Sugar Ray Ramone Catone (The Bronx Bi-Blogger) – Hollywood’s Great Deception, BRANGIE

Posted on April 16th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

The world’s top discussion…critics carping…no oppressed truth seeker here…Brangie has pulled the wool over everyone…innovation is disemvoweling…Angie uses Ian to filter posts…he should outright ban them…unknown gyres…unleashed energies with anarchic twists…no successful joke…Angie sex tape will emerge…thanks to market forces…like pebbles in a bag…year of plenty development card…unlucky 7…no preggo…reemphasizing an old rule…go-to game…fix the grid…Sudanese supper…Sudanese lunch…Sudanese breakfast…another coal-fire…inexpensive and abundant…a smarter grid…utter chaos…Keane is dead on…So is Kate…solution won’t spring forth…until Angie comes clean…no more baby powder…or white crystals…enterprise is unique but redundant…Scores and guillotines…individual neurons…terabyte per day…Angie neurons…spread out like peanut butter…fear and anxiety…hoping she won’t get caught…millions of brain slices per day…unique barcodes…bunnies and brats…Richard Gere on the phone…so was former President Clinton…so was Madonna…an animal that at first appears normal…divided into microscopic cubes…crinkling around…patch drops down from her lower lip like an exclamation mark…velvet-lined boxes…visible from the highway…incriminating evidence…The biggest Hollywood deception since Rock Hudson and Doris Day…she’s a rich girl…and she’s gone too far…cause she know it don’t matter anyway…she can rely on the old mans money…she can rely on the old mans money…its a bitch girl…but its gone too far cause she know it don’t matter anyway…estoy cansado…buena suerte…te toca a ti…callate….

                                                    Te Amo, SRRC

*****UPDATE*****  Angie offers Brad $90 million for kids (READ THIS)

****UPDATE****Ian snags interview with Pitt/Jolie closest friend – explosive stuff!  Stay tuned!

****UPDATE**** Threats made against Ian.  Action will be taken ASAP.

****UPDATE**** Ian has hired a full time bodyguard and will lay low for the next few days.  Ms. Ninecent has taken over as interim editor.

****MAJOR BREAKING UPDATE**** Angelina not Preggie!!!! IUC has confirmed it.

  1. mandy said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:23 am

    OMG! did SR just quote Hall & Oates? Seriously, every time I hear that song I think of Angie. Wow. TMI. Don’t even know what to make of it all. Sounds like Angie is in big trouble and this whole thing was a sham.

    Reply
  2. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:28 am

    Okay Keane and Kate – you’re on! Going to the gym and coming home to read how you’ve unravelled this one! Can’t wait!

    Reply
  3. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:28 am

    A sex tape, hmmmm? Interesting…

    Reply
  4. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:30 am

    @Tamara:
    Ditto for me!! I’m on the way to working out, too!!! Can’t wait to see what Kate and Keane have to offer!!!

    Reply
  5. Mama San said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:32 am

    @Tamara:
    Me too, Tam ,I got to go to work, but if I read this correctly, there is a sex tape of Ms. Ange…..oh no!
    Keanne, Kate, can’t wait for you two’s interpetation. Thanks Sugar, for the update, ow! this is gonna hurt someone. I’m taking a stab that the white crystals SR’s referring to is about her meth habit.

    Reply
  6. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:35 am

    Angie sex tape will emerge…Sounds interesting.

    Keane and Kate, cannot wait to see your comments!

    Reply
  7. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:36 am

    Gyres – circular or spiral form vortex – are they coming full circle??
    Terabyte – hard drive information – Angie spending lots of time reading these comments??

    Reply
  8. Susanna said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:37 am

    Brad and Angie have fooled everyone – is their relationship fake at this point, or is this referring to their PR moves that have taken them from reviled cheaters to “saint like” humanitarian parents?

    Angie filters Ian’s posts = is Angie supplying tips and stories to Ian? Or is she just posting here?

    She is definitely not pregnant, and Keane, Kate and others are right on that she is just putting the story out there to cover up the truth about the split and custody fight. It’s her old go-to fixer, to get pregnant to avoid negative publicity, but this time it won’t work. Angie is afraid she will get caught – seems like there are drug references in there – is she afraid her drug habit will be discovered? Or that the real truth about Brangie will come out?

    Richard Gere, Bill Clinton and Madonna on the phone – with who? Brangie? Or Ian? Or does that mean Angie has had sexual relations with all three of them?

    Reply
  9. jeannie said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:41 am

    So the whole Brange thing was a fraud? Unless the sex tape was with her brother–there’s nothing that would shock me about her. And people make sex tapes on purpose not on accident. I still think that she can buy her way out of any scandal. I’m interested to see what Pitt is going to do for promoting Inglourious Basterds. Will he try to parade her and the kids around for publicity or just say screw it? I hope the latter. Have you ever noticed that there are some celebrity kids that you never see and others that are just so shoved in our faces that we knew what they looked like at every stage of development? I don’t worship any celebrity. I admire the talents of some and would love to bone some of the guys but then again maybe not….

    Reply
  10. Mama San said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:47 am

    @jeannie:
    I’m with you on this one, unless it is a tape of her and the family pooch and or brother, I don’t think the sex tape will the same, DAMN , OMG, holy sh*t, R U KIDDING ME factor. I would expect a tape of mutiple lovers, both men and women. Believe you me, I wouldn’t want to see it, the thought of the possibilties are making me sick, and I haeven’t even had my first cup of joe yet.
    I’m going out on this one, the alleged abortion rumor , was a product of her and James, JMO.

    Reply
  11. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:48 am

    estoy cansado = I’m tired
    buena suerte = good luck
    te toca a ti = it’s your turn
    callate = shut up

    Reply
  12. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:56 am

    Ok.. I want to know what former President Clinton has to do with this? I wonder if that is what “A lot of people are going to end up getting hurt” means. There’s something illegal here that is going to be exposed? Besides, the drug abuse, bestiality and incest of course. Jesus, Ian.. you must be scared to death. I can only imagine the threats you are getting.

    Reply
  13. Susanna said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    Some incriminating evidence is going to come out, perhaps the Angie sex tape? Then the fraud will be exposed. Perhaps it is a tape showing threesomes with AJ and BP, otherwise they couls just claim it was filmed before they got together. Or perhaps one of the “stars” of the tape is going to speak out publicly. Market forces will allow it to surface – meaning, there is such a high demand and outlets would pay top dollar for it – it’s too big for Brangie to keep under wraps. 2009 is going to be a big year for new developments with BP and AJ.

    The references to Sudanese breakfast, lunch and suppers…something about BP’s Sudanese lady? Is this a verification that the Sudanese woman really is pregnant?

    As for “Rich Girl” by Hall & Oates, Wikipedia has this to say:

    Rich Girl” is a song by Daryl Hall and John Oates. On March 26th, 1977, it became their first (of six) number one singles on Billboard’s Hot 100 chart. The single originally appeared on the 1976 album Bigger Than Both of Us.

    The song’s lyrics are about a spoiled girl who can rely on her parents’ money to do whatever she wants. The song was rumored to be about the then-scandalous newspaper heiress Patty Hearst. In fact, the title character in the song is based on a spoiled heir to a fast-food chain who was an ex-boyfriend of Daryl Hall’s girlfriend, Sara Allen. “But you can’t write, ‘You’re a rich boy’ in a song, so I changed it to a girl,” Hall told Rolling Stone.

    Several years later, Hall read an interview with David Berkowitz, the Son of Sam killer, in which Berkowitz claimed that “Rich Girl” had motivated him to murder (though interestingly, the song was not released until after the Son of Sam murders had already begun, casting doubts on that suggestion).

    So, the reference to that song means that Angie really thinks she can do whatever she wants to and will get away with it, because she’ll buy everyone off so that no one will print a negative story of her.

    Reply
  14. knowone said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:17 am

    Oh Sugar, that’s a good one. Bring on the free market economy and expose that sex tape and lets see her fall hard. I’m no good at interpreting these, but I like the overall gist. Looking to forward to reading all the posts tonight. Thanks SRR!

    Reply
  15. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    Thank you for the update!

    My guess:

    They fooled the world with their fake happy family and humanitarian image, have managed to prevent negative reports in the mass media. Nothing new here.

    A sex tape with Angie (and one of the celebrities mentioned, or with the dog or her brother) has been sold for a substantial amount and will be published or used as evidence in a law suit.

    Angelina is definitely not pregnant. She planted the rumour to get some sympathy.

    There are at least two Sudanese women involved. Were they paid off?

    no more white crystals? Crystal meth indeed, not meth (liquid)?

    Angelina is going nuts.

    There is incriminating evidence regarding what? Drug abuse, drug trafficking?

    The old man’s money? Her father or ..?

    Reply
  16. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:25 am

    I’d really like to know what kinds of privileges or protection AJ is give because of her UN position, if any?

    Reply
  17. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:31 am

    Was a dog used to smuggle drugs? I know…way out there, but who know?

    Reply
  18. KatB said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:35 am

    Velvet lined boxes visible from the highway…….is SR talking about an asylum, a brothel or a graveyard???????

    Reply
  19. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:39 am

    Rely on the old man’s money: This may mean she has an extremely rich and influential lover/friend, and thus a card blanche.

    Reply
  20. jeannie said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:42 am

    I think she fucked Clinton–like many other celebrity women. I hope that she is at least able to pretend to be sane around the children. Otherwise she should lose custody and would in California based on the meth addiction alone but who knows where they’re off to in the world next….CPS will never be able to catch them.

    Reply
  21. Gitano said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:43 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Thanks for the tanslation. Interesting. Some one here is being told to shut up (callate). An insider. “Keane is dead on” “So is Kate” This is probably misdirection, unless they are insiders, in which case “dead on” could be taken as a threat.

    Reply
  22. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:46 am

    She had her own drug business on the side???

    Reply
  23. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:49 am

    @ jeannie – has Clinton fucked a lot of famous women, I did not know that. Not that it would come as a great surprise. I’m busy for most of today guys and some of tomorrow but will put my mind to it when I can x

    Reply
  24. too curious said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:03 am

    @Gitano:

    Keane and Kate are regular posters and SR seems to be saying that their “translations” of his last message were on target. : )

    Reply
  25. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:06 am

    @Tamara:
    Or maybe running the rumors around in circles?

    Reply
  26. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:12 am

    @ too curious – could refer to a lot of what we’ve said though, I wonder if SR is talking about my take on the fake pregnancy story or my interpretation of one or all of SR’s previous posts, and there have been plenty of them! Hard to know exactly what he’s referring to…. maybe everything?

    Reply
  27. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:16 am

    I was wondering if visible from the highway had anything to do with the Limo Driver?

    Reply
  28. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:17 am

    @Keane:

    Keane, apparently Bill Clinton has the get up and go of a man far younger than his years. The man barely sleeps especially when he’s on the go doing appearances and things like that. The man gets paid HUGE amounts of money for appearances, he’s incredibly wealthy.
    My husband has been involved in security detail when Clinton is in town, and the man’s schedule is unbelievable. We’re talking like MAYBE 5 hour turnaround from taking him to where he will stay the night to picking him up the next morning to start all over again.
    It wouldn’t be surprising if he was boinking this sex-fiend Scrangie. He certainly has the energy for it.

    Reply
  29. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    @Keane:I know! When I read that I was like oh no, which comment is he referring to that is right on??? All of them? I dont want to have to go back and read them all again!!
    Re Angie filters – okay so who is it? Clea whatever or nephillygirl?

    Reply
  30. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:22 am

    The world’s top discussion…critics carping…no oppressed truth seeker here = This is the top story all over the world and critics come here to discredit. But Ian is not holding back.

    Brangie has pulled the wool over everyone… = They have lied to us. They’re not what they seem.

    innovation is disemvoweling…Angie uses Ian to filter posts…he should outright ban them = new things/theories are being discredited by Angie at this website. She or others from her camp post here.

    unknown gyres…unleashed energies with anarchic twists…no successful joke = Going around in circles. Not caring if it’s against the rules. Taking us in circles as a joke, but we don’t give up. Not sure about that one.

    Angie sex tape will emerge…thanks to market forces…like pebbles in a bag = Lots of money to be made with this sex tape.

    year of plenty development card = A lot will come to light this year. A lot of revelations about the power couple.

    unlucky 7…no preggo…reemphasizing an old rule…go-to game…fix the grid = Not pregnant with baby #7. It’s the trick they always go to to make us believe they’re solid. Fixing their base, infrastructure.

    Sudanese supper…Sudanese lunch…Sudanese breakfast = BP is spending much time with this mystery Sudanese woman. He’s with her for days at a time.

    another coal-fire…inexpensive and abundant…a smarter grid = This may have something to do with the Sudanese woman or BP’s PR is smarter.

    utter chaos…Keane is dead on…So is Kate = Our fellow posters have come up with very revealing theories. Their speculations have created chaos for Brange.

    solution won’t spring forth…until Angie comes clean = Until she comes right out and confesses her lies, Ian won’t back down.

    no more baby powder…or white crystals = No more kids or meth

    enterprise is unique but redundant = Their way of doing things (making profit) is unique, but the same over and over again. Profit for baby pics, etc.

    Scores and guillotines = They’re keeping score and want to people’s heads for the stuff that’s coming out. Trying to figure out who sources are.

    individual neurons…terabyte per day…Angie neurons…spread out like peanut butter = Not sure about this one. Possibly that they’re trying to keep up with their lies to get stories straight. Terabyte = one trillion bytes.

    fear and anxiety…hoping she won’t get caught = She’s done something worse than what we already know.

    millions of brain slices per day…unique barcodes = ?

    bunnies and brats = Hookers and kids

    Richard Gere on the phone…so was former President Clinton…so was Madonna = Possibly seeking help from their connections.

    an animal that at first appears normal…divided into microscopic cubes = The animal is Brangie and they’re being ripped to shreds to expose their not so normal way.

    crinkling around…patch drops down from her lower lip like an exclamation mark = ?

    velvet-lined boxes…visible from the highway…incriminating evidence = Jewelry box, coffin, limo. Something illegal. BTW, you can see the UN building in NY from the highway (FDR Drive).

    The biggest Hollywood deception since Rock Hudson and Doris Day = Rock Hudson was gay. Huge scandal.

    she’s a rich girl…and she’s gone too far…cause she know it don’t matter anyway…she can rely on the old mans money…she can rely on the old mans money…its a bitch girl…but its gone too far cause she know it don’t matter anyway…estoy cansado…buena suerte…te toca a ti…callate….

    Reply
  31. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:22 am

    Why is Clinton involved in this mess? Is he involved or does she want him to help her out of her mess? Will she ruin his reputation? Well, if you know about him…and I am not talking about women…

    Reply
  32. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:30 am

    Interesting blurb in mahalo.com:
    Angelina Jolie Hillary Clinton
    According to a study by the New England Historic Genealogical Society, actress Angelina Jolie and Democratic Presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton are distant cousins. The Associated Press reports that “Clinton and Jolie are ninth cousins, twice removed, both related to Jean Cusson who died in St. Sulpice, Quebec, in 1718.” Clinton is not only related to Jolie but also singers Madonna, Celine Dion, and Alanis Morissette.

    Reply
  33. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:30 am

    “reemphasizing an old rule…go-to game…fix the grid”

    I think refers to an ancient board game from the far east in which two people fight for control of a board game using pebbles or stones. It is known for being rich in it strategic complexity despite its simple rules. This description may help elucidate what SR is alluding to here:

    “Placing stones close together helps them support each other and avoid capture. On the other hand, placing stones far apart creates influence across more of the board. Part of the strategic difficulty of the game stems from finding a balance between such conflicting interests. Players strive to serve both defensive and offensive purposes and choose between tactical urgency and strategic plans.”

    So this is about Ange’s PR strategy, she is trying to fix the grid and ensure she wins by releasing the story about the pregnancy etc. Its a strategy that has some long-term plans but may have to be altered to respond to urgent attacks/circumstances. Its a stratgey that is about attack but also about defence. I think then that SR is saying I’m dead on about her PR strategy, she knows she is going to be thrown to the wolves when they split so she is either trying to force him to stay by making him look bad for leaving a pregnant woman, or he is on board too and will group together with her when necessary to defend them both from current attacks (the stories from Ian’s sources). But their is a long-term strategy that she is trying to implement which involves separating from him and maybe grouping together with another pebble i.e. another man.

    “Sudanese supper…Sudanese lunch…Sudanese breakfast…another coal-fire…inexpensive and abundant…a smarter grid…utter chaos”

    Does this imply that Brad has made a simpler, more straighforward and honest plan. Less strategy and hoking up with different women to save his skin, further his career, just a straighforward menu of this Sudanese lady for breakfast, lunch and dinner. SR thinks this is a smarter way to play the game, keep it simple. (The game is reknowned for the complex strategies it uses but its rules are very simple, Brad is going with simple). But when you add his gameplan (grid), together with Ange’s gameplan you get, and we are getting in the media, utter chaos. Which is why no-one has a clue what is going on, his PR is saying one thing, hers something completely contradictory. None of it matches up, but Brad’s simple plan of “good daddy PR” and a new love is the better one according to SR. That’s my interpretation of that bit anyway.

    Reply
  34. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:32 am

    September 2007 – Jolie joins Bill Clinton in New York for the Global Initiative to educate third world children
    March 2008 – Clinton joins a pregnant Jolie and Pitt in New Orleans to partner BPs charity for Katrina victims

    Reply
  35. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:34 am

    @Keane:Once again WOW good investigating!!!

    Reply
  36. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    I was thinking Sudanese for breakfast lunch and dinner meant he was spending all his time with her and making her his priority now

    Reply
  37. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:47 am

    @ Tamara- yeah I didn’t think that was too bad myself considering I only had 2 hours sleep last night! But the clue of “Keane is dead on” really helped, she’s referring to what I was talking about yesterday re: their PR game plan. Made it a lot easier to interpret.

    Reply
  38. sinker said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:49 am

    old man’s money — could it be referring to Trevor Neilson? (Aj’s advisor, head of global business coalition, board of saflink)

    Reply
  39. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:54 am

    @ Angie’s Fax Machine -that sounds very plausible,good work my friend

    Reply
  40. Z said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:55 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    Or “unlucky 7″ is that the baby isn’t Brad’s and it is going to put AJ in the shitter. Sugar Ray (I think) brought up 7 a week or so ago and we were thinking it was the movie BP was in…maybe it was the baby. If AJ is pregnant, it is a miracle…how someone that anorexic could get pregnant is beyond me. Really, woman lose their periods at that point….and if it’s hormones that why another father?

    So maybe she isn’t pregnant.

    Reply
  41. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Go to game could be Monopoly – Go Straight to Jail. They may be involved in something illegal like the adoptions or the IRS

    Reply
  42. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:58 am

    @Z:Sugar said No Preggo, which makes Keane correct on their PR game plan

    Reply
  43. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    @ Keane -again good work,btw do you think clinton would find her a way out of this mess,is he still powerful in US,i so want to see this crazy manipulating bitch and her dumbass side-kick get what is coming to them – SR and HH i don’t know what pressures your facing right now but please carry on the fight in the face of adversity!!

    Reply
  44. ascar said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    do you not think if brad is going right to another woman (who he is in love with and/or having a baby with)that the public will tolerate that (he has little children), i think that his career will be over etc

    Reply
  45. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    millions of brain slices per day…unique barcodes. Barcodes sort out information imprint in them. Angie’s has a unique configuration…as in, fragmented, confused, the coding is not what it should be?

    Reply
  46. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    The world’s top discussion… They are the world’s most famous couple, for sure so everybody is going to have interest
    critics carping…their detractors are trying to expose them, it is becoming more and more that people are tired of their sham
    no oppressed truth seeker here…Ian and SR are not bowing to any pressure to stop exposing them in any way they can
    Brangie has pulled the wool over everyone…This may have been a calculated pairing from jump street, a hugely successful power play to catapult them into unearthly standing. At least it worked at first.
    innovation is disemvoweling…Could this be a type-o? I would think not, but that’s not a real word. Is it a made up word to mean something if you look at it literally- like something to do with information being spilled out via blogging? Just literally like letters that make up words, meaning written info? (baffled here)
    Angie uses Ian to filter posts…Could she be a “source” giving him bogus info?
    he should outright ban them…whatever name she is posting under, should be banned? (does he know when it is her posting, if so???)
    unknown gyres…Ian’s being led in circles unwittingly
    unleashed energies with anarchic twists…her efforts are to destroy Ian’s credibility
    no successful joke…She hasn’t succeeded yet, shit’s catching up to her
    Angie sex tape will emerge…Can’t wait for this to happen, she’s a dumbass!
    thanks to market forces…She’s the most popular/lusted after woman in the world thanks to her greed to be so and there’s GOT to be a huge market to see her gettin’ down for real,not just movie nookie
    like pebbles in a bag…I can’t piece this at all
    year of plenty development card…This year will see the unveiling of the shenanigans (probably no where near all there is to be known, sadly)
    unlucky 7…this time pregnancy farce won’t be able to help with the charade
    no preggo…this ’splains itself
    reemphasizing an old rule…still doesn’t stop her from shamelessly lying to manipulate the public’s sympathy
    go-to game…this is her m.o. to manipulate people
    fix the grid…restructure the farce to dampen the blow of things that are probably going to make them look really bad
    Sudanese supper…Sudanese lunch…Sudanese breakfast…ArmPitt’s spending lots of time with this Sudanese lady
    another coal-fire…maybe heroin or meth “fire” substance use- what ever drug she’s using she is smoking?
    inexpensive and abundant…cheap and easy is the drug she is smoking?
    a smarter grid…trying to restructure farce of relationship to lesson validity of rumors, give reasonable explanations that could debunk whisperings?
    utter chaos…something is on the verge of leaking, or maybe someone’s behavior is very sketchy and likely to blow the cover on their farce? Maybe Scrangie is getting so loaded she won’t be able to keep her composure if she keeps on this way?
    Keane is dead on…So is Kate…Now we need to read about a million posts and try to figure out what they could be dead on about!
    solution won’t spring forth…Brangie doesn’t have a chance in hell of keeping some damaging things from coming to light
    until Angie comes clean…until she stops lying about being pregnant and doing drugs
    no more baby powder…too skinny/drugged out for baby-making
    or white crystals…no more drugs
    enterprise is unique but redundant…adopting/saving the world and helpless people and popping out kid after kid is unique but losing it’s “wow” factor
    Scores and guillotines…she’s cutting lines? coke?
    individual neurons…frying her brain with drugs?
    terabyte per day…LOTS of drugs?
    Angie neurons…this is your brain on drugs??? (this whole neuron thing has me baffled)
    spread out like peanut butter…she’s getting scatter brained and not thinking so clearly?
    fear and anxiety…don’t druggies get paranoid, right? And liars, who have things to hide.
    hoping she won’t get caught…ABOUT WHAT?! Dying to know all of these things she is scared of getting caught!
    millions of brain slices per day…I got nuthin’
    unique barcodes…still got nuthin’
    bunnies and brats…female side dishes and children to fuel her selfish wants (NOT implying pedo, just collecting of children)
    Richard Gere on the phone…she seeking advice on how to quash gay rumors?
    so was former President Clinton…her power hook up? supposedly the guy IS charismatic as hell, so he would be someone she might want to do the dirty with, I mean he WAS prez after all. That’s pretty sexy for a status seeking leech like her.
    so was Madonna…having some “elite” sex hookups?
    an animal that at first appears normal…just a down to earth mom and dad, loving their kids and caring about the world. We’re just regular folks like all of you!
    divided into microscopic cubes…they are now being dissected as skepticism abounds, and people are narrowing their eyes when looking at these two, things are not making sense- big hypocrisy is becoming evident. Their actions don’t match their deeds and people are beginning to look at all the different ways Brangie tries to be perfect.
    crinkling around…these tidings of criticsm
    patch drops down from her lower lip like an exclamation mark…no idea what this could mean
    velvet-lined boxes…don’t know but someone suggested cemetary (coffin perhaps?) or limo or trinket box? Don’t know, borrowed that from another poster
    visible from the highway…something went down in public that has potential witnesses?
    incriminating evidence…if it gets out what happened that was visible from the highway it could be trouble?
    The biggest Hollywood deception since Rock Hudson and Doris Day…the couple is a sham, never really loved each other but what does the world love? A LOVE STORY. With 2 beautiful people!
    she’s a rich girl…and she’s gone too far…cause she know it don’t matter anyway…she can rely on the old mans money…she can rely on the old mans money…its a bitch girl…but its gone too far cause she know it don’t matter anyway…She can get away with anything because she is rich as hell and even if she never worked another day in her life she could live a life of opulence and self indulgence. In the end even if she lost the adoration of the world (which I don’t think SHE thinks is even remotely a possibility, she has so many fantards who think she is a goddess) that she’d still be set and can live as hedonistic a life as she wants.

    Just my break down of SR’s bit.

    Reply
  47. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    @Keane:
    very very interesting, Keane!
    That makes a lot of sense.

    Reply
  48. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    @ Everyone – as for jolie or jolies camp posting on here,check out ‘tinitina’ and ‘truth for a liar’ on Limo Driver Part 11,very suspect,waddya think guys!

    Reply
  49. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    @p:
    Barcodes…could they refer to Angie’s tattoos of the kids’ birth places????

    Reply
  50. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    @CC:
    I could be wrong but I think the tats she has of the kids’ birthplaces are lat/long lines or coordinates?

    Reply
  51. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    @CC: . ah I like that one.

    Reply
  52. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    @McDooks:
    Right, but when you look at them, they give an appearance of barcodes… just a thought…

    Reply
  53. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    @CC:
    From afar, they give that kind of an appearance, is what I meant to say…

    Reply
  54. stinky-inky said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:28 pm

    Some thoughts:
    unknown gyre–something going down the drain?
    sex tape–not a big deal, unless: it’s someone more famous/important than her like a politician, really kinky S&M stuff or snuff, or involves something illegal (drugs, minors), or any combination there of
    no solution until she comes clean–won’t end until she goes to rehab
    baby powder–cocaine
    white crystal–meth
    year of plenty in development–both have lots of projects “in development” that will be put at risk with the news
    rich girl/old man’s money–using up BP’s money to pay for drugs, sex, and lavish lifestyle while she squirrels away her own?

    Reply
  55. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:30 pm

    For now, let me just comment on this, Brad I do not believe ever came back for Easter, I think Angie fed that to Ian, he is still inn France or has been trying to fix the mess he has gotten himself in with Baby #1 and that that is why Coal in fire is Baby # 2 is inexpensive and abundant, because that one is not going to try and bleed in ass dry.

    LOL

    Reply
  56. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    @CC:
    Yes they do you are right about that.

    Reply
  57. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:34 pm

    @Kate:
    Hmmmmmm…interesting…

    Reply
  58. LurkeyLoo said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    I’m totally going out on a limb but could use of the word “disemvoweling” relate to “vows” one takes in marriage…as in whether or not they are married and/or getting divorced?

    Reply
  59. ascar said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    @kate
    do you not think if brad is going right to another woman (who he is in love with and/or having a baby with)that the public will tolerate that (he has little children), i think that his career will be over etc

    Reply
  60. stinky-inky said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    @McDooks:
    That’s what I thought too!

    Reply
  61. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    …velvet-lined boxes…visible from the highway…incriminating evidence…

    Something she did might be relevant to criminal law. They often use private jets and it would be easy to transport illegal merchandise without being controlled.

    Reply
  62. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Great work AFM, your interpretation sounds plausible. This tape, could it have been planted by the PI that Brad hired and it caught AJ with her brother, an animal or Bill Clinton? It has to be unlike any other run of the mill sex tape. OK this is a huge stretch but if someone is going to get hurt, could it be Hillary and her future presidential chances, since she would never be able to live it down. Rumors of his affairs is one thing but a tape of him and AJ? I know maybe not. Anyway got to read more posts and reread SR’s post again and again.

    Reply
  63. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    @LurkeyLoo:
    I looked up the word and it basically refers to the removal of vowels in texts and emails to shorten the amount of characters used…could be figurative regarding the marriage vows or it could refer to Angelina posting/texting on the website…

    Reply
  64. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    @ascar:
    No I don’t think he is in love with her at all. I don’t think that is what the baby is about, not baby 1 or baby 2. I think what will affect his career more than anything is how he handles this. If he does it with decency and class, with his family behind him, he will come out okay. If not is going down with her. jmo

    Brad in a sense though is smarter than Angelina. This is what I think , Jolie has been reading this for awhile, and when SR told us about the litigation we starting making comments about how stupid she was to ever let him have custody of her kids, her adopted kids, that was early February, you can almost feel the wheels turning. in her mind. I think the dead on to K & K is not just a we are on the right track with the pregnancy story being total bullshit, but her in general. no need to go back and read old posts. SR is just saying she hates us because we support IAN, and we don’t back down when she comes on here or anyone else and tries to whack the board or discredit the story or when some of you guys start to get nervous and have doubts, we are just here telling you, hang in there, we know how this is going to shake down, and she hates because by us doing that, it strengthens the board, the board . Just my take. We are dedicated to seeing IUC become huge because it is Investigative Journalism, and not just gossip. Dead on. That is what I think it is.

    Reply
  65. Z said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    @Tamara:
    Oh, OK! Thanks. : ) Makes sense.

    Reply
  66. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    @ topbrit – “truth for a liar” most certainly is, you see these types of posts on internet sites all the time under Brange stories – someone claiming to know them all personally and quashing any negative story written about Ange. She is all over the internet like a rash, talk about control freak, no wonder she barely ever sees her kids, top busy posing as fake people on the internet to save her skin. Most telling bit about that post was the part where she says Angelina is “sweet to everyone at a fault”, how mega fucking hilarious! The whole world knows that’s utter BS from her cuntface for Anne Hathaway when she lost her award, her cuntface and rude disdain for Ryan Seacreast and the fact she refused to speak to him the next time they met, and her oh-so-faked look of beaming happiness for Kate Winslet beating her ass to every award. Just proving what a totally useless actress she is! It was school girl stuf, but then I do not ascribe to the theory that Ange is intelligent at all, certainly not after watching a bit of her interview for the actor’s studio. She came over as giggly, silly and immature, no great brains there. And for me saying she’s not intelligent is not the same as saying she’s not scary smart, dhe is, but she’s smart at manipulating people and getting her self places, for which you don’t need to be intelligent at all. She’s just the same as KAte Moss who is also machiavellian in the extreme but also common and thick as shit. If Ange were acually more intelligent I’m convinced she would be far less egocentric and obsessed with her own success. Intelligent people realise life is short and what is important is love and family and friendship and good times. All Ange thinks is important is success, what people think about her, being top dog and being remembered for all time. Which is ultimately meaningless as we’re all heading in the same direction. She can’t take any of it with her, her kids should be far more important to her. I just think she’s thick as shit in that regard. Hope that didn’t hurt your feelings too much Ange if your reading. Yeah, no I actually don’t care.

    @ McDooks – the bit about the drugs sounds like you’re on to something. Another coal-fire I think means smoking the resin form of pot like Brad used to do with Jen – much more chilled out, low-key and less harmful than what Ange is up to now. And its abundant and inexpensive, particularly in Africa. The rest about Ange sounds like she could be frying her brains with drugs doesn’t it? Could be on to something there. I’ll have to think on.

    Reply
  67. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    @LurkeyLoo:
    GOOD idea…

    Reply
  68. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    @ CC – yes could be, or I was thinking it could mean fingerprints – they are “unique barcodes”. Are Angie’s fingerprints all over something so she can’t get away with it?

    Reply
  69. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    @Keane:
    Ooooooooo…..interesting….vewry, vewry interesting….. ;-)

    Reply
  70. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    “unique barcodes….bunnies and brats” – could mean some people have stories about her shagging strippers and neglecting her children that will absolutely nail her. Her finger prints are all over them and she will not be able to get away with it. She’s calling Gere for advice on damage control, how he and Cindy dealt with the gay rumours. Not well in my view. Probably not the best person to call. She’s not too bright is our Ange, trust this.

    Reply
  71. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    Other than feeling sorry for the 6 kids, I really feel sorry for Brad’s parents. I’m sure they did their best in raising him but he’s really f’kd up his life. Two new babies on the way with 2 other people? They’ll support him like good parents but still.

    Reply
  72. LurkeyLoo said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    You are right, she is not intelligent. Only a dumb c*nt would talk to the media about shagging her husband on the way to an awards show…while pretty much sucking his d*ck on the red carpet…a few feet away from her Father, no less! Yep, she’s a real braniac…and classy, too. @Keane:

    Reply
  73. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    @Billi:
    I too often wonder how his folks deal with him leading such a hedonistic lifestyle. They seem very normal and down to earth so I can imagine they have tremendous misgivings over his choice to “marry” and raise children with a lunatic…

    Reply
  74. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    @Keane:She was so stupid on Inside the Actors Studio. Instead of projecting herself as a serious actor she flirted with James Lipton, it was absolutely cringe worthy. In Limo II tinitina does sound like her.

    Reply
  75. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    when sugar said keene and kate dead on. i think he meant they were right on about the pr both sides were using. coal fire= baby in the oven (sundanese lady) inexpensive and abundant= sudanese ladies are a lot cheaper than hookers in the us and there are plenty to choose from. smarter grid= brad’s pr has a smarter plan and/or going to doing the sudanes thing is a smarter place to engagi in activities.

    Reply
  76. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    also the PI brad hired probably got some video…hence the tape!

    Reply
  77. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    @Keane:Could she be having an affair with Gere’s wife, Gere calling Ian as a Source of information in exchange for anonymity?? We still dont know for sure if the calls are being made to/from Angie or if the calls are being made to Ian, do we?? Keane?

    Reply
  78. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    @CC:He was raised in the Ozarks Mountains with good old midwestern values, baptist church stable family. No matter how much you experience later in life the structure of your formative years will always cling to you. When I lived in LA I always said the only thing that kept me out of big ass trouble was my midewestern upbringing.

    Reply
  79. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    @Tamara:
    She doesn’t know how to deal with people except to flirt. That is her comfort zone…the i’m-so-sexy angle she pulls is nausea inducing! Also, she did the same flirty shit during the press conference for MAMS in Japan with Brad and for press junkets for the Changeling she also seemed to be making eyes at Clint Eastwood quite often. Again, that is the only way she knows how to behave with men. Me thinks Jonny Voight or a weird uncle molested her. She has daddy issues to the enth degree and thinks sex is a means to intimacy. She is text book molestation victim, imo.

    Reply
  80. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    Angelina Jolie ‘Offers Brad Pitt $90m For Custody of Kids’
    Apr 16 posted by Adam Nutburn

    Angelina Jolie has offered Brad Pitt $90m so she can gain full custody of their six children, it has been claimed.

    The couple have allegedly split after series of heated rows.

    And Jolie, 33, is eager to keep her brood — Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, Knox, and Vivienne — together.

    “The children are Angelina’s life,” a source tells British magazine Look. “I think she’s already resigned herself to the fact she and Brad may not weather this storm and she’s prepared to do anything to keep them. From the start, Angelina made it clear that money was no object and she’d fight tooth and nail for sole custody of all children.

    “The fact remains she wants them with her on a daily basis. To ensure this, Angelina sat Brad down and calmly informed him she was prepared to make a one-off, no questions asked $90m payout to him if he’d agree to forgo a nasty custody battle.

    “Angelina is always jetting off all over the world and she has homes in several countries, whereas Brad is more settled in the US. She wants to make it clear the kids will be mostly with her.”

    Jolie, 33, is currently in New York as she films her new spy thriller Salt.

    The source continues, “Of course, Brad nearly fell off his chair when she proposed the financial settlement. I think he thought she was joking for a while and told her to stop being so ridiculous.

    “He rejected the offer and sad in the event of a permanent split, he intends to for — at the least — joint custody and a promise that all children will be raised and educated primarily in the United States near his family.”

    “Despite their differences,” the source continues, “Angelina thinks Brad is a brilliant father. But I think he is insulted and above all hurt that despite all he and Angelina have shared together and the children they’ve had, it’s coming down to money.”

    http://www.showbizspy.com/article/184157/angelina-jolie-offers-brad-pitt-90m-for-custody-of-kids

    Reply
  81. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    dead on. she was molested and is a sex addict (like Clinton)
    what does ..patch hanging down from her lower lip like an exclamation mark mean? maybe verbal diarrhea or drugs coming out her mouth? idk@CC:

    Reply
  82. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    Just found this site yesterday. First hand knowledge of the situation. Ian’s right, they’re finished. They’re not ready to announce it yet, trying to work out details before the media storm begins.

    Angie (it’s so hard for me to type her name – I can only bring myself to call her psycho hose beast) is more diabolical, more evil, more manipulative than anyone could possibly imagine. She has great lawyers, and pays them alot of money, they’re very reactive because they have to be. With what she has done, anyone else would be in jail. If people knew the truth, she would be ruined.

    It makes me sick how people think she’s a do-gooder. She’s a horrible human being. She’s a master manipulator of everything and everyone and works with the UN to wipe her conscience for the horrible, heinous things she does in every day life.

    Reply
  83. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    @justathought:
    an animal that first appears normal..divided into microscopic cubes..crinkling around..patch drops down from her lower lips like an exclamation mark..velvet lined boxes…visible from the highway..incriminating evidence..

    I read into that possible drug smuggling through an animal, maybe a dog. the velvet lined boxes are there to bury the dogs.

    Reply
  84. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    @Tamara:
    LOL about the staying out of trouble!!! My tough Irish Catholic mother kept me in line!!! I know what you mean about the lasting effects (affects?) of a firm upbringing. Those kids don’t seem to have that and it’s a shame. They could face some life long demons with a mother like her!!!

    Reply
  85. Togi said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    @Kate:
    “SR is just saying she hates us because we support IAN, and we don’t back down when she comes on here or anyone else and tries to whack the board or discredit the story or when some of you guys start to get nervous and have doubts, we are just here telling you, hang in there, we know how this is going to shake down, and she hates because by us doing that, it strengthens the board .”

    Kate – I have noticed something about questionable posters. With the exception of SuzyQ, none of the recent others ever respond to kind words or gestures made toward them. I know that when I am under attack, I greatly appreciate kind and friendly words! SuzyQ was the ONLY one who responded in any way. If someone is on a mission, they won’t even bother. Just my observations.

    Reply
  86. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    I don’t get the references to the guillotines and brain slices. Lots of reference here to the brain being dissected.

    Reply
  87. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    @cuze:
    Maybe the drugs are rotting her brain and she’s making terrible judgment calls because of it?? IDK…

    Reply
  88. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    @anonymous:Oh boy. Okay who’s PR machine is at work on this one AJ or BP? Sounds like AJ to me.

    @justathought: Ive been mulling that one over too, Exclamation point is used to make a strong point, so it probably has to do with her trying to make a point with something she is saying. Dont understand the patch part of it unless that is what she used to cover up and now its slipping so she’s talking to try and save herself

    Reply
  89. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    @CC:
    possibly.

    Reply
  90. Togi said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @CC:
    I was thinking that brain slices were “multiples.” Does she have any history of multiple personality disorder?

    Reply
  91. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    no successful joke.. could mean that article where she offered the 90 mil.

    Reply
  92. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    @Togi:
    Now that is entirely possible.

    Reply
  93. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    @Togi:
    I think he is referring to the ones on the last article that Ian did most likely, they gave info on Brange, the others did not. Just coming on and saying Ian is this, Ian is that, is no big deal, but to come on and say they know them and you are wrong and try to discredit him that is what affects posters and makes them have doubt. That person was a fake. They did not write a word I could not have.

    Reply
  94. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @Togi:
    MPD diagnosis is a toughie. I don’t think she suffers from MPD or Schizophrenia but she definitely has some sort of mental problem…I’m thinking along the lines of bi polar. Bi polar women, it has been noted, tend to be highly sexed so I think she is more on the spectrum of mood instability/bi polar as opposed to MPD. I’m no psychologist or anything…total arm chair doc, here! LOL

    Reply
  95. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    @anonymous:
    LOL she tried to buy her kids AGAIN lol when he has 4 times that much how funny. Makes her look bad doesn’t it. Is that the “pitch” she gave him when the babies were sleeping. Didn’t work,on to plan 2, what is plan 2, You are not the daddy. lol

    Reply
  96. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    @Togi:
    Very inneresting.

    Reply
  97. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    [velvet-lined boxes…visible from the highway…incriminating evidence] . The velvet lined boxes are evocative of coffins. Cemeteries, often visible from highways, and surrounded by brush, are good places to hide incriminating evidence, including bodies. Course it could be where a tell-tale buried corpse is buried. Or maybe in a moment of insanity she killed and cut up an animal into microscopic cubes that 1st appeared normal, and buried it by the highway in a velvet lined boxes. I kid, I kid. I sure hope you ain’t talking about an aborted fetus.

    Reply
  98. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    @Kate:
    She just needs to get Maury in on this action!

    Reply
  99. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    @p:
    “I sure hope you ain’t talking about an aborted fetus.” Unfort, I was TOTALLY thinking that is what it meant….

    Reply
  100. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    @Billi:
    He has two different people (other than Angie) pregnant?

    Reply
  101. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    I know what you mean.. my mind is going places here that is quit disturbing. All the references to slicing the brain and the guillotine and microscopic cubes. I wonder if we are talking about crystal meth with the reference to white crystals.

    Reply
  102. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    @Tamara: Sounds like AJ to me, too.

    @Togi: The word is that she has a Borderline Personality Disorder.

    Reply
  103. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    I don’t know the rate of death from smuggling drugs in animals but if a heroin bag opens up in a human’s intestine it will kill them, if the animal smuggling is right, that could easily happen.

    Reply
  104. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    yes. that sounds pretty good. maybe pi got video of that drug transaction? maybe it was the dog’s lower lip that drugs were stitched into..@cuze:

    Reply
  105. Different Guest said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    Patch hanging down from lower lip a reference to BBT? Relationship with the Clintons – HC is Secretary of State all foreign adoptions go through the State Department. Sucking up (pun intended) as means to insure no investigation if any of the adoptions were illegal or to make sure that she’s allowed to adopt again.

    Reply
  106. too curious said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    AJ doesn”t have MPD – I’m not an expert but my sister had MPD so I have seen it firsthand. At least in my sister’s case, each personality was distinct but sort of one dimensional; there seemed to be one over-riding emotion that colored each personality, i.e. the flirty one, the angry one, etc. but flat with regard to other emotions. It’s hard to communicate exactly what that is like to others, but I have never seen that in AJ. Also I don’t think she could successfully do movies if she had MPD because the different personalities are often not aware of each other and what they have done. Seriously. I believe it is called “dissociative disorder” these days.

    As for bi-polar, psychotic, whatever I have no idea. Thank heavens I haven’t had first hand experience with those.

    Reply
  107. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    I like that,
    I m tired, good luck it ’s your turn, and then shut up, I think that means , quit whining everyone…here is your story. ha ha SR pretty funny I bet you are tired, must have taken forever to code this story, ha!

    LOL

    Reply
  108. Gitano said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    Years ago I did some cytology/histology. Cells, like neurons, might be smeared (spread out like peanut butter) on a slide, stained and viewed under a microscope or a tiny “cube” of tissue embedded in wax, sliced on a microtome which functions like a little “guillotine” and then fixed to a slide. The ultra fine slice would often “crinkle around” the edges. Then you might look in detail at “individual “cells like “neurons” looking for “unique” features or you might count (score) anomalies. With automation and computerization “millions of brain slices per day” (terabyte per day) can be processed. But this could also refer to fPET, MRI, CT scans. As a brain atrophies it can appear to “crinkle around” the edges on imaging. DNA test results can appear as “unique bar codes” which can then be matched between individuals. “An animal that at first appears normal” can indeed be infected with rabies which affects the neurons. There are many pathogens which affect the nervous system. Anyway, I get the impression Pitt is being exposed to some medical science research perhaps involving animal assays. Could his new love interest be a medical scientist? Is the Jolie-Pitt Foundation interested in backing some medical research? Is some one in the family being medically evaluated? Just guessing.

    Reply
  109. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    @cuze:
    That is what I was thinking. Meth rots the brain and ages people like crazy! And she has been looking a little old lately, hasn’t she?? I mean, 33? Serously? She looks 45, sometimes.

    Not that there is anything wrong with looking 45! LOL….it’s just that you’d like to look 45 when you’re 55 not when you’re in your 30’s!!!!

    Reply
  110. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    @pookiedoll:

    Here’s Kate’s earlier post: For now, let me just comment on this, Brad I do not believe ever came back for Easter, I think Angie fed that to Ian, he is still inn France or has been trying to fix the mess he has gotten himself in with Baby #1 and that that is why Coal in fire is Baby # 2 is inexpensive and abundant, because that one is not going to try and bleed in ass dry.

    Kate if I misread you, let me know (Brad’s 2 new ones).

    Reply
  111. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    @Gitano:
    Well Christ and a cartoon.. we’d never have figured that one out.. But since you put it that way…lol.lol..lol.. makes sense to me.

    Reply
  112. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    oh that’s good! so patch is referring to billy bob and velvet lined boxes right after that refers to an abortion of billy bob’s baby..all cut up and now buried….@Different Guest:

    Reply
  113. Togi said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    @Kate:
    Ohhhh. I just went to the late postings on the last blog. Now I know who/what he was talking about. Pretty much a no-brainer there. The “tatitina” or whoever was kinda funny. I know BP and JA … and only know AJ a little, and yet seemed to know a lot about the inner thinkings of AJ. Yeah … we all buy that one! LOL

    Reply
  114. me said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    ok, for first sorry for my english, its not my first language. Im also new here, and no, im not angie or everyone else!
    About the sudanese lady, i wonder something: how many chances would have a normal woman to meet brad around? and if she does, how many chances to continue to “talk” with him, or see him again, for more then 2 minutes? Really, i would like to understand from where shes coming out. Becasuse i do not think it can be easy to be no-one and be near him!
    Keane you do not think it is love, so how is the story about her and those babies?
    Im feeling really sorry for brad’s parents too… and a bit even for him, at least till im not able to understand all this sad story.

    Reply
  115. too curious said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    @Gitano

    Could any of that be used to refer to DNA testing or breating designer test tube babies? Just wild-ass guesses on my part?

    Unique barcodes = DNA will show exactly who the father (& mother) of Shiloh, Viv and Knox are?

    Reply
  116. Togi said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    @p:
    Oh GROSS! I can’t even go THERE! EWWWWWWW.

    Reply
  117. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    @Gitano:
    LOVE…YOUR….GUESS!!!! Smarty pants!

    @different guest: AWESOME ABOUT BBT!!! Yes, the patch reference could mean him!

    Reply
  118. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    I’m assuming that the twins are going to need some genetic testing.. especially if they are fathered by her own brother.

    Reply
  119. Hope said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    thought… wasn’t bunnies and rabbits a 50’s/60’s term for abortions? I could be far off but that popped in my head

    Reply
  120. too curious said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    breating = creating

    Reply
  121. Togi said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    @CC:
    Darling, I am soooooo glad you clarified that! BA haaa haaa! :-)

    Reply
  122. Togi said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    @Hope:
    If someone hasn’t already answered this, bunnies were used for testing for pregnancy.

    Reply
  123. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    @Togi:
    LOL ;-) I am turning 38 in July so the forties are looming and I hope I can stay looking good!!!!!

    Reply
  124. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    @ keane – thanks for reply,so eloquent and ‘dead on’ as per!

    Reply
  125. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    @Togi:
    Yeah, and I think the phrase “the rabbit died” refers to someone being pregnant…

    Reply
  126. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    This site is ruining me for gossip sites……I refresh here constantly, lol.

    Reply
  127. Togi said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    @CC:
    No worries. I have you by 9 years and believe me … the 40’s are awesome! And you can still look just fine!

    Reply
  128. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Pebbles in a bag, comes after Angie getting caught in the sex tape. I think dropped pebbles can be used to mark a path, from which you’ve come, when there’s no preexisting path, so you can find your way back –sort of like bread crumbs (in Hansel and Gretel was it?) . Course the trail can also be used by others to track you down or track where you’ve been. Just a thought.

    Reply
  129. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    @Billi:
    Yes, he has two new ones on the way that , one woman is giving him a hard time, and one is not. That is what I meant. To be fair I did not really come up with that all by myself. :) I have an appointment. BL

    Reply
  130. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    @Hope4Grace:
    I am a regular here, now, because it’s the first website I’ve found that is sympathetic and encouraging of the NON-Brangeloonies in the world….AH!!! FINALLY!!!! WE’VE FOUND EACH OTHER!!!! Ha ha

    Reply
  131. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    @CC: It’s nice to find somewhere that isn’t “Saint this and Savior that”! :)

    Reply
  132. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    @me:I agree, it cant be easy for anyone to get close enough to them to form a relationship so my thought is that she (Sudanese) was one of the Nanny’s for the twins while they recovered from the birth at the Chateau in France. This would give her alot of exclusive time with him. She lives in France, and he keeps going back or never came home from France. And, it might have some reference to the Nanny-gate stories that have been circulating lately

    Reply
  133. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @Me:
    Well darling you need to spill then since no one knows who you are. lol and ftr, it has hit the storm, but welcome abord!

    Reply
  134. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    Was hoping His Highness would drop in and drop another clue….

    Reply
  135. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @Togi: . You don’t need to, she’d just go to a Dr for that. And yeah the language for C-Scan sections are “slice” as in, rads per slice.

    Reply
  136. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @Hope4Grace:
    You said it, sister!!!

    Reply
  137. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @me:

    Good question, how did BP meet the Sudanese lady? Hopefully we will find out soon.

    That story about AJ buying out Brad for 90 mil. Would she have that kind of money? Brad yes, but AJ. Could the old man reference refer to Brad, meaning he’ll end up paying her off to get this relationship over and done with? As opposed to her father or a new man in her life being the old man. Hope that makes sense.

    Reply
  138. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    Kate – what are your thoughts on my nanny-gate post? She is what, 23, 25? That would make her a good age for a nanny. What do you think of this theory?

    Reply
  139. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    @Kate: I second that motion! Somebody needs to just start providing info rather than hints, it’s killing me.

    Reply
  140. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    @Hope4Grace:

    Other checking to see what other sites have about AJ and BP, I’ve basically deserted all the other gossip sites. Things happening here to fast to miss anything!

    Reply
  141. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    i cannot get over that brad has 2 babies on the way! this is mind boggling . seems unreal almost. kate- thought you had some inside info, so 2 it is! crazy idiot

    Reply
  142. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    octodad is on the way…

    Reply
  143. CC said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @Billi:
    I’m afraid to leave the computer! Ha ha…but alas, I must. This house won’t clean itself!!! Tootles, my favorite posters! I’ll be back in a few hours…can’t WAIT to see what you’ve all come up with by then!!!

    Reply
  144. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @justathought:
    Yeah, and possibly a reunion in the future with Jennifer. If she takes him back with two more children on the way she is an idiot.

    Reply
  145. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    agree, it cant be easy for anyone to get close enough to them to form a relationship so my thought is that she (Sudanese) was one of the Nanny’s for the twins while they recovered from the birth at the Chateau in France. This would give her alot of exclusive time with him. She lives in France, and he keeps going back or never came home from France. And, it might have some reference to the Nanny-gate stories that have been circulating lately

    Reply
  146. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    @cuze:

    My thoughts exactly about Jen and the reunion. I wish she was accessing this site and reading everyone’s comments. She’d have to be crazy to hook up with BP now unless those, babies have a connection to her (surrogate?) and BP. It’s still crazy anyway you look at it.

    Reply
  147. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    wow, did you read sugar’s updates…oh no

    Reply
  148. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    @Kate:Psycho hose beast knows who I am. And I’m sure she’s here reading the posts. So, I’ll say this once: if she makes Brad look bad, or if she causes him any more pain, I will go public with what she has done, and she will be publicly humiliated.

    Reply
  149. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    Yeah, Ian is going to get hit hard for this. People are not going to want this stuff exposed. They will try and shut him up.

    Reply
  150. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    @Me:
    That’s what I’m thinking.. hell we need to get this on Nancy Grace or something asap.

    Reply
  151. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    @Me:This site has been very good for you, your English has improved enormously since your first post! Well done you!

    Reply
  152. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    did we get confirmation of where the two babies are coming from,i get one from a sudaneses woman,possibly the nanny but i have totally missed where the other one comes into play.there was a poster on earlier who said pitt was getting a hard time over one of the babies……..i am lost guys please someone tell me about the second child and who is giving who a hard time! many thanks in advance
    @ me – don’t believe the bullshit your typing mate,if english is not your first language how can you read it well enough to know about ‘angie posting on here etc’ me thinks you are the sad story!

    Reply
  153. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    @Me:

    me – who are you and how would you be able to publicly humiliate AJ. Spill please.

    Reply
  154. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @Tamara:

    Very quicky improved!!!

    Reply
  155. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @Me:
    ME: what happened to the no english speaky and Bravo! spill!!!

    Reply
  156. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @Billi:

    meant quickly improved

    Reply
  157. me said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    Tnx ^^
    I also believe hes still in France… and im also thinking that hes a bit crazy in starting a story with another woman when he know what he should fight with angie for childrens. This is mostly the doubt i have.
    Now you are talking about 2 women and 2 babies… im confused.
    Can it be a plan to force him to give childrens to angie? Some lady payed to tell shes pregnant… to put him in a bad light more of how hes already just now…
    About the old man, at the beginning i thought brad could be

    Reply
  158. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    @Billi:LMAO – Oh good, I thought for a second I was being quite rude, but it seemed a bit much, I apologize to me if Im wrong, but I dont think so! hahah

    Reply
  159. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    Looks like there are two ‘me’s. I’m the first ‘me’, and english is my first language.

    I cannot and will not spill now. I’m keeping it in my arsenal in case I need it, which I very well may. Believe me when I say that she is beyond the worst things that have been said about her. Far far beyond.

    Reply
  160. me said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    hey give me the time to write pls :P

    Reply
  161. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @Me: Why don’t you go public now? Are there any illegal activities?

    Reply
  162. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @Billi @justathought – tnx!! Okay am I losing my mind here? LOL

    Reply
  163. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @Me:

    me – still waiting for a response on the how to publicly humiliate please . Now don’t do anything that could get you arrested.

    Reply
  164. guest mode said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    William Jefferson Clinton + Angelina Jolie = She can rely on the old man’s money. DNA tests for all bio kids, stat

    Reply
  165. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @Me:OMG, I thought I was losing it! hahaha Okay thanks!!

    Reply
  166. me (the not english one) said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    yes 2, a Me and a me.
    Im the not english “me”
    Look at the M and m… thats the difference

    Reply
  167. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @Tamara:

    You don’t have to apologize to yourself! :)

    Reply
  168. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    I’ll bet there will be a lot of people to come forward if things get too far out of hand.

    Reply
  169. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    @Me:Oh geez! If you have anything real to say just say it already

    Reply
  170. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    @Billi:LOL

    Reply
  171. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @me:
    You are saying the new rumors of Brad getting the women pregnant are phony?

    Reply
  172. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    OK I get it there’s a Me and a me? My apologies, so much to grasp here on who, what and why.

    Reply
  173. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    @ english speaking me – is that you brad!
    @ everyone – does anybody think on SR’s update the jolie/pitt closet friend could be Holly,have they betrayed over the baby she had for them and now she wants revenge,nothing is too insane at this point about these two idiots!

    Reply
  174. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    Who is Holly???

    Reply
  175. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    @ HH – hope action is not against you or SR,please don’t allow them to shut you down,i have abandoned all other sites for this one,the rose amongst many thorns!

    Reply
  176. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    @topbrit:

    Is Holly related to the rumor about the twins? Angie had one and Holly had the other and quickly disappeared once the babies were on the scene?

    Reply
  177. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    @topbrit:
    I don’t understand 2 babies either. I asked & got a reply but it didn’t answer it for me.

    Reply
  178. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    Didn’t Brad mention in a blog of his that he wanted to see more investigative journalism? Wonder if this is why? He wanted this stuff outed.

    Reply
  179. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    this is the 1st Me’s post:Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    “Just found this site yesterday. First hand knowledge of the situation. Ian’s right, they’re finished. They’re not ready to announce it yet, trying to work out details before the media storm begins.

    Angie (it’s so hard for me to type her name – I can only bring myself to call her psycho hose beast) is more diabolical, more evil, more manipulative than anyone could possibly imagine. She has great lawyers, and pays them alot of money, they’re very reactive because they have to be. With what she has done, anyone else would be in jail. If people knew the truth, she would be ruined.

    It makes me sick how people think she’s a do-gooder. She’s a horrible human being. She’s a master manipulator of everything and everyone and works with the UN to wipe her conscience for the horrible, heinous things she does in every day life.”

    hmm..psycho hose beast…what did she do with a hose? probably inseminate herself with dog sperm…she sounds so vile

    Reply

    Reply
  180. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    No, I’m not Brad. But I am someone who has his best interests at heart, and he would kill me if he knew I was posting here. All I can say is that someone participated in horrible, heinous acts against someone else and if the crap this person did were to be made public, they would be humiliated. That’s all I’m going to say.

    Reply
  181. me (the not english one) said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    @cuze:
    I cannot know if those rumors are real or not…
    just i find it s at the same time stupid and not logic. 2 women pregnant at the same time looks strange.
    It could be a possibility that those rumors are phony then, specially if the source could be still angie.
    A nanny is possible, 2 a bit incredible. Dont you think so?
    Just ipotetical thoughts

    Reply
  182. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    @ Tamara – jolies assistant who incidentally was pregnant at the same time,gave birth at the same time,had a child in france at the same time(allegedly)with jolie,did her husband agree to this,”yeah give birth to our first child in france away from our respective families blah blah” ………that holly

    Reply
  183. too curious said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    I don’t read the gossip mags and tabloids regularly or anything, but I do usually surf by E!Online to read Ted C and see the cover of the mags in the grocery store checkout lanes. Does it seem to anyone else that there is less Brangie stuff the past week or so than usual? Since Ian started spilling all of this? It seemed for a while every place I looked there was some new pic from Salt or something…

    Reply
  184. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    @Tamara:
    Who is Holly. That came out of left field for me.

    Reply
  185. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    @Me:
    Unfortunately, I don’t see this ending very well for your friend. Unless others come forth to protect him. The only way I see is to expose her.

    Reply
  186. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    @Me:

    Are we talking criminal, like jail term or just extremely scandalous???

    Reply
  187. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    @pookiedoll: . Nutshell. There is a rumor that AJ is pregnant which no one here believes, if anything people think she PR-ed that story out to the tabs herself, to deflect the break-up, weight loss bad press of late. The other baby rumor is by the Sudanese woman herself, passed on to Ian by one of his CIs…unconfirmed.

    Reply
  188. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    @ Me -ok fair enough your comment at 2:40 sounds genuine and btw nobody on here doesn’t think jolie is capable of what you are describing, she is one sick biayatch and pitt is not in her league of nastiness but i do wish you would reveal your info because after all pitt has gone along with her depravity for 4 years,no excuse for that is there1

    Reply
  189. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    about time someone took up for brad. he should welcome you because if this site wasn’t here, noone would believe she is this bad.
    i just hope she did not hurt the kids physically and if she did it should be public
    @Me:

    Reply
  190. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @p:
    Thanks for clearing that up.

    Reply
  191. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    @topbrit:I remember reading that they were having twin girls to be named Isla Marcheline and Amelie Jane, then all of a suddenn it was a girl Viv and a boy Knox

    Reply
  192. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    @cuze:
    There are children involved, main concern is for them. I agree and I may need to expose her, which is why I’m keeping my arsenal intact. I can imagine her attorneys reading this, they know who I am and what I have and are probably shaking in their boots.
    @Billi:Both. Anyone else who did not have a few million in the bank and a team of lawyers to hide behind would be in jail. Trust me, absolutely heinous stuff.

    Reply
  193. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    Since we all agree she has no boundries….Could she be too close to Maddox. I know tha’t a sick post but look who we are discussing.

    Reply
  194. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    tha’t is suppose to be that’s. sorry

    Reply
  195. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    @Billi:I still think the go-to game could be the Go Directly to Jail move from Monopoly, meaning something is probably illegal and worth jail time if uncovered.

    Reply
  196. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    Well I wonder how Salt will do at the box office when it’s released because I’m sure the scandal will have broken by then. Who will want to see her in any movie? Box office bomb.

    Reply
  197. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    @ billi – yeah that was the rumour and she or her ‘child’ has not been seen since yet she was always by jolies side,very very suspect,apparently over on female first( hope i am allowed to type that) there is more info and speclation
    @ pookiedoll – think ‘p’ just answered our confusion on second child!

    Reply
  198. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:56 pm

    @justathought:oh she is that bad. And worse. If people only knew, it’s just worse than you could ever imagine. It’s inhuman.

    Reply
  199. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:56 pm

    she’s out for blood! ruthless bitch..get armed ian
    this in response to sugar’s latest update…..

    Reply
  200. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    @Billi:All of her last few movies have been bombs. People dont like her, wont pay to see her movies. I think some of it may be that she is so scornful of the US and yet she expects us to pay our hard earned US dollars to see her movies and yet she doesn’t spread any of her goodwill in the US buys all her babies from third world countries and does absolutely nothing for the starving needy children right here in the US

    Reply
  201. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    Ian keep posting info

    Reply
  202. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    @Me:
    Does this have to do with the children. Activities????

    Reply
  203. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    @Me:I hope you’re not saying that she’s harming the children

    Reply
  204. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    @Tamara:

    That could very well mean JAIL time. Do you think the english Me was implying the scandalous info is so bad it could mean jail if made public or that AJ’s would become an oucast? I don’t want the person (Me) to jeopardize their identity and confidence but it would be so great if they could just give us a hint if anyone’s comments have come near to the truth. PLEASE?

    Reply
  205. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    @topbrit: . Assuming Me is real, I figure the person knows Brad’s not Mother Cabrini in all this and that’s the reason it hasn’t broke wide open already, BP is cloaking some secrets of his own. But if AJ plays hard ball and outs him for his indiscretions…game over for rich girl who done gone too far. That’s why this charade could go on as is indefinitely…especially if either party wants to hang on to the kids.

    Reply
  206. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    @Me: How far has Brad fallen is what I’m curious to know? Is he still “normal”

    Reply
  207. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    evil can take over a person. i’m sure she is possessed by a demon. pretty scary and very sad for brad, as he was probably innocently caught up in the evil and had no idea@Me:

    Reply
  208. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    @ tamara – ah yeah i remember that story being put out plus there were so many unanswered details that suspicion was raised which gave birth pardon the pun to so many rumours(which looking now maybe weren’t rumours after all)
    @ pookiedoll – you might have something there,i read apparentley she stopped off somewhere,mid travel,to go home and shower with maddox when there were showers available to her in closer vicinity something along those lines anyway!

    Reply
  209. me (the not english one) said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    @Me:

    If she’s that bad… why brad did not split before?
    Is there some way to help kids ?

    Reply
  210. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    Because if she is harming the children then BP knows about it and can cited as an accessory. There is a fine line in blasting her without implicating him, I would be very careful

    Reply
  211. Lucifer said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    There are dark and sinister forces at work here.

    BEWARE

    Reply
  212. too curious said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    RE: most recent update – OMG. OMG. Ian be careful and Ms 9 cents please watch your back, too! Thanks for keeping things going while Ian has to lay low…

    I have never been around people as rich and powerful as Brangie but I have been around wealthy business people (several hundred million level) enough to know that they have two sets of ethics/beliefs- what is ok for THEM and what is ok for others. Of course THEY can do whatever they want but Ian expose them – HOW DARE HE! I really would not be surprised if they attempt bodily harm toward Ian and/or set something up to try to discredit him. Be safe.

    Reply
  213. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    @Me: . Well if it’s INHUMAN and Brad hasn’t done anything about it, the boy must have SOME fucking secret of his own.

    Reply
  214. Geminilou said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    Anyone remember footage of Angie in the drug den?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyF1BVHABoI

    Reply
  215. KatB said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    Whatever the outcome we must remember that there are children involved here and their best interests must always be paramount. If AJ has done something truly wicked then her holding onto to them might well be out of her hands. Maybe she needs to be exposed and humiliated so the children can have a chance at a stable normal life. So Me, I hope that you are considering this as well and that you get the opportunity to safely disclose what you know. Be careful Ian.

    Reply
  216. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    @Tamara:

    Yes I didn’t understand why she hasn’t adopted a needy child in the US until someone pointed out the waiting time is long (I’m sure with her money she could speed up the process) but I believe the main reason is related to blood testing of the would be parent or something like that would show AJ drug’s use. Now if my memory is inaccurate please someone clear that up.

    Reply
  217. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    Best case is that neither of them are with kids…… she filming in NYC, him who the heck knows and the kids somewhere with caregivers. Obviously though something is going on, not even E! has commented on the rumors, I think they got their hands tied legally…

    Reply
  218. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    @Me: You say she is beyond the worst things that have been said about her, and she knows who you are. I hope you have taken precautions so she won’t even try to do you any harm. Sorry for my English.

    Reply
  219. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    @pookiedoll:The acts I refer to does not involve her parenting or children. I only meant that there are 6 beautiful, innocent children who need to remain untouched by this breakup. Up until now, they have been and everyone wants to keep it that way.
    @p:True P. She may have dirt on Brad, which she may be holding against him but I am as clean as a whistle, and she has nothing on me. @Hope4Grace:What is ‘normal anyway’. He wants what’s best for his kids, they’re the first priority.

    Reply
  220. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    @p:I have a sneaking suspicion that ME could be saying (well, not really saying much of anything) but he/she implies that AJ is absolutely heinous which also puts into mind if she is this bad then why hasn’t BP put a stop to it, in a twisted way ME may be villifying AJ in order to implicate BP, under the guise of pretending to be his protector!!

    @ME – you have to admit you are only spewing venom, under the pretense that you have inside information, and yet you are saying absolutely nothing.

    Reply
  221. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    @ p – good points and i really don’t want it to be indefinetly,btw who is mother cabrini? is it our uk equivalent of saying ‘mother theresa’ in sarcasm

    Reply
  222. virgo said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    2 things: First, could the really weird radio interview BBT gave a few days ago be coincidental to any of this? He seemed completely zoned out. Second, could AJ have planted the pregnancy story to be used later, as in “look who made me have a miscarriage” ?

    Reply
  223. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    @Me: Sadly that is true, there isn’t much of a standard for normal anymore.

    Reply
  224. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    JMO, doesn’t mean Im right, but something just doesn’t ring true here I don’t know why

    Reply
  225. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    @anonymous:Thanks, I’m well protected. And I have an awesome lawyer.

    Reply
  226. whatever said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    @Me:

    Do you know Holly ME?

    Reply
  227. Linda Maple said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    @p: Could the “barcodes” be her tatoos?

    Reply
  228. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    @Tamara:
    That’s right.

    Reply
  229. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    @too curious:
    I have been around wealthy business people (several hundred million level) enough to know that they have two sets of ethics/beliefs- what is ok for THEM and what is ok for others. Of course THEY can do whatever they want but Ian expose them – HOW DARE HE! I really would not be surprised if they attempt bodily harm toward Ian and/or set something up to try to discredit him.

    I absolutely agree on the 2 sets of ethics. Have we not seen that with the Financial scandals that have torpedoed the economy. How about Madoff. And who pays for their greed and corruptions, we do. I can’t wait for the day when the media gets a backbone and does their job and expose these criminals. No more whitewashed reporting. It gets me so riled up. Anyway back to normal.

    Reply
  230. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    omg have you read Ian’s updates,he feels in danger enough to hire a bodyguard,be careful,all the team,very careful.can’t believe jolie is this powerful,has she sought help from higher up ie clintons cronies? who in the hell does she think she is,she needs bringing down surely money can only buy you so much anonymity,she’s not head of state,or don corlioni

    Reply
  231. Azzy said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    @Me:
    It’s good to know that Brad does have friends and they are looking out for him.
    For a while it looked like Brad didnt have any friends anymore. It was just him, Ange, the kids and nannies/bodyguards.
    Did Holly, MIckey B, and Cindy G stop working for them at the same time?

    Reply
  232. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @Me: Good to know. :)

    Reply
  233. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @topbrit: . A missionary. and the 1st American to be canonized in 1946.

    Reply
  234. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    And one more thing I want to add, Brad if you’re reading this, remember what I said last time we spoke – yes, I am still willing to go to war if you need me to.
    @whatever:no, I don’t know Holly.

    Reply
  235. too curious said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    @Me

    Are you Jen?

    Reply
  236. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    @too curious: And if you are, I so need the name of your conditioner, love the hair.

    Reply
  237. cero said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    @Me
    George C ?

    Reply
  238. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    @too curious:LOL. No, I’m not Jen, but I know her. She is an amazing person, one of the most together people I have ever known.

    Reply
  239. mandy said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    @Me:
    Please tell Brad he still has fans behind him and I’m one of them. I just hope he is o.k. I have been worried sick about him since he hooked up with that evil woman.

    Reply
  240. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    Me is starting to sound suspicious…why not say that to Brad directly if she knows him? Especially if he’d kill her if he knew she was posting. And why post here at all about unspeakable things, when we have no idea what s/he is referring to?

    Reply
  241. BigApplette said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    I don’t doubt that the truth is stranger than fiction, particularly in Hollyweird.BUT, I never underestimate the power of Brangie’s machine to buy off sources and keep things hush hush, i.e., the heroin tape, the old nanny’s tell all and Mickey Brett’s book. On a side note, Hey Ian, how come we never see Holly’s (AJ’s assistant)baby. The one that was miraculously due on the same day as the twins?

    Reply
  242. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    @Me:Why don’t I believe a word you’re saying? There is something wrong here and I think you know what I mean

    Reply
  243. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    @mandy:Thanks, he’ll be happy to hear that. You’re not the only one to worry. People have watched him over the years get ‘beaten up’ by it. But it’s ok now, he’s transitioned away from her and he’ll be safe now. Nothing that time and a whole bunch of TLC can’t fix. He has friends, and trust me, he’ll be very very happy soon.

    Reply
  244. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    Wasn’t Me trying to say that the pregnancy rumors with the Sudanese woman wasn’t true?

    Reply
  245. KatB said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    Don’t think Me is a she – think Me is George C as well@p:

    Reply
  246. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    @Tamara:

    Totally agree with you. To go from (All I can say is that someone participated in horrible, heinous acts against someone else and if the crap this person did were to be made public, they would be humiliated. That’s all I’m going to say)

    then to (@pookiedoll:The acts I refer to does not involve her parenting or children. I only meant that there are 6 beautiful, innocent children who need to remain untouched by this breakup. Up until now, they have been and everyone wants to keep it that way.
    @p:True P. She may have dirt on Brad, which she may be holding against him but I am as clean as a whistle, and she has nothing on me. @Hope4Grace:What is ‘normal anyway’. He wants what’s best for his kids, they’re the first priority)

    Sorry but something is not adding up. To go from heinous to the post above? OK, whatever.

    Reply
  247. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    @Ian: No legal threats this time? Anonymous threats? Take care! You have certainly called the police. Keep us updated.

    Reply
  248. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    @Me:
    Can you tell us, how far is BP in?

    Reply
  249. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    @Tamara:You don’t need to believe anything I am saying. That’s not why I’m here. I know she reads here, and my intention was to let her know that if she hurts him or makes him look bad I will go to war to make sure he comes out unscathed.

    Reply
  250. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    @p:Reverse psychology

    Reply
  251. topbrit said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    @ p – thanks for that and sorry for my ignorance,i love the US and americans but don’t know much of your history,my bad, love your sayings tho lol we use a similar saying over here when we feel someone is trying to be a martyr in a friendly sarcastic way you know like ‘who do you think you are mother theresa?

    Reply
  252. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    I can’t imagine George C is in love with this site, after all he was rightly or wrongly outed as bi on some list Ian posted.

    Reply
  253. too curious said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    “Hello all. My name is Too Curious and I am addicted to ianundercover.com”

    Reply
  254. mandy said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    @Me:
    I hope so. Can you tell us why he ever fell for Angelina in the first place?

    Reply
  255. Elle said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    OMG. Have to work. Can’t wait to read comments…

    Reply
  256. me (the not english one) said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    @Me:
    I dont care who you are. You say you are brad’s friend and for me its enough.
    If there is a war to fight, i’m with him too, even if he doesnt know me.

    Reply
  257. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    @topbrit: . mother theresa is a stand-by on both sides of the puddle but Ian pointed out there’s evidence she was a fraud.

    Reply
  258. KatB said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    @p: True p, but he is a good friend of BP and don’t think he has much time for AJ

    Reply
  259. cero said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    @Me @ me ..united we stand against the evil threat! lol

    Reply
  260. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    @Tamara: . Sorry Tamara, I don’t understand your comment.

    Reply
  261. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    @Me:Its not my intention to be hateful but seriously, can you see my point? If you come on here under the pretense of being such a good friend of BP that you would go to war for him, and then proceed to tell us all what a heinous horrible degenerate psycho hose beast AJ is, that she has done some really unspeakable things, then wouldnt that then implicate BP as an accessory to her crimes? Or at the very least put him in suspicion of aiding and abetting her? If you truly are his friend I would change my tactic if I were you. JMO

    Reply
  262. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    I seriously hope George C doens’t have this kind of time on his hands, I’m waiting on another Ocean’s movie.

    Reply
  263. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    @too curious:

    Laughing my head off!

    Reply
  264. moo said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Is psyco hose beast a popular American insult? The only other time I have ever heard it was when Steve Albini said it about Courtney Love aand what does it mean?

    Reply
  265. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    @Tamara:
    What do you mean? Can you tell all of us. This is all interesting. But I don’t understand why Me would post so much but so little. Which one is egging us on. Are more than one “playing” us? Perhaps in sync? Or is someone actually wanting to help? If they do, why aren’t they completely? So many questions, so few (concrete) answers.

    Reply
  266. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    @Me: . Right but if she’s as awful as you say, and you’re in the know, why not slip the word to someone who can expedite matters and put an end to it, in lieu of posting here?

    Reply
  267. KatB said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    @Hope4Grace: I think George C has all the time in the world to help out his buddy BP – maybe it can be the plotline for the next Oceans movie….

    Reply
  268. mandy said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    @KatB:
    This time the Ocean’s gang plan the biggest heist of all: stealing all 6 of Angelina Jolie’s children…cue the music…lol

    Reply
  269. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    @mandy: I’d buy that ticket

    Reply
  270. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @p:Her entire sense of identity comes from the press, and gossip sites. Posting here packs a bigger wallop.

    Reply
  271. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @Tamara:

    ITA again. Me – why has Brad hung in for as long as he has if AJ has done such heinous (henious?) acts? OK he’s made a decision to split from her finally but what gives with the previous 4-5 years, his excuse is??? All those kids in quick succession and both kept working and what’s with his new babies on the way, how does he explain that? He doesn’t come out of this situation unscathed, IMO.

    Reply
  272. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @p:I mean that it appears to me that ME is using reverse psychology on us.

    @ME – If Im wrong I apologize, but you are saying a whole lot of nothing while giving the impression of having a lot of inside information.

    Reply
  273. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @mandy:LOL Very funnnneeeeee!! haha

    Reply
  274. LMC123 said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    I have a feeling that this is all one gigantic hoax! Trust me. Don’t like Brangelina in the least, but this is just sooooo out there.

    Reply
  275. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @Billi:Billi – what is ITA?

    Reply
  276. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @Me:
    I have a good idea who this may be, if this person is real. As far as the Sudanese woman, she is trying to sue Brad apparently or so I have heard, and I suspect the second woman is not. That is what I meant earlier.

    Reply
  277. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    @Tamara:I know. And there’s a reason for it. This is for my own self-protection. As long as B knows I’m in and pschohosebeast knows I have a can of whoop ass I’m willing to open, then I’m good.

    Reply
  278. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Me:

    Either you’re a nobody (regular joe/jane) or you’re George Clooney. If you’re George can I ask you a question please? I’ve always wondered if you wear dentures, yes/no? I don’t know why but I think you do. You still look great though.

    Reply
  279. Susanna said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    I was thinking Me is Jen or George, or a close friend or family member. Interesting. What you are describing is some Michael Clayton sh@t!

    I just watched the youtube vid that someone posted, and stumbled across some other interviews. This is a Jay Leno interview Angie did in 2000. It’s very interesting, she is doing her tough girl act, and actually threatens Jay! She types up a list of jokes Jay made about Angie and her brother, and tears into him and says “we know where you live.” Also she says “If I wanted to kill you, I wouldn’t be here now.” This leads me to think that Ian’s sources are right, that Angie will do anything to get what she wants and she is a violent person.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5qXPcOwHvY&feature=related

    Reply
  280. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Me: . I see that her life is about publicity plainly enough, personally I don’t consider what they have a real relationship, the whole thing appears to be contingent on publicity; has done from the 1st. But you’re STILL not hearing me. I’m asking why you don’t turn her into the authorities, for the unspeakable things she’s done? An even bigger wallop.

    Unless they don’t involve the welfare of the children, or drug abuse/smuggling do they?

    Reply
  281. mandy said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    You know, I have seen this happen before on so many sites. As soon as someone tries to post with inside info people automatically start attacking them and questioning everthing they say and we never hear from them again. Why can’t we just give someone the benefit of the doubt and just listen to what they have to say. We could be missing out on info by running them off. Seriously, what do we have to lose at this point? Ian is apparently well protected.
    I have been checking these sites on an almost daily basis for the last few years and if there is a glimmer of hope that Brad has finally come to his senses and left her for good, I am hanging on to it. Just saying…

    Reply
  282. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @Kate:Oh Kate! Im so glad to see you! LOL I am just going to shut up and take myself out of this hot water! LOL

    Reply
  283. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    I want to know more about the Sudanese woman.

    Reply
  284. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @Tamara:

    I totally agree!

    Reply
  285. Fan said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @Me:

    You will find that most people think Brad has a lot of explaining to do, especially Jens fans. Angie, not so much, everyone expected crazy. Understand I’m not saying that they are owed or should even expect it, but they will want it.

    Anyway I still think one of the most interesting things to watch will be how media like CNN ( specifically the 360 guy ) handle this.

    Reply
  286. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @Tamara:
    I totally agree

    Reply
  287. KatB said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    @mandy: LOL, but don’t fancy their chances getting the poor kids away from AJ, JH, the pitbull and the other assorted hangers on.

    Reply
  288. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    I’m not George Clooney. B’s got friends who aren’t actors, people from all walks of life. I’ve known him for over a decade, and I’m not an actor.

    @p:There’s a time for everything…and everything in its time.

    Reply
  289. LMC123 said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @Fan:

    ITA. If ANY of this is true it will be VERY interesting to see the reaction by all of the media outlets that have fawned over them for the past 5 years. GREAT! Now I’m hooked again.

    Reply
  290. Me said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @p:oh and drug smuggling? NO.

    Reply
  291. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    @Billi: Spilt my drink on that one…..crack me up. seriously though it would be nice to have someone actually looking out for Brad, although at this point, he’s in so deep by his own will….it won’t just go away.

    Reply
  292. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @mandy:To Everyone – I am so sorry if I have hurt ME’s feelings, I just truly thought that something just didn’t make sense!!! I told ME that if I was wrong I apologize, ALL I was really trying to say was that what ME was saying (which by the way wasn’t much) could be more hurtful to BP then helpful!!! And that if ME had something to say why not just say it, or why come on and post at all? Now I see that ME thinks this is a better way to pierce AJ. Okay, thats it from me on the subject, I promise. Mea Culpa

    Reply
  293. Hope4Grace said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    @Tamara: I understand, really I don’t think you did anything wrong. Besides, this place is annoy, which means that anyone could post here without it tracing back to them. Why the secrecy? So I do understand your stance on that.

    Reply
  294. LMC123 said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    @Me:

    Will Brad be seeking custody of all 6 kids? Is there a fear that AJ will harm them in some way?

    Reply
  295. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    @mandy: . Inside information. Dude they’ve neither said anything specific (nor apparently done anything) except agree with Ian and lot’s of other people here that AJ is a dangerous nut.

    Reply
  296. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    @Hope4Grace:

    No I’m in Brad’s corner but he need a good cuff in the neck for screwing up his life. He should have seen the writing on the wall sooner with AJ and before all those kids.

    Reply
  297. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    @Me: . And the rest?

    How much time is “it’s” time?

    Reply
  298. tyin said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    @Kate:
    could you explain pls?

    @cuze:
    i believe we all want to know more about her

    Reply
  299. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    .@too curious:
    Yes, she has her gargoyle loontardian minion pets to call on for some dirty work.
    I mean that in all seriousness.

    Reply
  300. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    I wish to hell Ian had gotten some shit on tape. And the new pic up top of AJ w a gun to her head didn’t escape me.

    Reply
  301. mandy said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    @Billi:
    Agreed, but if he has finally left her then we need to support him and bring her down. I think she obviously deceived him at first and then there were kids involved. Maybe he stayed all this time to protect the kids. IDK

    Reply
  302. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    @Billi:
    She’s also a loon. She wouldn’t pass a background check, no way- no how! She is mentally unstable, this facade we see today is very very new. She was loving being a loon before she devised a plan to take over the universe as the most beautiful, benevolent, unearthly goddess.
    She has a history of depression, suicidal thoughts (hired a hit man to off herself according to her- what a moron), and probably a laundry list of other stuff I can’t think to mention right now. She wouldn’t qualify on the up and up here in the US.
    I know several DECENT and wonderful people who have been waiting what seems an eternity to adopt, and have yet to see jack for their time, money, and open hearts just dreaming of a bably to love.

    Reply
  303. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    @Tamara:

    Tamara not sure why you need to apologize. One minute the poster said AJ participated in horrible, heinous acts against someone else and if the crap this person did were to be made public, they would be humiliated. Now that implies pretty serious shit. Then in later posts the info had less serious implications, eg. not relating to the kids, etc. It begged questioning and that’s what you and others did. We’ll leave it at that.

    Reply
  304. mandy said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    @p:
    There is a reason she always plays assasins. Frightening!

    Reply
  305. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    I think we should cease to speculate about the identity of “Me”.

    Reply
  306. Gitano said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    @Lucifer:

    So, Lucifer, care to shed some light on your comment? Like the details of the “dark and sinister forces”!

    Reply
  307. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    @Billi:Thanks Billi – I just didnt want to come off as a bully!!

    Reply
  308. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    @McDooks:

    Looking forward to the day when the puzzle parts are all together and we get the whole picture. She’s a loon alright and hopefully she and her career will disappear in disgrace to some place far far away.

    Reply
  309. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    @Tamara:

    :) Bully, not even close.

    Reply
  310. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    @Me:
    But can Brad truly come out unscathed? If she has done some truly horrific and heinous things that he KNOWS about, but yet has continued this charade of thiers, there comes a point where he becomes guilty by association, especially if he knows of horrific things and says/does NOTHING in a reasonable amount of time. I mean days or weeks, not months or years or piles of deeds.

    Reply
  311. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Is it at all possible that BP really didn’t know much about her dark side, that she fooled him into believing that she had turned a corner and was now the benevelant glenda good witch of the world? Because when all this so called evil behavior comes to light then he is going to have some explaining to do.

    Reply
  312. LMC123 said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    @McDooks:

    Very good points.

    Reply
  313. anon said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @anonymous:
    I concur 100%.

    Reply
  314. mandy said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @Tamara:
    I am sorry. I didn’t think you were a bully and I understand where you are coming from. I would just really like to hear what this person has to say, if anything.

    Reply
  315. sinker said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @Billi:
    i interpreted Me’s remarks to mean that the heinous acts did not have to do with her treatment of the kids. could have something to do with her UN poste, some of her fauxmanitarian causes, ruining careers of others, her brother, mother, father, etc. etc. many ways she could be heinous w/out involving the children directly.

    Reply
  316. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @McDooks:Yeppers

    Reply
  317. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    Yowzie. I didn’t see Ian’s update re the bodyguard. AJ better be careful because if anything happens to Ian she’d be the obvious suspect. Have to watch the you tube link of AJ on Leno that Susanna posted.

    Reply
  318. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    @sinker:

    Could be stinker. My obvious concern was related to her children as opposed to an adult who could conceivable protect themself.

    Reply
  319. Susanna said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Have you guys read this Angie interview from Esquire in 2000? It is quite disturbing. Granted, it is probably from the time when she was admittedly on heroin. But in the interview she comes across as not only strung out on drugs, but totally insane. She can’t even carry on a conversation. Also, even though her dad brings her to the interview, and they’re obviously close she refers to him as “Jon.”

    http://www.esquire.com/angelina-jolie-torture-fame-0200?click=main_sr

    Angie is 50 minutes late to the interview, and the interviewer describes her as, “smaller and thinner and sadder than I expected from that hieratic movie-star face and the wild bad-girl spirit she projects onscreen–…She looks beaten and dogged.”

    She is on the edge of “quick flashing anger” …”it’s so quick and mercurial I feel very much like I’m dealing with a crazy person. Half of what she says I can’t follow, it’s in some private language about things that happened to her recently and she’s so jittery and raw I say, Don’t be sorry, I would have been mad before but I can see you’re a suffering human being and it’s not that big a deal. At some point she starts to cry–a tear wells in her eye and leaks down her cheek.”

    “She’s very skinny and pale and is wearing no makeup, a few blotches on her face, and I get glimpses of her arms, which are marked with black tattoos and it’s not two minutes in her presence that I check those long arms for tracks. Don’t see any, but every time I step closer to her so I can get into normal human speaking range, she steps back six inches or a foot more than normal. Did she just smoke a joint? ”

    “she’s twisting and twisting my card into lint and saying how she’s thinking maybe she doesn’t even need acting, maybe she should just move to the country and have a kid and I think, For God’s sake don’t do that–thinking of the kid.”

    Reply
  320. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    Sorry I meant sinker. When I was writing I was thinking why would anyone pick a name like stinker. My apologies.

    Reply
  321. Chelsea said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    @Me: Is there any possibility of a Jen/Brad reunion?

    Reply
  322. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    Aww there’s my baby! hahaha

    Reply
  323. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @Tamara:

    So cute. Still a pup?

    Reply
  324. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    @Billi:She’s a bit older now, a year old, still my baby

    Reply
  325. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    @p:

    Here’s Me’s earlier response to pookiedoll: The acts I refer to does not involve her parenting or children. I only meant that there are 6 beautiful, innocent children who need to remain untouched by this breakup. Up until now, they have been and everyone wants to keep it that way.

    Reply
  326. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    @Susanna:She has said that she wanted to be a mortician

    Reply
  327. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @Billi:I haven’t seen Me here for awhile now, but he/she seemed to back down the venom of his/her earlier posts. Who knows who ME really was, seemed so suspicious to me and Im not usually like that

    Reply
  328. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @Tamara:
    SO cute!!!

    Reply
  329. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @McDooks:Right back atcha! You inspired me to put mine up! LOL

    Reply
  330. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    Yesterday I questioned why we should trust any of Angelinas sources, and I am sure there are some that Ian does trust, but the one that he has trusted in the past that told him that they were all in New Orleans with a Priest was an obvious plant, and what SR is alluding to. I would be interested in knowing what other things that particular source has given Ian that we have been told, because that information imo we can just toss out.

    Based on what I know, just trying to understand any of this, Brad is the one who is private, not Angelina. He alwayas had a publicist for 15 years up until about a year ago, so he never bothered with any of this manipulative stuff that Jolie does. I mentioned before that Howard Bragman devoted an entire chapter in his book to her because he considers her to be a PR genius. As Dawn said, Evil Hitler smart when it comes to working the media. Now this is where she has one up on Brad. She has on her own done this for years and years, and without any confidentiality contracts, which is why there is information still out there she wishes was not. Brad on the other hand, had these contracts from the time he hit it big, which has been for a long time now. You do not hear much on him, unless he wants you too. He and Jen were very private people. He was to the so much it bordered paranoia. He bought his Los Feliz home many years ago and now has bult it into a compound, why, so no one else can buy those homes and spy on him, that is why.

    Anything that Ian has told us that comes from Brads sources he has gotten from going undercover and that is the only way he can get it most likely, and those imo are pretty strong sources. That is why I believe they are done, over, because I believe no one around him wants him with this batshit crazy ho anymore. Now the sources for Angelina on the other hand, some have to be real because the information is so damaging, and some of that is BBT camp. However the fluff puff like the New Orleans and any thing that does not make her look bad, that is a plant jmo

    Brad cares about his image as a movie star to promote movies, but I don’t think he was ever the one who wanted to pimp the kids out, but who knows. Maybe he did for a bit when he was under her spell and it has now worn off, and yes I do think he was mesmerized by her for at least a year, and he quickly saw the light when Shiloh was about a year old. He is a peacemaker though, not a fighter, that is his nature so imo he thought he could save his family. The Waltons it was not and this witch drug him down the darkness, anyone ever heard of that computer game Patch 3.1 or read the Wow Insider notes on it, hell it sounds like something right out of her life with the dogs the sex the demons the drugs and all that shit.

    I think Brad can make it back to the light with the right support, but if he is really stupid enough to make a public appearance with this woman to calm the masses on the split news after she has threatend to kill Ian, and he is going to call her on that with legal action, well, sink or swim buddy, myself, I think that may have been plant news also and he is bunkering down in France. JMO but we will see in time.

    Reply
  331. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @Tamara:

    You’re not going to apologize again are you? Just kidding. Well if Me was legit, he/she got their message to us that AJ has been involved in some serious bad shit and that they will support Brad in any way. Kate thought she might know who this person is but Kate has disappeared for now. She’ll be back and possibly shed some light on this person’s identity.

    Reply
  332. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    Awww. My avie is the REAL McDooks. Sadly, his lifetime has come and gone, I miss him so much. He was truly my soulmate in canine form. Enjoy your pup. Aren’t they like angels on earth?
    I wonder if we’llever be privy to what Me says they know, and is it really that damning. I wholly believe Scrangie is as self-serving and diabolical as Me says- you can see it all over her. Especially early on in her career before she became so huge- narcissist all the way. She set the stakes way high when she set her sights on being worshipped like none other in the history of the world.

    Reply
  333. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @Billi: . Ok I missed that post. The limo driver said something different but it would be good if SR, 9¢ could verify this person. Coz if someone can verify the drug, abuse, and unstable nature hasn’t effected them I’m much relieved. That’s the biggest issue, the rest are adults.

    Reply
  334. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    Haven’t heard from Kate either. I hope Me is who they say they are, are friend of BP’s. I would love more tidbits of info. I wonder if Kate was on to something when she posted the message below.
    Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 3:54 pm .
    @Me:
    I have a good idea who this may be, if this person is real. As far as the Sudanese woman, she is trying to sue Brad apparently or so I have heard, and I suspect the second woman is not. That is what I meant earlier.

    @Tamara:

    Reply
  335. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    Ok, I posted too soon. Kate’s back with us. I love her postings.

    Reply
  336. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    Hey, this is my first post. I’ve been enjoying lurking for awhile now but something struck me that I wanted to mention. This post by Sugar Ray quotes the song by Hall & Oates. I’ve never noticed that she’s done that before except in the Obama post. She has lyrics from Lady Madonna by The Beatles all through it. I wonder if it’s just an entertaining way to make a point or if there’s a connection?

    Reply
  337. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    Kate – what about the house in Santa Barbara? Did they sell that, or would that be the property they still own together?

    Reply
  338. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    @pookiedoll:Yea, I was wondering about the Sudanese, I must have missed the part where she is suing him. When did that come out?

    Reply
  339. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    @p:
    Me said she would be humilated. I take that to me it goes beyond sex because she has freely admitted most of what we have talked about. It is not about her parenting. Now we know about the beast balls. It is not about drugs. Henious..well faking a pregnancy would do that, but that would involve Brad so I say no on that, however, fucking your brother would work. lol Fucking him on tape would work better. That would only help Brad

    Reply
  340. stinky-inky said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    @Billi:
    Hey!

    Reply
  341. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    @p:
    I have a feeling that both of them can’t really be bothered with the kids, except for phot-op time. Maybe ArmPitt is the more caring of the two, but I don’t believe they are truly hands on parents. Undoubtedly to me they have plenty of hired help with the kids so they aren’t neglected as far as basic needs for survival go. The hired help probably play with them and give them each individual attention, but parental love is probably scarce in that clan.
    No offense to Brad supporters, but I just don’t think those kids are being parented by their PARENTS, but by caregivers instead.
    JMO.

    Reply
  342. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    @Kate: . Sorry I disagree. De Niro is private. Bale is private. Streep, Blanchett, Depp…are private. Brad, Jen, Angie, were never private. The publicist might tell you what looks good or bad to the public, but not how public you should be. Brad and Jen may have had more boundaries then AJ, but that ain’t sayin’ much.

    Reply
  343. Gitano said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    @Tamara:

    That would be Brad’s. He purchased that while married to Jen and kept it in the divorce settlement.

    Reply
  344. tyin said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    @Kate:
    what do you think brad should do then, Kate?

    Reply
  345. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    @McDooks:Oh McDooks: I am sorrier for you then I can even say!! They say dogs only have a short life because they are born knowing how to love it doesnt take them a lifetime to learn. They are the purest form on earth.

    Reply
  346. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    @Tamara:
    I think this is still pure speculation, but it sounds like there is a shakedown going on!

    Reply
  347. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    @Kate:
    I’m thinking along the same lines. She has been pretty open about stuff that would otherwise be humiliating- smart move, can’t come back to bite her in the ass.
    BUT a little brotherly lovin’ would hurt her a LOT. How many of her fans would be able to take that without seriously questioning their own sanity. Incest could be a career breaker for sure. ESPECIALLY if on video.

    Reply
  348. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    @Gitano:I was just wondering because that house seems to fly under the radar, and it seems like a good place to fly a private plane in and out of, and to hide out in.

    Reply
  349. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    @ Kate – doesn’t the fact that Angelina has made death threats to Ian now take this to another level in terms of news? To me this is not just about the stories on this site any more, its about what’s going on between her and Ian. This to me is a bigger story than anything that has been written on this site so far. She may well be the agent of her own downfall. BTW, are there any clues you can give as to who this Me may be (hi Me BTW). And I have a friend watching this site with me tonight who is now hooked, he says hi bitches.

    Reply
  350. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    @Tamara:
    I would agree with that point of view.

    Reply
  351. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    @Tamara:
    I don’t know. I was confused about a post saying two women were pregnant by BP. Then I got a reply & I interpreted it as being Angie & the Sudanese women. But then another post I read thru me completely off. If someone can explain please do.

    Reply
  352. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @: Kate – humiliation could mean exposing her as a hypocrite perhaps, maybe tax dodging, money laundering etc etc?

    Reply
  353. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @Keane:
    Surely she was smart enough to use a lackey, no? Someone terminally loyal, who wouldn’t rat her ass out? Lie and say it was all their own idea? Or maybe it IS a loontardian acting on thier own out of love!

    Reply
  354. Alif said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    @CC:
    @1:08 p.m.
    That’s what I suspected from day one!

    Reply
  355. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    How is Sugar comparing Brangie to Rock Hudson and Doris Day? I mean, I know he was gay and it was hidden until he died of AIDS, but he wasn’t married to Doris Day, they only acted in a few movies together, so what is the biggest scandal since then, and why use them as an example??

    Reply
  356. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    @Keane:
    Tell your friend we say “Wassup, skank!” I mean that in the nicest way, I hope you know :)

    Reply
  357. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    @McDooks: . Agreed 100%! I knew as soon as Brad said 3-4 yrs ago he would slow down his schedule, he ABSOLUTELY would NOT. He likes to have 12 balls in the air at the same time, wants to be in places to be seen and photographed, and was honest about that and how he played ball with the media to stay relevant, back when he allowed some honesty to filter thru in an interview w Clooney, who agreed w him. That’s why he was willing to play hard w AJ to begin with, and no doubt to look the other way a lot. He just ignored to crazy for too long. Pitt even said he was too selfish to have kids before Joloie came along, and discovered he could have a nanny household and use the tikes as leverage. He stalled as he could w JA. He knew himself… that and he probably wanted a young, total hottie on his arm long term.

    Reply
  358. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    @pookiedoll:
    I think one of the things tossed around yesterday that HH confirmed is that Pitt has not one, but TWO women knocked up right now.
    Ain’t that some shit!

    Reply
  359. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    @stinky-inky:

    Oh boy I’m in hot water :( Stinky-inky is a lovely name, not to be compared in anyway to stinker. :)

    Reply
  360. dina said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    Wow. This is getting crazy. Ian, SR and Ms. 9, all of you please be careful. Ian, have you gone to the police yet?

    I can’t believe how much this topic has exploded! I ran some errands today and came back to all this! I’ve read most of the comments but I still have a few to go.

    IUC posters rock.

    Reply
  361. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @Keane:HI right back atcha. Keane, re the death threats, first of all, thank God Ian hired a bodyguard, this is just getting crazy. But why would Nine Cent have to take over as Editor, it almost sounds like hes frightened to even post to this site. This site cannot be worth his life for fucks sake.

    Reply
  362. stinky-inky said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @Billi:
    lol!

    Reply
  363. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @McDooks:
    That is the shits. What I’m trying to figure out/understand is….WHO. Which two females.

    Reply
  364. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @pookiedoll:
    One is said to be Sudanese about 23 years old and I think it was ALSO rumored that the other woman is Sudanese as well. Anybody remember?

    Reply
  365. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @Billi:LMAO

    Reply
  366. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    I will say it again and see what someone thinks. Isn’t it entirely possible that the Sudanese was a Nanny to the twins at the Chateau? She still lives in France, and the Nanny-gate story could be to throw us off the scent of the REAL story. Keane – what do you think??

    Reply
  367. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    @Keane:
    Me said, All I can say is that someone participated in horrible, heinous acts against someone else and if the crap this person did were to be made public, they would be humiliated. That’s all I’m going to say.

    I don’t know about anyone else but heinous (to me) is beyond fuck your brother kinda sick. That is like molestation, mutilation, kinda sick.

    Reply
  368. tyin said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    THE sudanese is still one, what about the other one?
    we are talking about 2 women now.
    And anyway, nanny or not… i have some ideas about those 2 women, and not a nice idea honestly.

    Reply
  369. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    @Tamara:
    It didn’t come out-not yet lol

    The reason I gave credit due on that and said I did not figure that out on my own is I was told that and if that person is reading this board as well, and that may be, it would not be very ethical of me to pretend I figured that out on my own, however, if you read the way SR has worded that we would have eventually figured that out I believe. :)

    Reply
  370. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    Keane it depends on how the threats were made and what the evidence is. Example. if AJ’s voice is on his answering machine threatening to kill him, then yes. If some gun-for-hire shook him down in an alley, w no corroborating witnesses then no. Especially if she has a great team of lawyers. It could even backfire, given the strength of her legal team, and how inflammatory this site is.

    Reply
  371. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    @Tamara:
    Sure, I think it is possible. As me (not our informant, but the other one) proposed, what are the odds of some average jane infiltrating ArmPitt’s life? I wouldn’t put my money on a random/chance meeting, but one where she had a ‘purpose’ if you will to be around. just my thoughts…

    Reply
  372. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    @ Tamara – but if there are death threats coming from Angelina’s camp, anything that can be traced back to Angelina, even if she says they were nothing to do with her, this would sink her forever does everyone understand? This is the biggest story that has hit this site so far. If Ian has proof of these threats, has the police involved and is going after her legally because of it, this alone will sink her career. All these stories will become irrelevant when the world knows that someone in the camp of UN worker and mother of 6 young children, including 3 vulnerable orphans, Angelina Jolie, has a friend or associate or staff member making threats to kill a reporter. Does everyone see what I mean? This is Ian’s biggest story by far so far, and even if she denies it to the hilt this is scandalous enough to stick to her forever. That’s what SR meant by “high leveraged futures”, she is playing with the highest stakes possible. How she will ever be able to represent the peace enovy organisation of the UN ever again I do not know.

    Reply
  373. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    @Tamara:

    You could very well be right. The only thing I wonder is what happened to Brad’s well-connected Washington lady? Could she be Sudanese? Or does Sudanese relate to only one of the pregnant ladies and the Washington lady is still in the picture whoever she may be?

    Reply
  374. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    @tyin:
    Do tell your ideas.

    Reply
  375. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    @Keane:

    I wonder how the threats came through to Ian? By phone, could be tracked. By email, can be tracked. By mail, not very easily.

    Reply
  376. ascar said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    what i don’t understand if jen is in contact with brad than she knows what’s going on (he seeks advice from her) why in the hell she wants him back?

    Reply
  377. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    @pookiedoll:
    I agree, to me “heinous” is pretty heavy terminology. But you never know what someone’s understanding of a particular word is, or their perception of what constitutes heinous, or (no offense Me- we still have no idea of what your can o’ whoop ass contains) their propensity for exaggeration might be.

    Reply
  378. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    @Me: She exudes a very negative aura. Could she possibly be involved in some very strange, ritualistic stuff? I have heard about actors/politicians being involved in masonic, satanic rituals, ritualistic sacrifice. Reminded me of “Eyes wide shut”. Any truth to these rumours, in general?

    Reply
  379. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    @pookiedoll:

    I agree heinous has very serious implications. To SR’s post what are the velvet-lined boxes that can be viewed from the highway, coffins in a cemetary? I wish that was explained.

    Reply
  380. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    @Keane:
    I would think the threats would, but, keep in mind, the threats may have been passed through a 3rd party and not from her to him, so he would have to prove she did indeed say it or was her intention to do it. I thought I might know who Me was but then Me starting contradicting , Me said they were not an actor, they knew Brad for 10 years, and had a really great lawyer and was squeaky clean.Only 10 years, that puts Me meeting Brad when was 35 years old and he was married to Jen ….ah and some of the terms used-

    It will be War? and the just found this site yesterday, ah I don’t think so..lol
    then this-
    They’re not ready to announce it yet, trying to work out details before the media storm begins.
    sorry that does not sound like someone who is in Brad’s camp, a Brad source would not inclued her.jmo
    Then- he would kill me if he knew I was posting here but -wait- later- Brad if you are reading? WTF

    Sorry, I think this is another Angie plant..the more they yapped, the more they gave themself away. JMO

    Reply
  381. pookiedoll said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    @Billi:
    Me too. I was thinking of possibley funeral parlor, mortician, sex with the dead??? I don’t know. But let’s face it she’s fucked up!!! And many of us are on overdrive.

    Reply
  382. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    @ p – yeah I guess I just do not get the difference in legal system and cultures in the UK and the US. As a nation on the whole we are far less violent. Threats to kill are a very serious offence, you get years for them, even if you never hurt a hair on someone’s head. The association of a public or political figure with threats to kill, even if they did not come from that individual specifically or could be linked directly back to them, would be enough to ruin their career for ever. A tv presenter called Michael Barrymore in the UK had some dodgy incident happen at his house where a party-goer was found drowned in his swimming pool. There were signs he may have been raped according to the post-mortem but it may have been caused by consensual sex. While I don’t think Barrymore killed this man, someone at the party knows what happened and are keeping their silence. Barrymore had fled his house when the police arrived, probably because he was high on drugs. People don’t think he was responsible for the death but that someone associated with him knows what happened and they are keeping schtum. This has wrecked his career, its dead. He used to be the most popular, successful and family-friendly presenter on television. His career is finished. Similar story with someone who was accused of date rape by another presenter in her autobiography although she never named him. It got out that it was him though and he was arrested. He went to court and was eventually cleared of all charges. But his career finished there and then. He was also one of the biggest names on UK tv. Neither of these people were convicted of a crime or necessarily had anything to do with one. But there was no way they would ever have a career again. I would be amazred that a suggestion of making death threats from someone within AJ’s camp would not have a similar effect on her. But maybe the US is just a totally different culture.

    Reply
  383. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    @Billi: . I remember Ian saying the woman claimed to be pregnant and since it didn’t sound to me like Pitt authorized the happy announcement, that’s not good. And there exists the possibility the lady is a stripper. However SR seems to imply that Pitt’s Sudanese 3 meals a day approach is a better one…so I don’t know.

    Reply
  384. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    @p:
    Not quite what I meant, they did talk about their relationship, but they were not party animals. Stayed home alot, hung with a close knit group of friends, that sort of thing, all relative

    Reply
  385. Susanna said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    The update above says “threats have been made against Ian.” Now it doesn’t say death threats, it just says threats. I took that to mean legal threats, that they will file a lawsuit. I don’t know that even Angie is crazy enough to threaten to kill a reporter! I think her lawyers or her management team, or some studio lawyers are threatening Ian. These people have millions and millions of dollars, an unbelievably valuable vested interest, in protecting her as a star and a money maker. Even if the threats were for bodily harm, Angie is smart enough to be at least 5 people removed!

    Ian, is it threats against your health/life/bodily harm or just legal threats?

    Reply
  386. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    @Kate:
    Yeah, I agree. Some of the statements didn’t necessarily NEGATE prior statements, but some did, and if this person is who they say they are (meaning a close friend with menacing info on Scrangie) I hope they will understand the healthy skepticism.

    Reply
  387. Susanna said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    Also, the next update does say that Ian hired a bodyguard, which would make us all think that threats of bodily harm have been made. But, Ian could just be taking extra cautious measures. I sure hope that is the case.

    Reply
  388. dina said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    Could the velvet boxes be referring to smuggling drugs in dead bodies?
    Sorry if this has been suggested before.

    Reply
  389. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    @Susanna:

    Ian’s hired a bodyguard so he must feel there’s at least the remote chance he could be physically threatened. AJ is crazy, who knows what she’ll get ask someone to do or someone thinking they’d be doing her a favor and act on their own against Ian. You just never know.

    Reply
  390. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    @ Kate – I tend to agree, what exactly would the point of them posting here be? Just to let us all in on the jape? Why would they care, what are we to them. Yes, I think unless a so-called “insider” can reveal some detail of who they are and why they know what they know, I can’t give any more credence to what they say than any one of Angie’s alts. Plus there’s the lack of specifics. Just saying bad shit has gone on isn’t enough to make any dfference to what any of us think. I need details and an idea of who the source is. Otherwise, no cigar.

    But this stuff with regard to Ian is truly disgusting and must not be allowed to go unnoticed. But I guess it just shows how desperate she’s getting. Sleep well ladies and Ian, catch you all tomorrow.

    Reply
  391. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    @Keane:
    I think sadly the US culture is on a definite downslide as far as morals and what is deemed acceptable or reprehensible. More and more it seems like big time fuckups are overlooked or downplayed, and it is worrisome.
    I would think that Scrangie would use a minion to do the dirty work and have absolute power over this minion. Like Dracula over Wrenfield…

    Reply
  392. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    @dina: I think it is something even more disgusting. Could the velvet boxes refer to snuff videos?

    Reply
  393. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    @Susanna:
    I don’t think he’d have hired a full time body guard unless he feared for his safety.

    Reply
  394. Perez said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    I don’t believe these stories. Brad, Angie and the kids are a very happy and beautiful family. Angie is pregnant with a 7th child and they will adopt another child this year, so they become in octoparents. For all these stories Brangie has kept silence because they won’t fall in this kind of steril discussion and garbage. On the other side Jen has moved on, I don’t know what the media wants to keep the triangle among them. I remember the Jen’s words: “There are not heroes and villians at this story. I owe nothing to anybody, nobody owes nothing to me”. Please Ian, dedicate you site to Mel Gibson and Leave them alone.

    Reply
  395. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    @Keane: . Again if there’s strong evidence, he was threatened it would indeed have serious consequences. But people are suspicious of ppl trying to blackmail $$ out of the rich to begin with. Also the lawyers may paint Ian as a man on a mission, purveyor of spectacle, since they may not be able to dig up enough proof to support most of the very dirty stuff here.

    Reply
  396. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    @pookiedoll:
    Hey Pookie, there is one Sudanese woman pregnant about 4 months, he is having problems with, and the other one we do not really know who she is, and not having problems with, that part is a guess based on what SR posted above. I am saying he is having problems based on something else, but it fits with what SR wrote as well.

    Reply
  397. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    @ Susanna – Ian has had legal threats made against him for a couple of days now – check previous updates about angry letters flying back and forth from both their lawyers (confirming their split), that’s all legit. Then he said he heard Angie wanted his head and he was going to look into it. Then he said he is passing the threats on to the appropriate authorities, i.e. the police. He’s talking about death/violent threats. That’s why I think this is a very sinister turn of events. Legal threats are one thing, threats of violence, now that’s serious. It takes all this from tabloid to broadsheet news if you hear what I am saying.

    Reply
  398. dina said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    @anonymous:
    Very good point. I remember hearing a rumor a few years ago that the real reason Patrica Arquette divorced Nic Cage was because of his collection of snuff films and his obsession with them. I don’t know if that is true or not but I read the rumor on more than one site.

    Reply
  399. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    Wish SR would step in and give is a hint if anyone’s gotten warm on anyone’s guesses, like the velvet-lined boxes.

    Is the Doris Day and Rock Hudson example just telling us this relationship was a sham from the start or if not, then what?

    Reply
  400. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    One final thought, could Sudanese for breakfast, Sudanese for Lunch and Sudanese for dinner or whatever the phrasing was mean THREE Sudanese women?! I leave you with that thought, catch you tomorrow x

    Reply
  401. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    @Kate:I KNEW it! I called him/her on it very early in her posting, and then voila, he/she just disappeared. Kate did you see any of what I said to Me about how he/she was implicating BP by her comments??

    Reply
  402. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @dina:

    Nic Cage and snuff films? That is so disgusting if true, I mean how can anyone watch another human being being tortured and killed and get enjoyment out of it unless they are truly evil?

    Reply
  403. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    @Kate: . Yeah they went to all the places to be seen and photographed. Up on stage at high profile concerts, swinging w Clooney in Vegas hot spots, trendy restaurants to be seen in, extravaganza interviews on Oprah. Red carpet film premiers. Even their B-day parties were spectacles, that the public was clued in on. That’s what I mean… they were media-driven, party animals, by Pitt’s own admission.

    Reply
  404. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    Me referred to her as a “psycho hose beast”. hmmmm

    Reply
  405. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:23 pm

    @Keane:
    Actually, I took it to mean he was spending day and night with her

    Reply
  406. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    @dina: Sexual perversions beyond imagination, and persistently ignored by the media.

    Reply
  407. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    @Keane:
    Their reason “cough cough” was because they said they knew Angie reads here and if she hurts Brad again or if she makes him look bad it will be war, and Brad just needs to sat the word. scroll up.

    Sorry that does not cut it for me, I am sick and tired of, “they would know it is me” bullshit. No hell they would not, a person could pass the info 50 different ways and all of those people could go out like a little army of ants and post it for them, does this person think they are the only one that has privy to this info, good grief. Good try Ang. Not a nice name you called yourself but that was a nice touch. lol

    Reply
  408. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:27 pm

    @ Billi – people who are obsessed with death and the dark things in life I guess. Remember AJ took a course to train to be a funeral directror in her youth and is in to black magic. She talked about it in that actors interview she did in a cutesy way just like she talked about her boyfriend and her cutting each other with knives during sex when they were 14 years old and how it was really smart of her mom to allow her to have a live-in boyfriend at the age of 14 because it kept her same. Like it was all such quaint and cute youthful indiscretion – how does she get away with it? Ah yes, that’s it, flirting etc. Of course. Night all x

    Reply
  409. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    @Keane:
    I thought about that too, but Brad is being sued by the Sudanese woman, or rumored to be.

    @Tamara:

    Yes, I think you were dead on.

    Reply
  410. Keane said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    @ Kate – yeah could well be her latest strategy, about time she tried to come up with a new one, the others just went round in circles.

    And Ange if you are still watching this site like a hawk as I’m sure you are, shame on you for your threats against Ian. Plus its the fastest way to end your own career. Got to go now, see you guys tomorrow.

    Reply
  411. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    @cuze:
    Wayne and Garth called Wayne’s ex-girlfriend that in the original Wayne’s World. Back then it was a popular put down, haven’t really heard it in a while.

    Reply
  412. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    Hi Keane’s Friend!!

    Wow, I’m gone for a few hours and all hell has broke loose in here. I hope Ian is OK and all this works out for the best without anyone getting hurt. However, these things need to come to light if anyone is getting physically/emotionally hurt by the hands of the Mistress of Darkness.

    Loving everyone’s comments. You’re all a smart bunch.

    Reply
  413. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    Could the Sudanese woman be another goodwill ambassador? A lot of them are regular people like us.

    Reply
  414. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    Keane – you just can’t leave can you? haha Go to Bed! LOL

    Reply
  415. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    Maybe, but 23 years old sounds pretty young. Not that I have the slightest idea what is the norm or average for that type of thing!

    Reply
  416. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    @anonymous:
    Are there any computer gamers on here, serious players, that know the terms, that spend alot of time doing it, that under stand , because Patch Drops is a term used in that, and it you look at some of the games related to Patch , yikes. There are some other computer terms SR used. Patch 3 is almost straight from hell, if I am understanding it, covers pets too.

    Reply
  417. honestly said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    after traveling/living throughout the u.s., etc., i really feel it would be a relief for them and the general public to announce their separation. what they, perhaps, don’t comprehend, is that the longer they stay together, the greater the amount of resentment against them for being fakers. seriously, since i used to be in the biz, if i was their pr person i would be moving faster to facilitate the split. in this day and time, morals are so relative compared to what they used to be, i really think their split and any dirt that comes out about them will not be as bad as they may fear…i mean look at how many politicians have survived dirt that, in other arenas, would have them placed in jail…yet they continue to serve in their positions, etc….really, there would be a scandal, but in this day and time and i feel i have traveled enough among all walks of life to say this, the scandal would not be as painful as they think. i think the public would be fascinated by what may happen next on their life journey…now the reasons people would be fascinated with the scandal would be wide-ranging, but still the world would be focused on them…again. isn’t that what a.j./brad make money off of…public fascination? c’mon in the world of re-invention and to the mind of an artist, can they really resist change? isn’t it what they crave? and isn’t it what the public craves to watch? in other words, ian may be doing them a favor at a time when folks were ready for them to go away.

    Reply
  418. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    Ok, just found this when I googled a bunch of the scientific/medical terms from SR’s post. There is a brain mapping project that was started by Paul Allen. It uses brain slices and the institute is capable of putting out a terabyte of info. each day and it seeks to describe the cortex at the level of specific genes and individual neurons. These terms are all mentioned in his post. Doesn’t Angie and/or Brad have connections to Paul Allen?

    Reply
  419. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    @McDooks:

    23 is kinda young I guess.

    Reply
  420. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    @cynicalone:
    What would it be used for? Obviously to study the brain, but what else can it be used for? Perhaps to trace down genetic make-ups (passed down disorders, etc)?

    Reply
  421. anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    @Kate: Sorry, no idea, I have never heard these term before. Do you think she is killing animals for (her) sexual excitation, and the sex tape could be related to these activities? Maybe ‘clients’ enjoying these films?

    Reply
  422. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    I’m not really sure. Here’s the link to the website: http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/17-04/ff_brainatlas?currentPage=all

    It explains it all, but I’m not really scientifically inclined.

    Reply
  423. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    Also, googled patch drops and exclamation point and found this on some blog:

    It’s from another article written for Wired magazine and it describes a man named Leonardo Notarbartolo who was arrested as part of the Antwerp Diamond Center Heist. Here’s the part that pertains to SR’s post: “A silver Rolex peeks out from under his cuff, and a vertical strip of white soul patch drops down from his lower lip like an exclamation mark.”

    Reply
  424. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:58 pm

    @cynicalone:
    Was she dressing up as a man for sexy times, and going so far as to have a BBT soulpatch as part of her get up?

    Reply
  425. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    @honestly:

    Wouldn’t Brad’s new movie suffer at the box office if the news of their split came out before the release? Put the focus on the couple and take away from the movie. Could that be one of Brad’s reason for a delay?

    Reply
  426. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    @cynicalone:
    Wonder if that could be on a sex tape, one with her and BBT where they look like twins? Okay, now I’m just being silly. But what if?…

    Reply
  427. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    @cynicalone:
    OMG Not Billy Ray Cyrus too? LOL The soooouuuulllllpaaaatch.

    Reply
  428. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    ****MAJOR BREAKING UPDATE**** Angelina not Preggie!!!! IUC has confirmed it.

    Reply
  429. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    @honestly:WEll, infidelity might be excused, but AJ is frightened, there are indications that she has done something heinous, there are rumors that she has sex with dogs, there is drug abuse and possible incest. She has masterminded an outrageous PR stunt, and there is possible illegal activity. If it all came out her entire existence would be revealed as a sham, she would never be able to recover. And, there is now evidence that Ian has been threatened, if that were to come out she will face prison!!! I dont think she will be able to dust herself off and go on her merry way in the aftermath of these revelations.

    Reply
  430. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    @McDooks:
    Well, this might sound like a stretch but he’s using the same description for Angie as he used for a diamond thief. Maybe the velvet lined boxes refer to jewelry and that ties into the incriminating evidence?

    Reply
  431. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:05 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Thank goodness. I think most were convinced that it was a PR move so that one can be put to rest.

    Reply
  432. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    So white crystals refer to diamonds?

    Reply
  433. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    I don’t know, I find the diamond heist theory a bit far fetched.

    Reply
  434. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    African diamonds. Blood diamonds.

    Reply
  435. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    @anonymous:

    Nothing would rile people quicker besides harm to a baby or young person than harm to animals. If there’s animal cruelty to involved in the tape, even death and she’s party to it in some sexual way, she will be vilified by the public. Thing is I don’t see SR hinting anything other than a sex tape that will sell well.

    Reply
  436. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    @Tamara:
    I agree it sounds crazy. I wasn’t exactly alluding to a diamond heist though. It could be something like blood diamonds or smuggling. I know it sounds ridiculous but when i hear velvet lined boxes, that what comes to my mind. It’s just a suggestion, not really sure how much I’d even believe it!

    Reply
  437. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    @Perez:Hey Perez, did you see the latest update> Seems AJ isnt pregnant after all, hmmmmm, what say you now??

    Reply
  438. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    @Tamara:

    I take it he believed the story.

    Reply
  439. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    @cynicalone:velvet lined boxes and pebbles in a bag

    Reply
  440. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    That’s what I was thinking. She’s spent enough time in Afica and it would be a HUGE problem if she’s been using her UN trips to make connections in the blood diamond trade. Again, I don’t know much of anything about blood diamonds and if this is even a possiblility so if anyone has any knowledge, feel free to shoot it down!

    Reply
  441. Fan said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    @cynicalone:

    Where would she get $90 million? I may be coming around… a little…

    Reply
  442. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:33 pm

    i know some of you could not wait to get rid of Me, but why couldn’t you go along a little longer so we could know for sure? Some of you cannot wait to get rid of people and i think Me could possibly have something to say. jeez, give people a chance, especially peeps who MAY have inside info. i mean most are obvious that they are lying, but Me seemed somewhat believable. Hopefully he/she will come back and not be given the “go away, you’re lyin” speech some seem so eager to give. i may be wrong ( knowing me , that is the most likely thing) BUT give this one a chance people…

    Reply
  443. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    Blood diamond (also called a converted diamond, conflict diamond, hot diamond or a war diamond) refers to a diamond mined in a war zone and sold to finance an insurgency, invading army’s war efforts, or a warlord’s activity, usually in Africa.

    Reply
  444. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    @Billi:Good movie with Leo Di and Djimson Hinsou (sp?)

    Reply
  445. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:42 pm

    just me , but it doesn’t seem like diamonds….@Billi:

    Reply
  446. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    pasted this down here so we don’t have to keep scrolling up with 444 comments!

    sugar ray says:

    The world’s top discussion…critics carping…no oppressed truth seeker here…Brangie has pulled the wool over everyone…innovation is disemvoweling…Angie uses Ian to filter posts…he should outright ban them…unknown gyres…unleashed energies with anarchic twists…no successful joke…Angie sex tape will emerge…thanks to market forces…like pebbles in a bag…year of plenty development card…unlucky 7…no preggo…reemphasizing an old rule…go-to game…fix the grid…Sudanese supper…Sudanese lunch…Sudanese breakfast…another coal-fire…inexpensive and abundant…a smarter grid…utter chaos…Keane is dead on…So is Kate…solution won’t spring forth…until Angie comes clean…no more baby powder…or white crystals…enterprise is unique but redundant…Scores and guillotines…individual neurons…terabyte per day…Angie neurons…spread out like peanut butter…fear and anxiety…hoping she won’t get caught…millions of brain slices per day…unique barcodes…bunnies and brats…Richard Gere on the phone…so was former President Clinton…so was Madonna…an animal that at first appears normal…divided into microscopic cubes…crinkling around…patch drops down from her lower lip like an exclamation mark…velvet-lined boxes…visible from the highway…incriminating evidence…The biggest Hollywood deception since Rock Hudson and Doris Day…she’s a rich girl…and she’s gone too far…cause she know it don’t matter anyway…she can rely on the old mans money…she can rely on the old mans money…its a bitch girl…but its gone too far cause she know it don’t matter anyway…estoy cansado…buena suerte…te toca a ti…callate….

    Te Amo, SRRC

    *****UPDATE***** Angie offers Brad $90 million for kids (READ THIS)

    ****UPDATE****Ian snags interview with Pitt/Jolie closest friend – explosive stuff! Stay tuned!

    ****UPDATE**** Threats made against Ian. Action will be taken ASAP.

    ****UPDATE**** Ian has hired a full time bodyguard and will lay low for the next few days. Ms. Ninecent has taken over as interim editor.

    ****MAJOR BREAKING UPDATE**** Angelina not Preggie!!!! IUC has confirmed it.

    Reply
  447. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    @justathought:

    Me told us as much as he/she could (didn’t you read their posts?) supposedly because Brad would be mad if he found out they were posting on this site. And what info they did provide us was suspect if you compared the earlier posts to the later posts. People were skeptical because of that. No one was mean to them.

    I think this person came here as a lark/challenge to see how far they could string us along. Especially since most of us favor Brad’s side so they started with the AJ heinous information. Don’t believe this person really had any connection to Brange. IMO.

    Reply
  448. Anonymous said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    @Perez:
    Trying to earn brownie points with the Brange, are we?

    Reply
  449. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    @Tamara:

    To be honest The Departed movie with Leo was more highly acclaimed but I loved Leo in Blood Diamond way better. Believe both were released in 2006.

    Reply
  450. Perez said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:51 pm

    Why do I have to believe this “MAJOR BREAKING UPDATE”?…When Angie or Brad deny this I will believe it. Come on, Can you believe that a person who is called a close friend of Angie is spreading all of this PRIVATE info to IAN?…What kind of friend is he or she?…Now it is just a speculation, everybody claims to have the true. Take care@Tamara:

    Reply
  451. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    @justathought:

    I don’t know if it does relate to diamonds but I posted the information because someone mentioned they didn’t know much about blood diamonds.

    Reply
  452. Mama San said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    @cuze:
    white crystals?- Crystal Meth

    Reply
  453. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    Just a couple of comments. SR said he was going to present us with a doozy, is that what he said, but the whole first part of this seems like it is warning Ian-

    The world’s top discussion-everyone is talking about this , around the net , newsrooms
    …critics fussing-many do not believe it, …no oppressed truth seeker here-we wont be stopped or oppressed,…Brangie has pulled the wool over everyone-(later on that)-Her…innovation is disemvoweling-their inovation is equal to removing all the vowels like Angie uses Ian to filter posts so that nothing makes sense at all, example -
    Real sentence-
    In the fields of Internet discussion and forum moderation, disemvoweling (also spelled disemvowelling) is the removal of vowels from text.

    But she changes info so we get-

    would be disemvowelled to look like this:

    n th flds f ntrnt dscssn nd frm mdrtn, dsmvwlng (ls splld dsmvwllng) s th rmvl f vwls frm txt

    …Angie uses Ian to filter posts , that is what she has been doing with her fake sources, and he should outright ban them, not the posters , the sources. …he should outright ban them-Ian should get rid of them

    ……unknown gyres…it is unknown where this info comes from that is taking us in circles, that is unleahing energies with unleashed energies with unknown twists and it is no unsuccessful joke,so many that would bid on this tape, it will come out.So much has happened this year, but she is not pregnant with number # 7

    So everything up to that point is talking to Ian from what I can tell, then it switches to Brad, then the last is the fraud ..that she did and Brad knew about.

    Reply
  454. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    in fact wouldn’t it be neat if people copied this and pasted it into their response with their ideas on what it could mean………most probably know but: highlight what you want, right click on copy, scroll down to message and right click on paste…wa la

    The world’s top discussion…
    critics carping…
    no oppressed truth seeker here…
    Brangie has pulled the wool over everyone…
    innovation is disemvoweling…
    Angie uses Ian to filter posts…
    he should outright ban them…
    unknown gyres…
    unleashed energies with anarchic twists…
    no successful joke…
    Angie sex tape will emerge…
    thanks to market forces…
    like pebbles in a bag…
    year of plenty development card…
    unlucky 7…
    no preggo…
    reemphasizing an old rule…
    go-to game…
    fix the grid…
    Sudanese supper…
    Sudanese lunch…
    Sudanese breakfast…
    another coal-fire…
    inexpensive and abundant…
    a smarter grid…
    utter chaos…
    Keane is dead on…
    So is Kate…
    solution won’t spring forth…
    until Angie comes clean…
    no more baby powder…
    or white crystals…
    enterprise is unique but redundant…
    Scores and guillotines…
    individual neurons…
    terabyte per day…
    Angie neurons…
    spread out like peanut butter…
    fear and anxiety…
    hoping she won’t get caught…
    millions of brain slices per day…
    unique barcodes…
    bunnies and brats…
    Richard Gere on the phone…
    so was former President Clinton…
    so was Madonna…an animal that at first appears normal…
    divided into microscopic cubes…
    crinkling around…
    patch drops down from her lower lip like an exclamation mark…
    velvet-lined boxes…
    visible from the highway…
    incriminating evidence…
    The biggest Hollywood deception since Rock Hudson and Doris Day…
    she’s a rich girl…
    and she’s gone too far…
    cause she know it don’t matter anyway…
    she can rely on the old mans money…
    she can rely on the old mans money…
    its a bitch girl…
    but its gone too far cause she know it don’t matter anyway…
    estoy cansado…
    buena suerte…
    te toca a ti…
    callate….

    Te Amo, SRRC

    *****UPDATE***** Angie offers Brad $90 million for kids (READ THIS)

    ****UPDATE****Ian snags interview with Pitt/Jolie closest friend – explosive stuff! Stay tuned!

    ****UPDATE**** Threats made against Ian. Action will be taken ASAP.

    ****UPDATE**** Ian has hired a full time bodyguard and will lay low for the next few days. Ms. Ninecent has taken over as interim editor.

    ****MAJOR BREAKING UPDATE**** Angelina not Preggie!!!! IUC has confirmed it.

    Reply
  455. Ty said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    Been lurking for awhile – first post. I visited New Orleans and their cemetaries are visible to the highway – just a thought I had since they spent alot of time there. Enjoy all the posts here – great site.

    Reply
  456. Mama San said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    @Mama San:
    A.K.A – Ice, crank.

    Reply
  457. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    @Perez:

    Maybe the friend is disgusted by what they see happening and is spilling the beans in confidence to Ian. They may have something to lose other than friendship.

    Reply
  458. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:58 pm

    i read every one and kinda believed this person. but i can be naive and believe so many people and then feel like an idiot for not seeing the truth. i still can’t give up on believing Me, but i now have at least a healthy dose of doubt…i guess i’m still hoping someone has some inside info because some of this is hard to believe.
    @Billi:

    Reply
  459. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    @Perez:
    Actually no, we do not believe anyone that knows her,however Ian does have a prime source with Brads camp. You would think he would know, right, even if they are living apart?

    Reply
  460. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    @Perez:Where do you read a Close Friend Confirmed It? Ian doesnt say that, he just says IUC has confirmed.

    Reply
  461. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    Patch drops down from her lower lip like an exclamation point..velvet lined boxes.. visible from the highway.. incriminating evidence… Kate, are you saying that part is referring to Brad also???

    Reply
  462. Fan said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    @Kate:

    disemvoweling – is usually not done that way though. It’s used more to “hide” the use of unwanted words. So “She’s a fucking idiot” becomes “She’s a fckng idiot” So it’s just “censoring” the “bad” stuff.

    Reply
  463. Alif said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    “The biggest Hollywood deception since Rock Hudson and Doris Day!”
    That “deception” was so lame compared to the John Wayne deception. Not even close.

    Re: the velvet-lined boxes can be seen from the highway. One would immediatley think to look down; but maybe one could be looking up. Maybe the boxes are on a hill; or on a low-flying airplane. Just wonderin”!

    Reply
  464. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    Well, you never know… But she’s got more money than God and people fawning all over her- she could buy or receive as gifts probably the most fantastic gems imaginable, though, no?

    Reply
  465. Perez said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:11 pm

    @Tamara:Ok Baby your first comment was:” Seems AJ isnt pregnant after all, hmmmmm, what say you now??”… So I won’t discuss with you. My answer is: When Angie or Brad deny this. I will believe it. Bye

    Reply
  466. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:12 pm

    @Fan:
    Isn’t it also used as a tool by site monitors to deal with trolls?

    Reply
  467. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:13 pm

    @justathought:
    The only part of this that we need to really be concerned about is what is the fraud, what is the incrimianating evidence, because the rest is just about Brad dealing with the pregnant girls, trying to regroup his game plan, Jolie having a nervous break down trying to get help from others and support. So the biggest fraud since Rock and Doris. They were not a real couple but they were called The Golden Couple. She claimed she never knew he was gay, even though many felt that she did. So she hid his secret for all those years, but so did Carol Burnett and she admits she knew. The fraud does not seem to be a gay reference because SR and Ian have already made it clear they both swing both ways. So what would be a big deception that would rock Hollywood with these two? The only thing I can think of is if it involves something to do with the kids and the donations and the huminatarian efforts. This seems to indicate though that Brad is hiding the secret and Angie is the deceiver. I am going to say it has something to do with the twins, just a hunch.

    Reply
  468. Fan said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:16 pm

    @cynicalone:

    It is but more often than not it’s just automatic. You create a list of words that you want and used in conjunction with a Banned words list. Banned words don’t show in the text at all so in the above example it would have been deleted instead of modified. Deleting posts/banning is much more common to control trolls.

    Reply
  469. Tigerlilly said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:16 pm

    @Kate:
    All of the brain splicing that SR alluded to…This is sometimes done in an autopsy under certain circumstances, not necessarily a typical one, but one that for whatever reason, they would need or want to study the brain. E.g., this is done with people of note (whether famous or infamous) that scientists might want to study…On the other hand, I believe this is also done in special circumstances of an unusual death where toxins might affect the brain and cause premature neural damage???….The velvet lined boxes SR alluded to…coffins? Something heinous that ME hinted at???
    I honestly really can’t believe that any of this is true, but it seems to me that it’s all pointing to AJ’s involvement in a death, whether in direct or direct, whether it’s homicide or not…it’s something morbid….

    Reply
  470. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:17 pm

    @cuze:
    No, that refers to her. I have no idea what that means. I don’t think this is drugs or diamonds though. They don’t need to do that. It has to be something she would “need” to do.

    Reply
  471. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:19 pm

    @Fan:
    Yes, but I think SR is saying that she is filtering his blog with her sources in the same method…method being the thought because she does not have access to his blog and our words are not being changed nor are his. right?

    Reply
  472. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:22 pm

    RE the exclamation point, I just read the Notarbartolo article and it sounds exactly like the plot of Oceans 12 or 13 cant remember which one, but it is almost exactly the same thing, its uncanny!!!

    Reply
  473. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:22 pm

    The world’s top discussion… this all refers to ian according to kate
    critics carping…
    no oppressed truth seeker here…
    Brangie has pulled the wool over everyone…
    innovation is disemvoweling…
    Angie uses Ian to filter posts…
    he should outright ban them…
    unknown gyres…
    unleashed energies with anarchic twists…
    no successful joke

    this about sex tape:
    Angie sex tape will emerge…
    thanks to market forces…
    like pebbles in a bag…
    year of plenty development card…

    this about pr and changing up the game plan as it is a loser:
    unlucky 7…
    no preggo…
    reemphasizing an old rule…
    go-to game…
    fix the grid…

    this about sudanese lover pregnant with bun in the oven:
    Sudanese supper…
    Sudanese lunch…
    Sudanese breakfast…
    another coal-fire…
    inexpensive and abundant…
    a smarter grid…

    the pr moves, she will have to give up coke and meth to come out of this mess:
    utter chaos…
    Keane is dead on…
    So is Kate…
    solution won’t spring forth…
    until Angie comes clean…
    no more baby powder…
    or white crystals…
    enterprise is unique but redundant…
    Scores and guillotines…

    help!!
    individual neurons…
    terabyte per day…
    Angie neurons…
    spread out like peanut butter…
    fear and anxiety…
    hoping she won’t get caught…
    millions of brain slices per day…
    unique barcodes…
    bunnies and brats…

    kate fill these in:
    Richard Gere on the phone…
    so was former President Clinton…
    so was Madonna…

    helpo:
    an animal that at first appears normal…
    divided into microscopic cubes…
    crinkling around…
    patch drops down from her lower lip like an exclamation mark…
    velvet-lined boxes…
    visible from the highway…
    incriminating evidence…
    The biggest Hollywood deception since Rock Hudson and Doris Day…

    someone else please finish some of these . i am exhausted. i did some grunt work of dividing phrases, so feel free to guess…..

    Reply
  474. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:25 pm

    Patch drops down from her lower lip like an exclamation point.. the diamond heist
    velvet lined boxes…jewelry
    @Tamara:
    That’s sort of why I asked Kate if it had to do with Brad.. the reference to diamonds, velvet box, incriminating evidence???? A secret engagement/marriage?

    Reply
  475. Fan said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:25 pm

    @Kate:

    Sorry Kate, didn’t mean to imply I knew what SR meant. That was one that jumped out at me. This “innovation is disemvoweling” is some sort of new tactic, but what does that have to do with disemvoweling? IDK.

    Reply
  476. too curious said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    @Tigerlilly:

    Read you post and thought, OMG, what if one or more of AJ’s babies died after birth because of the drugs and then someone else’s babies were substituted. Autopsy would reveal if babies died from drugs right? Fraud, brain slices, velvet lined boxes…

    OMG, so hoping that isn’t the case.

    Reply
  477. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:27 pm

    @Kate:

    Carol Burnett’s husband was gay or she’s gay?

    Reply
  478. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    i agree that this involves deception with the babies. are they his and does he even know? or was he duped also. the barcodes in sugar’s poem must refer to dna ( individual blueprints)
    deception: one child is Holly’s, or one child is James, or both kids?? DK
    @Kate:

    Reply
  479. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    @Tigerlilly:
    Maybe hr mothers death? There was talk at FF that she was not really at her bedside at death even though she has told that story over and over. She was not with her when she died. IDK That is not big enough for a scandal though, we know she is a liar.lol

    Reply
  480. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    @cuze:I just posted the link, its almost like they lifted this story and wrote the movie. But, how does it relate, that I dont know. Only thing in common is Pitt and Clooney were both in that movie, still a mystery to me

    Reply
  481. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:32 pm

    @Tamara:
    Way out there but here goes… Brad is secretly married, honeymoon was at Clooney’s….lol…

    Reply
  482. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    Joking folks, just joking.

    Reply
  483. Mama San said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/93964
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2202953/posts

    This might be the connection for Richard Gere. Both Brad P., George C., and Richard G. met with Nancy Pelosi, in Washington. Maybe the actual connection between Richard Gere and Brad Pitt is that they are friends and maybe Richard is counseling him. IMO.

    Reply
  484. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    @Kate:Well….and this is out there, but there is a sex tape. Could someone have died on tape during sex from an act of sexual asphyxiation or something. I know, too far fetched.

    Reply
  485. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:34 pm

    well , onto the new post by muslim chick…see you there

    Reply
  486. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    you are getting kind of silly@Tamara:

    Reply
  487. Fan said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    @Kate:

    And there is nothing shocking about Doris Day and Rock Hudson as someone pointed out. Especially by today’s standards. Unless there is something we don’t know?

    Reply
  488. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    @cuze:

    Is the word diamonds actually in SR’s post or are you just trying to explain the velvet lined boxes?

    Reply
  489. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    @Fan:
    No no, that was good, you guys we have to work together on this now okay this is really out there but one of you got me thinking about New Orleans, not sure how this would fit but there always was something very strange about the way that whole pregnancy with the twins was handled from day 1 all the way until until even today. – Brad would have had to know of course.

    velvet-lined boxes…visible from the highway…incriminating evidence…

    means that she has twins buried there, in the New Orleans cemetary.

    Now I dont know how or when, but the timeline never fit ever, she either looked too pregnant or not enough, and the even though all the bios look alike to a degree it is a Voight degree imo . Does that work to any degree at all?

    Reply
  490. cuze said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    @Billi:
    No.. but the reference to a diamond heist is in the post. patch drop from her lower lip like an exclamation point.

    Reply
  491. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    And if you’re still worried about bombing in what is, basically, the world’s biggest, cruelest comedy club, don’t be. I assure you, you’re getting funnier all the time, simply by dint of being plugged into the collective e-conscious and keeping up with the high-bandwidth badinage. Remember the Zen saying: “Like pebbles in a bag, the monks polish each other.” (If you can’t hit that low, fat pitch out of the park, then brother, no one can help you.) I envision a future where humans communicate only in jokes. Of course, by then we’ll have taken to the stars, in great space arks full of comedians, looking to colonize a planet populated entirely by straight men. And yes, that is, indeed, what she said.

    Reply
  492. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    @Billi:
    I think she was saying that Carol Burnett knew Rock Hudson was gay but never told.

    Reply
  493. knowone said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    Good evening friends. Wow, I spent a hour reading all the posts. ME sounds legit to me. He/she sounds like someone who knows Brad, knew Jen and says he’s got an arsenal of evidence to unleash against Angie, and the ONLY reason he posted here is b/c he/she knows she reads here regularly. H/she said Angie is totally defined by her image in the press, and he can speak to her through this web site to say he will open said can of whoop ass IF she does anything to bring about pain to Brad. He also said in one post, what he has on her is not JUST humiliating, he said it is enough to put a regular person (one without millions in the bank) in jail. He said it did not relate to children, that it was something very bad against another person. And he said Brad will be very very happy soon. So, what does that mean?

    Ian, be careful. She’s in red alert mode.

    Reply
  494. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    @McDooks:

    Oh. Thanks!

    Reply
  495. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    @cuze:

    I would have never known the patch drops…is about a diamond heist. Thanks for the clarification.

    Reply
  496. knowone said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    Ian just added update that AJ is NOT preggers. Confirmed. Faker. Is she going to respond to Star story or just ignore, or pretend to be preggers and pretend to lose it???? She’s lost it.

    Reply
  497. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    @Tamara:

    AJ said this?

    Reply
  498. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    i agree. Me was legit and can’t wait for her/him to come back. Tamara’s comments appear so wrong to me ..she took out Me and every post is about something totally unrelated. she is scaring people away and her comments are useless. jmo
    @knowone:

    Reply
  499. Tigerlilly said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    @Kate:
    Well, you know, the brain splices might have been done as an autopsy to see whether or not her mother was suffering from Alzheimer’s. This was done after a friend of my ma’s died. I know that Angie’s ma was realatively young to die of that or be afflicted with that, but it happens in people far younger than her ma was. I know of one of my neighbors who was afflicted in her early 50’s…I’ve read where there have been cases as young as 35! Maybe Angie’s Mom was bat shit crazy with Alzies since say, 45 or earlier…Wouldn’t that freak you out? Now if something like THAT is the case, then maybe Angie wanted all those brain samples destroyed. She wants no genetic trace to her…So her Mommy’s brain is not buried with the rest of her Mommie’s body? It’s eating away at her, though, tic…tock…she’s 34 ish…How long does she have before SHE’s a “CRAZY OLD BAT” with Alzheimers who buried her Mama’s brain?

    Reply
  500. fulasit said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    wow good laugh, can’t even make sense of this crap… can’t believe this site gets so many posts it’s gotta be the same delusional people that believe in all this random and contradicting investigative work.

    Reply
  501. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    @justathought:OMG! Im so so sorry! I dont want to spoil things for you so I will go away, I never meant to scare people away, I am really truly sorry.

    Reply
  502. Brad said on April 16th, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    @knowone:
    Yes but she also said he would be upset if he knew she was posting and then the next few minutes it was HI Brad ! lol little off don’t you think which is it?

    Reply
  503. fulasit said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:00 pm

    @Tamara:
    you mean you are scaring THEM away. What by giving them a dose of reality in their ful o s*it existence

    Reply
  504. BigApplette said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:01 pm

    I am posting all possible interpretations I can pull from the clues which are just my opinion as to the puzzle presented.

    The world’s top discussion… (the economy, bail-out), (Brangelina)
    critics carping…(people upset about bail-out), (People criticizing Brangie)
    no oppressed truth seeker here…(Ian)
    Brangie has pulled the wool over everyone… (Brangie are frauds)
    innovation is disemvoweling… (some new kind of computer code, language code), disembowling?
    Angie uses Ian to filter posts… (planting false stories)
    he should outright ban them… (trolls that are trying to destroy Ian’s credibility here and on Female First)
    unknown gyres… (something to do with ocean tides, currents?) Stumped
    unleashed energies with anarchic twists… (unleashed – dog which would also be anarchic since it’s illegal?)
    no successful joke… (???)
    Angie sex tape will emerge… (obvious)
    thanks to market forces… (obvious)
    like pebbles in a bag…( a lot of money)
    year of plenty development card… ( a lot will go down this year)
    unlucky 7… (7th pregnancy)
    no preggo… (obvious)
    reemphasizing an old rule… (pregnancy for p.r. value)
    go-to game… (pregnancy for p.r. value)
    fix the grid… (repair Jolie’s brain, repair the US energy grid that is in disrepair)
    Sudanese supper… (Brad’s g.f.) – (profits from Sudan/Africa – Darfur politics?)
    Sudanese lunch… (Brad’s g.f.) – (profits from Sudan/Africa? Darfur politics)
    Sudanese breakfast… (Brad’s g.f.) – (profits from Sudan/Africa? Darfur politics)
    another coal-fire… (dark skinned lover, coal energy?)
    inexpensive and abundant… (some type of energy source)
    a smarter grid… (energy grid – the US grid is in very bad disrepair)
    utter chaos… (energy grid – the US grid is in very bad disrepair)
    Keane is dead on… (obvious)
    So is Kate… (obvious)
    solution won’t spring forth… (Brad cooperating with Jolie, resolving custody issues)
    until Angie comes clean…(becomes clean from drugs, becomes honest about deceptions)
    no more baby powder… (no more babies)
    or white crystals… (meth)
    enterprise is unique but redundant… (some kind of new energy project, invention, computer program)
    Scores and guillotines… (Scores strip club, guillotines – s and m device) (score – gripes – guillotines – revenge, French way to execute prisoners)
    individual neurons… (medical experimentation, cloning herself lol!, some new form of drug detox?)
    terabyte per day… (medical experimentation, some new form of drug detox?)
    Angie neurons… (medical experimentation, some new form of drug detox or intoxication?)
    spread out like peanut butter… (medical experimentation, some new form of drug detox ?, sexual connotation)
    fear and anxiety…
    hoping she won’t get caught… (she did something illegal, immoral)
    millions of brain slices per day… (ruining her brain on drugs, some form of experimentation)
    unique barcodes… (some kind of secret code, medical research, genetic programming?)
    bunnies and brats… (animal testing and genetic manipulation, bunnies used to be how a woman tested for pregnancy), brats (kids).
    Richard Gere on the phone… (advice?)
    so was former President Clinton… (help, advice)
    so was Madonna… (adoption advice)
    an animal that at first appears normal… (cloned animal)
    divided into microscopic cubes… (cloned animal, animal testing, see bunny)
    crinkling around…(not sure)
    patch drops down from her lower lip like an exclamation mark…(soul patch, nicotine patch, birth control patch?)
    velvet-lined boxes… (coffins, jewelry, woman’s genitals)
    visible from the highway… (grave sites, prostitutes)
    incriminating evidence… (could be anything to do with the above)
    The biggest Hollywood deception since Rock Hudson and Doris Day… (“Rock” an allusion to diamonds?)

    Reply
  505. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    @Tamara:
    LOL I hope you are joking, now lets have some fun, what is the deception? Has to be something big.

    Reply
  506. fulasit said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:06 pm

    @BigApplette:congratulations u deciphered the mind of a rambling lunatic.

    Reply
  507. BigApplette said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    @fulasit:

    Thank you, I think. I always love a good puzzle. Nothing like the NY Times puzzle on a Sunday.

    Reply
  508. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    @Kate:I dont know what the deception is, but I do know that SR’s references to the exclamation point and the pebbles in a bag are both taken from Wired Magazine. We know that the ex point is related to diamonds and the pebbles is taken from a Zen saying “Like Pebbles in a bag, the Monks polish each other”.

    Reply
  509. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    ok now i feel bad. i want you to stay ( i was secretly mad when you called out Me and i totally believed, and still believe Me, and didn’t want anyone to scare this person away. Like i said i am naive sometimes, but believe until proven wrong (and am wrong a lot…guess i just harbored a little grudge ..didn’t want Me to go away..but realize Me said their piece and will not come back unless they are going to spill the beans_
    come back , i hate feeling like i hurt your feelings……please……….@Tamara:

    Reply
  510. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:28 pm

    @Tamara:
    The references that BigAppelette mentioned in their translation about the energy grid (fix the grid, smart grid, coal-fire, inexpensive and abundant, utter chaos) are also taken from a Wired Magazine article.

    Reply
  511. Kate said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:28 pm

    @Tamara:
    So do you think this is related to diamonds, computers, what? I am not good with that stuff?

    Justathougth, help us put on this, what do you think? (lol I think ME was a plant , but we do not have to agree :)

    Reply
  512. Tigerlilly said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:28 pm

    Did she abort her own baby?

    Reply
  513. Tigerlilly said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    Correct to say, did she cause a misscarriage, then bury the fetus?

    Reply
  514. knowone said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    @Brad:That didn’t strike me as disingenuine. I mean, if a friend (lets say a lawyer friend, or someone who Brad’s confided in) wants to help, but knows he’s in deep shit and doesn’t want to meddle in lawsuits, or out himself, the internet is a pretty good way to do it. It seems Ian’s little web site is drawing lots of new and interested readers, so private messages to HER, since they know she’s reading, seem like a valid way to say, it’s not just the public that’s reading, certain “others” are reading too. JMO

    Reply
  515. Tamara said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    @cynicalone:Hmmmmmm, what is the connection to Wired, besides the obvious the name itself? Wired, as in drugs. I dont know, do you?

    Reply
  516. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:52 pm

    @Tamara:
    I have no idea. I don’t think it’s a coincidence but I can’t figure out why Sugar Ray would do that. What’s more, I found an article in Wired that says “reemphasizing an old rule” only it refers to an rarely-used Monopoly rule where a player lands on property, chooses not to buy it, the property automatically goes up for auction to the other players. In this article, they also mention some new game trying to become “the go-to game” in American hall closets.

    Now, I don’t think Sugar Ray meant for this stuff to be taken literally, because why would he write about Monopoly? Maybe he just uses magazine articles to pull quotes and he uses them as symbols in his posts?

    Reply
  517. BigApplette said on April 16th, 2009 at 9:57 pm

    @cynicalone:

    That was my thought when I was deciphering. That there were two topics that were interwoven to create some confusion for legal purposes? It seems like there is the energy topic and then the Brangelina relationship problems topic. Maybe they are related but I’m not sure how.

    Reply
  518. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    Grid could refer to men moving strategically on the grid of an American football field…meant to say earlier.

    Reply
  519. cynicalone said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:14 pm

    @BigApplette:
    Right. I just clicked on Wired Magazine’s 17.04 issue and the articles that he pulled quotes from are all from the same issue. I wonder if he sprinkled those in as a bit of misdirection. It would be too coincidental that all of these things apply to Brangelina and they are all in the same issue of Wired Magazine. I think SR clicked on some articles, copied some terms and put them in the post. My question is, did SR use those terms to symbolize something that applies to Brangie or are they creating confusion for legal purposes? SR seems to use a lot of symbolism so it’s possible that they mean something. Now I’m more confused than I was when this started!

    Reply
  520. BigApplette said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    @p:
    There’s just so many references to energy and coal and tides that the puzzle. The grid is is a very hot topic right now. I googled and found a bunch of articles. If Brangie is in on some new energy development vis a vis the grid, it could be a very big deal:

    The term “smart grid” gained currency in February, when President Barack Obama provided seed money for smart grid innovations and electric grid improvements in the $787 billion federal stimulus package.

    Angus Duncan, chairman of the Oregon Commission on Global Warming, envisions huge benefits from making our electric system smarter and more interactive.

    Reply
  521. section9 said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:46 pm

    Here’s the deal, kids.

    Hollywood stars (or starlets) like Jolie are NEVER, EVER undone by pitt bulls or sex with their brother. The American people understand that Hollywood is a strange place filled with strange people.

    What kills the odd actor is personal corruption:: drug trafficking, sex crimes, money laundering millions of dollars in narcotics proceeds through banks in Grand Cayman just for the thrill of it, getting in bed with Wall Street banksters who use you as a Front.

    Nobody gives a fuck about sex. That’s why Clinton survived impeachment. People DO care about corruption. If Angelina is corrupt and has done things like money laundering or embezzelment, then she’ll hang and it won’t be pretty.

    Reply
  522. Billi said on April 16th, 2009 at 10:48 pm

    @section9:

    Love the way you just lay it out.

    Reply
  523. justathought said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    that’s true. they also might care if she gave her “partner” the Hiv virus deliberately ( or something else just as serious) as seems to be the case here…….@section9:

    Reply
  524. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    @Kate:
    Okay, I got a wacky thought- what if JAMES HAVEN had a baby with a woman (not Scrangie in this scenario) and they gave the baby/babies to Brangie??? Talking about the twins.
    Hence the Voight traits? But I still think Shiloh is DEF a legit 50/50 Pitt/Jolie

    Reply
  525. McDooks said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:19 pm

    @Tamara:
    Don’t go anywhere. I was popping in here the whole time all of this posting was done by Me, and I did not think you were over the top at all. You were just giving a healthy skepticism that the rest of us were thinking, too. Me was somewhat contradictory at times, and really did not have ANY info other than vagaries, so it should be understood that people are skeptical.
    I don’t think you offended Me, either. They seemed to accept the skepticism, and I don’t think you scared them away. I would think they were more of a hit and run mission anyway, Me wasn’t going to share any of the info they said they had. Just put the threat out there to Scrangie. That’s done. If Me doesn’t come back or very often, I don’t think it is because of any reason other than to “warn” Scrangie that they will rat her out for whatever it is they know. But they weren’t ABOUT to divulge the supposed inside scoop they had. You didn’t scare anybody away.

    Reply
  526. p said on April 16th, 2009 at 11:57 pm

    @section9: . Totally agree, disgusting sex lives usually won’t do it. Flat-out deciept, criminal behavior– child abuse or neglect… BUT in this case addiction would jump out as deception since the image that’s peddled is “family values,” and for the same reasons, infedelity.

    Reply
  527. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:09 am

    @McDooks:
    I agree that Shiloh is definitely all Brad and her. His eyes all the way, but the twins nope they look like James.

    Reply
  528. Elle said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:14 am

    [velvet-lined boxes…visible from the highway…incriminating evidence]

    Taking this from a comment and totally out of context but New Orleans has above-ground cemetaries because of the swamp land and they are visible from the highway. The velvet-lined boxes would be inside the visible tombs. So, this could be referring to something incriminating that happened in NOLA and there’s evidence of it, as opposed to a literal coffin.

    Reply
  529. Elle said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:25 am

    Scores is a strip club.

    I don’t understand this post at all!! (nor most the comments)

    Reply
  530. caea said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:26 am

    Ah Sugar Gay!

    The one who has gone too far is you and your int-the closet boyfriend Ian! You have gone too far by telling as about your peronal experiance from f-ucking your poor dog! How disgusting you freak!

    PS: Did you letz Ian join in in your “activities”?

    Reply
  531. Elle said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:28 am

    @section9:
    [Hollywood stars (or starlets) like Jolie are NEVER, EVER undone by pitt bulls or sex with their brother. The American people understand that Hollywood is a strange place filled with strange people]

    Dog and brother fucking can actually be sex crimes. I think that shit could easily tank or taint a career. She makes most her $$ these days on kids films and action films that cater to kids. Studios couldn’t be associated with that. I have never heard of a brother-fucking, dog-licking actress in my life. Super sluts and kleptos, yes. Bestiality and incest? No.

    Reply
  532. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:36 am

    When Brad went to Washington these area ll the people he was with- quite a meeting eh, wonder what that phone call to Clinton or with him was for?

    Also in on the White House meeting with Pitt was energy czar Carol Browner. Then Bill Clinton buddy and Liz Hurley impregnator Steve Bing joined Brad for talks with Energy Secretary Stephen Chu. Then, the actor went up to Capitol Hill where Speaker Nancy Pelosi led the collective swoon.

    According to the LA Times, Pitt and Bing were accompanied in Washington “by two former Clinton White House staffers, Chad Griffin and Trevor Neilson, who provide strategic political advice to celebrity activists”.

    Reply