IUC Exclusive: Clue #2 – Couple Splitting have kids

Posted on January 25th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

IUC is in the know about a major split between a well known celebrity couple.  The couple have kids and have been in contact with top lawyers for custody rights.  This ain’t gonna be pretty! 

  1. Keane said on January 25th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    Well that rules out Ashton and Demi, and Tom and Katie only have one child so we’ll assume its not them. Could still be JLo and Skeletor though, which I really wouldn’t give a rat’s ass about. But Brange are still in the running, hurrah! The only other one I can think of is maybe the sham of all Hollywood sham marriages, WIll and Jada. Interesting….

    Reply
  2. Mememe said on January 25th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    Oooh will and jada, didn’t think of them! I know their marriage is a sham but would they split up? I’ve got a feeling they’ve got too much dirt on each other to risk a custody battle.

    Reply
  3. George said on January 25th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    What about Tea and David

    Reply
  4. Keane said on January 25th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    First clue said they were one of Hollywood’s most notorious couples – which for me could only mean a few, TomKat, Brange, and that’s about it. Can’t be TomKat as they only have one child and I wouldn’t call Tea and David that notorious or Hollywood. It has to be someone who sells themselves as a couple. Here’s hoping its the Brange. I’ll be very disappointed with Ian if its just old JLoletor, everyone knows about them!

    Reply
  5. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    Will and Jada, didn’t he say divorce is not a option for them, they have an arrangement, and are open about it. Don’t think it is them. Ain’t gonna be pretty. Who would be really nasty about a custody battle and not try to work it out for the sake of the kids? I don’t think Jlo because Marc had kids before and there was no custody battle there. Same with Tori Spelling. This has to be a couple who is considered infamous for something that is not nice. David and Tea would fit that. Brangelina would fit that, but they are not married, and this is labeled Hollywood Divorce or does that matter. I can’t think of anyone else. Would the Branges really do this in award season? I doubt it.

    Reply
  6. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    This is on the Entertainment Lawyers site, so maybe it is JLo and Marc…

    Yeah, yeah, we have heard it all before, but I finally, finally, finally have someone who has actually spent time with Jennifer Lopez on at least a weekly basis, and sometimes more often. No, it isn’t a maid or a nanny or any kind of help. According to the source, Jennifer never wears her ring at home and refuses to discuss Marc Anthony ever. Jennifer is spending more and more time here in LA alone and is working on projects for herself with no input or help from Marc.

    My source asked how come Marc wasn’t working on these things with her as was usually the case, and Jennifer replied it was because they are getting a divorce.

    Reply
  7. Keane said on January 25th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    Yeah everyone knows about JLo and Marc, she’s been ramming it down our throats herself with all that Golden Globes “see no ring” tomfoolery. What an utter twat. The only one I really think it applies to is Brange and no I don’t think they would announce it before oscars night if it was them, I’m assuming Ian has the inside scoop. And in other news, celebs, fucking nutjobs to a man. I wouldn’t swap places with them for all the tea in china. Oh and its not Gwyneth and Chris Martin is it. Now that would be dull and again everyone already knows!

    Reply
  8. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    Apparently JLo recently gave a statement saying divorce is not an option, guess she is in Will’s camp. PR is abound, so who is really right here? I agree, I do not consider these two notorious, but some may I guess.

    Reply
  9. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    I agree Keane, Brange is the only couple that would really fit the “this ain’t gonna be pretty!” because Jolie will do just what her mother did and turn the kids against Daddy in time, and many do not believe he has ever adopted the kid, and then there was that report (on here) that Brad said he would take full custody and she said “over my dead body” so that tends to lend credence to them. That would be fun wouldn’t it. There as also a blind about a star that was going to make a change in the structure of the family that would take up most of 2009, and she was going to announce it sooner than later to steal another stars thunder who has had a lot of press lately. That could fit, would be a long fight.

    Reply
  10. Keane said on January 25th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    Yeah Kate I remember that blind item now you’ve said it and I thought it meant Brange splitting too. What else could a “change in family structure” which would keep her in the papers for most of 09 refer to? A wedding or another kid wouldn’t make that much news. I’m pretty sure we’re right. What a fucked up life she leads, popping out and adopting damaged kids left right and centre while cheating on their dad and with no real intention of staying with him. She’s a selfish bitch and those kids are going to be royal fuck-ups.

    Reply
  11. Keane said on January 25th, 2009 at 6:27 pm

    Plus I think she’s pregnant and Brad’s taken to the drink – what a fucking mess!

    Reply
  12. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    Pregnant, she was drinking like a fish at the GG, I hope not.

    Reply
  13. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 11:55 pm

    Well Keane, my bubble has burst, they seemed pretty chummy at the SAG. guess it is not them, they would not be all smiles and hands on if they had hired attorneys to fight for the kids, right? She does have a pooch, you may be right.

    Reply
  14. Mememe said on January 26th, 2009 at 3:39 am

    I’m probably way off the mark but I’m starting to think this could be julia roberts. Her husband isn’t a celebrity but the way they got together is certainly notorious, and the children part fits.

    Reply
  15. Keane said on January 26th, 2009 at 6:29 am

    Hm not sure Kate, they’re both actors. Industry events are work do’s, its all about business. I’m sure they’re pretty proficient at acting all happy together when they’re in full view of the media glare.

    Reply
  16. HisHighness said on January 26th, 2009 at 8:14 am

    I will give more clues soon…you might all be surprised.

    Reply
  17. Kate said on January 26th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    So she hits him and she drinks too much, what about Posh and Beckham, they are pretty high profile, and then there is Catherine Zeta Jones and Michael D. , can’t think of what they would be notorious for either one of them in a custody battle would be pretty nasty and would equal Brangelina I would guess. Julia is a good guess Mememe but I don’t think Danny would have the balls to stand up to Julia or the fianances in court for a battle. Still, Keane, I agree, they are actors, and Brad did say he would sue for full custody if they split, and she did say “over my dead body” so , and she has hit him before..and we have seen her falling down drunk….but Ian, “we might be surprised?” Come make our day? Brangelina , Please!

    LOL!

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

January 2009
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Meta