IUC Exclusive: Brad Pitt’s Ma and Pop Tell Him To Be Very Careful

Posted on March 24th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

This just in from my primary source in Camp Brangie.  Brad Pitt’s parents had a heart to heart with him the other day, telling him they support whatever he chooses to do as far as Angelina Jolie is concerned. But they voiced a lot of apprehension.  His mother Jane reminded him how sweet life used to be when he was hitched to Jennifer Aniston.   ”They made it clear to Brad that they’ve never been keen on Angie but supported the relationship anyway,” the source said.  “Jen’s name did come up.  Brad’s mother told him how much she misses her and how she wishes Angelina could be as sweet and sincere as Jen.”  Developing…

  1. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:32 am

    What exactly does that mean Ian, the way that is written it is a bit confusing? Careful about what? Are they trying to bribe him into going back to Jen,Jolie is not her and never will be and if they are done I am not sure I get that last comment from Mom either lol can you elaborate a bit do they know about the new girl?

    Reply
  2. cuze said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:36 am

    I have no doubt that Mr and Mrs Pitt feels that way however, putting it out there for the public to speculate on is not a good idea. Keep in mind that Angelina has their grandchildren. That is a tricky spot for any grandparent to be in and requires a certain amount of tact in order to maintain a peaceful co existence with her. Regardless of how they feel or what she has done she is always going to be in their life. Bringing up how much nicer the ex was is dangerous territory. Oh boy, I wish them all the luck in the world.

    Reply
  3. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:50 am

    Well this makes no sense to me. They tell him to be very careful, why. is she going to injure him or blackmail him? They expressed Alot of apprehension, that would indicate they want him to stay in the relationship.Then we have the Jen references, what does that mean If he does not love her he can not make it happen?

    follows with her wishful thinking .. Now never mistaken that their son is miserable with a mental case for a mother to his kids on drugs and ducking everything that moves, Mom wants her to be sweet? Lol

    IAN I know you had to have to had left out all the good stuff cause this makes no sense at all, co
    E

    Reply
  4. Outsider said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:51 am

    What parent with an ounce of sense would choose Angelina as a daughter-in-law over Jen? This is just common sense to me, of course they prefer the girl without the bad rep!

    A few years ago, when Brangelina were first together, someone posted on a message board that they went to the same church as the Pitt family and that the Pitts referred to Angelina as “The Witch”. That’s pretty harsh for a golden Baptist Bible belt family. Of course, it was a message board so could be total crap.

    Reply
  5. cuze said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:53 am

    Yeah kate.. I think a lot has been left out as well. Jen’s name comes up an awful lot. hmmmmmmmm

    Reply
  6. Susanna said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:12 am

    This story is right on par with a Ted C. at E! online post that I mentioned in another thread here. Ted C. says that the Pitts have a “Team Aniston” shirt on. I think it’s obvious that the Pitts have not liked Angelina from the beginning. Her bad rep, drug problems, commitment to mental hospitals…I mean, who would like that? Also remember that interview that Brad gave right after his separation from Jennifer? He said “All my bitches are mad at me.” Assuming that meant Jennifer AND his Mom, at least. Perhaps other people in his family and close females friends were mad too, like Catherine Keener.

    I think Mama Pitt knows what a liar and manipulator Angelina is, and she is scared of what Angelina and her PR machine will do to Brad if he dares to follow through with the separation. For all of his faults, Brad seems like a trusting guy. He falls hard for women. He probably doesn’t really think that Angelina will get down-and-dirty with him and sling the mud. Mama Pitt is saying, oh but she will. She will do anything to protect her image, because that keeps the money coming in, and she is a complete narcissist.

    Reply
  7. Billi said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:51 am

    The title is baiting with “Careful” but the actual story mentions nothing of the kind. So what’s the deal with careful? Pitt’s parents are in a sticky situation. They don’t want to alienate Angie. If she was spiteful, Angie could make a big deal about how much time the grandchildren spend with the grandparents and she could also color the children’s impression of them as well. That would be nasty and selfish but it happens everyday in regular families (right now thinking about my brother’s ex). Wasn’t it Hillary Clinton who wrote the book “It Takes a Village” to raise a child.

    Reply
  8. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:52 am

    Interesting. Kind of makes me really wonder if Ian’s source in Camp Brangie isn’t Brad himself. It’s not as if there would be many employees hanging around overhearing a discussion like this one.

    Reply
  9. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:20 am

    @ Canuck – I agree. But with regard to Mr and Mrs Pitt’s access to the grandkids, wouldn’t Ange have less control over that once they had separated? If Brad had primary or joint custody his parents could see the kids as much as they liked without needing Ange’s say so. Wouldn’t that give her less and them more power? And as for them calling her “The Witch”, well when you put that together with how she is known in HW (”The Terminator”), its really making Ange come across as one really sweet gal hey?!

    Reply
  10. tikki said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:25 am

    hello everybody on this board eager to know about the outcome of this tragedy going on for some years now!

    what i have to add is that the action of taking brad pitt and since adding and adding to fill the ever emptying glass of existence has sent so much bad energy to me that it got me quite addicted to following their relationship to figure the flaw.

    i will be very happy when this will be over. you cannot base a relationship on lies. not even for a cause and if they both wanted it. it is a control game with one thing not being controllable, which is who controls who. you’re better off being honest and decent – even and especially if loving yourself in the first place!

    so, i would be equally happy if they turned to honesty, you know.

    but staying as they are is pollution to humanity – to the light that we represent.

    yes, they’re not the first and they will not be the last. so, their bad, it’s their turn now.

    about the other users on this board: i am very entertained with your analyses of the networks of the filming industry! thank you!

    Reply
  11. Elizabeth said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Perhaps Jane Pitt was referring to Angelina’s tendency to use voodoo spells to get her man. In the beginning of the Brangie relationship, a friend of Pitt’s found a voodoo emblem in the glove compartment of Brad’s car. He says Angie gave it to him to protect him from car accidents. A voodoo priest described it as a “marriage breaking” spell consisting of ground up bat parts. Angelina has also been known to have visited voodoo shops in New Orleans where voodoo is serious business. I would bet Jane has heard of these antics and wishes to protect her son from what his babies’ mama’s black magik.

    Reply
  12. section9 said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:37 am

    @Keane:

    Angelina’s options to play hardball are somewhat limited. Grandparents are always afraid that the mother will poison the childrens’ minds against them. However, as we are all aware, if Angelina decided to play hardball, Pitt could go straight to the State of California and bring down maximum shit on Angelina’s head. I think they’ve both decided not to go that route.

    My take: Jennifer Anniston will have the last laugh.

    Reply
  13. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:52 am

    @ Section 9 – I agree, and I think she’s probably known she will for quite a while now. As for Ange well I have to say that I don’t believe in many things but one thing I do have faith in is karma. Just because it always seems to come true, especially in the tv industry for some reason – bullies always spectacularly and very publicly get their comeuppance, and all us tv employees laugh our asses off! And I think this holds true for people like Ange too. She’s treated a LOT of people very badly in the last few years. I was only thinking of someone else she’s done the dirty on recently this morning and wondering how she got away with it. Most Americans probably don’t know her but a pop star called Kylie Minogue is a national treasure in this country, probably Europe and definitely her homeland of Oz. Four years ago she was diagnosed with breast cancer and everyone was shocked and devastated for her as she’s the epitome of niceness and fun and people of my generation have literally grown up with her. She was dating Olivier Martinez at the time – who is a total loverat – and Martinez was working wth Jolie. It was well rumoured that he was cheating on Kylie with her and there were pics of Kylie flying out on her own to the set to see what was going on. I’m pretty sure this was around the time of the diagnosis of her illness. Somehow Jolie has miraculously managed to avoid taking the rap for this too, it was all hushed up somehow and is hardly ever talked about. But Jen Aniston is far from the first and by no means the last person this women has done this too, she’s utterly ruthless and cares for no-one’s feelings but her own. But what goes around comes around, we’ll see what happens next.

    Reply
  14. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:06 am

    P@section9:
    How will she have the last laugh? I agree it does seem as though Brad is the leak on some of this but if that were true Ian would be more sure of the sophisticated lady gaga story. So yesterday his source said that were sure that they had parted ways . If this conversation with mom and dad was a few days ago,probalbly this pas t weekend he chose to go forward . Since Jen keeps getting brought up it does not sound like Brad told Mom he is al gaga googol over another woman. Ian said in a chat that mama wanted Jen to be the one to raise the kids (LOL in does Jen know this) so I m guessing here that this is about that. Be very careful could be in regards to trying to take sole custody. Sounds like Ian had to write this in code to keep from breaking a confidence,jmo there is just no way they would encourage him to stay. IMO

    Reply
  15. surreal said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:19 am

    @Keane:
    Keane, as I am sure you already know , Angelina is notorious for coming on to her co-stars. Rumor is Melanie Griffith came out to the set on a regular basis when her husband (his name eludes me) was making a movie with Angelina Jolie. I’ve also heard she came on to Nicholas Cage, Ethan Hawke, and Colin Farrell on set. All of these men were attached, so Angelina is evidently the Happy Homewrecker. Her behavior indicates that she has no conscience and/or she enjoys hurting women.

    Ian’s latest post indicates that Brad’s parents will back him 100 per cent if he dumps Angie;their apprehension indicates they’re concerned about what kind of stunts Angie might pull. They wish Angie were like JA, because if JA were in Angie’s shoes, she would be fair and would handle the split very reasonably. Angie is wack and could retaliate in a manner that would hurt Brad and the kids. It sounds like Mrs. Pitt would love it if Brad reunited with Jen;if not, perhaps they hope his next romantic pick will have Jen’s kind and pleasant temperament.

    Reply
  16. surreal said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    Hate to double-post, but look how grimly Mr. Pitt grips Angie in that picture, as if he’s trying to keep her under control. LOL.

    Reply
  17. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:47 am

    @ surreal – but what I find unfathomable is the only one she’s ever been called out on is Jen, and she even managed to turn that around to her advantage! How has she got away with it all these years? By rights she should be hated by most women, but instead she is somehow their fantasy figure! I’ve never understood the mentaility of the loons who bash Jen Aniston for not getting over the destruction of her marriage, admittedly they’re all teenagers but they say dumb things like “well if it had happened to me I’d be over it in a flash, not mope about it for years like her”. And I’m like, er, you do realise that if Ange wanted your man/husband she’d be after him like a shot too, does that not bother you? But I almost think they’d feel honoured if she did steal their boyfriend, they worship her so ridiculously! The loons have been so indoctrinated into her cult that they think she’s the Queen of the Universe and superior in every respect, but she so isn’t. All she’s got is her looks (achieved with the help of a LOT of surgery) and her cash. Other than that, she is totally unremarkable. Maybe she’s done the batdust spell on all her fans!

    Reply
  18. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:53 am

    @Keane:
    I think that his Mom would be apprehensive about how the split will play out, because AJ sure isn’t JA in the “reasonable” department. AJ has kept her kids from her father for how long now? She has, according to the tabloids, threatened his parents with not seeing the kids either because of Momma Pitt’s continued friendship with JA. No wonder that they would not be expecting the best in the aftermath of the split. There is also the possibility of AJ moving abroad with the kids if she gets primary custody , which would seriously complicate things for the Pitts.

    @Kate:
    I’d say from the tone of the post that they weren’t encouraging him to stay, if they made it clear to him that they were never really keen on AJ, but supported the relationship anyways. That’s not something that usually comes up while your son is still in the relationship, that stuff comes out afterwards. Notice that “supported” is not in the present tense either. My thoughts on this is that part of the support that they are offering to Brad is help with the children, which would make me think that he’s planning on going for primary custody.

    On another note, Jen has started filming in NYC. Small world, LOL

    Reply
  19. Liz E. said on March 24th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    Ian, please. Such drama. It reads llike a bad soap opera. As if you have someone that is handing you confidential communications between parent and son. How believable is that? And anyone who wants to believe Brad Pitt is giving you this information is as naive or damaged as they come.

    Sorry, Ian, you may have attracted a pack of people eager to believe anything and everything bad about these people, particularly if it feeds their wishful thinking, but you have a long way to go to prove your bona fides as a real reporter. Stop insulting your readers who are interested in real celebrity news and not unprovable fairy tales.

    Reply
  20. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    Surreal & Canuck, I think you both have interpreted this right. It does sound as though Mama is saying , in a nice way, “Look, we told you so” lol, but now that you know that, we are here to help”

    Well this should be interesting.

    Reply
  21. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    @ Liz E.

    You’re quite right Liz E., we are all interested in hearing “real celebrity news”. Perhaps then you could do us all a favour and give us your side of the story? Seems like Bradley is doing his fair share of leaks to the media right now! And BTW dear, this story is being talked about in lots of other circles other than this gossip board. This is just confirming a lot of what we’re hearing from other sources. (P.S. You need to think up another username if you want to sound convincing, I called this one out yonks ago!).

    @ Everyone else:

    So does this imply that while they may have separated, Braddy is unsure whether to stay or go? Or is it just a case of how dirty should he fight in the custody battle?

    Reply
  22. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Yet you still come around. Hoping for what?

    Reply
  23. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    @Keane:
    It implies that he wanted to make sure his parents could stand the jerk, he probably had to tell them what to be prepared for, how messy it was going to get, which is why they said, be very careful. One thing we all know about Brad Pitt, once he has moved on, he has moved on. He is not going to stay in a relationship and be miserable, no. He is out of there. He has to have his parents support though, how else can he do it?

    Reply
  24. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    I think he’s going and he’s getting his ducks lined up for the aftermath.

    Reply
  25. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    the source said. “Jen’s name did come up. Brad’s mother told him how much she misses her and how she wishes Angelina could be as sweet and sincere as Jen.”

    I think Canuck or Surreal go this right, she is saying she hopes that Jolie will handle this the way Jen did.

    She won’t.

    Reply
  26. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    @Canuck:
    yeah, sounds that way. Now how exactly does one make this exit, lol

    Reply
  27. DebFrmHell said on March 24th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    The Pitts have good reason to be warning their son about the manipulative Angelina Jolie. They have watched the damage she and her PR machine have done to Jennifer Aniston for the last four years. Plus she holds the power of the children and you can bet that there is nothing that is going to be amicable about this split. I think Angelina will be as vindictive as ever when it comes to the children. I also believe that AJ cares more for the welfare of her adopted kids than she does her bio-kids. They were just a means to the end in getting BP.

    Reply
  28. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    @Kate:
    That’s a tough one. Easiest for him would be for her to get photographed cheating on him with someone on set. Classiest would be to just split and say “no comment”, but that would suppose the other side is also saying “no comment”, which I doubt will happen.

    Reply
  29. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    @Canuck:
    Brad has always said that he felt things like this should be private. He tried the “no comment” with Jen and look where that got him. lol Problem with trying to accuse her of cheating is that with all this threesome stuff going down she has just as much to use on him. Sugar reported that she wanted out too though. That is why this is a bit confusing. This has gone back and forth for a while now, like most relationships, but then Ian got confirmation that they are definitely parted because of this new woman that Brad is ga ga over. Now that is enough to make Jolie flip out I would think. No one, even if they want out, wants to be replaced before they get out. lol Then the kids, there are those who stand by their sources and say Brad has never adopted Mad, Pax , or Zahara, it was just a name change. Well we saw what Jolie does with name changes. If that is true, when he leaves, if she has no regard for how these children feel for their father , he is at risk of saying good-bye to them forever. That leaves only trying to get sole custody of the biological children. He still will be stuck having to deal with her through visitation.

    Reply
  30. tikki said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    It’s not just the PR machine guys. Brad has stated always to be the shark, but this time it’s about kids, his family. Considering his intact relationship with his own parents he will for sure want to fight for best of the children. The stronger he will fight, the more we will get know that he thinks of Angelina being labile. Which again will make it clear that he never actually got to know her really before starting a family with her head over feet. This in the end shows how few he is thinking through things ‘to the end’, which makes him a bit naive but explains again why he’s so much mama’s boy that will defnitely need their support now, no matter what he might want to do.
    The more interesting question is what Angelina will do, who is having noone left, but her brother. Him again, he rather appears to be like a fan than a brother.

    Reply
  31. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    “Brad’s mother told him how much she misses (Jen) and how she wishes Angelina could be as sweet and sincere as Jen.”

    Doesn’t everyone!! Hell yea!

    O/T – Wouldn’t it be so strange to have your child grow up this famous, when you are just a regular person?

    Reply
  32. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    @Kate:
    Maybe mom wants him to go back to Jen, wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

    Reply
  33. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    @Kate:
    I didn’t mean accuse her of cheating, I meant papparazzi pix of her with another man. Regardless of what has gone on in private in their sex life(s), the general public would not blame him for leaving if a pic like that was on the front page of every tabloid and gossip site around. He would have the high ground, in the public’s eyes, at least at first. Then he’d have to be very very on his toes to make sure he stays that way.

    Reply
  34. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @Z:
    I think half the world wants him to go back to Jen, LOL

    Reply
  35. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @Kate:
    Now never mistaken that their son is miserable with a mental case for a mother to his kids on drugs and ducking everything that moves, Mom wants her to be sweet? Lol

    Yeah, that’s not going to happen – maybe they are saying be very careful as you extract yourself from this relationship, so that you gets the kids?

    I agree some pieces look to be missing.

    Reply
  36. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    @Susanna:
    “All my bitches are mad at me.” – such a nice guy!

    Reply
  37. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    @Canuck:
    Yeah, I was wondering the same thing….

    Reply
  38. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @Z:

    Maybe the source did not give Ian any more than that. LOL ya think they had their head up against a wall with a glass trying to listen. ha ha. It is kind of odd how it is worded. Kind of strange they would even bring Jen’s name into it at all , isn’t it? If Brad and Jolie are parted then he is not in the same residence with her, the the Brangie source has to be his family, not him, because we are getting what they are saying, not what he said. hmmmmmm

    I hope Ian will come back and give us an update, too many answered questions, and this just left open more-

    Who is the the new woman, has that panned out?

    Is he now staying , going, thinking about it, or planning the custody attack?

    Where is he living?

    How will he make the exit, and annoucement?

    Does she want the split?

    Reply
  39. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    @Canuck:
    Well yes, that is true, but she is too smart for that right now. Too bad no one got pics of her blowing that kid in the car in the garage in New Orleans last fall. lol

    Reply
  40. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    @Keane:
    Geez, that sounds like what John Edwards did to Elizabeth Edwards…so despicable. Yesterday, when I was reading through the Brange stuff on Dlisted I read that she did a lap dance for Martinez. A bystander saw this. And this happened after she had officially hooked up with Brad.

    Reply
  41. surreal said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    @Keane:
    Keane, I agree that the loons are in a class by themselves and I will never figure them out. I do believe that a lot of them must be teenagers or at least very young. They’re fascinated by Angie’s “rebel turned earth mother” image, and don’t realize they have been sold an inferior bill of goods. They are gullible and naive, and it’s also possible that some of them admire Angie because they’re homewreckers, too, and admire her loose morals.

    However, our numbers are growing. D-listed and Ted C don’t care for Angie, and Female First has devoted a whole board devoted to Brangelina naysayers. Angie’s getting called out on the media, too. On “The View”, Sherri Shephard and Elizabeth Hasselbeck called Ang a husband-stealer, and Joy Behar joked that Angie’s vag must be stretched out.

    Reply
  42. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    @Kate:
    Really, there aren’t too many nice and clean ways for either of them to gracefully exit this situation. Reminds me a bit of when I was learning to golf. You get to a point that you realize that it’s usually better to take the penalty stroke than try for the “miracle shot” that costs you more in the end. This seems to me to be one of those sorts of situations. If they both decide to be mature about it, they might make it out reasonably unscathed.

    Since we are on the subject of Jen (vaguely), does anyone else think she knew what was going on and broke up publicly with Mayer first so it wouldn’t look like she was breaking up with him for Brad, when the Brangie split becomes public?

    Reply
  43. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    @Kate:
    Yes! Enquiring minds want to know? LOL.

    Maybe mom told his brother and brother leaked it. Hmmm, although it would be someone who doesn’t want to get on Brad’s bad side, possibly? Or someone who wants to remain anonymous?

    Reply
  44. DebFrmHell said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    @Canuck:
    I think it really revved up at the Oscars. That was the first time BP and JA have seen each other since the divorce. I thought he looked very hapy to see her and she seems to smile the same way back at him.

    Reply
  45. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    Hm, the other thing I can never figure out about Angie’s rep is how she’s known to have slept with this number of men and women and had many casual affairs – often with more than one partner at a time – yet never acquires the label that other women who do what she does get labelled with. She’s never thought of as a whore or a slut, just so wild and free and liberated. Not that there’s anything wrong with that cos there’s no reason why women shouldn’t be able to have as many partners as they like and as many as men are allowed to, but how has she escaped this tag? Not many women manage it, so how has she got away with it.? People like Paris Hlton, Lindsay Lohan, Kate Moss and Britney Spears are all labelled as sluts and carrying venereal diseases (however fair or unfair that may be), but not her? How does she do it? One thing I will give her is that she must have AMAZING PR people!

    Reply
  46. Susanna said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    Did some more research back on Ted C’s Bitch! Back. This time from August to November 2008. His posts about trouble between Brad and Angelina didn’t really start until last fall – I expect it was because Angelina just gave birth last summer. It looks like things started to get really bad this winter.

    Here are a few interesting ones, pertaining to Angelina’s proclivity for women (didn’t Jenny Shimizu come out and say last year that Angelina would never settle down and stop loving women, and that she was just playing house with Brad?) :

    Problems in relationship and hints that she really likes the ladies
    Dear Ted:
    I noticed Angelina Jolie always wears black. What the hell is she mourning?
    —Melissa
    Dear Good Question:
    Mutual multiple orgasms, darling.
    ************************************************
    Dear Ted:
    In your Morning Piss about Angelina, are you saying all this with Brad is just an act? If so, why would she go to all this trouble and have all their kids just to eventually leave him? I’m curious for your opinion on the real reason she will leave him.
    —Rick
    Dear Ants In Her Pants:
    She likes hot girls and bad boys, it’s no secret. Brad’s a sweetheart, good for the obligatory procreation stint
    ********************************************************************
    Dear Ted:
    So what is it you really have against Gerard Butler? You never fail to question his romantic abilities. Is it because he is hetero and turned you down? Or is it because Hollywood types are so cynical and crass that they can’t deal with a genuinely nice, if sometimes goofy, man?
    —Dwitosky
    Dear Scot Straight Up:
    Gerry never offered; I never asked. And as far as goof appeal goes, give me Pitt any day (as Angie probably will not so far off!)
    *******************************************
    Dear Ted:
    It’s official! You are America’s new hero! For what? For dissing Angelina Jolie. Never liked her and her man-stealing ways (I got the “man-stealing ways” line from your BFF Jules Asner). When will the people of this country realize what a fake she is? Never bought the whole adopt-a-child scheme of hers. There are a lot of homeless and orphaned children in this country. Why not start here? Question: When do you think she’ll dump Brad?
    —Taryn
    Dear Man-eater:
    When another hunky, unavailable partner comes along, that’s when. She and Jodie Foster really should get together. For so many reasons.

    Reply
  47. DebFrmHell said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    Keane, you were right. I really like this site. I appreciate the time and thought given to the comments and the posters seem smart without the arrogance!

    Reply
  48. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    @ DebFrmHell – its good isn’t it? Dlisted is fun, but you never really get any inside scoops, so all you see everyone’s endless PR. I want to hear what’s really going on. And this is the only site I’ve seen that tries to get to the bottom of it!

    Reply
  49. Susanna said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    And I think you all are right – Mama Pitt is warning her son to watch out. She saw what Angelina and her PR machinations did to Jennifer Aniston. Amazing how one woman can steal someone’s husband and make the WIFE look like the bad guy. I thought it was interesting on another board how the very first report that Jen didn’t want to have kids cam eform Angelina herself, on a story on IMDB where she sais “all I did ws offer a shoulder to cry one. He was distraught because he wanted to be a father and that wasn’t happening for him.”

    I think the worst of it all is that Angelina deliberately went after Brad, denied it to the press, then started a smear campaign against his wife.

    Here are a few more Q’s and Asnwers from Ted C’s Bitch! Back column, that show it is well know Angelina and Brad did have an affair, and that Angelina is working against Jennifer (i.e. the Voodoo doll in the sconed Q and A) This goes right along with those reports that a friend of Brad’s found some voodoo stuff in his glove compartment when he hooked up with Angelina.

    Man-stealer and sabotage Jennifer
    Dear Ted:
    This is something I’ve never understood about the whole Brad Pitt-Jennifer Aniston breakup. To me, it really doesn’t sound like anyone did anything wrong. It sounds like this is a couple who developed different priorities. Brad had made a lot of movies and was ready to expand his life with a family and charitable causes. Jennifer had just finished Friends and was at the perfect point to build her film career; she was in no position to get pregnant and start a family. So, Brad fell in love with someone who shared his priorities (having a family and charitable work). It happens. Is this really what happened, or is there something that I’m missing?
    —Elle
    Dear Stuck in 2005:
    Yes. You’re missing Angelina Jolie.

    From Right after she gave birth:
    Dear Ted:
    Why is Angie hiding? I know there’s more to it than taking care of the twins…Please spill it.
    —Vanessa
    Dear MIAnge:
    I think the superwoman is realizing she can’t handle six kids, a career, exacting interior decorating, Jen’s Voodoo doll and Brad in the bedroom alone

    Reply
  50. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    @Keane:
    Yeah, that is such a good question…I mean she seems to have more partners (+) than many who get that label. I think you are right on….some amazing PR. And all the deals to keep the negative stuff hush, hush…but still…it is very strange. Even with PR and deals, there is the negative info out there and she somehow breezes by it.

    Reply
  51. Guest said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    What’s up everyone? I have a gripe with this dumbass Lainey? She wrote this yesterday (among a bunch of other bs) about the whole John choosing twitter over Jennifer: “That Jennifer Aniston, who once lost her man to the Jolie, now lost another to the Twitter. Snicker!” Is this Lainey not married? Geez. I would like to see her snicker if she lost her husband to another woman. I’d like to see how well she would take it and how sympathetic she would be then. I’m sorry but she’s an asshole. As a woman, at least be a little sympathetic to another woman who was wronged. She lost me as a reader.

    O/T: It’s good to see that Brad’s parents are keeping him somewhat balanced. What I mean is that they’re giving him a whole other perspective on things. It seems that he never really knew Jolie when he got involved with her. Remember that interview Brad did where he said that people have her pegged all wrong and that she’s good, etc. I think he really truly believed her to be that person. His parents probably tried to warn him from the beginning about the trouble he could get into by starting a relationship with Jolie and leaving Jen. It’s too late for him now, but at least he has his parents’ support.

    LOL @ the ladies of “The View” calling out Jolie. Was this recently, surreal? I’d like to see that.

    @Keane: I think the reason she was able to get away with not being labeled a “diseased homewrecker” is because none of the other men went so public with her the way Brad did and BBT of course. But BBT was a know cheater and beater. Didn’t his ex-wife accuse him of beating on her? I mean, no one really cared who JLMiller was or who he left to be with Jolie. And BBT was a known asshole so no one gave a shit. The others just pretty much hit it and quit it… they were all just rumored affairs she could easily deny. As candid as she was, she also kept a whole lot to herself. That’s JMO on all this of course.

    Reply
  52. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    threatened his parents with not seeing the kids either because of Momma Pitt’s continued friendship with JA

    Yeah, I just read that, too…that happened earlier maybe 1 1/2 ago. Brad really must be working on a plan here…he is going to have to have a good one.

    Reply
  53. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    @Canuck:
    Yep and the other half don’t lol. The ongoing war….

    Reply
  54. Susanna said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    Z, I think Angelina breezes by the negative press because she is a master manipulator, and because her fans are totally psychotic. Just like her. I have never encountered people willing to personally attack posters on the internet like I have when typing something (even remotely negative) about Brad and Angelina. It is disturbing. The reason I have become so fascinated with it is because I have a pretty good bullsh@t detector, and as soon as Angelina stole Brad, started doing all this humanitarian work and broadcasted it, and got knowcked up – I smelled a rat. I don’t really care about her stealing Brad or being a drug addict or a promiscuous person. But I do care about stars that manipulate and use the media, and their fans, to their own end. It’s disingenous and calculating at best. I actually liked Angelina in her early days, just because she was so honest. Now, she is the epitome of hypocrisy and narcissism.

    Reply
  55. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @Kate:
    LOL..I agree.

    Reply
  56. topbrit said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    i don’t see why bradders can’t just be alone and sort out custody and care and stability and normality for his children instead of moving onto to the next woman,god knows he’s gonna have it tough sorting things with wacko without other distractions, geez you would think he would stop all the blood rushing to his teeny weeny and keep some up top for his one brain cell just to think,think think about his kiddies first. imo it may be his sister leaking info,it was reported she hates jolie and brad used to confide in her that he was sick of her going through his pockets and phones etc to see who he had been in contact with.i also believe that jolie would try take all the kids to france or somewhere other than the US(her obvious disdain for america and its citizens never ceases to amaze me) she would do that because she is a nasty spiteful bitch who doesn’t care about her kids feelings or brads parents feelings.last but not least i think jen would jump at the chance to go back to brad but i don’t believe he would take her back,which is a shame because since they split i think she has ‘grown’ so much as a woman and wouldn’t take as much crap as maybe she did in the past jmo

    Reply
  57. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @ Susanna

    “all I did ws offer a shoulder to cry one. He was distraught because he wanted to be a father and that wasn’t happening for him”

    That’s quite astonishing isn’t it that she had the nerve to say that! A “shoulder to cry on” and he “was distraught because he wanted to be a father and that wasn’t happening for him”!!! I am AMAZED that Jen let her get away with saying that. She could have come right out and immediately said that was BS with no trouble at all. She could have said that is total BS and I can’t believe AJ had the nerve to say that, we had a nursery for fuck’s sake! She could have immediately shown Jolie up and made her look even worse than she was looking already. But she didn’t and it was such a stupid move not to IMO. She could have stopped all this selfish, non-child-bearing Jen crap in an instant. The fact that the world has been sold this lie for such a long time has got to be redressed. If I were her I would NEVER have let her get away with saying such things, esp. the bit about her being Brad’s “best friend”, I mean what a way to dismiss your marriage – just his “best friend”. Its outrageous! Jen is far too nice for her own good IMO.

    Reply
  58. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    I think you are so right here. Brad should have considered this before he even got involved. Could it be he was naive? Or just believed it would last forever? Although on Oprah he said he doesn’t fight with Angie anymore because he is not going to be with this person forever. That was recently, though. And a hint if you ask me.

    Reply
  59. Susanna said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    A couple more items from Ted C. at E! Online about how vengeful Angelina is. It is simply amazing that she refuses to let her own father see his grandchildren for doing the exact same thing that she did to Brad and Jennifer! Barring incest, I have always believed that one should forgive and forget when it comes to the perceived wrongs that their parents did – ESPECIALLY when there are grandchildren involved.

    Brad better watch out!!

    **************************************************
    Dear Ted:
    Is Lloyd Boy-Toyed Jon Voight?
    —Marilyn
    Dear Angelina:
    Haven’t you gotten enough revenge on your father already? Answer’s no.
    ********************************
    Morning Piss: November 14th
    Angelina Jolie, just like Joaquin Phoenix, knows precisely what she’s doing by telling BBC News she’s not that long for the acting game. Both actors have said, essentially, they’re just not that into us anymore and want to concentrate on other things, music for him, peddling children for her.
    It’s just more look-at-me biz from both highly sensitive performers—although for quite different reasons.
    Poor Joaq’s got a whole butt load of emotional probs to sift through (how much time do you have right now?). Angie, just one, essentially. Hates her dad, always has, always will; it drives almost everything she does.
    “She will never get over that one,” a close family friend told me, regarding Jon Voight, who cheated on Angie’s late mom. So, what we’re in for is a whole a host of rebirths and chameleonic life swaps from Ms. J until she comes to terms with the fact that her behavior isn’t so different from her father’s.
    And until that time passes, Jolie will most likely have retired from the screen about 242,000 times, while somehow miraculously finding the ability to keep getting nominated for Oscar after Oscar.

    Reply
  60. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    @surreal:
    “Her behavior indicates that she has no conscience and/or she enjoys hurting women.”

    People w/o consciences are usually sociopaths or psychopaths. Sociopaths usually know how to put on a good face for the world and are very manipulative in trying to get their own way. They care only about themselves. No empathy. And usually have one or more personality disorders (Narcissism, Borderline, etc.). This all really fits with AJ…especially when you add in the cutting and all the other mentally ill behavior.

    Reply
  61. DebFrmHell said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    @Z:
    The treat came after just Shiloh was born. (My mother had to take my ex to court to gets visits once a month. Talk about Karma!)

    Reply
  62. Susanna said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    Keane

    I am right there with you that Jen should have come out and addressed the rumor that she didn’t want to have kids with Brad. I don’t know why – I guess that Brad was playing her all along, telling her what she wanted to hear, trying not to hurt her. That was my perception about their break-up – certainly why he went on vacation with her before the separation was announced and was photograpphed kissing her on the beach. It’s funny how Brad never said Jen wouldn’t have kids, but Angelina came out and said it to defend herself and it spread like WILDFIRE.

    I think Jen just wanted to be cool about it all and reasonable, even though it devastated her. Jen was just too nice to come out and fight fire with fire. IMO Jen didn’t start speaking out until press for Marley & Me. But by then, the Brangaloonies had grabbed onto the “Jen wouldn’t have babies” story and used it to crucify Jen and canonize Angelina. That move should be taught in Public Relations classes all over the world!

    Reply
  63. topbrit said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    @ p – just off topic i really enjoy your posts and admire you constantly asking about the kids welfare and actually saying that you would report these two to ass holes to child services even though they are celebrities its good to know some people have got there priorities right,good on you!

    Reply
  64. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    @Kate:
    I agree, if she didn’t want him and he didn’t meet someone else, things might be OK (maybe?)…but she will become vindictive as hell if she feels dumped. And I think she would try to turn the kids against him. Which I think is one of the nastiest things a person can do…leave the kids out of it!!!! They didn’t ask for any of this! I feel so bad for them – they are really going to be screwed up. Maddox always looks so serious and angry. Sad.

    Reply
  65. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Wow…that is so sad. I hope she won (your mom)!

    Reply
  66. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    LOL well , I think it is safe to say whose side everyone will be on. Now, why does Brad get a free pass, this asshole sanctioned everything Jolie did to Jen over the last 4 years lets not forget. In 2007 he had the nerve to say he had “no regrets” dumping his wife and moving on. In Dec 2008 he said he hit a “dead end” , the guy is shameless. He is a user. I don’t see him as Ted describes him, as a sweetheart. He treated her cold. He has a lot to make up for imo. He enabled the mother of his children to do drugs, and while she was pregnant if we are to believe Ted. He allows the batshit crazy woman who is violent and unstable to be a influence in his childrens lives. He brought a stripper into the home, where his innocent little children were , so she could shit and piss on her, while he was no where to be found, out drinking in his sorrows? Sorry, but what kind of a daddy is he, a sorry one. What kind of man is he< a weak ass one. Any man with and decency would have put a stop to this mess 2 years ago, of not for his won self respect, for his children. jmo Any of this comes into a custody case a Judge will hold him just as accountable as her.

    Reply
  67. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    @Canuck:
    Canuck, that is a great idea for him…he should be working on that. He would have the public’s approval, what a PR coop. People probably wouldn’t even believe her if she can back w/ the 3-some info. What are the poor loonies going to do?

    Reply
  68. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    @Kate:
    It’s confusing bc I thought they already parted ways.

    Reply
  69. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    @ Susanna – I know and I can’t bear the fact that half the world seems to have been sucked into it. I once considered going into PR as a less gruelling career to what I do currently but when I realised what it entailed I thought God know. Can you imagine spending your life making up lies to cover up the shit of overpaid, spoilt, narcisstic people with entitlement issues, who feel that they should be able to get away with anything, and quite possibly destroying the reputation of a decent person into the bargain? I mean in some jobs in tv you feel like you’ve checked your soul in at the door, but to do something like that would be beyond me and my morality. Seems like a lot of people put money before morals though. Its very sad. But yeah Ange could write a handbook on how to get away with murder at the same time as having great PR, but it would only be useful for people who are prepared to lie, destroy someone else’s reputation as well as their marriage, use vulnerable children for publicity purposes, and much, much more. Few people in the world are as cold and ruthless as her I would wager, she almost makes Madonna look like a warm, kind lady – at least she doesn’t exploit her kids!

    Reply
  70. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    @Kate:
    Forgot to add, he also went out and bought another dog! WTH? He sees what he sees and he does not leave? Now seriously people, what would you have done? Would you not just be a little worried that one of the kids might be next, because I sure as hell would have.

    Reply
  71. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    @p:
    I still think they have, but just the way it is written is a bit of a mystery. I agree with Surreal and Cannuck though, I think this was a conversation that they had when Brad called to tell them he was done with her and he was going for sole custody, and they were discussing how that would go down, joint or sole, not stay or go. What you do with Angelina, I think that is what that means, but it would be nice if Ian would clarify for us.:)

    Reply
  72. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    @Guest:
    What’s up everyone? I have a gripe with this dumbass Lainey?

    My question too, I think that she is in a panic that Ian is going to scoop her Pitt Porn and ruin her fun. LOL What or what is she going to do. She has basically built her blog off of the Pitt Porn, and her secret sources. If you look at what she writes most of it is just a recap from other tabloids. She rarely ever has any info and if she does, she says, oh my sources say they are tight. Well who are they Lainey, at least Ian will tell us who the person is , what they do. Hell I could say the same thing Lainey does. She is a loon through and through and I would bet she is over her posting too having heart faiilure that her idols are going down the toliet.

    Reply
  73. Alif said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    @Susanna:
    You people are good! The way you research and debate, and more!
    Sometimes, I think the cold case files dept. in any police dept. would love to have you investigate their unsolved crimes. At least you’d give them a good showing!

    Regarding Jodie Foster and Angie; the only thing I can come up with, is this: When “Brokeback Mountain” was winning Best Movie awards from everywhere, including red states, and outside American, a few oldtimers came out against it. This was during the oscar voting period. (JMO: Jay Leno, he of the obsssession with everything gay, started it as soon as the movie opened.)
    Ernest Borgnine, Tony Curtis, Harry Hamlin, and JODIE FOSTER, were among others who joined the chorus. Nevermind that those actors needed gays in the movie business, to advance their careers. They cited John Wayne’s memory as cause for their protestaions. Others started getting into the act.
    But, Jodie Foster? She was well-known as a lesbian. Her “love” scenes with hetero males were embarrassing to some of us. And she, a lesbian, comes out against a story about two pre-gay-movement males who fall in love? Well, hypocrisy came to mind. JMO!

    Reply
  74. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    @ Kate – I agree with what you say about him being weak but I think a lot of men are and are easily controlled by women. (Many within my own family for starters). And I just think Brad did what he was told to have a quiet life. I’ve always thought men are no way near as mentally tough as women and are generally much more straightforward creatures, they are no match for a hard-as-nails manipulator like Jolie! And with my experience with men and women I can report that men are very easily influenced, especially when you’ve got sex on your side, whereas women are much, much trickier. If they say no, they mean no and they’re very hard to convince otherwise. Men – do they even know what that word means? I’ve very rarely heard it anyway!

    Reply
  75. Guest said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    @Kate:
    You are so right! People definitely give Brad a pass way too often. Who’s gonna write an article and expose him too (like they did with Angelina and her PR)? I hope someone grows the balls and writes it.

    Reply
  76. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    @Keane:
    I agree, Keane…you are right on with all of this. This is ridiculous:

    “well if it had happened to me I’d be over it in a flash, not mope about it for years like her”

    Only proving that they are teenagers who have never even had a serious relationship.

    Reply
  77. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    @Susanna:
    “all I did was offer a shoulder to cry one. He was distraught because he wanted to be a father and that wasn’t happening for him.”

    Angelina is such a bitch…imo.

    Susanna, thanks so much for posting the Ted stuff! I appreciate it.

    Reply
  78. surreal said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    @Kate:
    Lainey is a piece of work. Sometimes I wonder if she’s on Angie’s payroll. If Brangie breaks up, her raison d’etre (I don’t know much French, but I’m try to say “reason for existing”) will be kaput. What the hell will she have to talk about? And how is she going to continue her campaign against JA, unless she gets paranoid and claims JA caused the breakup?! She’s no journalist and she writes like a teen who failed English Comp 101.

    Reply
  79. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    @Alif:
    Alif…these people came out against the movie? What is wrong with them?!?!

    Reply
  80. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    @ Surreal – I think she will prob support Brad and whoever his new bit of stuff is, but its gonna make her look quite the hypocrite. As for the loonies, God what will become of them, I think they’ll just implode to be quite honest!

    Reply
  81. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @Keane:
    lol well I don’t know about that, my own father would have not have tolerated it, none of my brothers, my hubby would have kicked my ass to the curb for sure, and my son , same, I don’t know guys that weak, none. I can not honestly think of any man that after walking in on their wife suckinga pitballs balls would just go on their merry way and keep dipping their wick, without bagging it it, I mean honestly , she did get pregnant again. Then we have the kissing and making out, hell people die of tumors in the mouth and throat just from spreading HPV, and she was sucking a dogs balls? Nasty. Having babies, breastfeeding, does he have no freaking shame at all? Going on Oprah and talking about Shiloh picking up the dogs shit and bringing it to him? I just shake my head. I wonder if his parents know about this nasty stuff she is into .

    What the hell would you say to your son if he was with someone who did this stuff? I would call child services. I have a friend whose son and his wife were doing so much cocaine, shooting it up, they would just lock the kids in the bedroom, have orgies, the dad went over there and knocked the door down to get the kids out. He took them to court and got custody of the kids. They did not get them back for 5 years. Brad is responsible for allowing his kids to be in this mess. Now of course to his credit, he may have hired enough nannies to protect them, we don’t know, but unless he is there or his parents, no way to know what is really going on. That story SR gave us was disturbing.

    Reply
  82. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    @Keane:
    You are SOOOOOOOOOOO right and I think deep down everyone actually knows that. Men are fundamentally weak and that makes most of them easy to manipulate, if you’re inclined to do so. That’s why Brad gets a pass, because hardly anyone (at the time at least) could imagine how any man would turn down AJ if she was after them. Remember Ted C’s poll about “who would you want to sleep with of your own sex?” AJ was the hands down winner of that, back then.

    Reply
  83. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    @Guest:
    Well, I suppose one has to be supported for the sake of the kids, yes. He is the better parent, so she has to be sacraficed. Her own fault, but from our perspective as fans, he does not get a free pass, he needs to fess up and apologize and then move on,jmo, but I would bet he does not think so.

    Reply
  84. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Canuck:
    That is because no one at the time knew how nasty she was. lol I bet the poll would be different now.

    Reply
  85. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @Kate:
    I’ve noticed that they always seem to rent these huge houses, with 35 bedrooms. My guess is that most of the time, the kids are about a half a mile away in another part of the house with the nannies.

    Reply
  86. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @Kate:
    Yes, I’d be willing to bet that she would be way down the list these days.

    Reply
  87. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @Susanna:
    Yeah, I really agree with everything you say here. She was refreshing when she was honest. But she’s a liar now and, like you said, hypocrite.. And I also don’t care about the shit she does if it’s consenting…but she is out to hurt people. And those kids…ugh. So selfish.

    Reply
  88. TBanks said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @Kate:

    Hi Kate – how do you know that BP walked in on AJ with a dog? Can’t seem to find that info anywhere but here, but I believe it, just haven’t seen it anywhere else. Just wondering! Thx.

    Reply
  89. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @ Kate – I agree that that would have pushed somone to their limits, but when you factor in how kinky their sex life was supposed to be anyway, his boundaries must have already been different to most people’s. I mean I know water sports and I’m never sure what the equivalent term is for poo – poo play perhaps?!!! – is not uncommon, I personally find it pretty fucking grim. But then I don’t like to have sex with more than one person at a time either, so none of what they are supposed to have got up to appeals to me either! But they had already pushed the boundaries to their limits, but hers were just that little but significant bit broader – shall we say? – than his!!! So in the context of that I’m not that surprised. I just think Brad was in way over his head and totally lost. How the hell could he get out of it once he’d brought all those kids into the relationship? And I assume he must have loved her in some way, can’t have been just the sex. But yeah, my experience of men is that 99% of them you can wrap around your little finger, women, not that many at all! We’re such a different breed!

    Reply
  90. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @Keane:
    Keane, I am with you here. I guess Jen was trying to take the high road…but she should have nipped it in the butt.

    I’m always so behind on here! lol….posts come way too fast for me to read.

    Reply
  91. Susanna said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    Z and ALif

    I am happy that you like my “research” over on Ted C’s blog! I wanted to find some other reporters/bloggers who might have been hinting about a fracture in the Brad/Angelina facade…I guess I have been reading Lainey and Perez for too long, because I didn’t think anyone else was reporting about it! You all here have pointed out that the reports are out there, but you have to dig to get them. Brangie pays people off too fast – just as soon as something bad is written they “throw some money at the problem” as it is said in business!

    Reply
  92. mandy said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    As far as the “I was a shoulder to cry on…” quote. I remember an interview Jolie did at that time where she denied ever saying this. In fact, she said she had sent a letter from her lawyers to Jen and Brad stating that she never said any of that. I didn’t believe it at the time and don’t believe it now, but I thought it was interesting and proves that she has no problems lying about anything.

    Reply
  93. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @Susanna:

    [Dear Ted:
    This is something I’ve never understood about the whole Brad Pitt-Jennifer Aniston breakup. To me, it really doesn’t sound like anyone did anything wrong. It sounds like this is a couple who developed different priorities. Brad had made a lot of movies and was ready to expand his life with a family and charitable causes. Jennifer had just finished Friends and was at the perfect point to build her film career; she was in no position to get pregnant and start a family. So, Brad fell in love with someone who shared his priorities (having a family and charitable work). It happens. Is this really what happened, or is there something that I’m missing?]

    Is only points to the insane slight-of-hand that holds what’s left of the brand intact.

    She notes the ostensible (patently ridiculous) reasons JA wouldn’t have time for kids, but fails to see that Brang have no more spare time in their crazy schedules–between professional and non-professional activities — than JA would have had. Add to it the NY TIMES article that called them out on their deals w the press and exploiting their kids in fake-candid shots and it’s a wonder anyone can still ask this question with a straight face.

    Reply
  94. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    @Kate:
    BJ in a car in NOLA? Whaaaa???

    Reply
  95. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    @Keane:
    I think A LOT of people think AJ is a dirty slut imo.

    Reply
  96. Guest said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    @Susanna:
    “Brangie pays people off too fast – just as soon as something bad is written they ‘throw some money at the problem’ as it is said in business!”

    Funny you said that because I believe, and Keane I don’t mean to speak for you, that’s why Keane may get on the newcomers the way she does. I mean if Brangie are finding out these things too fast, then it must mean that they have people trolling all these gossip sites IMO. Especially when this site’s owner has confirmed that a certain person has been lurking/posting here. I’m not saying that all the newcomers are working for Angie. I think most people here are legit, but there have been cases where the ire was focused on Keane and Kate.

    Anyway, I’m liking your Ted C posts. Thanx for your work.

    Reply
  97. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    @Susanna:
    Geez is this so right:

    “She will never get over that one,” a close family friend told me, regarding Jon Voight, who cheated on Angie’s late mom. So, what we’re in for is a whole a host of rebirths and chameleonic life swaps from Ms. J until she comes to terms with the fact that her behavior isn’t so different from her father’s.

    So, does anyone know why else she can’t stand her Dad?…the cheating…oh and he said she was mentally unstable. Well, She is just like him. Her father’s daughter. Hypocrite!!!! It just seems, that sooner or later, it’s good to forgive and move on. She’s probably not capable of that…too much twisted shit going on inside.

    Reply
  98. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    @Keane:
    Well, that is true, I suppose the poor love sick fool thought he could fix her.

    Reply
  99. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    @topbrit:
    Thanks for the nod. I’m still waiting for something to allay my fears that the kids aren’t being protected from this crap. Sometimes people forget they’re there.

    I’m asking again guys, give us something more on the kids.

    Reply
  100. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    I remember when AJ was on The View promoting Alexander (before BP) and she was wearing a slinky, nude colored dress and yet again randomly told the world that she had “lovers” and met them in hotel rooms. All the View bitches did a “wha?” and there was some shifting in their seats and uncomfortable silences. AJ broke the silence nervously and explained that it was to protect her son…blah…blah…the reaction from Joy and Hasselback was priceless. I loved it.

    Reply
  101. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    @Z:
    In a interview,on tape, she said, (and this was after he did Tomb Raider, where they reuntied and got along well, happy, huggy, smiled all that) he wrote her a letter when he left telling her how he felt about her. She said that crushed her. That was when she cut him off. The truth about this if you dig further is this is when he was urging her to get mental help, she also said in another interview, she thought he was the “crazy one”. She resents him because he wanted her to get help for her problems and she knew that would keep her from future adoptions. Any shrink records, and she would never adopt. That is the real reason. There are pictures of her and James and her mom spending time with daddy throughout the years, so she has not been all that honest about him not being around. Now, we see that Daddy was right all along.

    Reply
  102. topbrit said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    @ – Susanna – yeah i agree good call on all your postings from ted.c,i am a bit behind agreeing with the praise from Z but i have been reading all the posts,love em just lurve em!

    Reply
  103. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @Elle:
    I remember that, yet she can scream 4 lovers and gets away with it. see total bullshit. This is why people hate her. That was a really stupid PR move on her part. She admitted to 2 or 3 in that one interview. lol

    Reply
  104. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    @p:
    I doubt we will get that because of the custody case, just my feeling.

    Reply
  105. HisHighness said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    @Kate
    My source in camp Brangie just emailed me saying “they might pose together in public but there’s no hope in hell for them. They’re done. There’s a Spitzer hook to this all but I can’t tell you yet Ian. I’ll keep you posted. Keep up the enlightening posts.”

    Reply
  106. azzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    I hope Jens wearing a ridiculously huge hoodie to hide the smile on her face, knowing what’s going on with
    B & A now.

    Reply
  107. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Thanks Ian, well you know everyone will call you a liar when they do that lol. Sounds like your source is reading this board.

    Reply
  108. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Spitzer hook as in hooker I’d imagine. Did Brad bring a NY hooker over state lines to DC? From the same agency?

    Reply
  109. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @p:
    I was wondering if maybe he was not funneling some of the charity money through a prostitution ring, geez, can you just imagine. lol Would he be that dumb? I mean there is not really all that big a deal in him using a hooker, we know that already, yes. He has used them before.

    Reply
  110. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    @azzy:
    lol isn’t that the truth. Brad should just bite the bullet and get the hell out of this mess, the longer he drags it out, the worse it will be for all of them, his parents included.

    Reply
  111. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Tell me that AJ hasn’t been whoring for $$$ for the thrills of it…
    Or has she been sleeping with a politician? Or has he? lol

    Reply
  112. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    maybe the hooker is his new sophisticated lady love??

    Reply
  113. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    @Jezzy:
    lordy lordy from one whore to the next, please no, his mother will die.

    Reply
  114. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    all things considered the hooker might just be a step up from Jolie

    Reply
  115. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    Does anyone think Brad’s family is reading what Ian is posting?

    Reply
  116. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @Kate:
    Exactly what I have been thinking for the last couple of days reading this….what is to stop her from abusing those children, if it’s OK to do dogs. Scary….she has no boundaries, imo.

    Keane, maybe people are just thinking of Brad as the lesser of two evils, but he is still selfish and has been really mean and thoughtless (to Jen for one).

    Reply
  117. cuze said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    Secret wedding maybe?

    Reply
  118. surreal said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    Considering Angie’s lax morals, I don’t see how she could object to Brad engaging a prostitute–unless he refused to allow her to participate in the fun.

    Reply
  119. surreal said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @Z:
    I can’t stress how much I hope this dog thing is not true. It’s absolutely disgusting.

    Reply
  120. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @HisHighness:
    So who hired the ho (the Spitzer angle)? Apparently both of them.

    @Alif:
    I think the cold case files dept. in any police dept. would love to have you investigate their unsolved crimes.

    Now for me, that would be a dream job! I love mysteries, true crime, etc….probably one reason all this is so interesting to me.

    Reply
  121. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    My biggest problem with Brad Pitt is the sin of Omission, he stood back and passively let his former wife get dragged through the mud, and even at some point got in on it when he thought enough time had elapsed. I think Jennifer Aniston was smart just to stand back and keep her mouth shut, because everything would come out eventually. Thats the thing about lying…its hard to do and its hard to keep the facts straight day in and day out(add in the apparent drug use and memory is the first thing to go), escpecially with all the media scrutiny on these two halfwits.

    Reply
  122. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    @Z:
    You know when you think about it, Jen really suffered less than Brad is, lol. He is definitely getting his due. He dumped her for who he thought was his “great love” and now look at this mess he is in, and he is stuck, miserable, a possible huge scandle, plus she does not love him, probably never did, would rather have sex with anything but him..ha ha so in essence he really got his ass handed back to him on a silver platter. What was it he said, he like to embrace the messiness of life, well embrace it baby. You got it.lol

    If I had to choose between going through what Jen did, and what he is going through, no question, I would choose Jen’s path. easy.

    Reply
  123. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    Yo its all heating up around here! I get completely lost when people refer to American politicians cos I know nothing about them, so I need further elucidation (if such a word exists!) from my American friends. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t Spitzer the guy who is supposed to be SR’s uncle? Is this how the whole thing connects up? And does Ian mean Brad is linked to Spitzer in an “extra-curricular activities” way or in a political context?

    Reply
  124. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    @cuze:
    Secret wedding, what are you talking about?

    Surreal, SR gave us the story about them hiring the hooker together, in NY, they shared her, a threesome, Brad got jealous, so he went out and hire his own, a guy for himself. Then Brad hired another hooked just for her , Bunny, that was the piss and poo story. Maybe these hookers are part of the Spitzer…

    Reply
  125. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @Kate:
    I can’t believe even in hard times, Pitt doesn’t have enough disposable income to pay cash. No way is he that stupid. Or broke. However it wouldn’t shock me if someone recognised someone and he got caught crossing state lines to play.

    I can’t think Pitt himself is passing the hooker info along, so I don’t see how this conflicts w throwing us a bone about the kids welfare. Not with regard to his custody win anyway.

    Reply
  126. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    @Keane:
    No, Spitzer, was the one that buster for spending 15000.00 on the prostitute, he was the Mayor of NY, he had to resign, he was married, with 2 daughters. He was under a FBI inverstigation for trying to hide some of the money by breaking it up into smaller amounts. Google him, you will see, it was a huge scandal, not that long ago that involved a big agency. Excecutive I think

    Reply
  127. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    Does anyone know if the story of Angelina slapping Brad because he was paying attention to (I don’t know what he was suppose to be doing) a nanny is true? I can’t even remember where I read it…but haven’t seen anything else about it.

    Reply
  128. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    @Kate:
    sorry meant Gov, SR’s uncle is the Mayor.

    Reply
  129. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    @azzy:
    I doubt this is all news to Jen. If she’s laughing at all, it probably started a yr or two ago. In my experience, weirdness like this doesn’t happen over night. Bet she’s known all along.

    Reply
  130. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    Why would it have to be Brad with a hooker?

    I can’t help it, I remember reading a story a couple of months ago about the rates a Madame was saying that Angie could get as a call girl.

    http://angelinajoliesite.blogspot.com/2009/01/call-girls-rate-for-celebrities.html

    Maybe it’s just a random connection, but this is the same Madame who provided girls to Spitzer.

    Reply
  131. cuze said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    Kate… there was an anonymous poster that would post on different blogs that JA and JM were a bogus couple and that they were going to stay together until Jennifer married. Supposedly, Jennifer was seeing someone hidden from the public. If you follow Cojo’s tweets he alludes to a marriage taking place between him and JM. Yes, he is being silly but it makes you wonder. Something is going on with Jennifer. I have never believed that she was seeing JM but I do believe she was seeing someone. Now, with all this business with BP it makes me wonder if there is a connection. I have also believed that BP and AJ have been separated for a long long time.. even before the twins births. If there is a hooker involved, I’d have to wonder if BP got the hooker for AJ to set her up.. to get the dirt on AJ. Now, that is a half baked theory I admit but why else would BP bring a hooker to AJ and then bolt?

    Reply
  132. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    @Kate:and Keane
    He was also head of a task force for busting hookers and madams and imposing harsh fine and jail term for repeat offenders…ironic huh.

    Reply
  133. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    @Z:
    I doubt that, I think that was put out to show that Brad is innocent , that Angie is violent , even in front of the kids, and out of control, that is why he needs his mother there.

    Reply
  134. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    @cuze:
    What about the hooker they shared in a threesome?

    Reply
  135. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    @Kate:
    lol, goodnight everyone! Yes, Mr. Bradley one of the most desired man in the world *vomits* is unable to satistify a woman. What a joke! In fact, he’s been a mess with ALL his past girlfriends. I suspect he’s envious of female. He is the whore. As Kate reported very well he has no dignity maybe due to his prostate issue. the one AJ and Slim looked capable to handle.
    He’s NOT a good father. Who has forgotten his interview about Maddox sick taste for guns and knives? This man and woman visited war camp refugees and then promoted military birthday parties?

    Reply
  136. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    Kate and Z
    I copied and pasted the link regarding the nanny incident from the Daily Mail to one of the posts here, because I’d never seen that story other than here, and it was suprising to see it on a mainstream UK publication

    Reply
  137. cuze said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    I don’t know what to say about that part Kate.

    Reply
  138. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    @Z:
    Someone here suggested they put that out there themselves but I fail to see how making Angie violent protects the brand. I actually said on this site I could see Brad taking up w a nanny for a transition, didn’t actually mean he is doing it or will do it. For all I know they just scan around for ideas, however cliched and fill up space w it. In truth they could have easily come up w that trite scenario themselves. Of course the name of the nanny wasn’t revealed although there’d be no reason not to, so….

    Reply
  139. cuze said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    There’s too many stories floating around about nannies, hookers, animals, etc.. the truth is probably somewhere in the middle.

    Reply
  140. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    the nanny story is fake. It serves a purpose: attest Brad is straight and find a reason for a breakup.

    Reply
  141. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    @cuze:
    Occams Razor..but with these two I don’t think anything has a simple explanation.

    Reply
  142. Billi said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    Spitzer hook? Spitzer frequented the Emperors’s Club known for international prostitution and money laundering. Also rumoured that he was using campaign funds for his trysts. If Brad or Angie was using a hooker would that be news? It has to be more than that but what.

    I still hope Mickey Brett comes out with his book and that he hasn’t been bought off. That’s one book I’d like to read.

    Reply
  143. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    @explain:
    Thats why I was suprised to find it on the Daily mail, they love and worship the ground she slithers on and the story doesn’t paint her in a pretty light. So fake if it is, its doing its purpose.

    Reply
  144. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    some are questioning Lainey lost of subject if they split out… but the same will happen to Ian, no? Also, it still disturbs me very much the firendship of Ian and Perez, because Perez drink from the same source of Lainey. there ’s a couple of gossipers who look all connected by using the same insulting name to the same people. I don’t like them at all.

    Reply
  145. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @Jezzy:
    Hello Jezzy, the story didn’t paint her bad imo. It paint her as someone emotional, like any woman would be if she founds out her lover in a massage session with another woman…

    Reply
  146. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    Yeah the nanny story was originally published in a UK magazine, could have been Closer or something. I couldn’t figure out from whose side it was supposed to come from and to make whom look good. I mean the suggestion was that he was getting flirty with the nanny, so being the kick-ass Angie that she is she hit him and kicked that nanny to the curb. I really didn’t get the point of it unless it was simply an opening gambit in paving the way for a split which didn’t lay the blame on either one of them. To me neither of them comes off that badly in it, its a complete story. Brad was comforting the nanny, maybe getting a little too friendly for Ange’s liking, she read more in to it than there was and over-reacted cos she was jealous. They sacked the nanny and they’re all ok again. I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a slow dripfeed of stories like this to gradually pave the way for an eventual split further down the line. There was one in The Enquirer as well, something about Ange getting angry with Jen for bringing up Brad in interviews all the time and telling her to back off her man – ha ha ha, as if! That would be my take on these stories anyway, all entireliy made up by their PRs and phoned in to the press who have to print them otherwise they won’t get any exclusives/interviews in the future, same wth all the Jen and John bogus crap. I would hate to be a magazine journo. They just have to repeat total lies.

    Reply
  147. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    @Kate:
    Thanks, Kate!

    Reply
  148. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    @Keane:
    Hy Keane, all true! We forget one point: may be the nanny was due to… AJ, and that time it was her turn to get jealous, lol.

    Reply
  149. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    @surreal:
    Me, too, Surreal….if it is, she’s really is way too far over the edge. And the kids really are in danger. And like people have said, Brad should have walked out then, with the kids.

    Reply
  150. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    Spitzer connection – so he may have been using laundered money to pay for his high-class hookers? So could it be that some of the money in that Jolie-Pitt foundation was used in the same way? Just throwing things out there, there’s always been a slight question with regard to the money in that foundation hasn’t there? Any thoughts?

    Reply
  151. Billi said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    @Keane:
    I agree with you on how Angie has somehow managed with her promiscuity to not end up being labeled a slut like Hilton or Lohan. Great PR staff aside, it still amazes me.

    Reply
  152. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    @explain:
    I can see that angle as well, but if you look at all the stuff on here and a few other(abeit rare)websites that have brought to light her drug use and mental unstability, you could also see the other angle of a whacked out drug addict walking by a room and seeing her lover having a heart to heart with a nanny and going ballistic in front of the kiddes nonetheless. But I think Keane is right as time goes by more and more of these stories are going to wander into the press, mostly just to test the tempature of the public. How the public reacts is how both of them will procede.

    Reply
  153. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    @Jezzy:
    What gets me is that this is about the first time that I’ve actually seen it admitted anywhere that they have nannies. Usually, it’s “they’re very hands on parents”, “they look after the kids themselves”, “they do it all”, “they are superheros” blah blah blah. Even that story about her wanting to lose 21 lbs in 21 days for her film mentioned that she screamed at him for not doing some chore or another. As if they don’t have people cleaning, cooking, ironing and looking after the kids, yeah right!

    Reply
  154. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    @Keane:
    Yep Keane, I think you are right…slow leaks to pave the way for the break up, since they’ve been pretending to be together for so long…imo.

    Reply
  155. Guessing said on March 24th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    @Canuck:

    I have no doubt that JA knows that BP/AJ are on the outs. After 4 years they have had ample opportunities to cross paths at various industry events so why this time? It’s almost as if JA was saying to BP look at what you gave up.

    As so for JA/JM IMO that was a mutually convenient relationship. They both provided each other with publicity that otherwise seperately they would not have received.

    Reply
  156. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    @Jezzy:
    there’s a way for the publilc to react: not feeding all those type of characters! How? don’t buy gossip mags and above all don’t watch their movies. Each little euro will increase their fortune. I do like Eastwood movies even if he made it for Oscar’s nomination. He knows what he do but doesn’t know what he says regarding to Jolie (I have for me she had an affair with his wife. There was a blind item circulating about the wife of some director who use to recruit a female lover into the crew of each movie of her husband. that kiss was disgusting!). I didn’t go to watch the changelling! I’m a hard lover of fincher’s movies. Even if I believe Pitt is a better actor than he used to be and knowing this movie, I refused to go to watch Benjamin Button. It’s not the best of fincher, so no big lost.

    Reply
  157. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    @Canuck:
    like I said lying is hard, hard to remember and hard to maintain, and finally cracks are starting to be visable in the perfect picture these two have forced down the publics throat for entirely too long.

    Reply
  158. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    @Kate:
    Yep, no one sets out to get std’s. That’s what you’s probably be doing with her….and probably Brad, too. Yuck. IMO.

    Reply
  159. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    @explain:
    I hear ya, I was offered advance review copies of the changling and benji button and I adamently refused, same thing with the Sienna Miller/Keira Knightly movie (can’t think of the title at the moment). I don’t buy gossip rags or the paper anymore, if I want scandal, I wait and go to TMZ/Dlisted/here.

    Reply
  160. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    @Guessing:
    Agreed. I also think that the JA/JM couple didn’t look very natural for some reason, and frankly he’s like an immature little boy next to her. That said, it can’t be easy being a single woman in HW who isn’t in her 20’s, as I imagine all the guys who are worth seeing are either already married by their 40’s, or gay. Or both, LOL. Shame that French guy on Dancing with the Stars is married, I could see her with a guy like that. Hot and not afraid of being hot, charming, he looks like a nice guy and most absolutely looks like he knows how to treat a woman. And, he’s nice to his Mom. :)

    Reply
  161. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    @Canuck:
    LOL…now that is a good insight. I read these interviews with them where they can’t get a moment alone, etc, etc, they spend all their time with the kids and can’t get any “mommy and daddy time”. Hhmmmmm. Right. Unless, it’s cuz Ange doesn’t want mommy and daddy time. imo.

    Reply
  162. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    @ Guessing – JA and JM was a totally fake relationship indeed (for a quick cross-ref, top story on Ted C’s Awful Truth, he says there’s no need to make up fake break-up stories for a relationship that was never real in the first place, he’s getting way more explicit in what he says lately in my view, maybe as Ian is gettign away with it he feels he can start speaking more freely, cos he defo is). And the previous ones were also fake too: VV and Gerard what’s his face the model. They are all supposed to be gay or bi, Ted C alludes to this too and all paid just to do publicity shots and show up at events to give her good press. A dead giveaway is when you see a celeb engaging in a very obvious PDA in public in the full knowledge the cameras are there, i.e. they are very clear shots. Jen Aniston would never let a pap get such intimate shots if they were real. Anne Hathaway also did one recently (she’s well rumoured to be a lesbo), and the reporter even described how she was in the car with the guy then parked it right in front of her house and got out and ran towards him for a full-on embrace right in front of the pap. Couldn’t have been more staged. Orlando Bloom also did some very obvious recent ones on a balcony with Miranda Kerr is it? I get the impressin he’s a homo too, otherwise why have fake girlfs?

    Reply
  163. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    @Z:
    lol, Brad and Angie were the kid! that’s why they hired stripper nannies for them both!

    Reply
  164. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    @Jezzy:
    lol Jezzy, real juicy scandal has now only one address: this blog, lol!

    Reply
  165. Jezzy said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    @Keane:
    Maybe they go with the fake relationship so they don’t have to risk putting themselves out there emotionally, the fake relationship are safe, no real emotional investment needed. and when it does go pear-shaped there feeling are not dragged out infront of everyone….I’m just saying as an alternative possibility.

    Reply
  166. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    @Guest:
    I mean if Brangie are finding out these things too fast, then it must mean that they have people trolling all these gossip sites IMO. Especially when this site’s owner has confirmed that a certain person has been lurking/posting here.

    Good point!

    Reply
  167. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    @Keane:
    that’s why vince Vaugh annouced a speedy engagement? lol, collateral damages he was one Aniston’s boy!

    Reply
  168. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @p:
    And they are the most important part of all this….very sad.

    Reply
  169. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @explain:
    3 years later is speedy?

    Reply
  170. Guest said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    @Keane:
    I wish Ted C would begin his own gossip blog (outside of E!) and be anonymous. That way he can spill everything he knows and no one will know it’s him. Wouldn’ t that be grand?

    I think you’re right about JA. If they were truly intimate moments, she wouldn’t let there be paps shooting pics. Didn’t she sue a publication when they took pics of her topless in her own backyard? This was at the house she lived with Brad. She was royally pissed. As far as the pics of her and Mayer at that pool in Miami, those were staged imo. I don’t believe she has ever slept with Mayer. As a matter of fact, I think she already knew about the way he treated Jessica Simpson sexually and didn’t want to touch that. He’s disgusting. And word gets around about those things. I just wish she had chosen someone else as her pretend boyfriend. Perhaps other actors don’t want to get involved in the “Bermuda Triangle”… Brad, Ange, and Jen.

    Reply
  171. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    @Canuck:
    It depends how many times they have seen or been with each other. the annoucement was dropped when JA and Jm split out, right?

    Reply
  172. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:27 pm

    @Kate:
    Thanks, Kate…that is interesting. I appreciate the info. I didn’t realize that they had made up at one point. And it makes sense she wouldn’t admit it so she could adopt. Probably also for her reputation. IMO, she has a personality disorder. While those people can get better, most don’t want to. They like their lying, using other people, manipulating lives just as they are. They get more that way.

    Reply
  173. explain said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    @Canuck:
    because it looks any man who was seeing as Aniston’s date is gay or bi and all is faked. May be VV needed to clear the things up.

    Reply
  174. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    @Kate:
    LOL…my thoughts exactly!

    Reply
  175. carrie said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    @Keane: Most people have always thought she was a whore. It’s just the media that she bought and paid for that hyped her up. CNN and People are both owned by Time Warner and the NY Times reported that they have a deal for no bad publicity with her. E! news has given money to the JP Foundation. She makes deal with tabs for staged papparazi photos. If you look at who has always portrayed her in a positive light it’s media outfits that she makes deals with or that softball all celebs like Larry King and Anne Curry. Outside of them she has always been hated. She has never been trully popular with a majority of people.

    Reply
  176. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    @Kate:
    Yeah, so you would think it would have to be bigger than them just using a hooker….imo.

    Reply
  177. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    @ Jezzy – the deal with JA according to Ian and Ted C and from what she says in interviews is that she is still in love with her ex-husband and isn’t really interested in having sex with anyone but him (i.e. she is the complete opposite of Angelina, a shameless hussy, sorry I was just looking at the pics where she got her boobs out for the paps on the balcony in France, bizarre!). I really see where she’s coming from cos I feel the same about someone, don’t want to just have sex with any old person just for the sake of it. So VV, model guy and JM were all just to get press attention really and so she doesn’t look too single and desperate. The quality of the guys willing to play ball has obviously not been too high which is a shame! And yeah to an extent by doing this, any flings, one-offs she has in private remain hidden. But JM looks like her gay little bro kissing her at the oscars, check Ted C’s page first story, such a bad choice, but obviously the best they could get! Anne Hathaway is a lesbian, all those supposed boyfs are just beards. The golden rule to remember with celebs is that if you were famous would you tell the whole world all the ins and outs of your private life unless you were a major famewhore like Ange? So when someone talks about intimate details of their relationship with someone you have to wonder if they’re saying it cos its real or just doing it for publicity. I defo now think that Ange was with Brad anad had all the kids for the attention. I don’t think she loved him as much as the attention she got from being with him. A poster on another board under the pic of her kissing Clint’s wife said the same. And yeah I do tend to think now there was something going on between the 3 or 4 of them. Ange and his wife are similar-looking, would not surprise me at all considering how he gushed about her and how she’ll fuck anything that moves. I used to think that everything in the public realm about her was for publicity, now I think its probably just the tip of the iceburg.

    Reply
  178. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    @cuze:
    Yeah, no divorce necessary to move on.

    Reply
  179. Keane said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    Ok now must go, nite all, catch you tomorrow, happy gossiping!x

    Reply
  180. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    What is the law on being common-law married in California anyways? Or does that exist in the US? In Canada, if you live with someone as a couple for two years, the law considers you to be a common-law married couple regardless. Unless that has changed over the past few years…

    Reply
  181. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    @Kate:
    I’d have to agree with you there! I’d rather be in Jen’s shoes any day. She’s already been the one looking and smelling like a rose, as far as I’m concerned. And I think she is just going to be more and more respected as things go on (by the normal, non-crazy people).

    Reply
  182. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    @Kate:
    LOL…I had never heard that whole story. Boy are they pathetic…imo.

    Reply
  183. Canuck said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    Could the Spitzer hook be that “Bunny” is the same girl as Spitzer got caught with?

    Reply
  184. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    @Z:
    Yeah I don’t like the way JA is tooling around w the media, but at least there are no kids involved, it’s relatively benign, if less than admirable.

    Reply
  185. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    @Kate:
    I think the biggest ….or worst…thing about Spitzer is that he is such a damn hypocrite…busting and fining hookers, when he was going to one himself.

    Reply
  186. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    @p:
    Yep…I wish she would just be straight up…it could only help her in the long run. And the short run.

    Reply
  187. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    Wasn’t Bunny picked up at a club. I didn’t think Spitzer’s indiscretion-girl made her primary living straddling metal poles. Thought she was from one of those discrete agencies. I mentioned before it’s not unheard of for big stars to ask strippers home for a bash w the bi wife. Not all of them are game but some are. Especially if the price is right.

    Reply
  188. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    @Z:
    Yeah, so you would think it would have to be bigger than them just using a hooker….imo.
    Ordianarily, this would not be such a big deal, Brad has paid hookers before. Remember the one he paid $600.00, she came to his house, he put on a condom, she said he did not last too long, just basic sex. lol My he has come a long way baby. But, Mr Brad Pitt Goes to Washington is now on a different socio-economic level. He demands a different kind of respect. He hob nobs with the President of the United States. Imagine how embarassing it would be for information to be made public in the main stream news with a bust like it was with Spitzer, so that everyone knows about it, not a tabloid now, but the mainstream news. Brad Pitt busted for using a hooker. ha ha Can you just see all those Washington suits that were fawning all over him two weeks ago? Let alone his parents. What about those who believe them to be the Richard and Liz of decade? lmao now that would be some damaging news. It would set his arrogant ass back a few pegs. Now add to that , if she too was part of it. Ah, mommy and daddy of the year!

    Yeah, keep on singing their praises Lainey. Love it. Sure, I could see a Spitzer connection blow up in their face, and like Keane said, if it involves any money laundering with the Jolie-Pitt Foundation Charities and he is hitting up Obama for help with the MIR project, hahhhhhhhhhhh.

    Reply
  189. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    @Keane:
    Well, we are wondering where all the money went, right?!

    Reply
  190. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    @Z:
    well there was that investigation by the Swiss into some other actors Foundations, I wonder if his was part of it and that was part of why he was seeing the lawyer in D.C

    Reply
  191. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    @Kate:
    That would seriously damage his bright and shining career. He might not recover from that one. He would even have a harder time recovering from that Angie, imo, because people know the stuff she’s into. He’s suppose to be golden boy.

    Reply
  192. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:01 pm

    @Kate:
    Did you say $600.00? Just $600.00? For sex?? Boy the recession is hitting everyone hard.

    Reply
  193. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:01 pm

    @p:
    Trying to remember, but what was it that the hooker revealed that Spitze liked, was it a dildo up the butt?

    Reply
  194. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    @p:
    Yes, $600.00, this was before AJ, he was not married to Jen, so thinking between Palthow and Jen

    Reply
  195. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    @Guessing:
    Do you all think that is what’s up w/ Reece and Jake, too. I haven’t heard much about it…except some people think it’s fake.

    Reply
  196. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    @Kate:
    Many years ago when AJ was a teenager, her dad Jon Voight called an attorney to represent him against allegations of child molestation. True fact.

    Reply
  197. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:05 pm

    @Kate:
    [thinking between Palthow and Jen]

    Shit that would still be low balling it, even on a slow night.

    Reply
  198. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    @explain:
    How cute! Twin set stripper nannies…lol.

    Reply
  199. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    @Kate:
    [a dildo up the butt?]
    I seem to recall something like that. I hope Jen’s learned not to get serious w guys who go to strip clubs/pay for sex (they don’t all you know). But who knows what’s acceptable to her, people will surprise you.

    Reply
  200. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:16 pm

    @Guest:
    I wish Ted C would do that, too…that would be fun!

    Yep, I remember that about her suing, because of the topless pic. More evidence that the pool shots were staged…imo. yeah, take one look at JM and he is just so yuck. You don’t even have to know anything about him…the gut says YUCK!!

    Reply
  201. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    @Elle:
    uh huh, well Jolie has posed , for some very very provocative pictures with her Daddy, not just her brother. Not on his part either. So if there was any molesting going on, she was doing it. jmo

    Reply
  202. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    IAN, did you find out if the Sophisticated Lady was real or not that Pitt is suppose to be ga ga over?

    Do we know if Brad is moving forward with sole custody?

    How does Jen fit in this mess, why does her name keep popping up?

    With all the headlines of late that we are reading on here and how things are going this is starting to read like a episode of the X Files. lol probably for you as well. It would really be great if you could predict when the split will be made public because then I could watch Lainey and Just Jared for fun. ha ha. That would be very entertaining to see another smug bitch fall. yeah I know, she is probaly nice in person, but the more you talk about Brange the nastier she gets about Jen.

    Reply
  203. derek said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    Again another story with no scoop. What was revealeved here? That someone the parents tell their intimate feelings with jsut contacts teh news? I call BS again…All stories lead nowhere..

    Reply
  204. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    @derek:
    I thought it was interesting, Mama does not want Ang around, prefers Jen, telling her son to be careful, sounds like she is singing a verse of Billie Jean to Bradley to me.

    Reply
  205. Guessing said on March 24th, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    @Z:

    Yep I honestly believe JG is TT. Being with JG hasn’t harmed RW’s career at all but instead IMO it’s probably warmed her to a new fanbase. Prior to JG I always thought she came across a little harsh.

    If I have learnt anything in my brief time working in the industry is that there are two sides to most actors. An image that the studio and PR machines would like the public to know and then there’s reality. It’s all about the box office and if actors did tell the truth about their sexuality then, it’s sad to say but, still in todays society there are many people that would not be able to accept it and boycott an actor’s film based on it.

    I think it’s harder for a male actor to come out than it is for a female actor.

    Reply
  206. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    @Kate:
    I’m not saying JV did it but he needed a lawyer to defend him. Not sure if it was MB who acused him or not. It is not unusual for people who were molested as children to act in an overly sexualized manner and do things like have 14 year old lovers and engage in knife play and then act out sexually with their siblings. It actually makes sense. They have to get it from someone imo and in the opinion of a bunch of researchers. I do not believe JV is sincere. I think he is a total nut (as did the lawyer who politely turned down his case way back when – he creeped her out)

    Reply
  207. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    @Kate:
    That would explain acting sexy at 5 or 6. Molested kids do act that way, not knowing better. It’s a scary thought. Molested children also can grow up to be molesters. And often do, if they don’t get help.

    Reply
  208. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:13 pm

    @Guessing:
    Now that’s an interesting thought (JG is TT). And yeah, I think you are right about actors coming out. For some reason women are more accepted. For the most part anyway. I guess though, if someone comes out as gay they would have a hard time being a lead man/woman. No one would buy the romance angle (and there’s almost always a romance angle)…unless they were really good actors and not publicity whores, I suppose.

    Reply
  209. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:14 pm

    @Elle:

    [t is not unusual for people who were molested as children to act in an overly sexualized manner and do things like have 14 year old lovers and engage in knife play and then act out sexually with their siblings. It actually makes sense. They have to get it from someone]

    I agree, from what I’ve seen of these cases (and I’ve seen quite a few) that’s true. Also manic-depression can cause over-sexualized behavior in some women. To be clear, I’m not pulling a diagnosis but heavy drugs use w some people has also been described as self-medicating, so there are a few things to ponder. However I think there are other explanations as well.

    Reply
  210. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:15 pm

    @Elle:
    JV is the one who tried to get his daughter help from the time she was ten years old, when at that time she was depressed and did not want to live. Her mother is the one who had boyfriend after boyfriend going in and out of there like a revolving door. She allowed Angelina to have a bf live with her at 14. She had other men live with her young daughter often. Her brother is the one who got her hooked on drugs, according to those who know him…the story is more complicated than many people think. She claims her dad cheated but her mother was having affairs while she was married to Jon as well. Angelina has a selective memory. She can seem to get the age right as to when that affair took place, sometimes it is when she ws 1 or 2 , sometimes she was 4. Not really defending him, or going against her, just stating information that I am aware of. She has whined on and one that she never ever saw her father, not true. It was with her fathers support she moved to NYC to pursue modeling and acting, not her mothers. She avoided her mother in the last year of her life, traveling all over the damn place, knowing she did not have long to live. I don’t understand this girl. Her crock about her father’s affair was just that, a crock. She slept with Brad from the 1st month of filming, and there are plenty of people that are witness to that..imo

    Reply
  211. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:18 pm

    @Canuck:
    Hi Canuck, yeah, this exists in the US. I think it may be different for every state. Years ago, I heard it was considered common law marriage after 7 years. But recently, I think I heard less. So I am thinking it’s different for each state….but don’t know exactly.

    Reply
  212. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    @p:
    uh huh like having a relationship with your brother. Did you ever read that article published in England, not all that long ago by a writer that is married now, but she grew up sleepig with her brother, They always had sex from the time she was about 12, and all through college,and beyond. It continued until he got married. She talks about how natural it was, how they hid it from their parents, never told them, and how hard it was for her to give him up when he got married. How it hurt to be at his wedding. It was very sad to read, but I imagine that is just the kind of relationship that Jolie and James have. They trust only each other, really love only each other. He was two years older than her.

    Reply
  213. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    @Z:
    There are only presently 7 states in the US that recognize common law. California is not one of them, and the ones that do, you have to live together for a long time. I don’t think that would apply to Brad and Angelina. If he has not adopted the kids he will have a tough time anyway. If his name is on the birth certs of the others at least that is something.

    Reply
  214. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    @Kate:
    Did she say she had sex w her brother? Who said it? The only clip I saw of them kissing, while somewhat prolonged, was not nearly as suggestive as people made it out to be, so I wasn’t sure.

    Reply
  215. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    @p:
    I’m not an expert, either…but imo, heavy drug use, alcohol use are almost always used to self medicate. Even if someone’s problems aren’t all that severe, I think it’s common. I have seen it an awful lot.

    Reply
  216. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:47 pm

    Here, read this article if you have time-
    I had sex with my brother but I don’t feel guilty
    A woman slept with her sibling for years and has good memories. Not many people understand their relationship, she says
    http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article4332635.ece

    This is not Jolie, but wow! See, this is what Ian was saying, she thought she could go public like this, when she realized she could not, she latched on to BBT.

    Reply
  217. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    @p:
    Have you ever seen all the pics with her brother, lol? Plus the ones with her dad? Where she is rubbing all over her dad, has on a see through shirt, has her hands all over him, very sexy. Strange. The ones with the horse licking her breasts?

    Reply
  218. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    @Kate:
    The only pics of AJ + bro I saw were closed mouthed. I haven’t seen the dad ones, but I have seen the one with her and the horse. The thing about many sexually abused girls I’ve noticed is they tend to be in flirt mode 24/7. The only way they relate to the world is sexually. That’s some, not all.

    Reply
  219. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    @Z:
    Yeah good comment Z.

    Reply
  220. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:19 pm

    @Kate:
    Hey, Kate…do you have any ideas/opinions why she demonizes her father and says her mother was a saint? That is all very fascinating to me…what you wrote. Seems somehow she had to turn it around and make her mother seem so wonderful. Growing up, my parents split. And they both tried…and failed in a lot of ways…but they are good people (nothing awfully out of the ordinary). But for some reason my brother thinks my mom was a saint and my dad was a terrible father. He is extremely codependant, I know…and was with my mom. I guess he felt he had to protect her. Anyway, this stuff always interests me to no end, and I’d love to know the whole story about AJ. Although, you told a lot…a lot I didn’t know anyway.

    Reply
  221. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    @Kate:
    Gosh, that is so, terribly sad. Talk about ruined for life…unless you have tons of therapy, I would think. Tons and years and still it wouldn’t straighten everything out.

    Reply
  222. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:27 pm

    @Kate:
    She slept with Brad from the 1st month of filming, and there are plenty of people that are witness to that..imo

    I remember seeing a picture early on in the filming of that movie, before the rumors…or maybe they were just starting. They are standing side by side…not touching, but you can tell something is going on. She has this little girl flirty stance…they are reading a script or something. Does anyone remember that..I tried to find it online, but couldn’t.

    Reply
  223. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    @Kate:
    Oh, thanks, good info. Yes, and they were in France, too. Does anyone else think Brad saying they wouldn’t get married until gay marriage in CA was legal was a crock? I fully believe he supports gay marriage, But imo they never had plans to get married and that was a good excuse to use for the public.

    Reply
  224. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    @explain:
    Or what about the time BP was on Oprah and got so freaked out and downright rude about not wanting to explain the meanings of his tattoos to a HUGE fan of his. Tattoos!! He was like “When you can share something like this with another person it’s a special, private thing.” Ew, it’s a tattoo. But , in a written interview, he readily told the world Pax pisses on his chair during time out (major issues) and Shiloh likes to be called John (ditto). So, the kids’ acting out behavior is less deserving of privacy than some your somehow oddly sexual tattoos? Gross. Real gross.

    Reply
  225. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:32 pm

    @Z:
    That reminds me of something I forgot to mention. Usually it’s the primary caretaker that has the greatest impact, at least in my experience…unless the less frequent time spent w the other parent was horrible. Whether the split was when the kid was 1 or 4, unless mom dwelled on how horrible the infidelity was (and men were in general), that alone wouldn’t have that great an impact. But if mom otoh, had a revolving door of lovers and/or was inattentive, irresponsible and slammed dad for his infidelity years after the fact, that’s a different story.

    Reply
  226. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    @p:
    It is not just the fact that she kissed him, she did it at 3 different events, for magazines, and all differents poses. Now if it was just leaning in face to face and kissing your brother on the lips, okay can excuse that one, but no, she has poses kissing him the same way there are pictures of her kissing Pitt. Standing in front, head back, arms reached around, pulling him to her,holding his head in to her, bodies pushed together. That is not a brother sister kiss. Maybe they got off fkig with the public.

    Reply
  227. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    @Elle:
    Makes you wonder if he has had some of them removed huh? lol

    Reply
  228. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    @Z:
    Or a lame excuse, I guess…hahaha

    Reply
  229. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:38 pm

    @Billi:
    I think the only reason AJ got away with that is because when she was super wild in her 20’s the internet wasn’t what it is today. In fact, this onslaught of evidence has really only become the norm in the last few years. But who cares, it’s not like she didn’t tell us she was having sex with knives at 14! Who does that??? No one chaste and virginal.

    Reply
  230. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    @Elle:
    [Pax pisses on his chair during time out (major issues) and Shiloh likes to be called John (ditto).]

    I don’t know if a 4 yr old wetting his pants during time out is necessarily considered a major issue (unless he a chronic wetter) , ditto a toddler playing at being in Peter Pan. My larger problem is he freely offers-up far too many details about his kids, to an audience so vast, there’s an increased risk of drawing them to the attention of a stalker or kidnapper. All for the sake of brand.

    Reply
  231. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:52 pm

    @Kate:
    I beg to differ here. Fruit does not fall from the tree. I am pretty sure she did not have much contact with JV. Some red carpets, maybe he helped her financially to go to NYU, etc. But seriously, what kind of father or man would go to the tabloids to tell the world his daughter was insane to “help”? Was he trying to cause a mental breakdown or suicide? I really think JV did some nasty things. He doesn’t strike me in the least bit as a caring, normal, loving man. He even looked fake when he made his heavily televised plea. That was when she cut him off and I would’ve too. She also said the makers of Tomb Raider wanted her dad so she obliged even though they have no relationship and doing the scene itself was surreal because it dealt with an estranged father and daughter. And then there was the time he couldn’t get the names of his grandkids right when half of America could’ve remembered them. JV is no rejected, victim daddy. I don’t buy that one at all. In fact, I bet he’s a total freak.

    Reply
  232. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    @Kate:
    [She talks about how natural it was, how they hid it from their parents, never told them, and how hard it was for her to give him up when he got married. How it hurt to be at his wedding. It was very sad to read, but I imagine that is just the kind of relationship that Jolie and James have. They trust only each other, really love only each other. He was two years older than her.]

    That’s what I meant the other day. I think if AJ was really doing it with JH, they would’ve hid it. I think it was all part of her maladjusted punk rock persona. JMO

    Reply
  233. Kate said on March 24th, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    @p:
    See, that is so classic. Pitt had just done a interview, with LK and and said he did not want to talk about his kids. Then he goes on Oprah, because that audience is housewives and he taylors his answers to the women with children. He was nervous, you could see that. He did not want to be asked about Jen, about cheating, and even when Oprah said he looked happier than she had ever seen him he looked caught off guard, and with good reason, he was. Whe she said, “she is the love of your life” he didnt know what to say” so he says, “dare I say?” now , lol, gotta laugh because that is a stupid answer. When he was in New Orleans and SR says this is during the time Jolie is blowing some teenager in a parking garage, he does a interview with Ann Curry, and she sets him up for the marraige question. “Angie says to ask you when you are getting married. Again, he is caught off guard. Stunned. They edited. Does he say when everyone can get married, no, he says, “what did she say?” and Ann says ,well she thought maybe one day the kids, etc. and he said, “yeah well she did set me up, laguhing, ah uh, I guess if it is important to the kids one day” more bull. Now they are not getting along during this time already. He is drinking all the time,staying out after filming in Berlin, and then every time she is asked, she says, “ask Brad”.lol The awards begin to take its toll on them, and that is pretty obvious. By the time the Oscar rolls around they don’t even bother to try and do decent interviews and play up cute kid stories. “What are the kids doing” ‘oh they they don’t care, doing thier own thing’ lol game over.

    She does the same, depending on the movie, they each change what they talk about depending on the movie promotion. Pitt though, on CCOBB began spouting , “Life is short, make the most of it” right after his premier, took his ring off, and off her went. Just like he did with Jen.

    Reply
  234. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    @Elle:
    I agree. Whatever his intention, at best it was awful judgment, making an emotional, public plea about the frail state of his kids mental health. True or not, did he honestly think that would resolve the problem? Doesn’t sound like she hit the jackpot in the parent dept.

    Reply
  235. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    @p:
    Right, but won’t discuss his tattoo. Also, didn’t someone on here say he said he wouldn’t discuss his kids and then turns around and he’s discussing them? My memory is really getting foggy! I’ve been reading too much lately..lol.

    Reply
  236. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    @p:
    And then, that goes with the fruit falling close to the tree and maybe JV is a total freak? I think both those parents probably screwed both those kids up.

    Reply
  237. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    @p:
    [don’t know if a 4 yr old wetting his pants during time out is necessarily considered a major issue (unless he a chronic wetter) , ditto a toddler playing at being in Peter Pan.]

    No, BP told the story like his son intentionally peed on the time out chair in an act of defiance. That is acting out imo. Fair enough with Shiloh but she does dress kinda butch. KIDDING! I did think the call me John thing was a little odd though. Not majorly so, I stand corrected. BP made me go there. See?!

    Reply
  238. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:11 pm

    @p:
    was not nearly as suggestive as people made it out to be

    It still seemed very strange to me….so maybe it means there was incest, or maybe it means they wanted to shock people. Or both. I’d believe any of those scenarios.

    Reply
  239. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:13 pm

    @Kate:
    Ew. jmo.

    Reply
  240. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    @p:
    Yes, P…I think you are so right there. I had a friend who was abused. So sad. But she was the most promiscuous person I have ever met. She honestly couldn’t help herself. We were supposedly good friends and she slept with my boyfriend. And flirted with everyone…it really goes on and on. Those people do a hell of a lot of damage to themselves and others.

    Reply
  241. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:21 pm

    @Z:
    Well, I read that article and it doesn’t sound like she feels ruined for life. But, I can’t help but think she’s kidding herself. jmo.

    Reply
  242. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    @p:
    That makes so much sense to me! Great point!

    Reply
  243. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    @Kate:

    [Whe she said, “she is the love of your life” he didnt know what to say” so he says, “dare I say?” now]

    I take that to mean they’d been circumspect for so long bc after he bolted on Jen they took great pains to make it about the kids. “It’s just about the kids, folks, NOT our hotness for each other. No sir.”

    [“yeah well she did set me up, laguhing, ah uh, I guess if it is important to the kids one day” more bull]

    You know even if they were in it for the long haul I’m not sure marriage would have factored in. Well except maybe for show. “We are the bestest couple EVER, and have the bestest ring, with the bestest dress and cake, going on the bestest honeymoon, not to mention the bestest interviews about how best everything is.

    [“What are the kids doing” ‘oh they they don’t care, doing thier own thing’ lol game over.]

    Maybe but also they’ve got to be aware that increasingly, the heat is on re their kid-publicity-machine.

    [Pitt though, on CCOBB began spouting , “Life is short, make the most of it” ]

    I thought part of that was to talk-up his partner… but “for as long as it lasts” was revealing I thought.

    [and off her went. Just like he did with Jen.]

    Yep, “She’s the most bestest everything…until someone else is.] I [ahem], called that one.

    Reply
  244. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    Can someone please find me the AJ/JV pictures???

    Reply
  245. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    @Elle:
    I remember distinctly me and my pals getting so into a game, we INSISTED on staying in character insisted those too unimaginative to appreciate it, oblige us whether they saw the sense in it or not. There I said it.

    Reply
  246. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    @p:
    I thought part of that was to talk-up his partner… but “for as long as it lasts” was revealing I thought.

    Yeah, this and the comment about not fighting with AJ because he wasn’t “going to be with this person forever”.

    Reply
  247. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:40 pm

    @Elle:
    Yeah, link anyone?

    Reply
  248. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:40 pm

    JA has been the star through all of this. She kept mum and private. She really didn’t need the faux bfs (come on, VV and JM??? who thinks they are desirable?). That was a faux pas or two. I do really hope she does the hot single woman thing now. Wouldn’t it be hot if BP and AJ broke up and JA was this fabulous, mysterious single woman who didn’t mean a man? But then went on dates with rich, powerful, older, sophisticated non-actor men on yachts and exotic places? I would feel vindicated and I’m married. She really has bad taste in bfs or faux bfs. I’ve met VV and his is a disgusting, sexist ass imo. And that was when he was thin and supposedly “hot”.

    Reply
  249. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:43 pm

    Haha, I wrote “mean a man”. WTF? I don’t even understand that, freudian or otherwise. Anyway, *need* people *need*.

    Reply
  250. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    @Elle:
    I don’t think she needed them either…but someone must have thought it was a good idea. To help her not look like poor Jen. I bet if she just kept her head up – like she always did, actually – she would not have needed to go there.

    Reply
  251. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:45 pm

    @Elle:
    I read that just how you meant it… : )

    Reply
  252. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 10:45 pm

    @Z:
    [Right, but won’t discuss his tattoo. Also, didn’t someone on here say he said he wouldn’t discuss his kids and then turns around and he’s discussing them?]

    Yeah well like I said, the guy’s a shit-heel. They’re both shit-heels. I’d like to do a video or put up a site calling them out and shaming them every time they set up a pretend candid-shoots with the poor sprogs or talk about them in interviews, encouraging lame-asses to talk about them like they know them, further encouraging crazy-ass stalkers to come after them.

    SHIT-HEELS!

    Reply
  253. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    @p:
    That would be a long, long video…or a lot of info for a web site. LOL You should do it…it would be interesting and fun. It seems that is what they do, in public anyway. Set up fake shoots, etc. I believe absolutely none of it now. I guess the NY times article really called them out on that.

    Reply
  254. p said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:16 pm

    @Z:
    [I guess the NY times article really called them out on that.
    And none too soon I might add.
    At the end of the rant there’d be either Brad or Angie getting an animated shit-pie in their shit-heal faces. Or getting an animated hard swift kick in their silly rear-ends. (w them screeching “ahhhhh! @&^%#@% WTF!! @%&%!!! OOWWW!”) ;- )

    btw my above post to Elle should have read:

    I remember distinctly me and my pals getting so engrossed in games, we INSISTED on staying in character, insisting those too unimaginative to appreciate it, oblige us whether they saw the sense in it or not.

    Reply
  255. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:30 pm

    @p:

    [I remember distinctly me and my pals getting so engrossed in games, we INSISTED on staying in character, insisting those too unimaginative to appreciate it, oblige us whether they saw the sense in it or not.]

    Oh, I know. My point was that he could reveal private details about his children who have no say in the matter but be private about tattoos. And unlike what you wrote, he didn’t give a context that was relatable, understandable. It was like a response to “How are the kids”. Well, Matt whips out his weiner and pisses on the walls when he’s upset and my daughter wants to be called “Joe”. It was just random. Anyway, I am really saying that BP should not disclose the details of his kids private lives if he can’t talk about a fucking tattoo he got with his baby mama. Priorities seem upside down to me.

    So I take back saying the kids have issues. But, I think his comments carelessly created fertile ground for speculation of such. I am really only being critical of BP. And if it weren’t for his careless comments, I wouldn’t be writing about this random shit!

    Reply
  256. Elle said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    Even total famewhores like the Holmes-Cruises, the Beckhams and Madge do not divulge details about their children.

    Reply
  257. Z said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:46 pm

    @p:
    LOL…you are cracking me up here….hilarious! I love the idea of that animation. I’m still laughing…maybe I should go to sleep…I’m getting punchy.

    @Elle:
    That makes sense to me….and it is random. How did he decide what to talk about…if there was actually thinking involved. And also, you are right about the other media-ho’s not talking about there kids. They might parade them around (at least Katie and Tom do), but they don’t talk about them…and that is really better.

    Reply
  258. kick said on March 25th, 2009 at 12:00 am

    @p:
    Another classic symptom of being sexually molested is self mutilation. Eating disorders are also very prevelant in women who had been sexually molested. IMO, aj has displayed symptoms of both.

    Reply
  259. p said on March 25th, 2009 at 12:11 am

    @Elle:

    [And unlike what you wrote, he didn’t give a context that was relatable, understandable.]

    Yeah well a brilliant storyteller he’s not.

    [Even total famewhores like the Holmes-Cruises, the Beckhams and Madge do not divulge details about their children.]

    eh they’re on my shit list too.

    I say we hammer all their monkeyed skulls together till their eyes cross, their ears spin and their heads ring like a Chinese gong!

    Or do you like the pie in the face idea better?

    Reply
  260. p said on March 25th, 2009 at 12:17 am

    @kick:
    Yeah kick, sadly all that’s ring a bell.

    @Z:

    and Z… sorry but there’s more. (above)

    Reply
  261. Elle said on March 25th, 2009 at 12:48 am

    @kick:
    [Another classic symptom of being sexually molested is self mutilation. Eating disorders are also very prevelant in women who had been sexually molested. IMO, aj has displayed symptoms of both.]

    Thank you!!! She has them all.

    Reply
  262. Elle said on March 25th, 2009 at 12:55 am

    @p:
    I don’t really have a shit list. These people just amuse/scare me. I am from lalaland so I have my own perspective on all this bs. It’s funny/sad how they still try to hold onto old hollywood glamour in the internet age. It’s really just not possible. They’ve become fodder for virtual target practice. I hope the money and lack of privacy is worth it.

    Having said that, definitely pie in the face and especially when they take their kids out for obviously staged photo opps. Those poor things all look like they have ptsd.

    Reply
  263. p said on March 25th, 2009 at 1:36 am

    @Elle:

    That’s 1 for the stinky pie.

    Reply
  264. topbrit said on March 25th, 2009 at 1:49 am

    imo, as stated by one of the earlier posters i think she has def got sociopathic tendancies,i have just looked up the definition on google and she has too many of the traits to be normal,i think daddy knows this and tried to call her out on it and i think she used the old trev magic(pr charactar assasination,you know,the one she used on jen)on daddy but he deserved it.

    Reply
  265. Z said on March 25th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    @kick:
    That’s interesting, too…she really has many, many symptoms…imo.

    Reply
  266. Z said on March 25th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    @p:
    P, I can’t help but be partial to the pie. : ) hahaha

    Reply
  267. Z said on March 25th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    @Elle:
    So, I would think (imo) the more classic symptoms you have, the worse the abuse? What do you guys think?

    @topbrit:
    Yep Topbrit, I’m not a doctor/sociologist, but have always been fascinated and done tons of reading. She has a lot of symptoms of a sociopath…and narcissistic/borderline personalities. My mom is a therapist and says bipolar disorder and borderline personalities can go together a lot of the time – people have both. Idk, but it does seem like abuse could create these mental problems.

    Reply
  268. p said on March 25th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    @Z:
    That’s two from the county heard from.

    Pie : 2

    @Z:
    Yeah I’ve seen these things go together…you find yourself navigating around bold-face liars and until you get to know them, it’s hard to tell, bc lying often feels the same to them as telling the truth. Sexually abused women act out in lots of ways. It’s often girls that were “the pretty ones” whose self-worth is based heavily on their looks, that it’s most apparent to me. Very manic, unstable personalities. The ones who protect themselves under layers of fat I think exhibit their wounds differently. It’s why I mentioned Gloria Trillo in the SOPRANOS. It’s never clear what happened to her, ie exactly what pathology was playing out, but it might as well have been sexual abuse. Their relationships never end well. The partners invariably get fed-up/turned-off /creeped-out fast, assuming they’re at all healthy.

    Reply
  269. explain said on March 25th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    @p:
    Reading all this, her mother didn’t seem to work her brain in good ways… and reading how fun they find little Shiloh been called John, well, those guys are protected by their money, because it’s a case of urgent social care intervention!

    Z, lol, I love both your ideas of the blog and the pie… BUT don’t forget that the word “shit” had some magic effects on those two loonies: it turn them on!

    Reply
  270. explain said on March 25th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    Not z, but p! Sorry.

    Reply
  271. p said on March 25th, 2009 at 8:20 pm

    @explain:
    Yeah it’s a shit-pie.

    Do I count three counties heard from for pie?

    Don’t forget there’s also the “gong” idea.

    Reply
  272. Z said on March 25th, 2009 at 11:11 pm

    @p:
    Yes, that all sounds right on to me. My friend that was abused had huge fights with her bf’s…and she was bi. I don’t know if she really was, or just needed the attention so bad she’d sleep with whoever showed interest. Really, really sad. : (( She didn’t pick the most stable people to be with either…or healthy…but she had revolving relationships. Makes sense, though. And they definitely seem to be into drugs…I wonder about Anna Nicole Smith…she was pretty – then gained a bunch of weight – the drugs -I don’t know much about her relationships…except they seemed unnatural, mostly…like marrying an 80 year old guy (not sure of the age – but he was ooold).

    explain…oh yeah, we have to remember that about the shit! Hmmmm, maybe it won’t work, P. We don’t want them to like it! lol.

    Reply
  273. Z said on March 25th, 2009 at 11:12 pm

    @p:
    Well, let’s think about it…maybe gong idea is best. You are so funny!

    Reply
  274. p said on March 26th, 2009 at 1:07 am

    @Z:
    [You are so funny!]

    the way to my heart pal…the way to my heart.

    Reply
  275. explain said on March 26th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    @Z:
    hahaha, yes the gong idea!!! P you’re such such a prolific creator, lol.

    Z, I do believe thare’s only a pie those superior spirit will NOT appreciate: cod-liver oil pie! Hummmm…

    Reply
  276. p said on March 26th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    Alrightee

    I think thats;
    2 for gong
    1 for pie

    sheeesh you gotta be a computer to do this job.

    Reply
  277. Z said on March 26th, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    @p:
    LOL…let’s give them both!

    Reply
  278. Z said on March 26th, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    @p:
    LOL…that was a huge LOL….you are hilarious!

    Reply
  279. Z said on March 26th, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    @Elle:
    Good thoughts there…and yeah, shit, I feel so bad for those kids…they do look like they have ptsd. Zahara and Maddox look so serious and angry in their photos….it’s too sad. And Pax looks lost.

    Reply
  280. Z said on March 26th, 2009 at 10:59 pm

    @explain:
    Yep, we could try that type of pie…choke….let’s see, well that would be enough to make me puke, I’ll tell you…but the shit pie would work on me, too. We have to be extra diabolical to think of a pie they wouldn’t like…lol.

    Reply
  281. p said on March 27th, 2009 at 3:34 am

    @Z:
    It’s pretty sad when you have to cull for more disgusting substances bc shit in the face is too pleasant.

    Reply
  282. Z said on March 27th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    lol…that is a fact, my friend!

    Reply
  283. explain said on March 28th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    @p:
    @Z:
    Hello p and Z!!! lol, while we waiting p to become a computer I suggest a… pad of paper, lol!, to keep ALL the brilliant ideas on… BECAUSE it is missing the ONE: the blog!

    Sum-up:

    2 for gong
    1 for pie

    1 for blog

    @p:
    [t’s pretty sad when you have to cull for more disgusting substances bc shit in the face is too pleasant.]

    I understand what is going on with BP. He literally has his “butt” on his face, u know… I found this today:

    “BuzzFoto Blind Item #15: It’s a Long and Pocky Road
    This rumor has been around forever – we bet that you’ve heard it too. A-list celeb, who has a big reputation for being one of the finest men around. Well, in his younger days (even on film), he was still fine, but a bit more pocky. Yes, our leading man had scars from a teenage acne problem. He took care of it though, once he settled down in LA. How? Well, the good old-fashioned way. He paid a doctor mucho moolah to inject fat from his butt into the scars. It worked great though, even if the thought is a bit nasty. Anyway, we met the real deal a couple weeks ago, someone from the doc’s office that assisted on the procedure and she/he set the story straight for us. Remember, LA is essentially a small planet, and nothing stays secret forever!

    Reveal: Brad Pitt”

    Reply
  284. p said on March 28th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    @explain:
    So now we can just call him ass-face, and defend ourselves with yet another example. See you stick around long enough and BAM! explanations presents themselves.

    The blog is part of it. It runs like this.

    So what did Brang/TomKat/(insert asshole duo of your choice) do to exploit and fuck-up their tots this week?

    Then the offending pic (blurring tikes face)

    Finally The Biggest Asshole Award.

    Resulting in

    The-Boot-Of-Justice (swift kick in the ass)

    Shit-pie (in the face)

    …for weeks when everyone is behaving badly

    Chines Gong (communal head smashing)

    Reply
  285. explain said on March 28th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    Im writeless(sort of speechless)! p, you are rare, :-) )! I can help, if you want. I can play the GONG, lol.

    Reply
  286. p said on March 28th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    @explain:
    heh I know there’s got to be software w a gazillion sound effects but seeing as I don’t know what they are I just might use you to pinch hit as the chinese gong…like casting for the school play huh? ;-)

    Reply
  287. Very Interesting said on March 29th, 2009 at 2:00 am

    @Keane:

    I agree with you on this score. Your insight into humanity is excellent. Your comments are the most interesting I’ve read in a long time – both you and Kate are a force in these threads. Thank you.

    Reply
  288. Not Very Interesting said on March 29th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    @Very Interesting:

    Seriously? Either you’re an arse-licker, or you’re one of Keane’s clones.

    Reply
  289. Kate said on March 29th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    So Brad Pitt really does have his ass on his face, OMG that is so funny, I wonder if he did that before or after the ass shots for Troy, his ass was pretty in that movie, all the boys at DL love it. Maybe that is why he said not more nude films. lol

    Reply
  290. bgarza said on April 28th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    Well, parents always want to protect their children even if they are grown adults. I think they know Angelina is a “loose cannon” who will react very ugly if Brad does leave her. They probably are looking out for the grandkids as well. Under the law, Brad has full rights to his children, but Angie will probably make it hard on him.

    Reply
  291. Brennifer 4 lyf !! said on January 14th, 2011 at 11:52 pm

    i adore Jen an i think Angie is the devil in disguise and came down on earth to destroy ppls lives
    Jenn is way betta n is an Angel without wings
    shes an awsum actor
    i will always stand behing Jennifer no matter what happens n will neva go on Angies side
    xx Jennifers biggest fan Bella <3

    Reply
  292. Matilde Ysaguirre said on May 22nd, 2011 at 6:56 pm

    I REALLY liked your post and blog! It took me a minute bit to find your site…but I bookmarked it. Would you mind if I posted a link back to your post?

    Reply
  293. mag said on June 17th, 2011 at 7:34 pm

    HERE WE GO AGAIN!!! Leave it to the mother in law to stick her 2 cents in, nosy bitches…get a life and leave your kids alone….if it werent for meddling mother in laws, more marriages would survive in this world…

    Reply
  294. Barbara said on February 1st, 2012 at 11:58 pm

    I think this is a bunch of nonsense. Nobody killed anyone here, why would your parents ask you to leave your children and your mate? what do you tell the kids because your mother did certain things which a lot of us done she should be punished and her partner should go back to his ex.

    that means you do not care for your grands

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

March 2009
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Meta