Sugar Ray Ramone Catone (The Bronx Bi-Blogger) – Brangie Turmoil!

Posted on April 7th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

No late night visitations…happened one night after shlepping to a titty bar…loud knocking on her door…IRS problems…she loves to flaunt them…false eyelashes…various bank vaults and safety deposit boxes…France, London and Nassau…old school ties…South American flavor…physical distress…expansive pad…shaved her pussy hair…too much competition…wants Louise’s head…chilly NYC…crashing back like a piledriver…tonguing the small hole…great sleeping pill…20-dollar bill…no longer capable of breast-feeding…leaning tower of Pisa…flown off the roof!

                                                                       Te Amo, SRRC

  1. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 7th, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    Wow, this is some surge… from all angles. Louise? Anyone?

    Reply
  2. Danyelle said on April 7th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    Is Louise Madonna?

    Reply
  3. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 7th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    @Danyelle:
    Madonna is her competition. I think you’re right.

    Reply
  4. Billi said on April 7th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    South American flavor makes me think of Madonna’s toy boy Jesus Luz, Brazilian model. Calling on Kate please!

    Reply
  5. p said on April 7th, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    – She locked Brad out after he returned from a titty bar one night?

    Yeah Louise is Madonna’s name.

    – Does she want “M”s head in a sexual sense? Or does she want her head (as in.. on a silver platter) bc of too much competition?

    – I assume they have $$ deposited all over creation.

    – She can no longer breastfeed due to the implants, discussed before?

    – She likes to flaunt her new implant boobs?

    I truly suck at this.

    Reply
  6. Kate said on April 7th, 2009 at 7:27 pm

    I wonder if this has anything to do with the new develpment last month with the Swiss, it also includes, France, London, and Bermuda-

    Swiss authorities have already provided the U.S. with the banking details of up to 300 wealthy Americans suspected of tax fraud. But Switzerland has refused to identify about 50,000 more U.S. account holders Washington wants.

    UBS and Swiss officials have said further cooperation would violate national law, which makes an unclear distinction between the serious crime of tax fraud and the minor offense of tax evasion.

    None of that money for the kids pics ever showed up in the tax returns for the Jolie-Pitt Foundations, it was not listed.

    Reply
  7. Anne said on April 7th, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    I thought Madonna’s name was Susan Ciccone?

    Reply
  8. p said on April 7th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    @Kate:
    That would explain prblems w the IRS.

    I know nothing about tax-laws on charitable foundations. But how do you know that?

    Reply
  9. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 7th, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    @Kate:
    @p:
    Now THAT is a lot of hot water to be in. I wonder how our govt will cover for her since she’s so well-liked… and you know they will.

    Reply
  10. Kate said on April 7th, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    @p:
    I don’t know much about the Jolie Pitt Foundation, just that none of the money was filed with the tax forms , a while back , some months ago, someone at at FF I believe made a very informative post about where al the money had gone. The tax forms for al Foundations are public, I have not seen them, but this person had seen them online somewhere, and said that the money from the pics of the kids were not in the Jolie Pitt Foundation and there was some speculation of what they had done with it.

    Now also a few weeks ago there was that Spitzer connection comment, not sure if that connects but using charity money to pay for whores might be of interest to the IRS lol

    So Madge wants to fuck Pitt, and she has fucked up her own adoption, and she and HO use to fuck, hmm, yeah I can see how this might be a big ole mess, but

    Sugar Ray, this is too vague , we need some direction darling, we never even finished the last one beyone getting that Brad made Jen do a threesome, if that is even right?

    You gotta help us out babe!

    Reply
  11. g said on April 7th, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    Just type in Jolie-Pitt and hit submit
    http://nccsdataweb.urban.org/PubApps/990search.php?bmf=1

    You’ll see 205176706 Jolie Pitt Foundation
    Click again and you’ll see the tax forms for 2006 and 2007 at the bottom. They haven’t filed 2008 yet.
    You can see what came in and what went out.
    So for 2006 when Shiloh was born they supposedly got (according to Forbes) $4.1M from People and $3.5M from Hello for a total of $7.6M. The 2006 return shows AJ put in $4.1M and BP $4.4M for a total of $8.5M. So it seems they gave $1.1M of their own money. (seems like a pretty low % of what I believe was their income in 2006 but I don’t have time to search for that, plus they could have donated directly without going through the foundation).
    Anyway, they only distributed $2.5M out of the $8.5M that was put in so the remaining $6M was invested. It shows shows 8 separate donations given out. Two largest were Doctors w/out Borders and the Global Aids Alliance both got $1M each.
    I won’t get into 2007 except to say that you can see they gave out about $3.4M (approx $1.4 of that to Make It Right) and you can also see the $250K donation that came in from E! Entertainment

    Reply
  12. cuze said on April 8th, 2009 at 6:22 am

    Well, I see your back up now. Did we blow a fuse here?

    Reply
  13. Canuck said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:24 am

    No longer capable of breastfeeding = can’t have any more bio children?

    Reply
  14. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:30 am

    @ Canuck – or the big tittie job? And yes, what happened there, I couldn’t access the site at first either. I think we need to have an alternative website to go to in case something happens to this one in future, where we can regroup and find out what’s going on! Was it sabotage?

    Reply
  15. cuze said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:37 am

    @Keane:
    I think a few of us took refuge at the FF board. I know some posters here don’t like it over there though. Just a thought.

    Reply
  16. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:37 am

    @Canuck:
    Could also be due to drug use or getting clean from drug use.

    Reply
  17. Canuck said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:40 am

    @Keane:
    Yes, sometimes maybe SR means exactly what he says, LOL

    I came across the Wiki article concerning crystal meth use while waiting for the site to come back up. Apparently one of the ways to administer it is anally, and according to the article, one of the nicknames for that is “butt rocket”. Made me think of SR’s reference to a “roman candle up her ass” in an earlier post.

    Reply
  18. Canuck said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:41 am

    @Keane:
    How about Ian’s twitter feed?

    Reply
  19. R. Catone said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:46 am

    Someone knocked this site down last night – kudos to Ian and his team for working all night to get it back up. Someone don’t like us here. To them – hate nothing but hatred. “A friend is one who has the same enemies as you have” – Abraham Lincoln.
    Happy Passover and Happy Easter to all my wonderful readers. Te Amo, SRRC

    Reply
  20. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:52 am

    @R. Catone:
    Buenos dias y muchas gracias. Hope you have a good holiday also.

    I noticed that last night. I tried to get back in, but was not successful. Hope all turns out well for everyone.

    Reply
  21. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:55 am

    @Kate:

    I’m curious is Ian getting the inside infomation and he’s passing it on to SR and Ms. NineCents for them to dress it up their way for our decipher or do SR and Ms. 9C have their own sources for what they post? Also I don’t get the need for the cryptic way of passing the info to us (SR especially). It can still have the same flavor but a little more decipherable would go a long way for enjoyment. Before anyone jumps on me, I enjoy the site and appreciate reading before news is reported on other sites. JMO.

    Reply
  22. cuze said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:58 am

    @R. Catone:
    Happy Easter and Happy Passover to you to dahhlinnng…kiss kiss!

    Reply
  23. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:58 am

    @ Billi – I’m pretty sure Ms Nine Cent is a character of Ian’s creation. SR could be the same or could be someone different, the jury is still out on that one. As for the cryptic references and allusions, I think its partly what they can get away with legally and partly to keep us all hooked, and so far its working!

    Reply
  24. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:00 am

    Now why would someone want to try to shut this website down hm? That’s very interesting isn’t it? Could it be that someone somewhere is afraid of what is being said here but can’t get their lawyers on to it because its all true? I have 2 suspects for the sabotage. Keep it up Ian and SR, you must be getting very close to the bone…

    Reply
  25. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:07 am

    @Keane:

    Yes it’s a given for legal and having us do our investigative part creates some intrique for us. But still say the info can cover both angles but still be a little more transparent with the details. Also think it would attract and keep more people to the site as well. To Kate’s post above, more information required.
    Again JMO.

    Reply
  26. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:22 am

    Ok – I think this is about an encounter between Madonna and Ange or maybe Ange and a hooker now I come to think of it. The “south american flavor” could be Jesus Luz or could be someone Ange or Brad has had a fling with, not sure what the “physical distress” refers to though. Ange shaved her pussy, is there too much competition for Brad’s affections? So she wants to have some more with Madge. Back in chilly NYC. A piledriver is a wrestling move and also a sexual position which can be performed by a man and a woman, 2 women (one with a dildo) or 2 men. I guess this was Ange and whoever, possibly Madge, and this was their sexual position of choice! They took some drug that knocked them out cold, the “twenty dollar bill” makes it sound like this person was paid, which implies it could be a hooker. Maybe the drugs she took meant that she couldn’t breastfeed the twins or Shiloh any more as it would be in her milk. Leaning tower of Pisa could mean that she was so fucked she couldn’t stand up straight. And the last bit could mean that she left by helicopter from the roof so as not to be detected.

    I think the earlier bit, the “France, London and Nassau” could refer to the places the liaisons with Madge took place. Madge lived in London, Ange in France and maybe they hooked up in the Bahamas sometime. London and France aren’t tax havens, and neither are The Bahamas to my knowledge so I don’t think it refers to where they may have stashed cash to evade paying tax. And if they are doing this it would hardly be a surprise as they are chums with Bono and he is well-known to do it, so are the pair of them as much a hypocrite as he is?

    I don’t know what “old school ties” refers to yet….

    Reply
  27. CC said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:30 am

    Ok…I’m by no means Kate when it comes to these and I’ve never really tried to decipher so please play nice if i’m way off and educate me if I am! Thanks!!!

    No late night visitations…happened one night after shlepping to a titty bar…loud knocking on her door=Kicked Brad out of the bedroom after discovering his trip to titty bars and he didn’t like it much hence the loud knocking to be let in.

    IRS problems=tax fraud

    she loves to flaunt them=her children

    false eyelashes=real ones keep falling out from drug use

    various bank vaults and safety deposit boxes…France, London and Nassau=hidden assests, again tax fraud?

    old school ties=old school as in “kickin it old school” or old school friends? not sure on that one

    South American flavor=maybe it’s not India she plans to adopt from but instead from South America?

    physical distress=collasping on the SALT set

    expansive pad=staying in an NYC apt by herself while filming

    shaved her pussy hair=she wanted to loose even more weight? JK

    too much competition…wants Louise’s head=doesn’t like that Madonna’s cutting in on her adoption racket

    chilly NYC…crashing back like a piledriver=again, collasping on the set of SALT? Clueless on this one

    tonguing the small hole=licking a butt hole?? GROSS!!!!

    great sleeping pill=her drug usage or maybe her movies?? They are becoming snooze fests!!!!!!

    20-dollar bill=makes for a straw to snort meth/coke/heroin or pays for a small amount of drugs?

    no longer capable of breast-feeding=obviously from the boob job or the drug use

    leaning tower of Pisa…flown off the roof=she’s tall and scrawny and keeps fainting (which I don’t buy, I think she manufactures these collasping stories and plants them in the media for sympathy)

    Reply
  28. R. Catone said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:35 am

    @CC – Si, Si!!!!!!!!!! MUY UNIDA!!!!!!

    Reply
  29. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:40 am

    Old school ties = old drug buddies, maybe. drug dealers from back when

    Reply
  30. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:44 am

    @CC:

    According to SR you are very close. Congratulations CC, you made it clearer for me.

    Reply
  31. CC said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:46 am

    @R. Catone:
    So close, I can almost taste it!!!! ;-) Thanks for the brain teases, these are wacky but fun!

    Reply
  32. CC said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    AH!!! yes, that makes total sense…@Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Reply
  33. Canuck said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:56 am

    I’m just going to throw this out there as a random thought that’s been nudging me…
    Natalie Portman grew up in Washington, now lives in New York and graduated from Harvard. Could she be the Sophisticated Lady with Washington ties, and could she be the “too much competition” and “old school ties” (in the British school/regimental ties sense)?

    Reply
  34. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:12 am

    @ Canuck – there was a story about Brad’s attration to Natalie in Now magazine this week, apparently he’s been going on about how beautiful and intelligent she is to Ange and “cute as a button” (barf). Ange is reportedly very jealous. In SR’s previous post there is a bit at the end about Brad being involved in a process of assimilating his new lover in to his PR story/image I think. There was an interesting bit of info on a Star Trek about how the Borgs set about assimilating people into their collective who they considered worthy and would add to their technology and strength, but whether the object wanted to be assimilated or not was irrelevant to them. Could he consider Natalie worthy of him and therefore be setting about to assimilate her into his life and image, whether she likes it or not?! Just a thought…

    Reply
  35. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:15 am

    @Canuck:

    You may be on to something Canuck, great connection. Portman is a different level of competition for AJ than say a Jennifer A. Not that I have anything against Jennifer but…

    Reply
  36. CC said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:17 am

    @Canuck:
    Sounds plausible to me. She has spoken before about meeting Hillary Clinton and John McCain before the elections while in DC for Finca {a nonprofit org that gives loans to businesswomen in developing countries} so yeah…she could be the Washington lady…but does anyone think he’s smart enough for her? She seems to have a certain type of guy that looks nothing like Brad…they are usually younger and more hairy than he is!! LOL

    Reply
  37. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:21 am

    Could the first bit refer to drug use? “No late night visitations, i.e. the dealer didn’t come to her at night with the drugs, she got them after visiting a strip bar. Could the loud knocking on her door be from the police or the feds who have discovered she has been commiting tax fraud? She loves to flaunt her wealth, her assets and the IRS now want to know what she’s done with it all. Turns out its all been deposited in safety boxes and vaults in London, France and The Bahamas, so she can evade paying taxes? Old school ties could be old drugs buddies and “South American flavour” could mean cocaine? She’s now been fainting a lot and collapsing. She shaved her pussy hair because she thought it would make her seem more sexually attractive, there is too much competition from other women for the men she has her eye on. She’s mad with Madonna for all the trouble around her adoption attempt, will probably hinder her from adopting. And the rest all seems like sex and drugs, that she can barely stand up straight like the leaning tower of pisa and that she had to be flown by helicopter ambulance of the roof of the hotel she was staying in?

    Reply
  38. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:22 am

    Or the police could have been knocking on her door re: the drug use…..?

    Reply
  39. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:25 am

    @ Everyone – also check out my interpretation of the previous SR post, let me know what you think….

    Reply
  40. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:41 am

    @CC:

    Just reminded me of a blind on e that everyone guessed Natalie P.

    WHICH petite screen actress isn’t as intelligent as her college degree would imply? She refuses to read the scripts her agents send her and then throws a fit when plum roles go to her harder-working peers.

    Not that it adds anything to the discussion except she may have enough things in common with Brad to spark interest although he’s not her usual type. Still do we know if anything has started or is it just that Brad is enamored at this point with this well connected Washington lady?

    Reply
  41. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:43 am

    @ Billi – yes, she’s not as smart as people think she is. More on Brad’s level after all…..interesting!

    Where is Kate?

    Reply
  42. CC said on April 8th, 2009 at 10:01 am

    @Billi:
    Ah you’re right! I do remember reading that BI and wondered if it was her but didn’t think about it again till you mentioned it!! You’re right then, he’d be perfect for her! LOL

    Reply
  43. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 11:23 am

    @Keane:

    Kate may be doing some behind the scene investigation. She always comes up with some juicy information. :)

    Reply
  44. Canuck said on April 8th, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    @Keane:
    That story about AJ being jealous could be just another gossip rag piece of BS, I suppose. I wouldn’t think that even BP is so stupid to go on and on about his next conquest to his drugged up knife-throwing ex-or-soon-to-be girlfriend. However, I could see BP chomping at the bit to start to woo her if indeed she caught his fancy. As to her intelligence, according to her online bio (which may or may not be true), she was a straight A student. She certainly comes off as being informed, intelligent and thoughtful in the few interviews of her’s that I’ve read or seen.

    I just pulled up a page of Harvard graduates. and was surprised to discover that the guy who played Gopher on the Love Boat is one, as is Steve Zahn, who is in the next Aniston movie and was in Sahara, Tommy Lee Jones, Jack Lemmon, Yo Yo Ma, the guy who played Dano in Hawaii 5-0 and a few others that I did know about.

    http://www.nndb.com/edu/473/000068269/

    There is a journalist Mark Halperin too, any relation HH? :)

    Reply
  45. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    @g:
    Thank you g! That is very helpful, how interesting to look at actual tax forms, hmmm, so they donated to the MIR foundation? That makes me wonder if he owes her money back or something, remember he went to see Obama about getting funding for this project, maybe she wants to be paid back for those homes deeded in her name.

    Reply
  46. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    @R. Catone:
    ahhh, Well they were joling on the The Insider article that The New World Order took Ian down , actually they were down right nasty putting up negative articles about Ian. I figured someone was dancing with ya guys, lol Have a nice Easter SR.

    Reply
  47. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    @Keane:
    I was sick last night, so I am just getting my bearings, :) I can eat now at least. I read this yesterday and it hurt to even think about it. ha ha

    Reply
  48. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    @Billi:
    @Billi:
    I agree Billi, I think there might be a bigger response if we could decipher more easily, Sugar has gotten more difficult as we have gone along, and that may be for legal purpose, but IF the source is true, there is not need for that, unless he is trying to just protect the source. If we can not figure it out though, what are the chances that Angelina and Dumb dumb can? I would bet Trevor probably does not do much better at it because he would need to know all her and his dirt. When it gets too frustrating, people just quit trying and give up. I think these threads could easily go into the 600-700 posts if they were better understood.

    I also agree with Keane, it is probably Ian and his brilliant mind on overtime, or someone helping him on staff. Now, you have to admit, he is one talented guy!! If not then a good friend or associate that thinks alike. :)

    We may have to stay calling him Sybil. ha ha

    I love this site though,at least I was getting sick as it went down, otherwise I would have been having withdrawals like Ang.

    Reply
  49. knowone said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    @R. Catone:Ha. I expected you might get some sabotage. Reminds me of the quote “if you can keep your head about you while others are losing their’s and blaming you….” Keep you head, and your site, strong, Ian. This is the very definition of a free press…and we all know (especially in light of the modern day practice of buying off the news media and what a dangerous precedence that sets) how important it is for US to chat freely.

    Reply
  50. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    @ knowone – here, here – I can’t believe this stuff has remained suppressed for such a long time, especially the suspected drug use, particularly when the woman is a representative of the UNHCR. How has she got away with it all?

    Reply
  51. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    I can’t see Brad with Natalie is the one that brought the script to him and asked him to do the film with her, later she was seen dallying with Sean Penn, so who knows. He could be ga ga over her, but she is about 28 years old. What we have another Michael D. here.?

    CC you did great, Keane too. So what, Jolie has never heard of a Brazilian? lol

    Actually France and Nassau were both named in the investigation as safe havens for tax shelters. The week Brad was in Washington visiting the lawyer the investigation was breaking hard. I just wondered if he was part of it or not. This post by Sugar does say Brange, but if CC is right and Brad is trying to get back in the bedroom, how old is it?

    Time lines would help since we have been told they have not slept together now for about 6 weeks. jmo

    Reply
  52. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    @Keane:
    Can all this info be sent to the UNHCR? I’m not suggesting we should, but do you think they may get their hands on all this info? Just asking out of curiosity because it seems to me that they don’t do much of a background check, do they. I mean, if the gossip tabs can get this kind of info, why not the govt?

    Reply
  53. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    @Kate:

    I’m glad you’re feeling better Kate. And you understand where I was coming from in my earlier comments re making SR’s & 9C more transparent is only to get Ian and his site more respect and interest. I bet a lot of people coming to this site, read one of SR’s posts and right off dismiss as crazy and never come back. Otherwise, ITA with you he would get +++ posts.

    Also I checked out The Insider and the comments are so nasty like it’s totally unbelievable that Jolie could ever be an addict. Totally in denial. Time will bare all.

    Reply
  54. knowone said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @Canuck:Steve Zahn is hilarious. Now I know why he’s so attractive to me as an actor–funny and smart! (That movie where he plays an ex-con posing as a beauty pagent consultant is soooooo funny.)

    Reply
  55. joanne said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    @Billi:
    Natalie Portman is boyish thin just the way Pitt seems to like them. The last few award shows I thought Jolie looked out of it.

    Reply
  56. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    oh didn’t you hear , those dumbass loons contacted them and told them not to believe that she fucked a dog, have no fear, they will do it for us. lol

    Reply
  57. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    @Keane:
    Keane, what do you think about Ian’s comment that Ange is trying to say that the adoptions (Brads) of the kids are not legal? Should be interesting ..any ideas why ?

    Reply
  58. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    @ AFM – I was actually just looking into that today. The UNHCR has a section on its website giving details about how to report malpractice by members of its staff. It is pretty detailed. One of the causes for reporting somone is “bringing the UNHCR into disrepute” which I think would be apposite here. It can be done annonymously and is obviously 100% confidential, but you have to give your e-mail address. I think the drug addiction (which is pretty obvious to all but the most naive/blind) is cause enough to warrant this, without even going into the supposed betiality, the hookers etc etc. I did notice that another goodwill ambassador for them is Ben Affleck – hardly reknowned for his goo dbehaviour either? Are these people stupid? And I very much doubt any loon has contacted them re the dog stuff, it is unprovable anyway, unless SR’s source is willing to go on the record. The drug stuff however would be easy for them to establish with a simple drugs test. I assume they don’t do this, or haven’t in a long while.

    Reply
  59. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    @ AFM – and I’m pretty sure they don’t know about this site either. If two leading tabloid newspapers in the UK didn’t, then there is no way the UN would. So, the choice is really up to us as to whether we pass the info on, and suggest they check it out.

    @ Kate – sorry you weren’t feeling well hon, glad you are better now. Re: the adoptions, I assume because he is in danger of getting full or primary custody of them all and she is trying every trick in the book to stop him. Including trying to prove the adoptions weren’t legal. Sounds like an indication of desperation to me, how do you interpret it?

    Reply
  60. p said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    @Kate:
    btw how come no sightings…you’d figure even if it was only for publicity,..a dinner here, a function, or playground stop there. Maybe they’ve stretched this long before, and I didn’t notice, it just seems like they’re always around together in the papers.

    Reply
  61. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    Hey Keane,

    Okay so looking at this, SR said that CC is yes yes united on what he/she is saying,and CC did a really good job, hard to tell what part is right and what we need to tweak with SR’s comment, but I will say that the beginning would seem to apply more to tax problems and not Brad going to a bar and coming back to her room, this behavior seems to be more recent than old and I don’t believe they are sharing a bedroom. Just a thought, or have been since they left California, which was January.

    I think the tax angle applies to both of them maybe, but SR has used Brange for just Jolie before..so..we should take what CC did and work with that, and hope that SR will come back and help us out. :)

    Reply
  62. p said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    @Keane:
    Not only drug tests but if she has been to detox docs, and there must be records of it somewhere if she has, it indicates an on again/off again relationship w drugs.

    Reply
  63. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    @joanne:

    Yes she is tiny and beautiful. We know she’s a Harvard graduate and outside of her acting she’s been involved which might give her some additional appeal to BP. For instance:

    Portman was involved with the 2004 presidential campaign of Democratic candidate John Kerry and has supported antipoverty activities. In 2004 and 2005, she traveled to Uganda, Guatemala, and Ecuador as the Ambassador of Hope for FINCA International, an organization that promotes micro-lending to help finance women-owned businesses in poor countries. In an interview conducted backstage at the Live 8 concert in Philadelphia and appearing on the PBS program Foreign Exchange with Fareed Zakaria, she discussed microfinance. Host Fareed Zakaria said that he was “generally wary of celebrities with fashionable causes”, but included the segment with Portman because “she really knew her stuff.” In the “Voices” segment of the April 29, 2007, episode of the ABC Sunday Morning Program This Week with George Stephanopoulos, Portman discussed her work with FINCA and how it can benefit women and children in Third World countries. In fall 2007, Portman visited several university campuses, including Harvard, UCLA, UC Berkeley, Stanford, Princeton, New York University, and Columbia, to inspire students with the power of microfinance and to encourage them to join the Village Banking Campaign to help families and communities lift themselves out of poverty.

    Reply
  64. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @Keane:
    I am thinking the asshole donated the 100K to same sex marriage because when he petitioned to adopt it had just passed in California, and when it did it changed the way adoptions were done for everyone based on same sex couples because there are over 70000 kids with gay or lesbian parents in Cal. Then it was overturned, so maybe he had a vested interest on a very personal level to see it stay put. Jolie you notice did not donate one dime, and she is the one who has had a same sex relationship. I am just guessing, but part of the reason for this is for the adoption process. Now I don’t know if the reversal of that bill changed the laws or affected them at all one way or another, but I could easily see her trying to use that loophole, know what I mean? That would make sense, and I can not see any other reason. She has to sign off on him adopting HER children, they are hers, just as if you or I brought a new person into our life and allowed someone to adopt our child if dad was dead, same thing. It is not like adopting from a orphanage for him,or from a silent adoption, if they had been married it would have been a simple step-parent adoption, but they were not married, so he had to go the way of the same sex marriage adoption….as a partner, except now that does not stand..

    He filed in Cali so it was done there. This may explain his behavior on Charlie Rose as well. It was all very sketchy..

    Reply
  65. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @Kate:

    I wonder if the IRS was tipped off or do you think it was a random audit that caught a discrepancy or discrepancies?

    Reply
  66. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @p:

    Well , Cannes is coming up in about 3 weeks lol

    Reply
  67. Guest said on April 8th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    Natalie Portman seems to be a very nice girl, Pitt doesn’t deserve her.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2007/nov/25/1

    Reply
  68. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    @ Kate – yes I think the no late-night visitations must refer to the taz fraud/evasion and visits from the police rather than a dealer, so lets scrap that. The bit that I’m struggling with though is the “she likes to flaunt them…false eyelashes”. Well the first bit makes me think of her fake breasts which she flaunted on the balcony in France, but could be her children I guess, she flaunts them and makes money from them. But what on earth is the “false eyelashes” aspect about. The only thing I can guess is that there have been a couple of instances where cosmetic companies have faced legal action because the women in their ads, Kate Moss and Penny Cruz, in fact were actually wearing false eyelashes. So is there some sort of false advertising suggestion here? That they said they were doing one thng with their money, i.e. donating it to their foundation or directly to charities, and in fact doing another? What do you think?

    Reply
  69. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    Ok and this “South American flavour” and “shaved her pussy hair” = a Brazilian right? Are we talking about a Brazilian child that she wanted to adopt, thinks she won’t be able to now because of what has happened with Madonna?

    And are the “old school ties” something to do with Nassau, and the depositing of money there. Nassau is famous historically for shipwrecks and piracy, and more recently as a refuge for the mega-wealthy to relax, gamble and get up to no good. Do the “old school ties” relate to that?

    Reply
  70. patty anne said on April 8th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    @Kate:
    I saw a clip of a television newsperson interviewing Brad Pitt, when he mentioned the children, Brad responded he has three children…and is not the adoptive parent of Angie’s other three….. should be a way to verify this

    Reply
  71. Togi said on April 8th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    Hey! What’s going on with this site? I am getting the Internal Server 500 error again. Uh oh. I think you guys must be getting seriously close to something and are really getting on SOMEONE’s nerves!!!! Hope that “someone” doesn’t sabbotage the site again! Ugh.

    Reply
  72. p said on April 8th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    I was wondering if “old school ties” meant “old money” myself.

    @Kate:
    But does this seem like a long time or am I imagining it?

    Reply
  73. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    Site trouble again???

    For the heck of it I’ll throw the latest from Ted C’s Bitch Back.

    Dear Ted:
    Is this Jolie-Pitt impending breakup going to be drawn-out and tearful or quick and dirty? Did James Haven really move in to stop the breakup? If yes, will the next dramatic chapter be she walks in on James consoling Brad on a bed?

    Dear Git ‘er Done:
    When A realizes she’s ready to split, the only feelings she’ll be cautious of are her kids’. And hello, don’t you remember the Oscars? Don’t you think we should worry about James and Ange over Brad?

    Reply
  74. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 8th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    I’ve never read this article before from the NYTimes. I’ve heard it being referred to on comments sections. Didn’t realize it was written all the way back in 2007:

    After All That Goodness, a Sudden Fall From Grace

    Article Tools Sponsored By
    By CARYN JAMES
    Published: January 22, 2007

    Before she set a toe on the red carpet at the Golden Globes last week, Angelina Jolie’s carefully molded image as humanitarian and mom was already showing some cracks. The Internet had been flooded with reports, picked up from European interviews, that she had called her biological daughter “a blob” with less personality than her two adopted kids, and had criticized Madonna’s adoption of a baby boy from Malawi. Women’s Wear Daily reported she was being difficult about designs from St. John, the staid company whose ads she appears in and whose conservatively elegant gown she wore to the Globes.

    By the time she reached the end of a haughty, humorless walk down that red carpet on Brad Pitt’s arm, the Good Angelina image had crumbled to dust. In the next days columnists from The Washington Post to LA Weekly attacked her for a television interview with Ryan Seacrest on E! that made it clear she was above such drivel. His red carpet questions were drivel, but that was no reason to sneer the words “Cereal, we made cereal” when asked how the family had spent the morning.

    Video of the interview was spread and ridiculed on Web sites like TMZ and YouTube; Mr. Seacrest complained about her on his radio show; the current issue of Us Weekly reported on more behavior fit for a queen in an article headlined “An Angelina Backlash?” There was really no need for the question mark.

    Once famous as a tattooed wild woman, Ms. Jolie has soared to the saintly realm and plummeted again in record time. Madonna, her only rival in shape-shifting, has maintained the devoted wife and mother image for more than six years now, despite her recent adventures in adoption. Good Angelina didn’t even last two. That shattered image, a lesson in the limits of spin, is the product of a lethal combination: a public that never bought into the reformed persona and a star who may have bought into it too much.

    The backlash had been building all along, and not simply because, while married to Billy Bob Thornton, she wore a vial of his blood around her neck. (No fair blaming the press for her vampirish image.) She adopted her son, Maddox, from Cambodia just before that marriage broke up, and has always seemed sincere about motherhood. But from the minute her name was linked to Mr. Pitt’s, there was plenty of snickering at her claim that they were just friends while filming “Mr. and Mrs. Smith,” when he was married to Jennifer Aniston. Only the Jolie-Pitts know the truth; let’s just say the public remains skeptical. Once they became an acknowledged couple, Ms. Jolie assumed a saintly manner, deglamorizing to the point of wearing a bandanna on her head for a “Today” interview while visiting orphans in Africa; did she think viewers wouldn’t spot her cat’s-eye makeup and heavily glossed lips?

    Such doubts about the noble Angelina accelerated especially fast over the last month. In the January issue of Vogue, talking about how her relationship with Mr. Pitt developed, she restated that they were “very, very good friends” for a long time, sounding as disingenuous as ever. And she added, “It was clear he was with his best friend,” which on the surface is matter-of-fact, yet manages to desexualize Ms. Aniston. Venom in the guise of kindness?

    The new Us Weekly article reports that Ms. Jolie was “a nightmare” during the Vogue photo shoot with Annie Leibovitz; that she pushed through a crowd at the premiere of “God Grew Tired of Us,” a do-gooder documentary about the lost boys of Sudan that Mr. Pitt helped produce; and that she coolly pulled him away from a conversation with Courtney Cox Arquette, Ms. Aniston’s close friend, at the Golden Globes. Even if some of those incidents are exaggerated, the backlash is real. A kitschy painting of Ms. Jolie as the Virgin Mary holding her children and hovering saintlike above a Wal-Mart, a work too banal to be half-good as satire, made a media splash when it was shown at Art Miami 2007.

    The backlash isn’t entirely her fault. The press helped it along by playing fast and loose with her quotations, gleefully picking up the Shiloh-is-a-blob comment without context. In the full interview in British Elle, when Ms. Jolie hesitated in describing her newborn daughter, the reporter suggested the word blob. Ms. Jolie foolishly responded: “Yes, a blob! But now she’s starting to have a personality.”

    In response to a question about Madonna, she did tell the French magazine Gala that adoptions are illegal in Malawi and, “I prefer to stay on the right side of the law.” You can almost hear her coo her superiority as she says it, and you can almost hear anyone who reads it thinking, “Witch.” But her first response was to say that the happiness of Madonna’s child is all that matters; most second-hand reports made that seem like an afterthought.

    Still, at best her own bumbling led her to this state. At worst, blame her self-importance. When she was interviewed on the Globes red carpet for “Access Hollywood,” she was shown an old clip of herself jumping into a swimming pool fully clothed after the 1999 awards, not exactly a tough reminder of her wild past. Yet New Angelina seemed royally unamused. And while she looked ultra-glamorous at the premiere of her latest film, “The Good Shepherd,” the perfectly upswept hair and self-contained demeanor of her recent appearances have also made her seem plastic.

    In part she is suffering from a common problem: movie stars who make too few movies and are forced to coast on their fame. In “The Good Shepherd,” as the wife of a buttoned-down C.I.A. agent (Matt Damon), she goes from vibrant young femme fatale to brittle, middle-aged alcoholic. It’s a fine performance but a minor part. Her next film, “A Mighty Heart,” isn’t scheduled to arrive until June. That leading role might help restore her saintly image; she plays Marianne Pearl, whose husband, Daniel, was kidnapped and murdered while reporting in Pakistan.

    But as Ms. Jolie’s horrific month has shown, reshaping an image is harder than you might think. Despite the charity work and the bun on her head, the burning question all along has been: Who is that woman in the St. John suit, and what has she done with Angelina Jolie?

    Reply
  75. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 8th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    @Togi:
    I think there’s been more traffic than usual. I got a server something or other message before. Spreading like wildfire I tell ya’.

    Reply
  76. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Very good article, thanks for posting.

    Reply
  77. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    For your reading pleasure today, looks like the tabs are getting on the train-

    Life & Style (BRADS PR TEAM< THIS IS WHAT IAN WAS TALKING ABOUT AND THE SOLE LEGAL CUSTODY THAT GIVES ONE PARENT THE RIGHT TO MAKE ALL DECISIONS INCLUDING RELIGION AND HEALTH. I RATHER DOUBT THAT THIS IS TRUE ABOUT THE FAITH THE MAG IS JUST USING THE FAITH AS AN EXAMPLE BECAUSE THEY CAN NOT USE HEALTH OR WHERE TO LIVE UNTIL THEY SPLIT PUBLIC)

    Moving on: Angelina and Brad are fighting over what religion the kids should be raised with. Angelina once said she would teach her kids about all faiths and let them pick, but Brad wants the kids raised Baptist like he was. “He’s from a family that looked at church as a big part of their lives,” says an insider, “and he wonders why he can’t expose his own children to the same influence.”

    In Touch (BRADS PR TEAM, THIS IS WHERE I BELIEVE JOLIE IS TRYING TO ADOPT AGAIN ALONE, MAYBE SA)
    “Now It’s War” Brad put his foot down when Angelina suggested they adopt another child from Ethiopia, and now she’s furious. “She told Brad he had no right to tell her she can’t add to her family and that she will adopt again – with or without his permission,” says a friend. Angie pointed out that she adopted Maddox, Zahara, and Pax as a single mom, so she really doesn’t need Brad to adopt. Though a friend says, “if it comes down to choosing more kids or keeping Brad, then she’ll choose having more kids,” she doesn’t seem that into the six she has. “Angie gets flustered trying to do Zahara’s hair,” the friend says. “And she doesn’t always have the patience to do Shiloh’s hair either. She asks the girls to try and learn to do it themselves.

    National Enquirer- (I AM NOT SURE THE POINT OF THIS ONE)

    NOW IT CAN BE TOLD –the truth about Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston’s divorce that has been kept secret – until now!

    Most fingers point at Angelina Jolie for triggering the Aniston/ Pitt split, but The ENQUIRER has learned that it was Jen who pulled the plug on their 4 1/2-year marriage!

    According to an insider, Jen and Brad – who tied the knot in a splashy Malibu wedding in July 2000 – were having problems long before he flipped for Angelina while filming the action flick Mr. & Mrs. Smith.

    “Jen was champing at the bit to divorce Brad long before they announced their separation in January 2005,” said an insider. “When Brad revealed the depth of his relationship with Angelina, it was painful for Jen, but she was almost relieved.”

    The once-tight golden couple had drifted apart due to career demands and the fallout from a miscarriage that Jen suffered about two years into the marriage, according to the source.

    “After Jen lost the baby, she and Brad could never again agree on when they would have kids, and they continued to grow apart,” said the insider.

    In the end, Brad’s relationship with Angelina gave Jen an “out” for ending the marriage, said the source.

    The couple had no prenuptial agreement, and the divorce was “pretty much a 50/50 California split,” said divorce attorney Seymour Reisman, who has handled numerous high profile and celebrity divorces.

    “But Jennifer is the one who wanted out, and she worked it so that Brad was portrayed as the instigator. In the end, she got the sympathy, while Brad got Angelina Jolie and the label of ‘bad guy.’”

    For all the details pick up the latest ENQUIRER

    Reply
  78. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @ Kate – hm, is that Ange’s PR – a pre-emptive strike to try to prevent the Angelina homewrecker angle being brought up again once the split is announced? I think the media and world will roast her on it, especially as their relationship only lasted 4 years. As for the irresponsibility of adopting/having all the kids, I think there is little she can do, apart from maybe going for a poor Angie had her kids taken away from her and she is pining for them desperatley etc angle. This I would guess, has come from Angie’s camp, you would totally disagree with what is being said from what you know right?

    Reply
  79. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    This is what CC did for us, so we can expand on this and maybe Sugar will direct a bit HOPEFULLY :) I added a little, CC did a great job, SR said yes yes, so it is close…No late night visitations…happened one night after shlepping to a titty bar…loud knocking on her door=Kicked Brad out of the bedroom after discovering his trip to titty bars and he didn’t like it much hence the loud knocking to be let in.

    no late visitations= Brad is not coming around to see her (I changed this, I don’t think he is sleeping with her)

    happened one night after shlepping to a titty bar-Brad did come around to see her , maybe drunk because of tax problems

    lound knocking on her door=he pounded on her door it was important to talk about

    IRS problems= they have tax problems he needed to talk to her

    she loves to flaunt them=her children (SELLS THE KIDS PICS FOR MONEY JOLIE PITT FOUNDATION, it was not his idea)

    false eyelashes= this must be representative of something ???????????????

    various bank vaults and safety deposit boxes…France, London and Nassau=hidden assests, again tax fraud?

    old school ties= ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    South American flavor=she is going to adopt from South America, Brad was set to film Lost City of Z, she may have started the process for this before they split and now he is putting the stops on it. There is a tabloid story on this today.

    physical distress=collasping on the SALT set AGAIN

    expansive pad=staying in an NYC apt by herself while filming

    shaved her pussy hair= can that be that literal a brazilian reference, isn’t that where Lost City of Z is?

    too much competition…wants Louise’s head=doesn’t like that Madonna’s cutting in on her adoption racket

    chilly NYC…crashing back like a piledriver= maybe a possible overdose

    tonguing the small hole=I think this is drug related

    great sleeping pill=same here

    20-dollar bill=makes for a straw to snort meth/coke/heroin or pays for a small amount of drugs?

    no longer capable of breast-feeding=obviously from the boob job or the drug use . or having bio kids
    not haveing bio kids makes sense to me

    leaning tower of Pisa…flown off the roof=she’s tall and scrawny and keeps fainting (which I don’t buy, I think she manufactures these collasping stories and plants them in the media for sympathy) maybe this is just she is barely standing on her own right now…

    Okay you guys help?

    SUGAR RAY/IAN ????

    Reply
  80. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    This report came out February 2, 2009-

    Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie will move their family to Brazil this summer, a report claims.

    According to the Daily Mail, Jolie became enamoured with South America while visiting Costa Rica in 2007 for her role as a UN goodwill ambassador.

    Pitt will work on James Gray’s film The Lost City Of Z while his family are residing in Brazil.

    A source said: “Brad didn’t need too much convincing as he wants to be known as a movie adventurer like Harrison Ford. So the family will be in Brazil in spring for his film. He’ll play British Colonel Percy Harrison Fawcett, who disappeared in 1925.”

    The couple and their children have lived in Nice, New Orleans and Berlin over the past two years.

    Now, considering they are fighting over custody right now , it is possible she started a adoption on a Brazilian child back last year..and now he is trying to stop her I guess, but why would she do something so stupid as that,it would seem that would work against her getting custody of the six she has? This must just be tabloid only…IDK

    But Brad goes to Cannes soon, she has to finish SALT and then he has this, so what is going to happen with the kids. in this split?

    Reply
  81. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    @Keane:
    yes, that has to come from her, we know Jen did not want the divorce. She wanted to get counseling and work it out, Jolie is trying to make Jen look like a evil bitch for using her as a homewrecker.

    Reply
  82. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    The “false eyelashes” bit must mean something, and the only thing I can think it refers to are recent fairly high profile cases where cosmetics companies have been forced to pull adverts plugging mascara because Kate Moss and Penny Crus (separate companies and adverts) were wearing false eyelashes. I think it refers to an element of fraudulent activity. As it comes directly after the things which we think is about the kids then either 1) one of the twins isn’t really theirs, as perhaps was hinted at in a previous post or 2) they didn’t do what they said they were going to do with the money from flaunting them, there has been a tz dodge or something. What do you think? Not sure about the “old school ties” still. Yes I think it is possible that she makes up the collapsing stories for sympathy, I’ve already said how her PR team are going for the “poor Angie” strategy cos they literally have no other options right now, but if she is on meth or heroin, then it could easily be true. “Flown off the roof” to me either refers to her being taken by helicopter to hospital from the hotel roof, what else could it mean? I doubt it would refer to a suicide attempt, not that way at least….

    Reply
  83. Guest said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    Old school= CFR?

    Reply
  84. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    @ Guest – could be….

    Reply
  85. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Ready to make his way out of the Big Apple, Brad Pitt was spotted arriving at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City to catch a flight on Wednesday (April .

    The “Fight Club” stud was dressed in a black leather biker jacket with jeans and his newsboy cap, surrounded by airport personnel as he made his way to the security checkpoint.

    The trip out of town follows recent rumors that Brad’s partner, Angelina Jolie, recently collapsed on the set of her new spy-thriller, “Salt”.

    When contacted by press about the incident by Access Hollywood, Sony, the studio behind Miss Jolie’s upcoming film, denied the reports – saying that they are “absolutely not true.”

    http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebri … er-212620/

    Wonder where he is OFF to? lol

    Reply
  86. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    @Guest:

    Which CFR?

    Reply
  87. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @Kate:
    So she didn’t collapse according to the studio? Alrighty then.

    Reply
  88. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    @Keane:
    Leaning tower of Pisa flown off roof+collapse flown to hospital -that is what I think that means.

    The fake eyelash follows the tax problems, then flauting the kids, but before the tax shelters, so it HAS to have something to do with that subject I think…old school ties could be someone helping her hide the money , lawyers etc Trevor etc..unless that is where the story changes and begins with the new adoption and talks about adoption from SA and her living alone in NY , being in distress, Madonnas failed adoption maybe adding to that, she can’t handle it so she does some drugs overdoses and has to be flown out for medical attention from the roof of a penthouse something like that.

    Sort of sounds like she planned to adopt from SA. that maybe she began putting it together when the twins were born, but could not apply til they were 6 months old which was Dec, then this all fell apart, to make it worse Madonna screwed was denied and that makes it worse for Jolie. Madonnas adoption was in the works from before she and Guy split as well. That is all I can think of. Brad may have put his foot down and said no more fkg kids . I bet she can not have bio kids, she is a mess. What is she going to do if she keeps adopting, what name does the new one get, just Jolie???

    Where is Sugar Ray?

    Reply
  89. Alif said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    I thought it was only my computer, and I copied the message, hoping to ask my friend, the computer whiz, about it. No go, as yet!

    500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR
    INTERNAL SERVER ERROR

    The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

    Please contact the server administrator, or webmaster @ ianundercover.com and inform them of the time the error occurred and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

    More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

    Additionally, 2500 Internal Service Error was encountered while trying to usa an Error Document to handle the request.

    Apache2.2.11(Unix)mod_ssl/2.2.11OpenSSL/0.9.8;DAV/2mod_auth_passthrough12.1mod_bwlimited/1.4FrontPage/5.0.2.2635Serveratianundercover.comPort80

    Whatever the above means. Maybe everyone got the same message?
    Relief that it wasn’t mine only.

    Reply
  90. Canuck said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    Anyone have a program that can depixelate a zoomed version of that photo? The ticket jacket says “Air SOMETHING” and I would almost swear it’s Air France from that little logo red bit near the name.

    Reply
  91. Guest said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @Billi:
    Jolie was ‘invited’ to the Council on Foreign Relations by her ‘political advisor’ Trevor Neilsen, a member, and now she is a member of the CFR (google CFR for the political and media influence of this think tank). This is ludicrous, but true. Wondering about her mission.:) I doubt they know about her weird life, she is not a poster child for them at all. She doesn’t even represent the 1-2 child NWO policy.

    Reply
  92. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    Good Daddy PR!

    The Jolie-Pitt family loves to eat fast food, so it’s surprise that Brad Pitt took his sons Maddox and Pax to Dunkin Donuts for breakfast on Wednesday.

    According to an eyewitness, Brad brought his two oldest sons to a Dunkin Donuts in Oyster Bay, New York around 8am for an early morning treat.

    “He looked just like a regular guy who was out with his kids,” a customer told Star. “He seemed really comfortable being there and not having to look over his shoulder.”

    The Jolie-Pitt family has been staying on Long Island while mom Angelina shoots the film Salt in Manhattan.

    A scruffy looking Brad allowed each tot to select a treat. “He picked up each kid so they could look at all of the choices. After a moment Brad asked each child, ‘What would you like?’ They both opted for a chocolate glazed donut,” the customer said, adding “I thought it was really sweet how he picked up each boy individually to pick a donut they wanted.”

    Brad also ordered a medium regular coffee and a medium cappuccino. After Maddox and Pax got their donuts, they said, “Thanks, Daddy.” The boys were “so well behaved,” says the witness.

    “While Brad was waiting he was giggling with the kids and he looked like he was having a good time. He was smiling non-stop. You can tell the boys really love him.”

    http://www.starmagazine.com/brad_pitt_k … news/15460

    Reply
  93. Guest said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    Loonies (eyewitnesses) are having a really hard time now.:)

    Reply
  94. Togi said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    @Alif:
    Nope, you’re not alone! :-) I can’t believe how QUICK people on this site are … the workings of the human mind are, well … MINDBOGGLING. From the looks of things, I’ll bet there are going to be more attacks on the site. Consider that a compliment of sorts. Of course, with compliments like that, who needs ‘em, right?

    Reply
  95. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    Has everyone noticed how quiet Lainey has been about how in love Brange is, she has not said one word about what the tabloids are printing, she normally knocks them. lol I bet her sources are starting to tell her that they are done . lol

    Reply
  96. cuze said on April 8th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    @Kate:
    Do you think Brad and Jennifer may be reading IUC? In Brad’s photo he has a pink crotchet looking thing around his neck.. much like the pink lei thing that Sugar Ray has in his photo. Jennifer’s last photo she is wearing a scarf pulled way up just under her eyes sort of like Ms Nine Cents photo. Think they are messing with us? Maybe a coincidence?

    Reply
  97. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    @Togi:
    Speaking of attacks on this site, Billi posted this earlier, now on first look this may seem innocent, but I have read Ted for over a decade, and reading between the lines it is easy for me to see, he believes that Angelina should get the kids, drugs and all. How whacked out is that? He has said before the only thing saving her right now are her children, but I have to ask how that is possible with the way she is living her life?

    Dear Ted:
    Is this Jolie-Pitt impending breakup going to be drawn-out and tearful or quick and dirty? Did James Haven really move in to stop the breakup? If yes, will the next dramatic chapter be she walks in on James consoling Brad on a bed?

    Dear Git ‘er Done:
    When A realizes she’s ready to split, the only feelings she’ll be cautious of are her kids’. And hello, don’t you remember the Oscars? Don’t you think we should worry about James and Ange over Brad?

    Reply
  98. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    @Canuck:

    I agree that it looks like the Air France logo.

    Reply
  99. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    @cuze:
    What pic of Jen, that thing around Brad’s neck looks like a rope lol I would not be surprised if he was not of the sources though. Nothing bad has been said about him really.

    Reply
  100. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @Guest:

    I wasn’t sure if it was Code of Federal Regulations (which in hindsight does not relate) or Council on Foreign Relations. Thanks much for clarification.

    Reply
  101. Keane said on April 8th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    @ Kate – I think the “old school ties” does refer to the money and burying it. Nassau has been the playground of the rich and a refuge from places of law and order for many years. Edward and Wallis Simpson lived the high life there during WWII, evading all the action. There have been numerous dodgy criminal cases there where people have got away with murder, literally. Then of course there are the recent ANS and John Travolta incidents. Its a haven from law and order and responsibility. I think that this is something along the lines of what it refers to.

    Reply
  102. Canuck said on April 8th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    @cuze:
    I think the scarf photo was taken before Ms. Nine Cents was introduced…

    Reply
  103. Canuck said on April 8th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    @Billi:
    Can anyone tell me if JFK has a different terminal for international flight and local flights? There is a “Korean Airlines” logo behind him in one of those photos, and in two others there is an air hostess who could be Air France, but the scarf looks not to be right for them. Anyone recognize that uniform?

    Reply
  104. cuze said on April 8th, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    @Canuck:
    Ok.. wasn’t sure.. I can’t find that photo now anyway.

    Reply
  105. dina said on April 8th, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    Welcome back Ian and Sugar! I’ve had a feeling for awhile the succubus would try and sabotage your site Ian.

    @Canuck
    I think he’s flying international. In one of the pics you can clearly see him holding his passport along with his ticket. Let me see if I can find a link to the pic…

    Reply
  106. dina said on April 8th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    Here’s the link with the pic of him holding his passport.

    http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrity_gallery/image_full/161657/

    Reply
  107. Canuck said on April 8th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    @dina:
    You don’t need to show ID to fly internally in the US?

    Reply
  108. Canuck said on April 8th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    @dina:
    That REALLY looks like an Air France ticket folder. Getting a head start on Cannes, is he?

    Reply
  109. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    @Canuck:

    I see JFK on the name tag for the official looking lady in the photo with Brad. Could she not be affiliated with the airport and responsible for looking after dignitaries/celebrities? It does not look like an Air France uniform but it sure looks like Air France logo on his ticket.

    Reply
  110. Billi said on April 8th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    @Billi:

    So who’s looking after the kids?

    Reply
  111. dina said on April 8th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @Canuck:
    Yes you do. They require a photo ID (drivers license, military ID, or Government issued ID card). You can use a passport as an ID to fly within the US but I would think he would just use his drivers license if he was flying domestically. Kwim?

    Reply
  112. joanne said on April 8th, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    @Kate:
    The national inquirer making Jolie look good and Aniston bad they must be losing customers and depending on the loons to buy it? I thought Aniston was pregnant during Friends and they wrote her pregnancy in the show but she miscarried.

    Reply
  113. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    @Canuck:
    Maybe he has to go back to get something out of that 60 million dollar Chateau they have since they are splitting up..lol..or let’s see , the twins birth documents are in France…maybe he needs something there for the custody case..

    Reply
  114. knowone said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    @p:I think it’s due to complete and total meltdown. Can’t even get it together for a photo, with the mental and/or rehab clinic and Brad having his own crisis (either emotional or due to his two brain cells on overload thanks to his new lady) ha. JMO.

    Reply
  115. knowone said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:49 pm

    @Billi:I saw that too!!! I immediately thought, uh oh Ted, hope you got the E! lawyers approval before you ran with that zinger. AJ is going to piss herself over that little remark. Loves it. LOL

    Reply
  116. joanne said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:05 pm

    Hollywood golden couple JENNIFER ANISTON and BRAD PITT are in mourning after the former FRIENDS actress reportedly suffered a miscarriage.

    The OCEAN’S ELEVEN hunk broke down in tears when the couple were told the devastating news by their doctor, according to American gossip magazine THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER.

    But sources insist the tragic event has only strengthened their determination to have a baby.

    An insider tells the Enquirer, “Jennifer had been in pain so she and Brad went to see her doctor. The doctor broke the terrible news to the couple, informing them that they’d lost their baby.

    “Brad was a total wreck over the miscarriage. But he did everything possible to tend to Jen. He and Jennifer were ecstatic that their dream of becoming parents were about to come true. Fate had other plans.

    “It was by far the biggest test of their love, and Brad came through for Jennifer with flying colours. Brad stood by Jennifer all the way. He proved that his main priority in life is Jennifer. It was tough going for Jen at the beginning.”

    16/07/2004 14:19
    I found this in contactmusic.com archives.

    Reply
  117. knowone said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    @Kate:Very interesting war of the PR machines in NE. I think it’s both Jen’s camp and AJ’s that are sources for this combo piece. I do not believe Jen ended that marriage, and I do not believe that she was relieved. I believe she was devastated, with dignity. (i.e. I don’t think she geared up with PR for a couple of years, and it was an attempt to fight the way she was being portrayed by AJ—as someone who did not want children. I do think in all this Brangie mess, Jen’s team has to continue to answer to her dignity. (and that may be why the truth is now coming out about the miscarriage. I had never heard that news, had anyone else? This is largely an AJ inspired image control piece, and I think Jen’s PR is filling in some long overdue “truth” about what really went down inside that marriage. I do have some respect for NE since they broke that story about that complete tool John Edwards. That was some stellar investigative reporting that brought him down.

    Reply
  118. Kate said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    @knowone:
    I had heard about the miscarriage because back then her friends and his family were not that careful about what they said, so they were being quoted around L.A. Even later after they split her friends mentioned it a few times, Brad never did. I do not know if it is true because I don’t believe either one of them have ever publicly addressed it. The NE has touched on it 4 times, once in 2004, again after the split and again last year, and now today. I tend to think that is Jen’s way of putting it out that she did want kids and that the kids should have been hers, not Angelinas, her friends have said in the past that is how she felt.

    Thinking about that threesomes he forced on her, he looked pretty grungy with her at times, I wonder if that was after she cleaned him up.lol

    Reply
  119. p said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:47 pm

    @knowone:
    Well one thing is certain, they can’t EVER say that the supposed candid pics of the kids are beyond their control. Just as after the birth of the twins — unless everyone under 8 was/is shut away in an attic, while the parents flew/fly around the world doing promos and award shows, work, etc…the kids traveled and presumably left hotels and/or whichever domiciles they were inhabiting at the time, and did things, w/o a hitch.

    Don’t EVER use that as an excuse again you filthy, self-serving bags of shit, we’re watching you.

    Reply
  120. knowone said on April 8th, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    @p:Yeah, don’t get me wrong. I think NE is on the dole, fer sure. I just think they also occasionally have an enterprising reporter who actually does get the story. I don’t buy the thing, ’cause you really can’t tell what’s been enterprised as a real story, and what’s BS. It’s such an interesting game to observe and comment about tho. lol

    Reply
  121. knowone said on April 8th, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    Over on dlisted, someone had posted a an exchange between Daniel Craig and a reporter. The reporter said something to the affect that you’re a big star now and yet we don’t see or read about you in the tabloids, why is that? Daniel Craig said “because I don’t want to be in them.” Well played, Daniel Craig. Their “job” is to act in movies and keep their privates lives private. But these fame whores are stupid when they attempt to use the press only to curry favor for how great they are, never understanding that when you invite the press in, they’re in for it all, good, bad and the ugly. That’s why I really don’t think AJ or Madonna or any of these people who attempt to control their images, really have a private life at all, or don’t care about it. They only want fame, so bring it on. That’s why we love it when they finally see that their “using” the media is a double edged sword. If only the media would not take their damn money, and do what they’re supposed to do—report the truth!!! And that’s my free speech rant of the day. LOL

    Reply
  122. p said on April 8th, 2009 at 10:19 pm

    @knowone:
    I just made the comment bc the story reminded me of their kiddie-driven pr machine and how their are no accidental photo ops of the babes when, they don’t plan them.

    On another matter, if they split, I reckon it won’t be announced till AJ finishes shooting and they can both safely hide from inquiring minds…and of course the kids are at least temporarily situated.

    Reply
  123. p said on April 8th, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    @knowone Well played indeed Mr.Craig. No question, they’re definitely generating this, it provable. If they stop? Neither one of them have the type of appeal to generate the magnitude of interest they want…and they know it. In honesty Brad more than Jolie…but still not nearly enough for his taste.

    Reply
  124. Canuck said on April 9th, 2009 at 2:20 am

    @p:
    I don’t know that Brad is really the fame whore that Jolie is. He and Jen managed to keep their lives a lot more private than he and Angie do, which would kind of indicate to me that it’s Jolie who is orchestrating the media circus for her own benefit, although Brad certainly has been complicit in allowing it to happen. The only person who really gained from that career-wise is Jolie, Brad was already a big star, Jolie wasn’t.

    Reply
  125. Alif said on April 9th, 2009 at 2:48 am

    @Togi:
    I’ve read too, that “Big Brother” notes everything we talk about on cell phones, telephones, computers, etc. If so, they’d die of boredom casing my thoughts, ha!

    Reply
  126. Alif said on April 9th, 2009 at 3:18 am

    One impression I’ve had of Brad Pitt for some time, is that he is determined to be a power player in the Hollywoods. Jmo, that he has degraded himself from the beginning with that goal in mind. A means to an end. He just didn’t think of the “slippery slope” aspects. That there would be consequences. It seems to me that he thought he had it all, and there was no reason for it to end.
    Again, he seems to have JA in his hip pocket. He has humiliated her in front of the whole world. And he gets away with it. A double standard is what we’re subject to, again. The male is empowered by treating his women like dirt. Not saying he does it to AJ. There, he met his match!
    It’s just that AJ has an even worse enemy to battle: Herself!

    Well, off my soapbox. Til’ the next time, then!

    Reply
  127. p said on April 9th, 2009 at 3:44 am

    @Canuck:
    Yeah his acting career was in much better shape, no question. But he wanted to be a bigger player on the world stage, and he thought he found the ultimate companion to play on his team. But unfortunately if reports are true, the companion holds court with strange bed-fellows, many of whom are demons in her head. I don’t know how private he was w JA, look at his old interviews…personally I think they were far too public also. They just didn’t blabber intimacies about their sex lives. No, Jolie did that.

    Reply
  128. Billi said on April 9th, 2009 at 6:59 am

    INF Daily 4/8/09
    Brad Pitt was a jet setter this afternoon when we spotted him at JFK airport in New York, apparently bound for France. The Pittster was glad in his usual newsboy cap and sunglasses as well as a giant gold ring (does he sell cars now?). The only accessory missing from Brad’s ensemble was a kid or two or six!
    No word what he’s up to in France, perhaps re-shooting some scenes for Inglourious Basterds?

    Reply
  129. Canuck said on April 9th, 2009 at 7:44 am

    From the Gossip GIrls:

    http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrities/hollywood/brad-pitt-back-in-france-212628/

    Arriving on a flight from JFK International Airport, Brad Pitt was spotted at an airport in Marseille in the south of France earlier today (April 9).

    The “Fight Club” stud sported his usual newsboy cap and sunglasses as he emerged from the terminal. He’ll be staying in France sans Angelina and the kids to get ready for the Cannes Film Festival.

    I wonder if the news of the split will hit while he is there? It’s a lot easier to avoid the paps in France where they have some pretty strict laws about that sort of thing. And just the sort of thing to drive the media into a frenzy of guessing in the run-up to the festival. Wonder if he’ll stay at the Chateau or not?

    Reply
  130. Keane said on April 9th, 2009 at 7:51 am

    I’m still wondering about the “she loves to flaunt them….false eyelashes” business and what that could mean. It is a highly cryptic expression and it makes me think that it is referring to something potentially explosive. I think it must refer to some sort of fraudulent activity surrounding either the photos taken of the twins or the money that they received from them. If it was something as insignificant as the fact that the pics were photoshopped (which ones aren’t these days?), then I don’t think it would be relevant enough to mention, and certainly not in such a cryptic way. I’m thinking there must have been something fraudulent going on with the pictures of the twins. Is it that they aren’t both their children as some of the wilder rumours have suggested? I keep thinking about those ads and people using false eyelashes instead of real ones in mascara ads and how they were pulled because of false advertising. I may be totally on the wrong track but I’m thinking that there is some sort of false advertising thing going on with those pics of the twins. Or it could be about the money they got and what they did with it, they advertised it falsely, said they were going to donate it all to charity when in fact they didn’t, and this was part of their tax dodge. Any thoughts on this anyone?

    And on a lighter note, re Brad’s predilection for wearing hats of late: what is the one reason and one reason alone that middle-aged men start taking up the wearing of hats whenever they appear in public? I think we all know what I’m talking about. Plus remember those pics of them both when she was supposedly preggers with the twins at the SAGs a few years ago. Definite hair implants going on there, he looked ridiculous.

    And as for the famewhoring, I really am coming to believe that Ange was always really in the relationship more for her image and what it could do for her career than any genuine love. As “Kimmy” said, she used Brad to “position herself”. And thats why their relationship has been flogged to us so mercilessly. She was only really ever in it for the publicity, so everythingthey did had to be in the public eye. They don’t have a private life because that was never really what she was in it for. The whole thing to me has just been one long, drawn out publicity stunt.

    Reply
  131. mandy said on April 9th, 2009 at 8:22 am

    @Keane:
    How aware do you think Brad is of her intentions and when did he catch on? That’s what I wonder about. Is he just completely oblivious to the fact that she is using him AND HIS CHILDREN for publicity or does he willingly partcipate?

    Reply
  132. Keane said on April 9th, 2009 at 8:36 am

    @ mandy – not very aware, but he’s probably caught on by now! I’ve said it before on this site and I stand by my theory that men are inherently less manipulative and much more sraightforward creatures than women, and they just don’t appreciate when they are being used. Maybe it comes from our development as a species: men were the hunters and the fighters, women had to use their wiles to attract a mate and to keep him so they were provided for and protected. Just a theory. And men are very often blinded by sexual attraction and love, and are very easily duped when they want to be. I’m sure many women are too, but in this scenario it is definitely her who had the upperhand. And I think she was so in control of him at first that he did what he was told, like many men I know do. I know men who are almost frightened of their wives, frightened of causing their displeasure. I could easily see him being like that at first, but then I think he fought back and all hell broke loose, and then he decided to take his balls back, and here we now are!

    Reply
  133. mandy said on April 9th, 2009 at 8:57 am

    @Keane:
    I agree that is true of most men. My husband is terrified of me. lol
    But after all Brad has been through (Gwyneth,JL and various others) you would think that he would be able to spot that stuff a mile away. There is no way this is the first time someone in his life has used him for publicity. Then again, sex is a powerful weapon. Wow! I wish I could have been a fly on the wall of that bedroom in the early days.

    Reply
  134. joanne said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    @Keane:
    She used Brad to position herself but it didn’t work, she just brought him down wto her level. Someone mentioned it before, she cheapens everything.

    Reply
  135. jan said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:03 am

    peewe pitt is again getting a free pass on the way he treats women and i wish the world would wake up and see that he is just as abnoxious and a pr hoe as jolie. they both set out to destroy jen and appear to the world that she was the bitch and they where just the innocent parties driven into each others arms by a mean and bitchie woman. i do not give jolie a free pass but peewee is the worst of the lot and really his few movies that did well where not that great. he will pr those kids as much as jolie and he loves to be in the limelight. he has always wanted to play with the big boys and this affair with jolie is just what he needed to have the world sit up and take notice. if jolie tries to adopt in sa she will have a hard time as it is not easy and has strict adoption laws as many sa parents are still waiting for a kid and alot have been turned down because of age and other issues. brad jumped in feet first in this relationship and will use jolie for as long as he needs her, so i do not think this affairs is not ready to end soon as she will fly out to be with him to be seen on the red carpet at cannes for the next round of pr whoring and all this speculation just puts them back on their pr path, jmo

    Reply
  136. joanne said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    @jan:
    They are both mediahos and nasty but Pitt had the status in Hollyweird thanks to certain bed partners.

    Reply
  137. Keane said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:24 am

    @ jan – Ian’s sources are telling him they’re in the midst of a custody battle right now so I don’t think it will be easy for them to fake their relationship for much longer. They were barely holding it together at the rounds of awards do’s and that was months ago now. If she turns up at Cannes its going to look all kinds of awkward I would have thought if they’re in the process of fighting over custody of the children. My guess is that she will blame her non-appearance on being weak and having collapsed recently and that her docs have advised her to rest up and not travel anywhere. Or they’ll make an excuse in relation to filming or the Producers ordering her to get some rest, you know the “poor Angie” angle that is becoming all too familiar now. I think their body language is so obvious now that its very hard for them to put on a convincing show in public, he always walks about 10 paces ahead of her for one thing, seems like he can’t bear to be near her. I think it will be less obvious if she doesn’t go, and besides she looks like death anyway at the moment, if she turns up at Cannes looking like that, the rumours about what is wrong with her will go into overdrive I think. But yeah I do agree with you he is as much of a famewhore as her nowadays, but I think he did see the relationship as genuine. I think she was just using him all along.

    Reply
  138. CC said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:48 am

    @Keane:
    Hi everyone! Okay…I think the false eyelashes isn’t too deep…let’s snorkle people and not scuba dive here…

    Ya know how everyone drones on and on about her gorgeous eyes? Well they are but she obviously has help with the false eye lashes. I think the clue is more simple than we’re thihnking…like everything else about her, the lashes are fake too. That hair? Come on…extensions. The plump butt on a skeleton? HAS to be padding. The boob job…the cheek implants…the girl is “gorgeous” because she’s got fake bits and pieces…just a thought….

    Reply
  139. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:56 am

    Cannes is not until the middle of May.He looked sad at JFK.Did he lose custody?

    Reply
  140. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    @CC:
    No cc because of the placement of that clue look at that

    Reply
  141. CC said on April 9th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    @Kate:
    I’m a lookin but it’s still not clear to me. ;-)

    Somehow, it seems like a light clue and there is a alot of struggling going on to decipher it.

    It dawned on me that maybe THAT is our problem and it’s not the one clue to be laboring over… But I could be wrong, I’m still new to these so I’ll keep scratching the brain to figure it out…LOL

    Reply
  142. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 10:13 am

    It seems to be related to the tax issue and flaunting the kids because of where SR put it . I don’t think he would just stick something out of context right in the middle there , maybe flaunt them is the twins and they did not donate the money to charity or used some it in a way that breaks tax laws and the fake eyelash has to do with that??

    Reply
  143. CC said on April 9th, 2009 at 10:24 am

    @Kate:
    Ah…okay…man oh man it’d be great if they were busted for tax evasion, huh??!!! I know that is evil to wish for but hey, if you make millions and millions of dollars then you have to pay taxes…just like the rest of us!

    I think THAT would sour people to her more than her drug use and kinky sex because lets face it, neither of those are shocking things when talking about AJ.

    But being fraudulent (sp?) during these precarious economic times could ruin her image pretty good…

    Reply
  144. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 10:27 am

    @Keane:
    I think we are seeing some of the FF girls express their opinins on a Brad they still have not accepted that Jen has forgiven Brad and has befriended him and they are once again in touch. May as well accept it girls because it sure sounds like Jrn has got her boys back on this.

    NOW is reporting that Ang told Brad she wants other lovers in their relationship and she does not see anything wrong with that because fidility is not important to her bc she kept two lovers before at hotels but Brad is more tradional so it had to affect and upset him , LOL

    this is daddy Pr

    Reply
  145. Canuck said on April 9th, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    @Kate:
    LOL, didn’t she tell the world how she is estranged from her father because of his infidelity to her mother? She’s losing track of her lies

    Reply
  146. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    @Canuck:

    LOL yes, but that article was put out by Bradders to make him look stable and her not. Remember, she wanted the chick, and she has had partners according to SR, so here we go on the custody merry go round.

    Reply
  147. Canuck said on April 9th, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    @Kate:
    Ah…I read it the other way around, that she was the one who is in control and will be doing the dumping when it happens. Makes more sense if it was Brad then.

    Reply
  148. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    @Canuck:
    Here is the article, what do you think? Did Brad put this out, or Jolie?

    * Back
    * Next

    Angelina Jolie | BAFTA Awards 2009 | Pictures | Now Magazine | Celebrity Gossip
    Angelina is said to have told Brad Pitt she wouldn’t mind if they had other lovers
    Angelina Jolie: ‘Brad, I want other lovers’

    Angry Angelina’s ’shocking’ proposition could be the final straw for fed-up Brad

    Thursday, 9 April 2009

    After being on shaky ground for months and even sleeping in separate beds, as Now recently reported, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s relationship seems to have finally hit rock bottom after a blazing row over infidelity.

    We can reveal that the couple, who often exchange insults in the heat of the moment, recently had a war of words that reached a shocking level – even by their standards.

    ‘Angelina and Brad were having one of their arguments when she told him she was so sick of being stressed that she just yearned to be free and wouldn’t care if they had other lovers,’ a friend of the couple reveals.

    Mum-of-six Angelina’s words show the volatile state of her and Brad’s once passionate relationship.

    According to friends, although Angelina’s been playing a monogamous role, the free-spirited star has never felt that infidelity was any grounds for problems between couples.

    Not long before she met Brad on the set of 2005 film Mr And Mrs Smith, Angelina had openly admitted in an interview that she was dating two lovers simultaneously.

    ‘Ange has never been a traditional kind of girl, especially when it comes to romance,’ says the source. ‘Even though Brad was attracted to her unconventional behaviour initially, at his core he’s a traditional guy.

    ‘As open-minded as he tries to be, he certainly wouldn’t be fine with her sleeping with another man and would definitely have resented the suggestion, even if it was a petulant slip of the tongue on her part.’

    See the full story about Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt in Now magazine dated 13 April 2009 – out now!

    Reply
  149. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    See that sounds like her friends say it, and it contradicts her dad cheating on her mom, but it is suggesting a open relationship, not cheating and so it is saying Brad is not okay with that (which we know is a lie, and he is TRADIONAL, courts like that) and this is enough for him to walk away, so it gives him the reason to leave.

    That is how it reads to me. jmo

    Reply
  150. Canuck said on April 9th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    According to the French gossip rag Voici, Brad is there for a quick trip to check out the work that they are having done in Miraval, and plans to spend Easter weekend in New Orleans with Angie, the kids and his parents, who will be needed to help hide all of those Easter Eggs.
    http://www.voici.fr/potins-people/les-potins-du-jour/exclu-brad-pitt-a-marseille-aujourd-hui-286833

    Reply
  151. topbrit said on April 9th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    @ everyone – in SR’s post if we summised that ‘loud knocking on her door’ was pitt after visiting titty bar,would this be recent? if so what is true – him being drunk and wanting some depraved sex(her speciality) or that he cannot stand to be around her at all.any thoughts my freaky geniuses!

    Reply
  152. topbrit said on April 9th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @ canuck – and on the same site did you notice them touching on stories of their demise one quote ‘married and separated’

    Reply
  153. CC said on April 9th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @topbrit:
    Could be that when he’s drunk he’s interested in her and when he’s sober he’s grossed out by her…don’t know…

    Kate interpreted it to mean that it’s IRS pounding on her door, right? So maybe it’s not Pitt at all who comes a knockin but rather, the Feds…that would be sweet!

    Reply
  154. topbrit said on April 9th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    @ cc – thanx,that is more plausable and yes,that would be sooooooo sweet.

    Reply
  155. p said on April 9th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    here’s a video of BP at JFK about to board.

    http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/04/video-brad-pitt-leaves-us-sports-pink-necklace

    Reply
  156. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    @Canuck:
    Hmm, well he is having some renovation done to that Chateau that was in the news awhile back but seems odd to fly all the way over there for one or two days and go all the way back to New Orleans for Easter. Hard to imagine they would celebrate Easter, they never have, ever.

    Reply
  157. p said on April 9th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    I thought AJ discussed how fussy she was creating just the right Easter baskees for the kids, just like HER mum used to be…this was, mmm…I want to say last year.

    Reply
  158. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    @p:
    Really, I never heard that one. They have always made a point of being out of the country on every religious holiday. I don’t remember them ever being in the US for Easter, that is a Christian holiday that would be important to his parents and one he and she both snub their noses at.

    Reply
  159. p said on April 9th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    I don’t recall what country they were in at the time, but somehow remember her saying it..I probably read a snippet of an interview. ah here it is

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18839115/

    [AWhen her mother spent forever making up an Easter basket, Jolie thought something was wrong with the woman.

    “It used to drive me crazy,” she said. “How long? It’s a basket, you know?”

    And then this Easter, the first since her mother died, Jolie found herself spending forever preparing Easter baskets for her four children.

    “I obsessed on it out of — somehow an understanding of there is nothing more important right now going on in my life than this Easter basket,” she laughed.

    On Easter morning, the kids lit up when they saw them.

    “They played with us all morning. They laughed,” she said. “It was lovely. It was great, you know? Everything else stopped to do that.”]

    Reply
  160. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Hmmmm, doesn’t sound like Brad had a planned trip to France-

    Actor James Haven came to Kirkland House’s Junior Common Room last night, bearing a message of solidarity but failing to deliver his famous sister, actress Angelina Jolie, and her partner, Brad Pitt—both of whom appeared set to attend the event earlier in the day, according to event organizers.

    The attendance of the celebrity pair, who were reportedly coming to see Haven accept a designation as the International Relations Council’s Senior Honorary Advisor for 2009, was “90 percent certain” yesterday morning, according to International Relations On Campus co-director Courtney L. Blair ’10.

    But Jolie apparently became tied up with filming commitments on Long Island, which prevented her from making the scheduled appearance, event organizers said.

    Haven delivered an acceptance speech focused on the imperative to serve, citing examples from Mother Theresa and Frederick Douglass.

    “Use every ability you have, from the smallest to the largest, to do what you can,” Haven said, rousing the roughly 80 persons in attendance to a prolonged bout of applause.

    Haven’s commentary chronicled his personal journey to find what he called “the roots of social responsibility,” presenting three concepts—communication, accountability, and need—as keys to energizing U.S. engagement in the third world.

    Haven recalled how his work in a charity theater production in Ethiopia three years ago confronted him with the tragic reality of life away from the comforts of home and instilled a sense of obligation that motivated him to action, the actor said.

    “My great dream,” Haven said, “is that in the next 10 to 15 years these global issues will be acknowledged.”

    Yesterday’s event was co-sponsored by the International Relations Council and the Harvard Global Health and AIDS Coalition as one of the final events in Harvard’s annual International Relations Week.

    Afterward, Haven responded to audience members’ varied inquiries, with some seeking his perspective on the use of condoms as HIV-preventatives and others wondering what fruit his efforts in educational reform would bear.

    Haven’s presentation was not entirely smooth sailing—suffering at one point from the actor’s misattribution of the phrase “Live Free or Die” to the Massachusetts state license plate. In fact, the phrase is the state motto of New Hampshire.

    Most students remained enthusiastic about yesterday’s event, despite the absence of the two star guests.

    “I mean, it would have been cool if they were here, but that wasn’t the main point,” said Virginia Ng ’11, a Kirkland House resident who added that she found Haven’s memories of Ethiopian children particularly heartbreaking.

    But Ng’s nonchalance was hardly universal, suggesting that, for some, Haven might not have been the main attraction of yesterday’s event.

    “Angelina’s brother?” one attendee grumbled. “Are you kidding me?”

    http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=527565

    Reply
  161. CC said on April 9th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @p
    Nice article. I’m being cynical and bitchy by saying this but my first thought is that it’s amazing how she trivializes the religious significance of Easter by glorifying the least important aspect of the holiday….collecting candy filled eggs in baskets.

    I guess those kids will grow up thinking that Easter is just a prettier version of Halloween…You still get to dress up but instead of going door to door you have to look in bushes and trees to find the candy…

    Won’t they be surprised to hear that Easter is ACTUALLY about some guy named Jesus who rose from the dead and THAT is what we’re celebrating! LOL

    Reply
  162. Keane said on April 9th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    @ Kate – very telling that neither of them went, and why in God’s name is James Haven being asked to make a speech on international relations? Because he did some community theatre in Ethiopia once? Good lord! I guess he was really just a snare to get Angelina right? The lure of celebrity strikes again.

    Reply
  163. Gitano said on April 9th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    @Keane:

    The false eye lash thing? It may refer to Angelina. She has this habit of fluttering her eyelids when she’s listening to some speaker and the camera has her profile. It’s not reflexive; it’s deliberate. Maybe she does this at other times to distract or whatever. It fascinates Brad the way she does this.

    As for making “bootie calls” that could be Brad. He did this with Jen before they were married as well. He’d be out with the guys and then expect a welcome in the wee hours of the morning. Brangelina are apart and Angelina is allowing no late night visitations even to see the kids.

    Like everyone with money in tax havens she is concerned about these new tax laws. Even under the current system she is not up to date. There’s her mother’s belated tax filing. There’s the Jolie-Pitt Foundation submissions that are not current. Who knows what else and what she really owes. She’s freaking.

    Could Louise be a nanny or wet-nurse? Is it Louise whose milk has dried up? Angelina never breast fed. Too many drugs and too busy with work and it makes them droop. Or is Louise the nanny Brad initiated?

    Jolie (and the kids?) are living in an expansive pad in a building with a heli-pad on the roof. Perhaps he left by the roof.

    Jolie’s preference now is men with old school ties. Graduates of the Ivy League like Trevor Neilson but with more clout; Skull & Bones, members of the CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group. She is going after the political power men with her kink. Even got herself a Brazil wax. Feels the competition of other women and is willing to prove herself.

    She’s physically exshausted and can’t sleep. But she has prescription and recreational drugs for that. On this meeting she was leaning like the Tower of Pisa and crashing back like a piledriver.

    That’s my take on it. A late night unplanned visit of Brad to Angelina. It’s Brad’s assessment of her state as revealed to some drinking buddie, probably at a tittie bar. .

    Reply
  164. Keane said on April 9th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    @ gitano – the “old school ties” thing sounds good, but then it says “South American flavour” – could this guy she’s interested in be from there? We think the shaving of the pussy hair relates to a Brazilian person, either a child she wanted to adopt or could be a lover. I’m pretty sure Ange would have a Brazilian anyway, unless she was going for the Hollywood of course! But still I’m thinking the South American/Brazilian is linked. We think she means Madonna by “Lousie’s head”. She’s either angry with her for the adoption debacle which may hinder her adopting again, or she wants to renew her affair with her. SR says Madge is the infamous female pop star Ange was supposed to have had an affair with which was due to be talked about in the Mickey Brett book. We’re all pretty sure the nanny incident didn’t happen. Unless “Louise” was the staff member leaking the stories to Ian. Could be.

    Reply
  165. Canuck said on April 9th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    @Gitano:
    Well, bravo! I have no idea how accurate you are, but well done.

    Reply
  166. Gitano said on April 9th, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    @Keane:
    It’s quite possible that Angelina has met a South American through her UN/UNHCR connections. She did attend a World Economic Summit with Brad once too. The next man she targets, if she has not done so already, will be politically powerful, wealthy and a humanitarian. no more actors or directors for her. She will be putting any thoughts of lesbian affairs on the backburner. So I don’t think she wants to renew her affair with Madonna nor is she angry with her about the adoption. Would not be good for the image she wants to project to him.

    Reply
  167. Guest said on April 9th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    Which wealthy and political powerful man would want to live with Jolie, a reportedly drug-addicted, hep c positive and crazy mother of six?

    Reply
  168. CC said on April 9th, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    @Gitano:
    Would Clint Eastwood count?? He’s Hollywood old school and there seemed something off about them at press junkets for The Changeling. And the whole, “gorgeous face” comment he made about AJ was a little insulting to his wife. I’d be pissed if my husband said someone else had the most beautiful face in the world. Even if it was true….I’d be pissed off and he’d be in big time trouble! LOL

    Reply
  169. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 7:19 pm

    Just to take a look at what Sugar Ray said about CC translating earlier, he said yes yes, very UNITED or something like that-here is the translation again and what SR said-

    CC said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:30 am
    Ok…I’m by no means Kate when it comes to these and I’ve never really tried to decipher so please play nice if i’m way off and educate me if I am! Thanks!!!

    No late night visitations…happened one night after shlepping to a titty bar…loud knocking on her door=Kicked Brad out of the bedroom after discovering his trip to titty bars and he didn’t like it much hence the loud knocking to be let in.

    IRS problems=tax fraud

    she loves to flaunt them=her children

    false eyelashes=real ones keep falling out from drug use

    various bank vaults and safety deposit boxes…France, London and Nassau=hidden assests, again tax fraud?

    old school ties=old school as in “kickin it old school” or old school friends? not sure on that one

    South American flavor=maybe it’s not India she plans to adopt from but instead from South America?

    physical distress=collasping on the SALT set

    expansive pad=staying in an NYC apt by herself while filming

    shaved her pussy hair=she wanted to loose even more weight? JK

    too much competition…wants Louise’s head=doesn’t like that Madonna’s cutting in on her adoption racket

    chilly NYC…crashing back like a piledriver=again, collasping on the set of SALT? Clueless on this one

    tonguing the small hole=licking a butt hole?? GROSS!!!!

    great sleeping pill=her drug usage or maybe her movies?? They are becoming snooze fests!!!!!!

    20-dollar bill=makes for a straw to snort meth/coke/heroin or pays for a small amount of drugs?

    no longer capable of breast-feeding=obviously from the boob job or the drug use

    leaning tower of Pisa…flown off the roof=she’s tall and scrawny and keeps fainting (which I don’t buy, I think she manufactures these collasping stories and plants them in the media for sympathy)

    Reply R. Catone said on April 8th, 2009 at 8:35 am
    @CC – Si, Si!!!!!!!!!! MUY UNIDA!!!!!!

    So that seems to indicate CC had it pretty darn close, so how do we need to interpret it from here?

    Reply
  170. Kate said on April 9th, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    Okay here is the latest damage report on them-
    Angelina Jolie And Brad Pitt Go To War!
    NEW YORK CITY, NY., Apr. 9 (TOTI) –

    Remember the movie Mr. and Mrs. Smith? That’s the set where Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie first met. Now they’re real life relationship is mimicking the characters in that film.

    That’s right. Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have gone to war!

    The stress of having six children along with the demands of being international movies stars has finally gotten to Brad and Angie, causing a rift that insiders say could spell the end for Brangelina.

    Somewhere Jennifer Aniston is smiling wryly and biding her time as the details of the latest fight between Pitt and Jolie become public.

    Brad and Angie, who once regaled the world with details of their passion and love for each other, have barely slept in the same room since Jolie began filming Salt in New York City.

    “They’re going through some tough times,” an insider close to the couple told In Touch. “When they first got together, Angie could do no wrong in Brad’s eyes. But four years later, he no longer thinks she walks on water.”

    The trouble all started in earnest when Angelina, 33, was interested in adopting yet another baby, this time from Ethiopia.

    Brad put his foot down, telling Angie no. You don’t tell Angelina Jolie “No” as Brad quickly learned.

    “Angelina was furious,” the friend said. “She told Brad he had no right to tell her she can’t add to her family and that she will adopt again – with or without his permission.”

    “[Brad thinks adding a seventh child] would be crazy,” the friend continued. “He’s told her he thinks life is hectic enough and that he doesn’t want any more.”

    Jolie let Pitt know that she adopted before she met him, and would do so again, without or without his blessings.

    Brad finally got angry with Angelina.

    “[He told Angie that if she adopts without him] she’s breaking the deal they made to make all big choices together – and he will leave.”

    Now the world waits to see what will be Brangelina’s next move.

    http://www.timesoftheinternet.com/63617.html

    Looking at Ethiopia Adoption law-looks pretty uncomplicated-
    Residency Requirements: There are no residency requirements for prospective adoptive parents.
    Age Requirements: In general, Ethiopian law and practice does not provide for intercountry adoptions by single persons under age twenty-five. If married, there is no minimum age. There is no maximum age limit; however, the practice is to limit the age difference between the prospective adoptive parent and the adopted child to no more than 40 years. Individual agencies may impose age limits for prospective adoptive parents. These age limits vary from agency to agency.
    Marriage Requirements: The Ethiopian Government prefers to place children with married couples who have been married for at least five years. Single men also may not adopt in Ethiopia.
    Income Requirements: Prospective parent(s) must prove financial ability as determined by the Ethiopian courts, though there is no minimum income required.
    Other Requirements: Gay and lesbian adoption, and/or adoption by same-sex couples are not allowed in Ethiopia, although the Ethiopian Government has occasionally approved such cases.

    BRAZIL on the other hand I think might be difficult for her-
    Because Brazil is party to the Hague Adoption Convention, children from Brazil must meet the requirements of the Convention in order to be eligible for adoption. For example, the Convention requires that Brazil attempt to place a child with a family in-country before determining that a child is eligible for intercountry adoption. In addition to Brazil’s requirements, a child must meet the definition of a Convention adoptee for you to bring him or her back to the United States.

    A home study including a psychological evaluation and medical report(s) of prospective adoptive parent(s) stating they are in good health and capable to adopt.

    It is a long process, and it takes a long time, and first preference goes to their own citizens unless the child is older than 5 or special needs. I think we can scratch the South American Adoption

    Reply
  171. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 11:29 pm

    @Keane:
    I have 2 suspects for the sabotage.

    LOL…let me guess…… ; )

    Reply
  172. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 11:32 pm

    @Keane:
    not sure what the “physical distress” refers to though.

    Maybe the butt rocket…ow. But that may be another poem.

    Reply
  173. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 11:37 pm

    @R. Catone:
    Good job, CC!!!!! These aren’t easy, imo.

    Reply
  174. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 11:40 pm

    @Canuck:
    This is a great idea!

    Reply
  175. Z said on April 9th, 2009 at 11:46 pm

    @Canuck:
    she was a straight A student. She certainly comes off as being informed, intelligent and thoughtful in the few interviews of her’s that I’ve read or seen.

    You would think she could memorize a script then…unless she doesn’t want to? I was going to say unless she’s lazy…but to be a straight A student at Harvard, you can’t be lazy. Or, like you said, maybe it’s not true?

    Reply
  176. Kate said on April 10th, 2009 at 12:39 am

    Okay well I am bored to death with the stuff I can not figure out. We need some new info, up to date.

    What is Brad really doing in France?

    Is he seeing anyone?

    When are they going to announce this split?

    Reply
  177. p said on April 10th, 2009 at 1:28 am

    @Kate:
    One thing he might be doing in France is making $$ on product promotion. I noticed one site –Just Jared– has very well lit shots (front and back), of him casually strolling, donning “Burburry” this, “LNA hoodie ” that, and “David Yurman” the other (according to the the caption). What else Jack-the-Lad is up to is anyone’s guess. I can see a week ahead of schedule, but a month sans family?

    Then again maybe they’re trying to confuse and throw everyone off. Then again maybe he needs to seriously chill. Then again…

    Reply
  178. p said on April 10th, 2009 at 1:35 am

    Before I forget, Happy Easter Sugar-Cakes!..or Happy Passover Bubala! (if you prefer) xx p

    Reply
  179. knowone said on April 10th, 2009 at 11:45 am

    @Kate:I love your ability to sleuth the press, girl. I read it the same way you do, this is Brad PR positioning himself as the responsible guy/father who was blindsided by this creature. Now, had you all determined that NOW was in the AJ camp prior? (Can’t keep track of which media outlet is owned by which party). Lol. JMO.

    Reply
  180. Keane said on April 10th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    @ knowone – no, I don’t think any UK mags are affiliated to either of them, other than perhaps OK which is connected to US OK. I don’t think they have any deals over here. Which makes me think I should call one actually. I think they’re just taking any story they get at whatever time.

    Reply
  181. signal forex said on May 10th, 2010 at 5:31 pm

    It interesting. You appear really knowledgeable in your own field.

    Reply
  182. incenseincerb said on December 7th, 2010 at 3:02 am

    smash flash[url=http://www.smashflash.com/] website templates[/url], [url=http://www.smashflash.com/]flash templates[/url] and other products are conventional entanglement designs, that can be employed as a prepare in search foolhardy and high-quality website. Our spark templates, trap templates and all other entanglement sketch products are bough customizable and psyched up payment prevail upon known download.
    We at smash split imperfect do our quell to do auspices of consideration you with [url=http://www.smashflash.com/]web templates[/url] hinder in sight of carrot quality.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2009
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Meta