IUCTV Show Tues Night at 8pm est with Special Guests – Not to Be Missed!

Posted on March 2nd, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment

The show the past two weeks has started to get going.  This Tuesday will be the best yet.  First off, NYC top Literary agent Jarred Weisfeld is suing the ass off Faber&Faber publishing for 10 million because of dirty Jew type remarks made against him in a new book about rapper ODB..  He’ll be my guest with Dr. Charles Small of Yale U.  In Touch senior editor Noah Levy will follow them with an hour of what’s hot in celeb gossip.  Not to be missed.  It’s all at ianundercover.com, Tuesday 8pm est.  See ya there.

  • 52 Comments
  • Tags:
  1. motherlessgoat said on March 3rd, 2009 at 6:48 am

    Hey, your “Royal Highness”, what the hell happened to all your Toothy = Jake exclusives? Still a loooooong way to go to out his cowardly ass.

    Or did you receive a C & D telling you to leave The General’s “bf” alone?

    Reply
  2. PedEgg said on March 3rd, 2009 at 7:54 am

    Top literary agent? LMAO You mean OL Dirty Bastard’s former manager. Good grief

    Reply
  3. payal said on March 3rd, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    will someone ask if angelina has leaked info to in touch and if she has sent stuff to show jen aniston in a bad light and her in a good light please!! i’ll be asleep

    Reply
  4. Mememe said on March 3rd, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    Ok people, i’ve tried to post this on the Brangelina post but it won’t post so i’ll put it here instead.
    I’ve been in touch with an old contact to do some digging and she has it on very good authority that Brangelina are NOT living apart and are NOT on the verge of splitting. It’s true they fight a lot but they’re still very much together. This is from someone extremely well connected and i trust her implicitly.

    Reply
  5. Kate said on March 3rd, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    Living apart could mean in the same home, different bedrooms, not having sexual together, called it quits.
    How would your source have that information without asking her , and then she would just lie? Brad is not going to tell anyone.

    Wondering what your souce would say, is Brad the pussy wussy some say or he is the controlling ass that we say?

    I have to admit it is rather funny to watch all the loons all over the net worried about him hooking back up with Jen. I have come to the conclusion as of today I would not mind that just to watch the fall out for all of those who have hated her for so long. It would be worth it to see her forgive him, take her back, help him fight for custody, be a stepmom. He may be a sexual animal but he is also 45 years old and his pickings are going to be slim with kids in tow. I don’t really care if it is a love story, I just want to watch Lainey and all those at Access Hollywood that have kissed Angelinas ass for so long, freak out. lol I know, so mean.

    Reply
  6. Kate said on March 3rd, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    oh and IAN, you must be rocking this story because you have them srurrying all over the web trying to prove what a lying scum you are and that you have no idea what you are talking about. lol They are going crazy at the mere thought you may be right and that they are splitting up and Pitt taking the kids. Keep it rolling on..

    Reply
  7. p said on March 3rd, 2009 at 11:01 pm

    Was this show ever broadcast. I tried to access it yesterday but a previous show came up.

    Reply
  8. Kate said on March 4th, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    It started but there were technical problems so , no. He is up in the mountains and bad reception.

    Hmm, Ian weren’t you up in the mountains when you were poking around the Xenu before . lol

    stay safe!

    Reply
  9. Billi said on March 4th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    Still no sign of Ian. I would have thought someone on staff would have posted an update of sorts on Ian. Sugar Ray anything new with you???

    Reply
  10. dina said on March 4th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    When can we catch the show? Your show is my Tuesday guilty please!

    Reply
  11. kick said on March 4th, 2009 at 7:25 pm

    @Mememe:
    I have it on inside HW authority that Brad and Angelina are together for public displays only. That in fact, they are living separate lives (not separate habitats although they do spend a great deal of time apart). They have been and still are a joke in HW. Brad’s actor friends have distanced themselves from him, and from what I understand, Angelina has no “real” friends with the exception of a few male friends.

    I think it’s interesting that you don’t see them pushing the two youngest around in strollers like they have all the others. Does this mean they have another high dollar pictorial coming out? Are they under contract for exclusive baby photo rights with somebody? These people do nothing that isn’t self promoting.

    Reply
  12. Kate said on March 4th, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    @kick:
    He stayed in the same home with Jen off and on for 2 months after they announced their seperation so it is conceivable that they would be doing the same here with children involved, except for the custody case. Trying to put myself in that situation, if I knew my SO was going to try and take my children away from me I would not want him within 5 miles of me, much less in the same home. That just gives him more of a chance to collect amo against me, right? Sounds like things are up in the air? No decisions have been made. jmo

    Reply
  13. kick said on March 5th, 2009 at 12:23 am

    @Kate:
    You’re right. I think if I were in a situation where dirt could be used against me if my SO stuck around, I’d have him leave ASAP. But what if there is dirt on both parties? This could be a real slug fest. On the other hand, because they are both so intent of portraying this “save the world” family to everyone, they may, with the help of alot of mediators, come to some kind of “hush” pact and custody agreement. And then what would probably happen is you will see them try to outdo each other with staged photos of each of them separately with the kids to increase their popularity in the public eye.

    Reply
  14. Kate said on March 5th, 2009 at 1:07 am

    @kick:
    Maybe, but this whole thing started because Brad wanted custody of the kids so he could give them a more stable home. If you knew your baby mama may expose them to something on the wilder side, how compromising would you really be? It also may get down to , who does he legally have to right to fight for? Someone can want out of a relationship pretty bad until they realize they may have to give up their children in the process. I don’t see either one of them doing that. Ian said Brad would be nice about it, but how does one be nice about a nasty custody battle of the century, and living together still?

    Reply
  15. kick said on March 5th, 2009 at 1:17 am

    @Kate:
    HI Kate,
    you are right, you have a good point.

    But from what I was told, I didn’t think it had come to the point of custody issues yet. It’s my belief that they are going to stay together as long as possible while putting up a good front for publicity purposes.

    If Ian knows more than that, this is going to be a really really interesting spring/summer!

    And you are right, who does he legally have the right to fight for? I’m trying to think of another situation where there were adopted kids and a couple who were together but not married and I’m thinking Mia Farrow and Woody Allen had a similar situation. And she got full custody of the kids.

    Reply
  16. Kate said on March 5th, 2009 at 4:00 am

    @kick:
    Ian did confirm though that litigation papers had been filed to get things going if it came to that. I heard Brad was the one who instigated it but he is such a wise that was a week ago who knows. Still he is a planner nothing is just an afterthought with him. Regardless how can they at this point have any kind of a relationship at all? The damage is done and it will just get worse from here on out. They have the Jolie-Pitt Foundation though and their money is tied together in his Katrina project. He is going to be speaking to Pelosi on that today soot is probaly stalled in this economy, she may want her money back. He has his Malibu home on the market overpriced . Sounds like he needs the funds for whatever reason. Wonder if he has to buy her out of that 60 million dallar charteau they bought in France.He wanted everyone to think they leased it for 3 years but not true it was bought. Nubby told me that when it went down and then later in a interview she slipped and revealed it buy it was edited out. LOL

    And Lainey is making a fuss over Jens hair stylist. I bet Brad has one noticed he had some highlights this last go round. As much as he takes care of himself you would think little Shiloh could have a hair cut a d a cute outfit like Maddox use to get. That kid was always dressed to the nines. Sui is the only one that looks like they always put dirty clothes on her and do not comb her hair.Poor kid can she help it if she will be the center if the custody fight? I hope Jane Pitt can have some influence somewhere for at least a few years while they are little.

    Reply
  17. Kate said on March 5th, 2009 at 4:05 am

    Excuse the typos so easy to hit the wrong one on my iPod

    where is Sugar Ray these days wonder if he has been theatened….

    Reply
  18. Kate said on March 5th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    Colleen is now the technical problem. LOL go home Tommy Boy.

    Reply
  19. kick said on March 5th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @Kate:
    I was wondering where Sugar Ray was myself! I feel bad and hope that people weren’t too harsh! I thought the posts were very interesting! Maybe we’ll find out more from Ian tonight.

    Reply
  20. kick said on March 5th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    @Kate:
    Yeah, there is too much damage to turn back now but you never know in HW. If apart they aren’t as successful, they will surely stay united. You know what I mean?

    I’m sure AJ will get full custody and walk the earth playing the martyr or Mother Theresa for many, many years to come. That would be sickening.

    Reply
  21. Kate said on March 5th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    @kick:
    Well he is playing politician today, and she is being called his wife again….so…think that maybe some damage control…

    Reply
  22. kick said on March 5th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    @Kate:
    Yup, damage control although I do think this was in the works for a while. Not sure if you can just “show up” and pop into the White House! lol!

    I am just really curious as to why you don’t see the two youngest. Like I posted before, it’s probably due to a contract they have with someone to have exclusive rights. I bet for damage control reasons, we will see another “family spread” in a magazine someplace.

    Reply
  23. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 12:06 am

    I wanted to ask about Johnny Depp but suddenly I couldn’t get my key pad to work. Not really a Jacko fan, it’s too long played out. I’ll bet John has some great stories minus the psychic angle, I just wasn’t prepared for that kind of show, hoping for more actual leads, not speculation. But I’d like to hear him talk about his adventures some other time. I also hope SR joins in. That guy no only hears the news, he lives it!

    Reply
  24. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 12:12 am

    @kick:
    {And she got full custody of the kids.} Only bc WA was seen as an unfit parent. Usually the mother is the primary caretaker …but not always. This case may be a “not always” if reports are true.

    Reply
  25. kick said on March 6th, 2009 at 1:48 am

    @p:
    Was WA deemed an unfit parent? Hmmm… I’m trying to remember. I know there was the drama w/ he and her adopted daughter, but didnt WA and MF share a biological child together as well? I think MF kept all the adopted kids and they shared custody of their biological child. I could be wrong, I’m going to check .
    And you are right, if all the reports are true, she may not be primary care taker. I would say though that they would have joint custody. I truly don’t think they want to drag anything out in the public eye. Their public persona is too important to them.

    Reply
  26. kick said on March 6th, 2009 at 1:53 am

    @p:
    You are correct. Here is what I found:
    Though they never actually tied the knot, the breakup of Woody Allen and Mia Farrow’s ten-year union took the tabloids by storm with its unique mix of adultery, cradle-robbing, and creepiness. The details: It was revealed that Allen was having an affair with Farrow’s 21-year-old adopted daughter, Soon-Yi Previn. Accusations of bad parenting flew from both parties, and a bitter battle ensued over their blended brood of adopted and biological children from their union and Farrow’s pre-Allen days. Farrow received custody of the children, as well as support from ex-husbands Andre Previn and Frank Sinatra, the latter of whom helpfully offered to break Allen’s legs.

    Reply
  27. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 2:46 am

    {Sinatra, the latter of whom helpfully offered to break Allen’s legs.} Ha! I would have paid to see that. I saw a clip recently and I think they originally were going with assisted visits with one kid, and were going to play it by ear to see if another would be ok with it in time…she never was, and it didn’t work very well for the other either. The older kids decided for themselves. A resounding, no. Sounds like she fucked-up royally with men but so far the older ones seem well educated (she saw to it] and self-sufficient. Not at all glammie HW types, very bright, no trust-fund babies there. Her son with Allan, Seamus, is the spittin’ image of Farrow (lucky dog eh?] and is so smart she had to find a college for him that accepted 12 yr olds. He’s now 20 and written for the NYTimes, he’s put off attending Yale law accepted 2ys ago I think. I believe he finished up his undergrad at PENN. Brang will never produce that, not the rate they’re going. Anyway, seems Farrow did a decent job. consistent NE upbringing and schooling. Bonding w neighbors and friends…etc

    Reply
  28. kick said on March 6th, 2009 at 3:00 am

    @p:
    To see Sinatra break Woody’s legs would have been classic!
    You have made some very good points. I am from the East Coast, that area in particular. I went to private boarding school with lots of kids that had famous parents. No one was treated any differently based on who their parents were (except for the Shah of Irans nephew who had his own private entourage and also the now King of Jordan who had security). There is alot to be said about raising your kids outside of HW. On the other hand, I also witnessed lots of children of famous parents who are dumped off at boarding school starting in kindergarten, never to live home full time again. The limo and driver would drop them off at the beginning of the school year and pick them up at the end of the school year. Very rarely did famous parents ever come visit. A few were good about it but the visits were always brief and there was no warmth. Very formal. When summer came, they would be shipped off to camp. Kind of sad really.

    Reply
  29. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 3:18 am

    That is sad. I don’t know that Farrow put them in boarding schools. There are probably very good private schools and in some areas, equally competitive public schools. (If I’m not mistaken her mom Maureen was close at hand to hel too In fact in NYC if for example, a kid goes to Hunter, Stuyvesant, or Bronx Science –public schools — it would look as good on a college application as say Dalton — an expensive private school. However you have to be tested to get into those schools (for bright kids.] But all-in-all she must be very proud of her children. One I think is a therapist. Moses, maybe…

    Reply
  30. kick said on March 6th, 2009 at 3:26 am

    @p:
    I am thinking that Farrow had her kids attend private schools in NYC. I don’t ever recall any of her kids being in any private NE boarding school as we pretty much knew who attended the other schools (kind of a competition thing).
    I remember one famous mom who is a notorious “you know what”, shipping her son off at a very young age and not even coming to see him over Easter break. She called a local candy store and demanded that they deliver candy to her child’s room on Easter morning. It was really cold.
    But, as many famous people’s kids that we went to school with, the ones that remained in HW were always the most screwed up.
    Where would AJ send her kids to school? Shouldn’t her oldest already be attending? Shouldn’t several of them? Those kids are going to be soooo messed up, especially if she and BP split.

    Reply
  31. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 3:30 am

    As a matter of fact, Cynthia Nixon, whose girlfriend happens to be in education, sends her kids to public school in park Slope Brooklyn (it’ has a well-to-do component but it’s mixed.] She feels strongly about it. Actually some public school districts, the schools are superior. Some Catholic schools are also pretty competitive.

    Reply
  32. kick said on March 6th, 2009 at 3:30 am

    @p:
    Oh, and for “being tested” to get into the exclusive private schools, trust me- if Daddy or Grand Daddy has enough $$ to throw at the school for example say a new sound system for the auditorium or wing to the gymnasium, any kid can get in! lol

    Reply
  33. kick said on March 6th, 2009 at 3:33 am

    @p:
    Yeah, NYC has some really good schools. It’s a different game in the city.
    The schools I know are swanky, old $$ schools. When I attended, there were strictly boys schools and strictly girls schools.

    Reply
  34. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 3:40 am

    Farrow lived both in Connecticut and NYC (I think the homes are probably only a 4O min drive apart.} I think they may have been schooled both places, not really sure. btw I think of NY as NE. Also not all Conn private schools are boarding schools. Brang skirts the education question by saying they have tutors, but that limits the avenues of learning and peer-bonding considerably. It’s like a cult, they probably don’t want to let too much outside influence in. Too threatening to their disfunction. plus cramping their lifestyle.

    Reply
  35. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 3:46 am

    [Oh, and for “being tested” to get into the exclusive private schools, trust me- if Daddy or Grand Daddy has enough $$ to throw at the school] Yeah I’m sure you can buy your way into the smart-kids-schooltoo but your kid would be a bit out of sync. That’s one of the reasons slots in these schools are coveted. When they SAY smart, they MEAN smart. I assume admissions offices know that. They want money sure, but they also want their pulitzers and nobel prize winners.

    Reply
  36. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 4:26 am

    Sumthin’ I said? You asleep?. Catch you latah.

    Reply
  37. kick said on March 6th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    @p:
    Hi P- I crashed out on you last night. Sorry! :(

    I don’t think it’s healthy to put your kids in a bubble and “tutor” them. A five year old doesn’t needa a tutor-a five year old needs socialization with peers! Those kids have no real stability. They are going to be so messed up and it’s going to be sad! I just have a huge feeling that Shiloh is really going to rebel and that she won’t get along with AJ when she is older.

    Reply
  38. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    Yeah 5 yr olds don’t need tutors, but I think everyone benefits from peer-to-peer relationships. A life with NO world-reach may be limiting, but having no consistency, or outside influence is no good either. Plus those kids also have to be on-their-guard even when they’re abroad, so all their yrs of traveling is easily eclipsed by kids who say, may have had say only 1 trip, but can move around more independently and talk to whomever they damn please, without looking over their shoulders. The key is the flow of interaction imo.

    Reply
  39. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    @kick:
    I think ALL the kids will rebel as they get older, and-or feel some guilt that they have to serve their parents life-style…not to mention pressure to keep their secrets for them. Kids know. “a family is as sick as their secrets…etc, etc, etc…”

    Reply
  40. kick said on March 6th, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    @p:
    yes, you’re right- all the kids are going to rebel because of what their parents are doing to them now. What if their oldest really really wants to go to school like most normal children his age? How awful would it be that they just trapse him around everywhere instead. I am anxious to see if next year he goes to school somewhere for the whole school year!

    Hey, what happened to this website? Where is everybody? How come no new posts by Ian or Sugar Ray?

    Reply
  41. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    @kick:
    I think Ian’s working on the Michael Jackson story and he said SR does tend to disappear, sometimes for days at a time, while he’s gathers details for his legendary 1st hand scoops. Wonder if Brad had a word with him. They’d probably say they do not want “normal” kids, conveniently side-stepping the idea that not all lifestyle variations are healthy ones.

    Reply
  42. Kate said on March 6th, 2009 at 8:27 pm

    @kick:
    Imagine, they most likely can not let them go to public school because they have to coach theem on what they can say and what they can not say. How could you shut Zee up? lol shh don’t tell anyone Daddy does not live here.

    Reply
  43. p said on March 6th, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    um Zee? …short for Zahara? Is she especially noisy or something? For sure they’d be coached within an inch of their young lives. Can you imagine. “1] The pittbull belongs to the maid. 2] Mommy was just having a bad dream. 3] Daddy only THOUGHT he saw something strange. 4]No one here EVER calls photogs in advance or uses you to self-promote.” I would think public school would be out of the question considering all the publicity, but surely private school isn’t. It seems Seamus [or Ronan] did in fact go to Yale law and graduated. All before age 21 and that’s WITH a hiatus. Whatever else went wrong you certainly did a lot right Mia. Good woman yerself!

    Reply
  44. Kate said on March 6th, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    Yes, Zahara, well lets say she is precocious. Remember that little story Jolie told before an awards.
    “Mommy, I need a cookie. -Oh YOU need a cookie. -Yes I need a cookie, -Why do you NEED a cookie.
    Cause Daddy is gonna cry if I don’t get a cookie.” Now did Miss Z really say this or was that just a cute story to tell? IDK. It was cute and this was when she was 3. years old.

    There is a poster on FF that has contact with a insider that says they live apart and use pictures to place them in the same area at the same time, (if they are not both say going to LA) and they bribe the kids to keep their mouths shut. I am not so sure you could bribe a 3 year old and we saw how well it worked in Venice with Pax. lol I would guess that only Maddox and Zahara have any real idea of what is going on. They are the two who truly look haunted. I think it would be tough for him to get those two away from her no matter what he has on her. jmo

    Reply
  45. kick said on March 6th, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    @Kate:
    LOL! That is too funny! But you have a good point- imagine what those kids could blurt out by accident???

    Reply
  46. kick said on March 6th, 2009 at 10:13 pm

    @Kate:
    That is a cute story about Zahara and I hope it’s true but isn’t it a shame that AJ and BP have created such a web of lies and deceipt around them that we don’t believe anything they say?! Shame on them!

    So what else is happening out there? I’ve had my head in the sand lately!!

    Reply
  47. Liz E. said on March 7th, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    @Kate:

    “Ian did confirm though that litigation papers had been filed to get things going if it came to that. I heard Brad was the one who instigated it . . .”

    What does that mean? If “papers” have been filed then there IS litigation. You don’t just file papers for the hell of it. There has to be an ongoing legal case. This is pure BS. The amount of misinformation in your post is funny.

    The French “chateau” is a huge complex consisting of the house plus businesses including the vineyards, winery, and recording studio. That’s why it’s valued at $60 million. It isn’t the house that is worth $60 million. Why would the owner lie about leasing it? He’s a respected and reportedly honorable businessman. All I have ever read is that the house is a rental and the owner still owns it. If not, then the transfer of property would be on the record. Did your friend provide some basis for his report of the alleged sale? How did he learn this information?

    Estates and historic houses (in the modern collector’s world) are rarely affected by the everyday housing market. These high ticket properties always have buyers at the ready – particularly post-modern houses like the Malibu house. Pricing this type of property is always speculative at best. It’s hardly a typical real estate comparable. Is it overpriced? Maybe. We’ll only know that if it doesn’t sell for the asking price.

    Any funds from either Jolie or Pitt or anyone else that went into any of their foundations no longer belong to either of them or any donor. Those monies now belong to the foundations. Another baseless argument shot to hell. Sorry.

    Honey, Brad Pitt is one of the wealthiest people in Hollywood. I’m talking BIG money. Hundreds of millions of dollars. Surely Ian would know this. With Pitt’s ability to get back-end deals on movies and with his production company he is never gong to run out of money. Again, sorry to burst your doom and gloom balloon. What’s with these fervent wishes for bad things to happen to people anyway? This just gets weird on your part. More interestingly why isn’t Ian correcting this type of posted misinformation? I would think he would have some clue about these people.

    Reply
  48. Updatacercaro said on March 11th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    President Barack Obama called Wednesday for cosmopolitan allies to tip-off on to more unfriendly steps to pass done with-start their own economies, commination that U.S. efforts to take off its own tight-fistedness professional care from the fidgety [url=http://www.popolodellarete.it/member.php?u=18889]cialis[/url] purposefulness falter without pandemic coordination. “We can do a in goal of fact credible job here at old folks’, with a undamaged emcee of policies, but if you

    Reply
  49. offedsnolodag said on March 17th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    91333jklBKJB\BLKJB>LKJ http://www.studiorientali.it/forum/index.php?showuser=4535 farmaci anti impotenza, 16268 efcsec [url=http://www.studiorientali.it/forum/index.php?showuser=4535]impotenza[/url], 62084 pfizer11128

    Reply
  50. gyyziu said on March 17th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    SsvEUN uxiyavvknryz, [url=http://jntchysqlxfa.com/]jntchysqlxfa[/url], [link=http://ufbcfjouotam.com/]ufbcfjouotam[/link], http://fyzbtowxcvfx.com/

    Reply
  51. John1621 said on March 28th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://opxaiey.com/oyyrqqy/4.html

    Reply
  52. Immiliemy said on March 29th, 2009 at 12:59 am

    [url=http://members.ebay.fr/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPage&userid=cialis-achat]Acheter cialis[/url] medicaments disponibles par commande ! Les prix les plus bas . cialis a vendre citrate de sildenafil bon marche Acheter de Cialis sur internet. :) [url=http://members.ebay.fr/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPage&userid=cialis-achat] generique medicaments en France [/url]

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

March 2009
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Meta