IUC Blind Item: Major Republican Politician Had Sex Orgies with Male Hookers

Posted on April 9th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

IUC has learned a well known member of the Republican Party organized numerous orgies involving male hookers in Washington last year.  Developing…

  1. deeca said on April 9th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Why am I not surprised?

    Reply
  2. Keane said on April 9th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    Condi? Ha ha, just kidding! Ok apart from Colin Powell, Dubya, Sarah Palin and that guy who was running for president against Obama whose name I’ve already forgotten, I haven’t got a clue about Republican politicians. And this is a matter of pride for me, I can assure you! Can anyone suggest who the likely suspect might be?

    Reply
  3. CC said on April 9th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    @Keane: No, but I too wsa thinking what a kick if it was a woman! I’d like it to be Condi…let’s make it Condi!!!

    Reply
  4. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    Could be anyone, not enough clues.

    Reply
  5. Keane said on April 9th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @ CC – yeah, methinks Condi would be hiring the women, if it had to be a woman I’d have to go for Palin! Kate, can you look at the SR thread about the whole picador thing. I and gitano have been thinking more about it. He thinks there is some reference to a cult or cult activities, I am developing some other ideas. Now what was that cult or secret society you were talking about in which HW stars and politicians got up to deviant sexual activity? It was you who was talking about it wasn’t it?

    Reply
  6. Billi said on April 9th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    Newt Gingrinch. If someone does guess the correct person will it be acknowledged?

    Reply
  7. Alif said on April 9th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    It would indeed be a surprise if this BI was about a republican woman.
    There are more than a few republican men who have been involved in this sort of activity.
    And it was all the more delicious to certain liberals, because they involved politicians who preached family values as their political platform.

    Reply
  8. Alif said on April 9th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    @Alif:
    Should have added that one could google or dogpile, “Republican male sex scandals” to learn more.

    Reply
  9. Guest said on April 9th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    Top five republican gay scandals:

    http://www.badmouth.net/top-five-republican-gay-sex-scandals/

    Reply
  10. Guest said on April 9th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    Earl Rynerson?

    Reply
  11. Guest said on April 9th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    Sorry, I noticed Rynerson he is not a rebublican.

    Reply
  12. Annenonymous said on April 9th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    Are we going to get a name? Also, if you do a reveal on this, will you also do a reveal of Obama’s?

    Reply
  13. CC said on April 9th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    @Keane:
    I was totally joking around. Never in a million years could Condi loosen up THAT much!! LOL

    Reply
  14. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    @Keane:
    LOL…you’re funny!

    Reply
  15. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    @Billi:
    LOL…yeah, Newt. What a name.

    Reply
  16. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 8:08 pm

    I may be thinking a little black & white here…but how can a person be gay and republican?? My step-uncle was gay and republican and I never could understand it. He was my uncle…..if I couldn’t understand him, then I may just never understand. And then his sister – my step-mom – is as liberal as they come?!? Nothing is black and white, that is for sure!

    Reply
  17. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 8:16 pm

    What has gay got to do with being republican or not, it is a poilitcal choice? Has noting at all to do with sex..there are plenty of gay replublicann.

    Reply
  18. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 9th, 2009 at 8:16 pm

    This would be frickin’ hilarious if it was Rush Limbaugh. But he’s not a politician. I’m gonna guess that Steele guy… the new head of the GOP. That’s Major Republican.

    Reply
  19. dina said on April 9th, 2009 at 8:34 pm

    I’m going to die laughing if it’s John McCain.

    Reply
  20. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    @Kate:
    I know…I’m not talking about sex…..I’m talking about point of view…open-mindedness…..nevermind. I’ll take Canuck advice and not talk about politics.

    Reply
  21. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:01 pm

    @Z:
    oh that is okay, I am Independent. lol you know there is so much of this that goes on in Washington and at the White House , nothing would surprise me at all.

    Reply
  22. Tigerlilly said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:05 pm

    Newt…I’ll bet…
    One time I was at a Brave’s game, and I accidentally spilled beer on the NEWT…. :-O
    Yeah, that’s the best I got…I was drunk and sloshed him in a crowd…my b/f was like “you just spilled beer on Da Newtie G” (well, he didn’t call him that), and I was like, “That fat fucker ran into me, so fuck him. If anything, he owes us an ounce or two of beer”….Yeah, I’m classy like that…

    Reply
  23. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    @Tigerlilly:
    You’re fucking hilarious! LOL.

    Reply
  24. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:23 pm

    Oh Shit! Da Newtie G is on the right side of the screen. One of the ads.

    Reply
  25. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:47 pm

    @Kate:
    I know…I shouldn’t be surprised…and am not most of the time…but sometimes?? I’m still a little naive. I guess I think it would be difficult for a right-wing extreme republican who is very involved in politics (like my uncle) to be gay. But he also had an extremely thick skin…so I know that helped.

    Reply
  26. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    @Tigerlilly:
    You are hilarious!!!! lmao!!!!!

    Reply
  27. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    @dina:
    Now he would need the viagra, I would think. Numerous orgies…that is a lot of keeping it up….

    Reply
  28. Tigerlilly said on April 9th, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    True story, tho….

    Reply
  29. section9 said on April 9th, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    Well, if it IS Condi Rice, that would put the kibosh on one of D.C.’s major parlor games. No, Condi is back at Stanford; although it would be nice to know who her partner is (it is NOT Randy Bean, by the way).

    Sarah Palin’s not in D.C., at least not yet. Todd’s not the kind of guy, methinks, who would let the Governor get into orgies with Gigolos.

    Mike Steele is actually married, happily it seems. He’s not quite become a modern day Ray Bliss (you can google his name) and turned the Party around, but I don’t think he’s the kind of guy who’d go in for male strippers.

    So, we’re talking about a U.S. Senator, or Karl Rove.

    Unless it does happen to be Condi and she swings both ways. Fess up, Ian. Times a wastin’. There’s a lot of Bushie deadweight that needs cleaning out of D.C. by those of us in the Republican Party that want to clean house (although Condi is the only Bush person that remained popular among the rank and file).

    By the way, can I let you in on a secret? THEY ALL USE THE HIGH PAYING ESCORT SERVICES IN D.C..

    Everyone of those pols in that town use the high dollar escorts. The women do too. I wouldn’t be surprised if we found out, for example, that Condi used female escorts. They’re descreet. They don’t talk. They take cash. They do outcalls.

    This isn’t a Republican vs. Democratic thing. Most people in Leadership right now on the Hill with access to lots of money are Democrats. Who do you think, therefore, is paying for the hookers and the booze? Democrats.

    Republicans are in the minority now. They don’t get the best hookers.

    Reply
  30. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    @section9:
    “By the way, can I let you in on a secret? THEY ALL USE THE HIGH PAYING ESCORT SERVICES IN D.C.”

    So it would probably be smart if they didn’t talk about fines and arresting the prostitutes, etc….you know, like Spitzer….just quietly do it, rather than be shown to be such a hypocrite. I think his whole deal would not have been as surprising or despicable, if he hadn’t been so hypocritical.

    Reply
  31. section9 said on April 9th, 2009 at 11:31 pm

    @Z:

    That’s the whole point: nobody is supposed to talk about the hookers and the lobbyists. It gets in the way of business getting done. The only reason why you saw Republicans like Mark Foley get taken down was that the news media figured that a gay scandal would hurt the Republicans late in an election cycle. It did, by the way; the Foley Scandal broke late in the 2006 cycle, and was publicized by the MSM in such a way as to keep Evangelical voters home. You don’t hear about the Democratic scandals because, let’s face it, only reporters like Ian will report about them. Or, they have to be galactic fuckups like Spitzer who become so embarrassing that they become Neon Dons like John Gotti and have to be outed and disposed of.

    This will slowly change now that Democrats are in power and the news media slowly sheds its habit of defending that party. However, old habits die hard. Suffice to say, sex, both hetero- and homosexual, knows no political boundaries in that town.

    Reply
  32. egm said on April 10th, 2009 at 2:34 am

    Oh please, we think it’s Condi, why? Because people assume she’s gay? Is that the best reason? I doubt it, this is probably very much a guy thing. What’s worse about this is that this is the party that consistently denies rights to gay people and that included classifying gay-bashing as a standard hate crime. It does not surprise me at all that sort of thing has gone on behind closed doors for tens, even hundreds of years. One rule for them and one for us, but the ordinary gays that have to live in and among the general public are the ones that have to face the persecution while the elite stay hidden in their activities and continue to be publicly against gays. Then things like this just make the generl straight public take it out on ordinary guys as if it’s all their fault and they too are involved in some big secret conspiracy. It really annoys me.

    Reply
  33. egm said on April 10th, 2009 at 2:35 am

    guys = gays. Pretend I can spell.

    Reply
  34. Kate said on April 10th, 2009 at 5:52 am

    How about our Arnie?

    Reply
  35. section9 said on April 10th, 2009 at 7:12 am

    @egm:

    Whoa! Why do you think the Foley thing was so effective back in ‘06? Aside from the fact that it betrayed some hypocrisy of the House Republicans, the news media peddled to the latent homophobia of the mass public to try to get their side elected. It’s one of the things that helped them that year.

    I may not like Barney Frank, and I can hold him partially responsible for the credit crisis and the banking swindle (which he is, despite the smoke screen he’s throwing up), but I respect him as an out gay man. Believe me, both parties are so gay that J. Edgar Hoover could come back from the dead and parade down the Ellipse in a new dress and no one would give him a second notice.

    Reply
  36. Billi said on April 10th, 2009 at 8:35 am

    @section9:

    Both parties have their fair share of scandalous behavior, some we find out about and some we don’t. The rub for me are the politicians who preach family values with a holier than thou attitude. Then when a scandal reveals their hypocritical behavior the resulting media coverage is indeed relished by some.

    Reply
  37. CC said on April 10th, 2009 at 8:52 am

    @egm:
    IMO, the Condi comments are just J.O.K.E.S. The humor comes from the fact that she IS so straight laced and probably ISN’T the person Ian’s talking about. That is what makes it funny…I too think it’s a man but the idea of it being a woman instead was pretty funny.

    She’s so serious all the time that the image of her transferring that serious business attitude to rounding up male hookers is HILARIOUS…in my mind, at least.

    But do i think the BI is about a woman? No. My first thought is that it’s about a man who is gay.

    When Keane wrote that it was Condi, however, I thought it was funny as hell…because it’s obviously not her.

    Reply
  38. knowone said on April 10th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    @egm:It annoys the hell out of me too, and I’m a middle aged white straight women. This is a conspiracy of a certain party to keep their gays bearding and behaving like straight people, imo. It is not right, it is not progressive, and it needs to stop.

    Reply
  39. JosieMalone said on April 10th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    Great post, Ian. What an insight into D.C. I Love to guess blind items. Definitely John Boehner and/or Mitch McConnell.

    Reply
  40. section9 said on April 10th, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    Hey, please, if it is Boehner or McConnell, please out them and get them both out of town on a rail as fast as possible. Grass roots Republican Party folk have been frustrated with their leadership since dinosaurs walked the earth. Although McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao, was always fun on TV (that’s why I don’t think it’s McConnell).

    I swear to God, if this is another David Drieir story, I’m calling out the Teletubbies on you, Ian.

    Reply
  41. kalan said on April 11th, 2009 at 11:12 am

    I’m thinking it’s Carl Rove.

    Reply
  42. joanne said on April 11th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    @kalan:
    This makes sense. He is slimeball enough to hold it over heads.

    Reply
  43. Flo Ridah said on June 4th, 2009 at 11:01 pm

    Lindsey Graham, y’all.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2009
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Meta