It’s McDooks and I’m incognito now.

    Reply
  264. topbrit said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    @ Keane – i don’t believe the bullshit from tinttina,she is defo scrangies camp and i’m sorry that the likes of her and clae or whatever have deemed it acceptable to attack you.imo they are harping on about ian must prove himself etc,what’s the rush,yeah we all get impatient but he is investigating,he is giving us tidbits of info and eventually,i say eventually things will come to a head and be proven one way or another.imo tinitina,astro and others are posts from psycho’s camp as susanna stated earlier,so worried they have to start trying to disrupt the site,hacking into your email,it;s all very suspect and none of this would be happening if it wasn’t hitting a nerve.incidentally why since the majority of this broke haven’t the chosen one’s been seen hmmm? Keane mate,just fcuk them off,keep grinding the bitch down and she will be exposed soon enough.

    Reply
  265. McDooksInCognito said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    @Mama San:
    Ain’t it, though!

    Reply
  266. p said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:23 pm

    @Kate . Let me see if I got this right. Presumably there are 2 women BP got pregnant. I is French, and she’s giving him a hard time. The other is Sudanese and she isn’t. And you think SR is given the latter a thumbs up for a smarter grid. And I don’t know what the split blog is.

    Reply
  267. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    I found this on The National Ledger, it looks like Voight, has entered the circus. I was wondering when he was going to enter the picture. If this is true, she must be desperate.
    http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272625694.shtml

    Reply
  268. topbrit said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    @ p very well said and very correct
    @ Keane – just read your post about truce etc,i personally don’t believe tinitina,i think your first gut instinct was right mate about them,and ‘me’ and others,please don’t fall for it.

    Reply
  269. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    @ p – thanks hun, you added the points I forgot to make and came back online to add! If this person is on Ange’s team then her efforts have been rather counter-productive, does she really want all this stuff gone over again and added together?! I actually feel like I know enough detail on her now to start researching a book, there is a lot of info that when put together makes a very convincing case. If Ian isn’t doing it already. Maybe there are things I could point out to him though in case he’s missed it. If tinitina is legit I’m sure she will come back and tell us about her body of journalistic work. Its hard to fake that detail to someone who is experienced in that area. I’m actually not sure she’s a troll at this stage, they don’t normally back down so much and are so reasonable. If anything she is just woefully misinformed and only sees Angelina on a superficial level. I am suspicious about how much she jumped to conclusions and how she waded in with her argument without knowing anything about what has gone on here. Not something I would consider a reputable journo would do, quite the opposite in fact. We shall see, I was wrong about Togi, but not any others that I can think of! Night p x

    Reply
  270. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    @ topbrit – don’t worry babe, as with all things I am keeping an open mind, I have been wrong once before so am reserving judgment. She will either prove herself to be one or another soon enough, all the best x

    Reply
  271. Astro said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    @Keane:

    COW COW COW….BOOOOHHHBOOOOHHHH. HAHAHAHA

    Reply
  272. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    @Kate:What about adoption and drugs and diamonds, or two of the above?

    Reply
  273. tinitina said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    @Keane

    Truce. Thanks for giving me some back ground on the site, I appreciate your efforts. I mean it’s interesting stuff, I know they are manipulative with the media, I’m just not sold on the sinister twist on things. But I’ll do my own digging too. I’m familiar with Ian’s work on Scientology (talk about evil) and his book on Kurt Cobain.

    For everyone else I’m not in anyone’s camp, I’m not trying to convince anyone of anything, I’m my own thinking feeling person. I’ve never met Brangelina, nor do I know anyone that works for them.

    I stick around because I’m intrigued, and I will continue to state my opinion. You can beat me up, question me, insult me, call me a loon, hate me, whatever, I’m okay with being different or the odd man out.

    I came out swinging and now I’m sitting in the corner.

    Reply
  274. topbrit said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    @ mama san – there is a blind item on dlisted that if true confirms this story,just one thing slightly out,the bi sates soon to be divorced star seeks help from parents rather than parent,tho i suppose holie could have a step-mum.

    Reply
  275. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    testing, testing, 1 2 3…trying to see if avie is working again- changed my email to disposable

    Reply
  276. Tamara said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    @Mama San:LOL I first heard it on Amy Winehouse BtoB album and love it! Great word haha

    Reply
  277. topbrit said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    @ all – nite nite and all the best x

    Reply
  278. p said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    @Keane: . Sorry baby I don’t care if her great-gran-da is furkin’ Hearst himself, if she had an ouce of invetigative ability, not to mention critical thought, she would have pieced together most of the points I made in my post from the first. She’d also know Ian had already pushed the US liable laws way past their limits. And she would never make a board she thought was negative and misguided her local cyber-watering-hole. No one does that. Just sayin’..

    Lerv ya babe.

    Reply
  279. Billi said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:10 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:

    Had to come out of lurk mode to say love your new name and identity, LOL @ incognito!

    Reply
  280. anonymousa said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    @tintintina:”I absolutely question everything, it’s Ian’s job to prove himself to the reader, I have every right to ask questions. I’m sure he can handle it.”

    So why don’t you question the “humanitarian golden couple happy family donating all to charity freak circus”? Why don’t you go to gossip sites and question ridiculous positive “reports”? As a journalist, it should be your call to fight against dumbing down. What is your interest in defending the BrandGelina?

    As to your question, no, I wouldn’t guess Mickey Rourke. He is NOT evil. And he is not evil to animals as well.

    Reply
  281. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:19 pm

    @Tamara:
    It’s sweet, use it in a sentence.
    Hope about … a lot of Tom-fuckery going on around here.
    @McDooksInCognito:
    What’s up I-spy, lol… thank’s for the new curse word.. I’m sure my hubby will love it.
    I’s not like I need another f-bomb to throw out there.
    My all time fave is mother fucker.. it’s got a nice ring to it, and it can cover a multitude of things.

    Reply
  282. Anonymous said on April 18th, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    @tintintina: Why do you waste so much time defending this weird woman, what is your personal interest? Nobody in their right mind would do that without being paid. She is not a victim or worthy of protection. Cui bono?

    Reply
  283. McDooks said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:27 pm

    @Mama San:
    The ol’ M F’er is a classic. It DEFINITELY has its place in many places!

    @Billi:
    Hee hee, I didn’t want to give up my user name entirely. I went and got a disposable email so I could still be “me” only under an alias email.
    I meant me as in literally me, not Me or me- the two different posters who visited us recently.
    I can’t wait to see what Ian is gonna drop next, I hope it really IS big. All this speculation we’ve been doing, it would be nice to see if we are even in the ballpark, ya know?

    Reply
  284. Roger Fleis said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    I didn’t see Tinitina doing too much defending of Angelina, but rather she is clearly doubtful of Ian and his unconfirmed exclusives. When Ian has posted such whoppers as “Angelina makes love to at least one plant a day,” and relies strictly on anonymous sources to make such explosive claims, isn’t this a valid concern to express? Amazing how regulars here instantly label those who question some of Ian’s stories “trolls” or that they are being paid by Brangelina to post here! By that reason, it could certainly be argued that Kate, Mama San, and Keane are being paid $$$ to eat up everything Ian throws at them while condemning everyone who even remotely questions him and his scoops.

    Reply
  285. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    @p:
    NO, one is Sudanese and living in France, she is giving him a hard time. The other one we know nothing about except she is pregnant.

    Reply
  286. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    @tinitina:
    Okay I will say I think you are being honest at this point, but you have not been fair imo of Ian, maybe because you do not know him the way we do, so yes please stick around and get to know him. Ian will be straight up with you as he is with us. He has no reason to lie, if he is willing to face jail time over past stories he has exposes , like the one from Canada,he is willing to go to the mat here. FTR Ian does not hate Angelina, he would love to see her get help and clean up her act and be a good mother …but she is a fraud.

    Reply
  287. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:22 pm

    @Roger Fleis:
    First, only a idiot would think she is making love to a plant.I don’t think Keane or I have ever said we take every source at their word, there have been times I have asked Ian about a source ,and told him if I believed them or not, and his he will respond with, ” this source is solid, or prime, or I trust this person to the bank or I will back this to the bank, or I have my doubts on this, or this is a rumor,etc” see this is the problem going on. New people come on and do not know what they are talking about and make accusations and think they do. We DO know, because we not only know the history of this, but we know Ian, and we know how his ethics are on this, we know he will say, this person tried to fuck with me, so for everyone that keeps driving it home that Keane and I are paid support or robots or whatever, we are not.

    We are just loyal fans who support Ian because we “trust” him because he has not given us a reason not to. If he did or does, we would both be gone. If we found out we were being duped, lied to made fun of, tricked, etc, outta here. I believe that Ian is honest and ethical and I know that he does not have any malicious intent behind this at all. None. That , sir, is the difference of someone who eats it up and someone who just believes in someone because they have proved them self to be a decent person over a months and months. I am very suspicious by nature, I do not believe everything that is thrown at me, and often I will call someone or ask my husband to double check something for me, because I would be the first one out of here I can assure you if this was all a fraud. Ask Keane about that. He knows how I am. I have no patience for bull shit, NONE. Welcome to the blog, Rog!

    I will add, I was a fan if Ian before her ever had a blog, just for the record.

    Reply
  288. Roger Fleis said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    Kate, in reviewing the discussion of the story: “IUC Exclusive: IUC outs Angelina Jolie as Being Quadsexual” in which Ian exclusively reports that Angelina is into plant and animal bestiality, you absolutely seemed to believe it and only slightly questioned its authenticity much later after other posters expressed major doubt! Your comments:

    “She has long delved into witchcraft, and this is all part of what she believes- she can fuck anyone or anything as long as she does not intentionally cause harm to them…is Brad on board with this shit?”

    “pagan sexual practices believe you can have sex with what they conceive anything to have a soul and spirit, and for them that included animals, plants, sex toys, etc. She thinks this is normal, and by now he might too.”

    Again, Ian quoted someone he identified as a “LONGTIME FRIEND” of Angelina to CONFIRM that she gets off on plants, dogs. Why would Ian run with any story, about any celebrity, before verifying the source’s credibility? Why would he post a story as truth if, as you claim, only an idiot would believe it? And again, this proves my argument (and likewise, Tinitina’s) that it is difficult to believe all of Ian’s stories when he posts such gems as the “plant” story, and none of this has been independently confirmed nor reported.

    Also, I’ve been a regular lurker here since I discovered the site either late last year or early January. I also own the Hollywood Undercover book. Still, I read Ian’s stories with discretion since I don’t believe that any of his blockbuster exclusives posted here have been confirmed as true, while others have totally fallen flat.

    Reply
  289. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    This is what I find interesting-this was from Ians Report on the Official Split Report-

    ****UPDATE**** (4:12pm est) – The stunning Sudanese woman lives in France and is 23 years old, IUC has learned.

    ****UPDATE****(4:27pm est) – IUC has confirmed Brangie was deep into adoption plans for two more children before they officially split – Developing…

    ****UPDATE****(5:20pm est) – IUC has confirmed that more children are on the way for Pitt. Developing…

    So before they officially split they were “deep” into adoption plans for 2 more kids, but at the same time Brad has 2 buns in the oven and one for the last 4 months, now we know they had not officially spiit back in December, so was he cheating too?

    Or was him being a sperm donor to these other women part of the plan, adopt two, and add those two also, that would give them 10 kids…

    Isn’t this crazy? Or did the adoptions fall through that far back and he did this so they could adopt those two?

    But then we have the recent adoption news that the reporter from the Examier says they were devastated to hear about, and that was 2 weeks ago??

    Any ideas anyone…

    Reply
  290. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    Or was he pulling one over on Jolie and planning to pass off his buns in the oven as the adoptees? Be rather entertaining actually, if she didn’t allow him to adopt the non bio 3, his revenge. I still wonder if the reason the latest adoptions didn’t go through are because the State Department is aware there was hanky panky going on in the previous ones.

    Reply
  291. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    @Roger Fleis:
    Rog, what I meant by that comment, is that I do not think she was taking a cactus and fucking herself with it and so many thought that meant. Yes, I do believe she uses plants and herbs for enhancement, I don’t see the big deal in that myself, do you? I don’t think she used a plant and inserted it, I think she uses the plants as many do in pagan magik sexual practices. As for the “animal bestiality” that was reported by Sugar Ray who Ian has said that SR does believe his source.

    Reply
  292. Chelsea said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    I think the whole sudanese woman being pregnant thing is bs, you must be really gullible to believe that one.

    Reply
  293. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    @Different Guest:
    I am curious to see also what is going on with the adopted kids and the status of her trying to prove that.

    Reply
  294. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    @Chelsea:

    WHY

    Reply
  295. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    @Roger Fleis:
    Don’t throw me into the mix to make your point to Kate.
    Stand up on your own 2 cents, and get off my ass.

    Reply
  296. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    @Mama San:
    Yeah I thought that was a little unfair also for him to throw you in but believe me my name gets tossed in everywhere lol

    Reply
  297. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    @Different Guest:
    Maybe he was making a bookend for Zahara , possible yes, if he had made an agreement with her but then she changed her mind and decided not to play fair.

    They lost a lot of money it seems in the J-P Foundation through bad investments for 2008, gotta sell some more baby pictures. lol

    Reply
  298. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:30 pm

    That’s what I’m thinking, is that the adoption of Pax and her lies about staying home and dragging the kids around and pimping them out for photo ops, sealed her fate for future adoptions. I’ve wondered if that’s why she went the IVF route with the twins, because she didn’t terribly enthused about being pregnant with Shiloh – I was surprised she decided to have any more bios.

    Reply
  299. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:30 pm

    Pfftt.. to him, what do I care what he thinks. I am flattered about the getting paid part, I wish.
    I am a free thinking individual , I got my own ideas, and points , and I don’t ride on anyone’s coat tails, and I am also quite capable of defending MPOV without name-calling, intelligently and politely.
    I don’t have to agree with anyone, and no one has to agree with me.
    Anyway, I only call out people such as Roger Dodger, as a-holes, when they can’t do the same , mutual and respectively, and throw people under the bus, when they don’t agree, or can’t make a point on their own accord.

    Reply
  300. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:40 pm

    Here it is-
    Knox and Vivienne Jolie-Pitt Get New Baby Play Mats

    Photo of Kensington baby play mat Angelina Jolie’s new twins, Knox and Vivienne, will be playing on these fun baby play mats from Plain Mary. Apparently, Knox wasn’t the parents’ first choice for his name — it was originally going to be Rex.

    Little does Brad and Angelina’s baby boy, Knox, know how close he came to be called Rex. A spy tells us that just six weeks ago, the star couple ordered an embroidered play mat from plainmary.com for “Rex Leon Jolie Pitt.” He’s still getting one of the $190 mats (with a new monogram), as is his sister Vivienne.

    The play mats come in a variety of colors and have monograms or full names. They retail for $190 at Plainmary.com.

    Posted on July 16, 2008

    Reply
  301. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:40 pm

    How’s this for a scenario, she’s been told she will not be permitted to adopt again in the near future, most reputable agencies would want the twins to be at least 2 before adding another older child to the mix (I don’t think they’d ever be allowed to adopt an infant again since they’ve had 3 bios and Maddox and Zahara were infant adoptions). She’s not up for another pregnancy, so he goes and impregnates a bookend for Zahara and a backup. Then the relationship falls completely apart.

    Reply
  302. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    @Mama San:
    LOL how much are we getting paid, I want to take a trip soon?

    Reply
  303. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    @Kate:Can I get paid too?

    Reply
  304. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:44 pm

    @Different Guest:
    Sounds reasonable except , he hired a PI because he thought she was cheating and she was? So did he do the dirty with her, yesss, lol I think he just screwed around. But it would make sense to give Zee the bookend, the girl is pretty young, he could give her a cool mil.

    Reply
  305. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    @Different Guest:
    I think Ian should put us all on his payroll myself. lol

    Reply
  306. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:50 pm

    When did he hire the PI? One woman is reputedly 4 months along, what about the other woman?

    Reply
  307. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:50 pm

    @Mama San:
    Why is that red.. ooohh ..?

    Reply
  308. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:53 pm

    I want to get laid and paid.
    LOL, I’m just kidding…. , I’m gonna tell my hubby that one… hee hee , I just kill me sometimes.

    Reply
  309. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:54 pm

    @Mama San:They already have, the State Department isn’t processing adoptions from Cambodia, Vietnam or Guatemala at the moment. And they are taking closer looks at adoptions from countries that haven’t signed the Hague Adoption Agreement.

    Reply
  310. p said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:01 am

    @Kate: . So is the pregnant one we know nothing about the sophisticated one, or someone else, bringing the total to three (that we know of)?

    Reply
  311. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:02 am

    @Different Guest:
    Brad hired the PI when he thought Jolie was cheating, no timeline on that but someone tipped her off that that is when the fights escalated ,so I will guess it was in the fall, and they had to be in the states for cheating with BBT and maybe France with Oliver. those were the two main suspects.

    Reply
  312. Roger Fleis said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:05 am

    @Kate, “using plants and herbs for enhancement,” not a big deal, no. But, per Ian’s write-up and your own comments in that thread, it was in no small way suggested that she literally fucks plants and further that she considers them better than humans and, disturbingly, dogs. Using herbs for sexual enhancement does not in any way equate to “Making love to plants” or “having sex with animals, plants, sex toys,” and I don’t think people would be labeled as bisexual (or quadsexual in Angie’s case) if they were simply using herbs and such for added sexual effect.

    Reply
  313. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:05 am

    @p:
    I am going to say since we never heard anything else about the sophisticated woman and now Brad is talking to a A list woman all the time and he is seeing someone, that she did not work out. Maybe that was just fling, that went no where. The sudanese girl lives in France, no hints on where the other girl lives. Ian did say he was trying to get more information on that. Total 2 pregnant. Brad seeing someone, but who?

    Reply
  314. Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:07 am

    @Different Guest:
    Good as they should. I am a child of adoption , so are my siblings , and several other of my family members. G-d bless my birth mom, and adopted parents. What gives me the hives with these court jesters , is that there are good decent folks, that work hard, and love children , and have the compassion , patience and love, the kindness to either sign up as foster parents and or adoptive parents. What gets my gall is that these hard-working folk have to jump through hoops and wait years to be eligible {foster parents} , spend thousands and thousands of their savings to adopt. Live under the scutiny of state agencies , and get paid a pittence , all for the love of children, most do, then there are those that exploit, use, and mock the system, i.e BP, AJ,and M. This shuts down the way for the honest folk out there, who follow the laws , kiss the bureacrats asses, live in the countries, spend their hard earned money, etc, etc, I could go on. My hat goes off to the everyday heros , that get the low end of the totem pole, not the likes of the Madonna’s , Brad’s and Angelina’s of the world.

    Reply
  315. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:13 am

    @Roger Fleis:
    Roger, are you not familiar with magik pagan sexual practices, because that is what Angelina does, and believes in, and yes, she has discussed it in interviews, go research that, so yes I do believe she fucked the dog, she does fuck objects such as sex toys and I do believe she fucks girls of all shapes and sizes, and anyone that turns her on, I don just think she is bisexual or a quad, I think she is a sexual deviant of the worse kind. I think to a point she sexualizes her children, sucking their hands like she is giving them a blow job, buying penis gum, taking nude pics of them, and I think she uses herbs, drugs,plants and whatever the hell else it takes to keep pushing it further, including peeing and shitting on he partners,

    Is that clear enough what my opinion is? What I don’t think is that she fucks a flower . Let’s not get picky over what I believe or not.

    JMO

    FTR I think the source who said they were all in New Orleans for Easter were full of shit.

    Reply
  316. Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:18 am

    @Kate:
    ROTFLMAO,
    “What I don’t think is that she fucks a flower . Let’s not get picky over what I believe or not. ”
    I LOOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEE UUUUUU Kate.

    Reply
  317. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:23 am

    @Mama San:

    Geez enough of this already, I am going to watch tv see ya tomorrow, another day and some more harrassment, why the hell does anyone care what I think.

    Gee so did SR mean dead on or dead? lol

    See ya!

    Reply
  318. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:31 am

    @Kate:
    Excellent clarification, Kate. I interpreted the same thing- she ain’t playing hopscotch on the plants, maybe it has something to do with “aura” or “energy” or some kind of stuff like that. I know nothing of pagan rituals, or any rituals, for that matter.
    I find it odd that ANYbody would accuse someone of thinking she is LITERALLY fucking a plant. Well, okay, this IS Scrangie we’re talking about, but STILL.

    Reply
  319. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:35 am

    @Kate:
    I can sort of (well, not really but we’re not talking about me or an average joe) see Brad inseminating 2 woment, especially if Brangie WAS just turned down for adoption of 2 kids and maybe as an ALTERNATIVE option they were going to adopt what was already half “theirs” instead.
    Fucking crazy, like collecting shot glasses these two are but with kids. Or stamps. Or bumper stickers.
    But, I digress.
    These alleged pregnancies could just be Plan B. Isn’t that the name of his production company, by the way?
    But, now rather inconveniently they are busting up.
    They aren’t very bright, if this is remotely possibly what’s going on with the alleged 2 impending babies.
    They are baby addicts. They need an intervention.

    Reply
  320. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:36 am

    And IF these (alleged) babies are REVENGE babies, well…that just speaks volumes (and scary volumes at that) as to the demented mind behind it.

    Reply
  321. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:37 am

    @Mama San:
    Grrrrr, you git’em girl!

    Reply
  322. Different Guest said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:38 am

    @McDooks:Maybe a venus flytrap?

    Reply
  323. Different Guest said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:41 am

    @Mama San:That’s the same thing that pisses me off, worked in social services many years and to see a) the hoops normal people have to jump through to adopt and b) the cost, it riles me no end when wealthy folks are allowed to “buy” children and skip to the head of the line.

    Reply
  324. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:41 am

    @Different Guest:
    She probably sucked it up because of the absolute frenzy of adoration and blissful worship the chosen one brought. Not so much about the baby, but the attention and image. People couldn’t get enough of the golden couple having a baby- the most beautiful baby in the world, and all that.
    I think she could suffer another pregnancy with a Mount Olympus of supporters and worshippers cheering her on and speaking in tongues at the mere existence of Brangie’s offspring.

    Reply
  325. Tigerlilly said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:42 am

    Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:18 am
    @Kate:
    ROTFLMAO,
    “What I don’t think is that she fucks a flower
    *****************************************************************************************************************

    Well, now…Flowers need good lovin’ too…just sayin’….

    Reply
  326. Different Guest said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:43 am

    @McDooks:Or was she even pregnant. I think that’s what makes me pause when hearing the she was never pregnant rumors. She did not like being pregnant with a singleton, and she doesn’t strike me as the type who would put herself in any physical discomfort even for the adulation.

    Reply
  327. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:44 am

    @Different Guest:
    Didn’t mean to copycat you, still playing catch up with the comments! I second that motion DG!!!

    Reply
  328. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:44 am

    @Different Guest:
    Me three?!

    Reply
  329. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:48 am

    @Mama San:
    That is an excellent point. And, sorry, these people do NOT spend a significant amount of “quality time” with their kids. I have 2 and I’m spread pretty thin. And I stay at home.
    That’s why I’d LOVE Ian to pay me for my comments, I’m broke as a joke y’all. But I get to be with my kids.
    Not to knock working parents, we do what we gotta do. But Brangie and Madonna…please. They are all so busy pursuing other things and it’s plain to see for the whole world. Nannies are raising those kids. The parents make ’special guest star appearances’ in their own kids’ lives. That sure as shit is what it looks like to me, but what do I know?

    Reply
  330. Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:53 am

    @Tigerlilly:
    Yes you do too don’t u , lol.

    Reply
  331. Different Guest said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:54 am

    @McDooks:It’s how the upper class lives. That’s part of the deal you don’t raise your own kids, nanny does. The good wealthy parents, the time they spend with their kids is quality time. If you talk to those kids what they remember is that when they were with their parents, their parents were totally attentive. Those are the kids who grow up and have good relationships with their parents, the others you get the Mommy Dearest books.

    Reply
  332. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:54 am

    @Different Guest:
    I think SHE’S a venus flytrap.

    Reply
  333. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:57 am

    @Different Guest:
    I think we’re gonna get some of those books out of this “soccer team” or whatever Brad says he wants.

    Reply
  334. Different Guest said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:01 am

    @McDooks:Then they are perfect for each other.

    Reply
  335. Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:01 am

    @McDooks:
    Oh yeah, I already cornered the market on that pet name for her ,lol, that and or a praying mantis. The female of the species bites the heads off her mates. ICK! ICK!
    I believe it’s Ms. jolie’s putty-tang that could be refered to as The Venus Fly Trap” ummmmhmmmmm..
    I’m just sayin’….

    Reply
  336. Different Guest said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:05 am

    @McDooks:Truthfully, I’m just hoping those kids make it to adulthood. With her own admitted drug use I can see her introducing the children to heroin at some point.

    Reply
  337. Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:05 am

    @Different Guest:
    I bet you put your heart and soul into it, G-d bless you.

    Reply
  338. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:06 am

    @Mama San:
    Not only the post-coital head-ectomy, but she really DOES look like a gangly praying mantis for real.

    Reply
  339. Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:10 am

    I have come to the conclusion with this blog that most of us here, I mean that generally, are decent , honest folk , that do care. I agree with you, my goodness, these are only babes we are discussing about.
    I have not into tried to put it into perspective , for them as teenagers.
    I’m a mama of four {{{Different Guest}}} I got your back anytime you want to throw a bitch in there about kids.

    Reply
  340. Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:13 am

    @McDooks:
    Hee Hee, you kill me, lol.

    Reply
  341. p said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:21 am

    @Kate: . I don’t know what the Examiner report is about, but I’m guessing things have been very rocky for months so maybe they put the adoption on hold, and on top of that, they might have been ruled out for future adoptions, bc of the new stricter guidelines.

    If the pregnancies are for real, it doesn’t mean Pitt intended them to happen…shit happens. Sounds like both partners cheated, so I wouldn’t fuss over 2-3 months timeline too much. Things may have come to a rapid boil the last 4-5 months, but remember, sounds like the problems began a lot earlier. TC… before he was gagged, felt a split was inevitable bc of inherent unfixable problems, from way back. Stories you hear from close sources will always be uneven. Some people will be confided in more, and to some extent individual interpretation plays in.

    Reply
  342. Different Guest said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:24 am

    @Mama San:
    That is the main reason I dislike this woman so intensely. I grew up in the high rent district in a dysfunctional family, surrounded by other dysfunctional families. Money does not buy happiness for kids, unless they are in a stable environment. That this woman’s wealth is allowing her to screw up six lives drives me up a wall. While I feel I sorry for the biologicals, it’s the adopted kids, who should not have been placed in the situation to begin with that I have real concerns about. No reputable adoption agency would have ever allowed her to adopt.

    Reply
  343. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:34 am

    @Different Guest:
    Whether driven by neglect/trauma or demonstrating role model, the chance is DEFINITELY there.

    Reply
  344. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:37 am

    @p:
    Exactly. Take for instnace, my huband, bless his heart- can’t hardly get the guy to say a bad word about anybody. AND if he knows inside information, you can’t get that shit out of him. He is frustrating to be around sometimes!
    Brangie undooubtedly has friends, acquaintances, whatevers who are privy to different levels of intimate goings ons. And some people just don’t see things for how they are. Or some do but don’t dish to anybody.

    Reply
  345. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 2:19 am

    @Mama San:
    ok that movie sucked Lol. You rock Mama San! Thanks for the back up I am sure with Ians next report it will just get worse, better watch out you have been placed in with the guity parties! He he

    Reply
  346. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 2:23 am

    @p:
    true we don’t know the time line, I do wonder though where he met this Sudanese girl in France and as many partners as they have where is the safe sex?

    Reply
  347. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 2:26 am

    N@McDooks:
    LOL revenge babies , ha then they would both be batshit crazy

    Reply
  348. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 2:32 am

    @Different Guest:
    so true even Josephine Bakers son wrote a book about her and know one of the Jolie-Pitt kids are going to do that one day . My bet is on Zahara LOL unless Brsd gets the kids but it does not sound like he wants sole custody anymore.

    Reply
  349. p said on April 19th, 2009 at 3:14 am

    @Kate: . For all we know she might been on holiday in the US or had a small role in one of his films. Me, I ain’t placing bets on how long these two have been shagging their tails off w outside interested parties. And yeah they must be regulars at the clinic.

    Reply
  350. BEWARE KEANE said on April 19th, 2009 at 3:20 am

    I have been thinking long & hard about this & I honestly think Keane is going to b hit with a lawsuit! I have read back on all Brangie posts & all comments. My reasoning 4 believing this is because Ian himself has only ever said things that have been said b4. Then he introduces 2 new ppl who r the one’s giving all this poetic, damning new ‘evidence’-not Ian.
    Keane has said on this & at least 2 other websites that Angelina ‘is a dog & plant f*cker. She has also stated the reason she believes this to b so is because Ian himself has confirmed this to be fact. If u read back he has NOT confirmed this he has said ‘according’ 2 SR she is.
    So how easy would it to have been to pose as both these other ppl ‘in the know’ or 2 hire 2 other ppl 2 write undr these names 4 him-not hard at all ($$$). It also doesn’t take much to have 2 unknown ppl pose for pic’s to support his new insiders.
    It’s weird to me that the more ‘involved’ u all got the more ‘insider’s’ & new bloggers appeared. Instead of one post per week u now have 1-2 per day. Do none of u think that is strange in itself?????
    Then we have Ian going into hiding & him & Keane having their e-mail’s hacked. Could it be that it is infact Brangie’s legal team at work?
    Just food for thought.

    Reply
  351. Billi said on April 19th, 2009 at 6:44 am

    @McDooks:

    Yes I’m looking forward to the next update from Ian and that’s why for now I’m just content to read everyone’s comments and enjoy the humor (you and Mama San are hilarious!). IMOO it seems we are going in circles. Is this an international scandal with intrigue involving their foundations and/or humanitarian work in Africa (credit great posts by Constant C, Keane, p and Section 9) or is this just your typical (by Hollywood standards) sex, lies and videotape scandal but with a twist or two. I’m leaning towards the latter. Hopefully with the upcoming updates we will know which way the wind is blowing for these two, their kids and the 2 in the oven. Have a great day!

    Reply
  352. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 7:33 am

    @ BEWARE KEANE – legal teams do not do illegal things such as hackng into people’s e-mail account and finding out their personal info then printing on gossip sites. This is an entirely illegal act which is currently being investigated by the UK police. How do you know I have reported this story on 2 other sites? And for your information I have NEVER said that I know this story for fact, I have only said that this is what is being reported or suggested on this site. In exactly the same way as saying to another friend this is what is being said/reported here, have you seen it, make of it what you will. I have never said I know that it is true, I have always said I keep an open mind and can neither categorically discount it or accept it and I have never tried to persuade other people of its veracity. The dog story was as shocking and difficult to believe for me as it was anyone else when I first heard it and I quetioned it straight away. All I have ever done is respond to things suggested or reported directly on this site in a hypothetical way. I have given interpretations as to what the posts may mean, multiple, conflicting ones in fact but have never drawn any definite conclusions as to what they mean. If I was committing any activity that may be able to be dealt with legally I would have heard from her lawyers by now as they know at least my name and possibly a lot more about me than that (plus I have an unusual name, they know where I live and would beasy to track down if necessary). All I have ever done is give my opinions as to the veracity or likelihood of what Ian and SR are saying, based on my own knowledge and experience. I have linked it to other things I have heard about her from other sources in the media (not personal ones) and BIs but other than that have not posted any statements pretending I know something about them from first hand experience. Everything I have said, like everyone else is only ever my opinion and speculation. And don’t worry I am now checking all this out with my lawyer friends anyway. Plus, if Angelina wanted to sue me that would be fine but I don’t have anything to take and she would have to have all these details reported on her here to be gone through in a court and reported on by all the media. I would doubt very much that she would want to do that if there is truth to it. But yes I am careful about what I say and have warned others to be too. I am more concerned in fact about the e-mail hacking and the implied threats in SR’s post of “Keane is dead on”. If threats have been made against me I need to know so I can inform the police about this too in their crime report. I am going to e-mail Ian about this today in fact. I need to know excatly where I stand and if any threats have been made against me then he will have to let me know.

    Reply
  353. Peri said on April 19th, 2009 at 7:38 am

    @McDooks: Thank you for the welcome. I go away for one day to get some sunshine, come back and there’s a bazillion posts to catch up on. I almost didn’t see your post. *laughing*

    Reply
  354. adtwah said on April 19th, 2009 at 8:14 am

    I personally think that Ian is throwing out every little gossip tidbit that comes his way. Some of these tidbits are true, somewhat true, or not true at all. I am not saying it’s a bad thing. I feel he’s trying to encourage discussion and increase interest in his site. I read his posts with an open mind, but I don’t take everything he says as the gospel.

    For the record, I hope everything that Ian reports IS the gospel, because I cannot stand Angelina and would love to see her taken down. I think she is a lying hypocrite and I am sick of having The Cult of Brangelina shoved down my throat.

    Reply
  355. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    @ BEWARE KEANE – BTW Ian is responisble for all the posts on his site – he is the editor of it even if he didn’t write them himself. However I am pretty sure both Ms Nine Cents is Ian, and it is highly possible that SR is too although I could not say this for sure. Re: Ms Nine Cents – not many muslim ladies post stories on gossip blogs – there are issues in terms of what they are allowed to do under their religion there. Ian is just being very “undercover”. And if Brangelina had a legal case against me then they would have been able to force Ian to give them my IP address, they would not have had to illegally hack into my personal account. They also posed as me using my full real name to make a comment which is also illegal, I think they did this to try to scare me off to say we know your name etc. It doesn’t scare me at all, but if they are making threats of violene through Ian to me then that is a matter that will be dealt with by the police. If they are making legal threats then Ian would have had to have given them my ISP address and I would have heard from them legally. The things that I have commented on or have said have been repeated by many people on many other sites, people have also linked to this site from other blogs. It is a very common thing to do. BTW re: the dog story, Ian posted a story outing Angelina as “quadrosexual”, so he was fairly explicit about the fact that she was into animals and it has been discussed at length by other people here. Having said that I am still keeping an open mind about it, it is probably the most bizarre thing I have heard on here in terms of my frame of reference and it is probably the thing out of everything that I am least likely to believe. All I know from my experience of celebs, great and small, is that the thing that you would be least likely to expect is possible, from the most “family friendly” type of presenters/artists etc. That’s why I can never turn around and say I just know that that isn’t true without having anything to base that on. Many things I wouldn’t have believed if other people told me I know are true from first-hand experience. That’s what I base my judgments and opinions on. I’m sure you meant well with your post though, are you someone I know from here or another site?

    Reply
  356. Kikumon said on April 19th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    HEY, What’s a banana…….fruit or PART OF A PLANT……..Get off of it or on it if it suits you…..@Roger Fleis:

    Reply
  357. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 8:35 am

    @ McDooks – in the interview she did with BBT before she adopted Maddox etc, Angelina talked about her knife collection. She had 30 of them in a locked room in their house, she said she liked them because they represented all the different cultures from where she got them. Souvenirs if you will. In my opinion she talks about collecting children in exactly the same way. In one interview she said she already had a buddhist and I believe she said a hindu child (can’t remember 100%), and she also wanted to get a Muslim and a Christian but that it was difficult for her to adopt from those countries. To me I find it absolutely unbelievable that she gets away with saying these things without getting called out on it. She is doing nothing more than collecting souvenir dolls from cultures she finds interesting. This is not providing a stable and loving home for a needy child, this is about her love of collecting things from around the world. I assume – and hope – she doesn’t say this in the adoption process as how she would get away with it other than throwing money at them would be beyond me. She was interviewd on Ellen, while she was living in England and had just adopted Maddox and said she liked the idea of adopting children from all cultures and in all colours from all around the world and have them live under one roof as “that’s the way she thought the world should be”. The audience all went ah how sweet. Does this woman understand that an infant child does not bring its culture or religion with it, it is not inherent in them, it is acquired as they grow up in that culture? They acquire the culture of the country they grow up in and the religion that is taught them by their parents and in their school, not that they have brought from their birth country! She also made a comment about Maddox on the Ellen show about how he occasionally says words that she doesn’t understantd and she assumes they are Cambodian. She adopted him when he was 7 months old and only occasionally took him back for holidays there afterwards (he was still probably about 18 months at the most) and she thinks he knows Cambodian words? Ellen was absolutely shocked at what she said and thought it was hilarious and made a big joke of it, saying well if he remembers Cambodian words from when he was 6 months old he truly is a genius! Does this woman have any brains in her head? She lives in a fantasy world to me. And it just goes to show how much time she actually spends with her children too.

    Reply
  358. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 8:46 am

    @ Different Guest – yes I agree with that having some people very close to me who were raised in a similar situation. Having a lot of money and a good lifestyle doesn’t make a child happy, especially if it is being ignored or dumped in a boarding school by its parents while they go off round the world (this is not uncommon among posh, wealthy people). I have friends who went to boarding school from the age of 7, their mothers did not even work. When I said well what did your mother do, they said well she liked to paint pictures and do flower arrangements and things like that. And I was like so your dad worked all day, you were at boardign school and she made flower arrangements? What a strange, lonely life, what is the point of having children if that is what you’re going to do? But I bet she was raised in the exact same way. So different to my upbringing in which I couldn’t have had a closer or more loving family, grnadparents included. Hey we didn’t have any money but my family gave my bro and I as much as they could and had literally nothing for themselves, never went out, never had holidays, hardly had any clothes for themselves etc, spent everything on us. And they supported and helped us in everything we did, they could not have been better. It was a magical, beyond perfect, money couldn’t buy childhood which I hope I can replicate to a degree with my own children one day. Its a tough act to follow though, and certainly looking back on it now I wish my parents had had more for themselves, they shouldn;t have spent everything they had on us. But with my friends who grew up in boarding schools they do have very close friendships as a result and say that you bring each other up as opposed to being brought up by parents. Its bizarre to me but there you go.

    Reply
  359. Tamara said on April 19th, 2009 at 9:00 am

    @Keane:Ah Keane, that comment makes alot of sense to me, nore than the wild theories that have lately been discussed. I haven’t been commenting because I dont know enough about the various organizations or the UN and Sudan etc. But this yes, a child doesnt understnd their culture if they were adopted as infants, or just because she gave birth to them in a different county. One thing I remember her saying though is that she plans to keep their culture alive for them as they grow up, I think she also said that the adopted children are learning their respective languages, do you remember something about her saying that? But yes, if she doesn’t educate them in their cultures then she is just doll collecting dolls and telling the public what she thinks we want to hear in order to justify the method behind her rainbow family imo.

    Reply
  360. Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 9:46 am

    Good Morning all….. What’s this…no news?
    Dang, alright …got time to get my cup of coffee.
    @Keane:
    Oh this is what I missed … is that what’s been going on Keanne ..someone’s been hacking your email?
    When did this start, isn’t Ian experiencing the same thing?
    Anyone here, if you don’t mind, could give a brief recap of the week’s tid bits, of what’s been figured out from Ian’s, Ms. NineCents, and Sugar.
    I would be very grateful. Thank you.

    Reply
  361. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 9:53 am

    @ Tamara – yes, and to think she thinks she has the capabilities of educating and bringing up her children from all those different cultures as they would have been in their own country is astonishing. There is no way she could remotely replicate those cultures and beliefs in this “multi-cultural” houaehold of hers, how on earth would she know enough to do that, no-one would. Unless she has a nanny/teaching assistant from each culture working for her which is more than likely but what on earth would be the point. Your culture is what you are brought up in, not where you’re born or what your race is. We are all a mix of different races from back in our genealogy, do we carry with us all those cultures, no way! I found out a few years ago that I have german heritage, do I know anything about German culture – nope! Its the same with all the saying her mother is French or French Canadian business, and how they should all learn French and about France because generations ago their ancestors lived there, its ridiculous! Interestingly though, my very insecure and thus self-obsessed ex-friend also does that about her german heritage, wants to go to germany and find out about it etc. It could be an innocent interest in where some of her family come from I guess, but I tend to think it is partly to do with bigging up herself. I’m not remotely interested in going to Germany and my great grandmother’s maiden name was Lutz. It has no bearing on my life! But then I’m convinced Angelina is not very intelligent at all, which is why I think she goes all flirty and giggly in interviews like the actor’s studio one. I just think she’s not that bright and is intimidated by what a more intelligent/educated person might ask her so flirts and giggles so they are kind to her. I always remember when she was interviewed at a press conference for AMH, a journo asking her about acting in the film and she said she was very careful about the portrayal because she didn’t want to misrepresent people in Pakistan. When the journo asked her what she mean by that, she looked a bit bewildered and like she didn’t know what to say and then said “well I really like visiting that part of the world so wouldn’t want to offend the people there”! Nothing about having a respect for the Pakistani people and culture and making sure it wasn’t misrepresented, stereotyped or sensationalised in the film, which is obviously what the journo was getting at, just “well I wouldn’t want to not be able to go on holida there again”! Hilarious! Not intelligent at all in my view!

    Reply
  362. Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 9:57 am

    @Kikumon:
    There is always the old stand by , cucumbers, that’s a veggie.

    Reply
  363. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 9:57 am

    @ Mama San – yeah someone hacked my e-mail mid-week, I posted it had happened here and Ian said same happened to him 3 weeks ago. Then someone posted under my real, full name on this site so I immediately reported it to the police as Ian has had death threats. I need to find out from Ian whether any have been made towards Kate and I too as they may well also have things like my address etc from hacking into my account. I am currently talking to some investigative journos, lawyers and possibly MPs etc to get advise and to inform them of my position. I am not easily intimidated and have been in the middle of a shitstorm before. I think they’re pretty lame if they have to resort to hacking into my e-mail account and posting under my name. That does not scare me, if anything it makes it personal and makes me far more committed to posting here. I won’t be intimidated by them or anyone else.

    Reply
  364. Mama San said on April 19th, 2009 at 10:00 am

    @Mama San:
    Just kidding, she’s nasty whatever she does sexually, I don’t find her appealing at all any longer.

    Reply
  365. McDooks said on April 19th, 2009 at 10:34 am

    @Keane:
    I am so glad you touched on the subject of different cultures, etc. I ABSOLUTELY agree, those kids to NOT bring culture. They bring the ILLUSION of culture, seeing as they are not LIVING their respective cultures under Brangie’s custodianship. Those kids are never in one place long enough to know where they are, much less absorb any culture, much less STILL from their birthplace cultures.
    She is so ridiculous.

    Reply
  366. Different Guest said on April 19th, 2009 at 11:13 am

    Culture and AJ is an oxymoron.

    Reply
  367. McDooksInCognito said on April 19th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    @Different Guest:
    I couldn’t agree more.
    They are complete strangers.

    Reply
  368. Kikumon said on April 19th, 2009 at 11:33 am

    http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=87&art_id=vn20090418071301879C180997

    Sudan is prepared to allow new aid agencies into the restive Darfur province to replace those the government kicked out last month following the indictment of President Omar al-Bashir, US senator John Kerry said, reported the Sudan Tribune yesterday.

    Kerry, chairman of the US senate foreign relations committee, arrived in Sudan for a three-day visit on Wednesday and met several top officials.

    He said “some of that capacity for humanitarian assistance will be restored”.

    Sudan expelled 13 organisations in early March, including Doctors Without Borders and Oxfam GB, after the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant on al-Bashir for alleged war crimes.

    Thought this was interesting………

    Reply
  369. Tamara said on April 19th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    @McDooksInCognito:LOL You are sooo funny! Love the new user name hahaha, you’re really hiding, we wouldn’t have a clue who you are with your new In Cognito name. LOL

    Reply
  370. Tamara said on April 19th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    @McDooksInCognito:By the way, where in the world is Cognito? hahahahah

    Reply
  371. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 19th, 2009 at 11:39 am

    @Tamara:
    Probably somewhere near Disguise

    Sorry, couldn’t help it. LOL

    Reply
  372. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 19th, 2009 at 11:41 am

    Testing. My comments aren’t showing up. I’m still the same AFM as always, Ian.

    Reply
  373. jan said on April 19th, 2009 at 11:51 am

    i am sorry but not one of those kids will ever live or undrstand their culture, i live in south africa and let me tell you that you need to live with the african cultue to understand it. it is very difficult to learn a lanuage if you are not constantly speaking to some one of the same tribe. z is missing out big time because the african culture is a beautifull and very caring people i look at their children and just want to steal one for myself. they are very well kept and their hair and clothes are a thing to see. jolie has no idea of how to dress her kids and they always look sloppy and untidy. i was a single mother since my youngest was 3 months old and even though i did not have alot of money and worked long hours my kids and me are very close even though they are grownup, they had the grandparents to help them with morals and teach them to respect for others. if you don’t have money it is the time spent with them from baby years that bond you and jolie and peewee have not spent the time to bond with one child before throwing another into the circus. they are not role models for the youth or adoption to be looked up to but rather what not to be like. if they are about to split is say about time as we are sick of this brand and it is time that they leave but please not to africa as we have our own notorious brands that we redicule. i just have to say as well that south africans really don.t care much for stars and could not care less when they are here just ask clint, damon and s jackson as they are here at the moment and nobody cares. do not care if they split or stay together really as the deserve each other and hope they make life hell for each other. that will be true karma jmo ( i hope ian is speaking the truth as i enjoy reading your comments and would hate to see this site go down. and please i am not saying he is lying but i will reserve my trust till things happen as to many mags have lied to the people before and i don’t trust easily.)

    Reply
  374. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    @ jan – yes I used to live with someone from SA, lots of her family and friends used to come and stay and the area of London we lived in was a total SA enclave so have some idea of the differences in culture. For a start there is so much more to do in SA than watch tv, read magazines, think about celebs etc, there’s the amzing landscape to explore for starters. And things are a lot more serious in terms of the prevalence of crime, poverty and inequality than they are here, people have much better things to think about. My theory is that when you live in a land of plenty, safety and where you don’t have too much to do, think about or worry about, celebs, brand and marketing steps in to fill the breach. When you visit other parts of the world, people are more concerned with their own lives and less interested in the supposed glamour of one or two individuals who happen to be in films, on tv or in magazines. The way normal human beings are elevated into the status of gods for these reasons is bizarre to me. I always try to say to people – they are just normal people, why on earth do people get so excited about other human beings?!

    Reply
  375. McDooksInCognito said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    @Tamara:
    Hee hee, incognito I believe means in disguise. You’d never guess it was me, eh?

    It seems that when I go between Safari & FireFox on my computer that it is storing my username info differently so some of my posts come by McDooks and some by my “alias”…
    I’ll figure it out one of these days, I am completely illiterate when it comes to computers. I can’t believe I found a way to use a disposable email, it truly was an idiot proof tool!

    Reply
  376. anonymous said on April 19th, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    It’s Jolie preposterous
    Published:Apr 19, 2009

    Witness Brangelina’s creepy little African coup and how celebrities can exploit their fame to take over a whole country. By Marina Hyde

    On the eve of the most recent Palestinian presidential elections, a televised message was broadcast to voters in the region. “Hi, I’m Richard Gere,” smiled its star, “and I’m speaking for the entire world…”

    Did you miss the meeting at which this got decided? Do you find it confusing that Gere should claim not simply to be speaking for himself (debatable), but for the whole of Earth?

    Then apologies for startling you, but this is your world. Try not to choke on it. In 1990 Richard was starring in Pretty Woman; 15 years later he was making formal interventions into Middle Eastern politics.

    Once upon a time the entertainment industry was an industry that made entertainment. Its workforce was required to do quaint things such as show up to movie sets, or make music, or go to wild parties.

    Today that brief has expanded slightly. In the past two years alone, celebrities have used the New York headquarters of the United Nations as a venue from which to sell luxury goods. Their cell-matter has been traded on the open market. They have made spectacularly uncalled for, even more spectacularly uninformed, statements on sensitive matters of science and medicine. The Russian parliament has voted on whether to send one of them to the International Space Station.

    You’ll be familiar with certain megastars’ practice of having stores close their doors so they can have the place all to themselves. Imagine if they could do that with a whole country. Great news: they can.

    Back in 2006, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie opted to give birth to their first biological child in Namibia. They did this for a variety of reasons, which can be broadly summarised as “total affectation”.

    Two months ahead of delivery, the couple and their two other, adopted, children headed to the seaside hamlet of Langstrand and set about weaving their African dream. The image offered to the public was that of two Hollywood idols roughing it in the Third World. The reality, not altogether surprisingly, was that the couple had rented the entire local five- star hotel…

    But we’re racing ahead of ourselves, because the big birth had a really packed undercard. In the weeks leading up to it, Angelina’s bodyguard was charged with assaulting a restaurant owner. This charmer was in charge of a huge armed security detail that cordoned off roads, used pepper spray, chased away locals and generally disported themselves as renegade law enforcers.

    As the pageant unfolded, the local governor’s declaration that “We don’t want them to be harassed” was superseded by strong- arm tactics. Government-backed security teams conducted house- to-house searches of Langstrand, apparently on the suspicion that locals could be shielding members of the world’s media.

    Although it’s difficult to cite the point at which the situation tipped over into dark farce, you’d probably locate it around the moment when the Namibian government began enforcing a no-fly zone over the stretch of coast on which the couple’s hotel lay. Congratulations, Namibia. You have ceded control of your airspace to the star of Tomb Raider…

    “Never in my life have I seen two individuals exercise so much power here,” was the furious verdict of Phil ya Nangoloh, executive director of the National Society for Human Rights, Namibia’s foremost human rights organisation. “They effectively captured the state.”

    It got worse. Half- way through their stay, Leon Jooste, Namibia’s tourism minister, weighed in. “[Brad and Angelina] never asked for anything,” he explained. “They simply said to me, ‘Listen, things are getting a bit out of hand.’ So I spoke to a bunch of people within government. For a small country like ours, with a small economy and a growing tourism industry, this is of major marketing value for us.”…

    The Namibian president wrote Angelina a thank-you letter before her departure. “For the first time ever,” gushed Sam Nujoma, “our entire nation can agree on something — how wonderful it is that you chose Namibia for your special day. You didn’t just birth a child but a new era for our new country. If we are the UN’s baby then you, as one of its greatest supporters, are among its founding mothers.”…

    As Nangoloh put it: “We have around 150000 orphans in this country and a lot of crime. I want to know how much money was wasted protecting two actors.” He demanded an inquiry but was denied it. So next time Angelina flaunts her “Know your rights” tattoo, remember this: you have the right to completely ignore her.

    — © Marina Hyde 2009. Extracted from Celebrity: How Entertainers Took Over the World and Why We Need an Exit Strategy. Published by Harvill Secker in May, R225

    http://www.thetimes.co.za/PrintEdition/Lifestyle/Article.aspx?id=980238

    Reply
  377. p said on April 19th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    THIS JUST IN!!!
    A growing number will come forward and testify on Keane’s behalf if necessary. Bingo… who was given his walking papers last week (at first he leaped with joy bc he loves to walk, until the finer points were explained to him), is past his whimpering, hurt stage, and moved into outrage… has contacted his attorney. There were also corroborating witnesses on set who will give testimony. By all accounts save one — and we ALL know which one that is — he was exemplary; he hit all his marks, and conveyed just the right amount of immediacy and pathos required for each scene… it was just that one. This could be a career wrecker if the blighted hound does not restore his good name. The bench is not expected take his remarks lightly.

    How the fuck do you piss-off a Golden Retriever? Add another one to the growing list of Jolie’s remarkable achievemants.

    The weight of evidence is mounting! developing….

    Reply
  378. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    @Keane:
    well I will go on record saying I completely believe the dog story LOL

    Reply
  379. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    @ Kate and p – I am currently talking to members of the pittbull family, descendants of Angie’s pet rat and other deceased animals who have been in her care for corroboratory evidence to Bingo’s testimony. Developing….

    Reply
  380. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @Keane:
    I told you guys do not use a real email account on any message board—– ever. go to yahoo or hotmail or gmail and register with a alias and fake address and if you really want to be completely untraceae purchase a good proxy for your computer and then no one can track you at all. A IP is of no use without a real name to match it to so you can not be sued if no one can find you. If you are using your legal name then make sure you make it clear it is your opinion only and not a fact.

    Reply
  381. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    @ Kate – yeah I have to say that in all my time commenting on gossip blogs it never occurred to me that anything I said would be enough of a problem for anyone to hack into my account. They then posted a comment using my full real (and unusual) name which is a crime is it not? Why would someone do that I wonder?

    Reply
  382. p said on April 19th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    @Kate: . I have only one addy w my real name and never use it on sites like this, a Yahoo site is ok isn’t it, or should one just use atotally fake addy full stop?
    @Keane: . Keane I didn’t realize they commented w your full name, I’d say you gotta case.

    [There are several felonies which have been added to the Federal Code in the last few years relating to hacking of various kinds. Pretty much any attempt to illicitly use a computer, especially breaking in using passwords you're not entitled to know, is now a serious crime. People have gotten multiple year sentences for it.
    posted by Steven C. Den Beste at 7:09 PM on April 6, 2006]
    http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:SU40Gk9fGWAJ:ask.metafilter.com/35875/hacking-someones-email-Uncool-or-illegal+hacking+email+felony&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

    Reply
  383. Patty anne said on April 19th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @Different Guest: To totally agree with you about the manner of stance of Jolie while supposedly pregnant with twins. Compare her posture with that of Holly standing next to her and the diference is instantly noticable….the sheer weight of twins protruding forward forces a pregnant woman to lean backward for balance, BUT, not as far backward as Jolie was leaning during the interview in which Jack Black “let slip” the twin news….it was definately a fake pregnancy…..

    Reply
  384. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    @ p – yes I am currently talking to the police about it. They certainly hacked into my e-mail account because the password was changed and I had to reset it. I don’t think they had access to it for very long though but I’m sure it was long enough to get plenty of my personal info, especially as my CV was right at the top of my inbox. They know at least my full name but this could have been gleaned from just looking at my IP address, so I’m not sure what they know. But they certainly posted under my name which I am talking to the police and lawyers about at the moment. And I have now changed to a dummy e-mail account, bit late now though!

    @ Patty Anne – that’s bizarre though isn’t it? Why would anyone do that? For the publicity, for the money? Because they wanted more children but didn’t want to admit they were using a surrogate? I can see someone wanting to keep that private and that is what I suspected was the case with Nicole Kidman, but she did not sell the pictures for cash. I find it mind-boggling. Is this what we’re guessing the cover up that Ian is going to reveal nect week was about?

    Reply
  385. p said on April 19th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @Keane: .Wow how mind-bogglingly stoopid on their part …and how creepy for you. Whoever it is, is defo twisted and on a mission…power?..self protection? The amount of effort and persistent presence on the site is telling. Keep us abreast of developments.

    Reply
  386. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    @ p – yeah but it just confirms that Ian is right on target huh? When the only thing you can think of to do is hack into the e-mail account of the owner, and then the e-mail account of one of the commenters, you’re just giving confirmation that the stories are true. No legal action, no rebuttals, no laughing at the ravings of a supposed mad man, just death threats and hacking into e-mail accounts? Its just confirmed the veracity of everything Ian has said to me. Very silly move IMO.

    Reply
  387. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    @p:
    Use a totally fake name , that way if you slip up and say anything you could be sued for they can not find you. The blog owner will not have any real info on you.

    Reply
  388. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    @Keane:
    Does not surprise me though because you stated on here that you were using your real email account when we talked about this before when I mentioned no one uses a real email so they knew mine is fake lol. You were instantly a target. There is nothing in mine at all because I made it up, anything that comes into is just spam.

    Reply
  389. p said on April 19th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @Kate: . Well they could read correpondance tho and that might provide details. Altho I don’t use this account for anything that reveals my name, occupation, haunts, etc…

    Reply
  390. p said on April 19th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    @Keane: . Well the rebuttals, and laughing at the ravings didn’t work. Whoever this is, is impulsive and CRIMINAL that’s for sure! No question.

    How is Ian btw?

    Reply
  391. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    @ Kate – yes I never really thought that anyone would care enough about what a commenter on a random blog would say to be motivated to do that. Ian’s work will go on even if I am not commenting on here. Why should it make such a difference what I say or think, there are hundreds if not thousands of people who read here now. All that I have said is that I believe what Ian is saying for all the reasons we’ve been into a thousand times. If they can’t stop Ian, what point would they have with trying to stop me commenting here? And the method, just posting a silly comment under my name, what is that supposed to achieve?

    Reply
  392. p said on April 19th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @Keane: . Besides what Kate mentioned, in a sense you gave her what she wanted, what all trolls — famous or not — want…ATTENTION. This is obviously a destructive person, who forms destructive relationships — obvious in the way she found others to participate. To HER way of thinking, thru your extensive replies, she’d made real contact. She formed a relationship with you… it got antagonistic fast, so she tried to do what she knows how to do… squash you. She’s just too impulsive to do it effectively.

    Reply
  393. too curious said on April 19th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @Keane: I think the purpose of posting under your real name was an attempt to intimidate you i.e. “we know who you are and where you live” kind of thing. JMO, though!!!!! [<-----blatant CYA]

    Reply
  394. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    Hey Keane, they are just playing their silly games, that is why I try to ignore them. Maybe we are reaching too far on this deception? Do you think Ian could get proof if one twin was not Brad’s , I could certainly see that making him mad enough to get someone else pregnant. If this Sudanese girl pregnant his twins were only about 6 months old when this went down. Ian said he is making up for lost time lol but he can not raise these kids alone and that suggest almost that they planned the Sudanese baby together as a bookend to Zahara and now the girl is backing out of the deal, doesn’t it?

    Reply
  395. Mary said on April 19th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    I’ve just stumbled across this site, and I find it so refreshing to find mature, intelligent posters and thsoe who aren’t just blindly adoring of Brangelina and their PR. I don’t know what to believe of all the accusations that are being tossed around, but I definitely believe that where there’s smoke, there’s fire…so at a minimum, the pair are on their way to a public split sooner rather than later.

    While I’m no fan of either, and welcome their demise if only so that JA can have the last laugh, I definitely do not want to see her back with that douche BP. I posed the next information and questions on a JA thread on this site, but since it was not current, I got no response to my inqueries. I’m reposting here to see if any of you have any thoughts:

    I’ve seen it mentioned/speculated around here that JA might have had/has fertility issues, and I was wondering if there was ever any confirmation of this. I seem to recall a NE story regarding a supposed miscarriage she had while with Brad (around summer 2004), and have also heard speculation that she miscarried earlier in their marriage (2001). I wonder if there has ever been anything to support the idea that she and Brad had been successful conceiving at least once? If so, I find his whole treatment of her and the PR she has received since the divorce all the more hurtful, and unforgivable.

    I remember reading an interview of hers (1997, I think RS) long before she even hooked up with Brad where she stated she loved kids and wanted to be a young mother, not to mention the numerous statements she made once they were together about wanting a family. On Larry King in 2005 when asked whether she would ever consider being a single mother she said, “never say never,” but stated she didn’t think so as having a child was something she wanted to share with someone. I always felt that the truth behind the kids issue with them was that they tried and were not immediately successful, but then she put the brakes on the issue amid concerns BP was being unfaithful with AJ. She herself was a child of a broken home and I wonder if she did not want to bring a child into the picture until she knew where BP’s loyalties stood. We all know how that ended, and somehow she has been turned into the selfish woman who wouldn’t give BP babies as a result. Her reaction to the idea that BP and AJ might be expecting in the VF article was all the confirmation anyone should have needed to show that she had always wanted and expected to have kids with him.

    Likewise, I feel her desire to “share” the parenting gig with someone, is what has kept her from having children since the split with BP. Unfortunately, the fact that she has not gone on to reproduce or adopt has led some to take her statements desiring children as lies, when I think she has merely not found the right opportunity to have a child as yet. I’m not saying JA isn’t smart and savvy and involved in directing and managing her PR, but I do take her for a genuine person for the most part. Nothing she has said on the baby topic has to be a lie or a change of mind if you view her history as I have. Just wondering if anyone else thinks there is any truth to my thoughts at all. I also just wonder what people’s thoughts are on whether she and BP did indeed have fertility issues during the marriage, because if this was a problem that caused them to drift apart (either partly or completely) and BP’s solution was to take up with AJ and have a tribe, I just cannot fathom why JA would ever be able to look at him with anything but anger and resentment ever again, let alone actually let this guy off the hook publicly or possibly conceive of getting back together with this class A douche.

    Reply
  396. Jade said on April 19th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    Check the Angelina Jolie stories on the examiner…

    Reply
  397. Keane said on April 19th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    @ too curious – yes that was my immediate reaction which is why I instantly informed the police in the light of AJ’s threats to Ian. I want to make sure they have everything on record. I am also keeping friends, including serious journos and lawyers informed. I am seeing my MP about something else this week so may also let him know. Intimidation does not pay. But yes Kate and p I also agree with you too, its also just another silly little game and an attempt to one up me and because I pissed her off by making all her little attempts at being clever look ridiculous. I actually couldn’t care a less if people know my name but I most certainly do care that someone (her) hacked into my e-mail account and read my e-mails, no-one has access to those except me, makes it very personal. There was nothing that exciting in there but there could have been and I would have been even more incandescent with rage than I am anyway if there had been. I hope she takes the hint and stays the fuck away from my private business unless she wants to create a whole lot more trouble for herself. Got that Ange?

    @ Kate – well that would be my interpretation of Ian’s expression too, that he found out that one or more of the kids might not be his so he’s been “making up for lost time” by making some more. I read or heard somewhere about how he wanted to spread his genes around far and wide, have loads and loads of kids, something to do with a fear of dying and not being here any more. I think that could have been why he wanted so many with Jolie. But sounds like he could have been totally screwed on that front so the 45 year old is now going hell for leather in a mid-life crisis mark two way.

    @ mandy – I agree with most of what you said there and yes the thing about not wanting to have kids alone I think makes perfect sense – I don’t want too either. And it is so ridiculous that she has been painted as selfish for not wanting children, having children is a selfish act anyway, who else are you doing it for but yourselves? The spin that Joie has weaved is utter BS and the world is a collective sucker for believing it. And re: whether Jen would take Brad back – if she really couldn’t picture being with anyone else or having children with them then I think it is possible to forgive anything. I actually know exactly how she feels and have myself forgiven some pretty unforgiveable behaviour. Again, in a way its selfish. If the only way to give yourself the life you want is to be with the person who has wronged you then you have to forget your principles and possibly sacrifice your self-respect. None of my friends can understand why I always forgive the person who wrongs me over and over again and am totally unforgiving with others (when they go against my principles). Its because I have no other option really. I have never felt the same way about anyone else and until I do this person is my only option if you see what I mean. Maybe the only option I will ever have. I can totally understand Jen’s position. Love complicates everything.

    Reply
  398. p said on April 19th, 2009 at 6:23 pm

    @Mary: . Nothing on fertility issues here that I know of and since NE ain’t too reliable…eh.. The reason can be anything . Pitt said on record a number of times he was too selfish (w his time presumably), to have kids. Since he hasn’t slowed down his work a mite for the kids, like he said he would, I’m inclined to think he was right about that. By some accounts they were preparing for it back in 2003, but if that’s true, we all know it got derailed. Otherwise having your heart broken in front of the world must have been devastating, and might easily make someonea lot more cautious about life, as well as change, or at least stall their trajectory. Which might help explain why she seems to spend so much time with light weight relationships these days (generall thought of a PR-driven).

    Ian wrote a compelling article about Jolie manipulating the press by leaking bs stories about how Pitt left bc he yearned for children. Nonsense,. You can find it in the February or March archives I believe (Ian did a great 4 part series on them), there are a lot of comments below. But yeah I also remember Aniston was the one who most wanted kids of the two.

    Reply
  399. Astro said on April 19th, 2009 at 7:05 pm

    HaHaHa…AJ threats to IAN…HAHAHAHA!!!!!….My goodness..AJ is an amazing woman. According to everybody She is a multitasking woman. Too busy Mom of six, with tight schedule filming a SALT movie,according to untrust tabloids and US bloggers like IAN, she is in a process of split with the partner of her life BP, with no enough time to devote to him, but she has time to come into this site and threat to IAN….Oh…”I am sorry I am dreaming”.

    Reply
  400. Kate said on April 19th, 2009 at 7:16 pm

    Ian did say an editor of a magazine in NYC told him that Jen can not have kids and I suspect that is what the reference in SR’s skirts post meant. She leaks the miscarriage that she apparently had 2 years into the marriage, but is that true, did she have one, and then could never get pregnant again, or did she leak that to keep people from digging . A woman not being able to have children can be a very painful thing. I suspect Jen shared that off the record with Vanity Fair. If she had a tubal pregnancy and had to have that taken care of that would be the end of that, bless her heart. jmo

    Reply
  401. Astro said on April 19th, 2009 at 7:19 pm

    Emerging again:

    http://womansday.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=802823

    Reply
  402. PAR said on April 19th, 2009 at 7:21 pm

    @Ingbot:
    No opinion on any of this but just wanted to correct this post.
    AJ made around 14 million in 2006 (year your link is from). She gave over 4 million (BR gave the 4 million) to charity which actually is 1/3 of her salary. So she was being honest when she said that. BP however does not give 1/3 of his salary, if he did it would be closer to 11 million.

    Reply
  403. Eye In The Sky said on April 19th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    Don’t think sorrys easily said
    Don’t try turning tables instead
    You’ve taken lots of chances before
    But I ain’t gonna give anymore
    Don’t ask me
    That’s how it goes
    ‘Cause part of me knows what you’re thinkin’

    Don’t say words you’re gonna regret
    Don’t let fire rush to your head
    I’ve heard the accusation before
    And I ain’t gonna take any more
    Believe me
    The sun in your eyes
    Made some of the lies worth believing

    I am the eye in the sky
    Looking at you
    I can read your mind
    I am the maker of rules
    Dealing with fools
    I can cheat you blind
    And I don’t need to see any more
    To know that
    I can read your mind, I can read your mind
    I can read your mind, I can read your mind

    Don’t leave false illusions behind
    Don’t cry cause I ain’t chnaging my mind
    So find another fool like before
    ‘Cause I ain’t gonna live anymore believing
    Some of the lies while all of the signs are deceiving

    I am the eye in the sky
    Looking at you
    I can read your mind
    I am the maker of rules
    Dealing with fools
    I can cheat you blind
    And I don’t need to see any more
    To know that
    I can read your mind, I can read your mind
    I can read your mind, I can read your mind

    I am the eye in the sky
    Looking at you
    I can read your mind
    I am the maker of rules
    Dealing with fools
    I can cheat you blind
    And I don’t need to see any more
    To know that
    I can read your mind, I can read your mind
    I can read your mind, I can read your mind

    Reply
  404. Astro said on April 19th, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    Thanks ….According to my insider: ” Brad was crying and laughing when she told him the good news about the baby. He kissed her a lot.”

    They are excited now.

    Reply
  405. Mary said on April 19th, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    Thanks to those who responded to my questions!

    @Keane
    You make a decent point: we can’t help who we love – crappy treatment and all. Hopefully JA finds someone else to love that completely before BP extricates himself from AJ. I would much rather see her with someone who really deserves her, and then finally getting the family she seems to long for.

    @p
    I agree that she is probably taking a step back these past four years, after being so publicly torn to shreds and humiliated, and I definitely recall BP making numerous statements regarding not being ready for kids while they were married. It seemed he only changed his tune on that after it had been speculated he got together with AJ in early 2004, so I have to wonder whether he was part of the great PR move to paint JA as selfish and career-driven, and himself as the poor husband whose wife won’t provide him a child. Even if AJ was the one to kick off that press angle, he should have done more to quelch it, rather than using it to his image advantage.

    @Kate
    That’s interesting re the idea that she can’t have kids at all. Not sure I fully buy that though, based on the comments of JA herself. She said in either GQ or People in December (regarding the constant rumours surrounding her being pregnant), that all the rumours are stealing her thunder from when she will actually be able to say she’s pregnant. If I was unable to have a baby, I definitely wouldn’t make statements like that; that is, ones that suggest I could get pregnant. Statements that comment on her desire to be a mom or being on the verge of that, etc. still make sense if she can’t have kids (she can always adopt). But, drawing more attention to the idea of getting pregnant if I couldn’t…I think that would be almost masochistic. I’m sure it could be argued that it is simply a PR savvy move for her to keep the pregnancy interest going, but I’m not sure anyone would be able to do that at that expense, least of all JA. I did feel like her intense reaction in the VF interview to the baby questions surrounding AJ seemed to suggest a hurt more than just that she had been robbed of the opportunity to have kids with BP now that he left her.

    Reply
  406. p said on April 20th, 2009 at 4:07 am

    @Mary: . [Even if AJ was the one to kick off that press angle, he should have done more to quelch it, rather than using it to his image advantage] BINGO! Nail, head. Even I thought simply saying “Ridiculous.” wasn’t enough considering how rampant the rumors of “she-didn’t-want-children” theory were. But he’d hooked up w a younger, super-hot babe, and he needed to hide behind an excuse, other than he wanted a younger super-hot babe…kids made a perfect shield, to deflect that accusation — that’s my take anyway. Funny before the recent flurry of award ceremonies, the two were still very cautious not to show any overt, public displays of affection…just as the whole thing started to unravel. I hope you enjoyed Ian’s articles…makes a lot of sense, I didn’t realize it was a concerted effort on Jolie’s part. But I agree had he wanted to badly enough, he would have crushed the rumors, or at least a bigger effort.

    Reply
  407. Keane said on April 20th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    @ Astro – no dear, that is the BS that she puts out. She is not a “too busy mom of 6″ at all, she has at least one nanny per child to look after them, PAs, security people, drivers, housekeepers, chefs, lawyers, PRs, her faithful brother, the works. She has plenty of people to do all her work for her. And while she may be on set for a long time each day, that does not mean she’s actually working for that length of time. Anyone who has ever worked on a film set of any kind would know that. Actors might do half an hour or one hour’s work per day while the rest of their time is spent trying to kill time while the crew film everything else they need to shoot, wait for the right light conditions, organise extras and so forth. Actors have stand-ins so they never have to be present for anything they aren’t actually on screen for. And sometimes they have body doubles for on camera stuff too. She has more than enough time and help to do a great many things. Get a clue.

    @ Eye in the Sky – I assume your little poem is directed at me. Unfortunately the tables have been turned on you as you are the one who has committed the crime against me, not the other way around. Hopefully with the help of my internet provider the police will be able to track you down and prosecute you. I have merely given my opinion on Ian’s stories and what SR could be referring to, its purely speculative and I have no evidence on which to base it other than that what has been said here or on other news outlets. Yes dear, and I really think you are the “eye in the sky” who can “read my mind” LMAO. You’re just a crackpot actress with mental problems and entitlement issues who can’t handle the monster you’ve created. Get over yourself.

    Reply
  408. OMG said on April 20th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    Hey Keane – Your obsessive rants seem to take place on a specific timeline every day. You seem to start posting around 0800 CST and end around 1800 CST. If you are in UK it appears that you do nothing but spew insanity on the internet from 2 or 3 your time to midnight or so. What kind of job do you have? I’m betting that you are some low level government clerk with no life – get one.

    Reply
  409. Keane said on April 20th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    @ OMG – yeah I’m not playing any more Ange. I’ve said many times what line of work I’m in. But if you would like to think I am a “low level government clerk with no life” that’s absolutely fine with me. And if you are in the habit of advising people to “get a life”, I would suggest you consider how great your life is when you have actually taken the time to figure out what times of the day a random poster on the internet comments on this blog. You would be the definition of “sad” only we both know what your vested interest is. I’m not interested in debating with you further. I am only interested in the police investigation now.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2009
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Meta