In Touch Magazine Hits Nail on Head – Brangelina in Deep Trouble!!!!

Posted on January 25th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment

Angelina’s ex bodyguard is spilling every detail in a new tell all book.  In Touch Weekly has a cover story this week detailing how loose a cannon Angie actually is, including explicit details of what she does behind Brad’s back.  This confirms IUC’s previous stories about how she cheats on Brad.  Saddest thing of all, Jennifer Aniston is still madly in love with Brad and would do anything to get him back.  IUC says they should have never split up in the first place.

  1. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    Uh how do you know Jen is still in love with him? Why bother with the couple split story and make it like it is a big deal when it is already posted on other sites as Jlo and Marc Anthony. This story too has been all over the internet for DAYs!

    Reply
  2. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    How about something that is really breaking news that you know and we don’t?

    Reply
  3. HisHighness said on January 25th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    I know friends of Jen who insist she still loves Brad and has never got over him. I stand by this. Thanks for your comments Kate. peace out!!!

    Reply
  4. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    Okay, well thank you for that. I just get very frustrated with all the bs on that crap Data Lounge that gets spread about Jen, I am sure you are aware what they have been saying this week about her, and why they split. It seems the girl can never catch a break, and it just seems the two famewhores always come up smelling like roses. If Mickey gets away with his book, great. Although there is someone that is connected to him that says the IN Touch article is off about the cheating, that he is not going to write about that, but the adoptions, the kinky sex at home, the way they raise the kids, when the affair started early in filming but not 3 weeks in,etc. I apologize for being rude. I do like your site, loved your book, I know you said Brad was straight, Ted seems to think otherwise. See, what do we know a fans. Data Lounge is pathetic and vicious.

    Reply
  5. HisHighness said on January 25th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    gotcha Kate, you make good, solid points.
    cheers,
    i

    Reply
  6. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    Thanks, missed your chat! I do hope you will be the one to break their demise II think that is what we keep waiting to see here. lol

    Reply
  7. Keane said on January 25th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    While Jen quite clearly to all but the completely blind still loves Brad I just don’t think he was that in to her. I heard that they hadn’t been doing the horizontal salsa for years, that he’d been cheating on her for a while and she was more of a BF figure. Ange did the hot sex act for him, got knocked up with a kid and cowabunga, the phenomenon known as Brange was born. Plus Ted C says Brad is bi which kind of figures when you think of some of his birds. Juliette Lewis anyone? Not for me thanks, and not Jen either to be perfectly honest although she seems like a nice chick. Gwyn I can see and Ange ok but I always say you can always tell a closet case by the relative unattractiveness of their heterosexual partner. Your views on this Ian?!

    Reply
  8. HisHighness said on January 25th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    Keane, I have zero to say. You said it all. Thanks!

    Reply
  9. Kate said on January 25th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    Keane, that makes me kind of sad. Years no sex with Jen for years? IDK if I believe that, and the bisexual thing , Ted is saying bi, I know everyone on Data is saying Jen could not handle him being bi that she always knew, but now, Ian went undercover and said Brad was one of the few straight men in Hollywood. That I do remember, and I think CF was another one.He did a pretty good job don’t you think, to have missed that? Those DL have no proof, all gossip, not one person can say they were with him, they all point to his landscape architect and his old friend Thom where he was the pool boy. That has been around forever. Ian had to have picked up on that. Is Brad so smart he could hide this for 25+ years, because Ted is not saying he just turned bi, he is saying always was. Brad sue seemed to love Jen in the early years, but he was cold in the way he handled the breakup. Brange may be born, but I have to say, Keane , have you ever one time seen him look at Jolie in a picture ever, in a loving way, I have seen a few pats on the but, a few lusts looks, but there was so many loving pics with Jen. What was all that . Nothing. No wonder she can not get over him, he has made her feel exactly the way you see it. His comments to W said it all. I will celebrate the day they split, and I really hope she takes all the kids. He has the nerve to take her to his home with Jen while cheating, he is a class A ass. jmo

    Reply
  10. anonymous said on January 25th, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    Interesting this should come out now. Another pub for Brangelina? Gosh, when is Jen gonna be cleared of these 2? I mean, she went thru a lot before & after the divorce. I think she definitely was better off w/out Brad. She looks amazing now more than when she was w/ Brad the last few years of their marriage. And yeah, the W Mag was a terrible thing for Brad to do— I was not married to him & I can’t forget it, what more w/ Jen? She is an amazing woman to take these all in. No matter what their relationship was, Brad was bad in treating her that way. He even allowed the media to make a big circus that Jen didn’t want to have kids w/ him that’s why he left her. I know why, it will make him still look good inspite of the affair. And both went on adopting to cover up everything and everyone went right into it. Disgusting!
    Angelina.

    Reply
  11. Laurie said on January 25th, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    With all those kids, where does she find the time for extras?
    ps your highness ask your webmaster to change the color of your name and email required zones on this comment form. Can’t see white font on pale yellow background.
    otherwise all’s cool

    Reply
  12. section9 said on January 26th, 2009 at 11:11 am

    I happen to agree with Ian here. Brad strikes me as straight. There wasn’t much untoward gossip on Perez’s blog about their joint appearance at the SAG Awards. I would not be surprised if there is a breakup within the next 18 months, however, unless this truly is an “arranged” marriage (a la Will and Jada). In which case, Jen will descend on Brad like an avenging Angel. I understand that the connection with the mother-in-law is still there.

    My sole concern is with Angelina. I think she is at or nearing the peak of her game. Ian, go look at the returns on her films. I’m not sure that she’s pulling in her weight, as it were. My take is that she knows this and that she’s going to retire soon and enter elective politics. Republican elective politics (because she’s an oddball and that’s how you differentiate yourself from the rest of Hollywood and stand out). She’ll take the Eastwood route, only she’ll want to go farther than just be Mayor of Carmel. She’ll also have a public conversion to Roman Catholicism, the thinking man’s evangelical Christianity. Whether or not Brad is still with her will be immaterial to her political ambitions. She”ll just get a new pool boy.

    You get out to CA more than I do. You might want to do some real-estate checking to see if I’m right. I have a sneaking hunch that she or her father might own real property in Ventura County or in the Inland Empire. It’s easy enough to establish residency to avoid the carpetbagging charge. These are purple-to-red congressional districts and are easier for someone like Angie to get an easy win as long as she gets past the Suicide King that the extreme right of the GOP will put up in the primary. Plus, her part-time lesbianism isn’t a real problem in California that it might be in, say, Alabama. She’ll run in “Reagan Country” and she’ll win there. People will take her seriously in ways that they would never take someone like Matt Damon.

    Bottom line? Angelina IS NOT STUPID. She is an extremely shrewd woman who has found her way to the top of the A List. The key is knowing when to leave so that you are remembered like Lauren Bacall, so you can use your previous career as a springboard to power.

    Reply
  13. Keane said on January 26th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    Section 9 – I read your thoughts about what you think AJ is planning and apart from the conversion to Roman Catholicism (which seems impossible on all kinds of fronts, bisexual, 6 kids and counting out of wedlock, you name it – are they really gonna welcome that with open arms and how on earth would she keep to RC rules of moral conduct?) and I agree it seems likely. Hey if Arnie can be Governor and Regan (and Dubya!) can be President, what’s stopping Angelina? Well I would wager for one thing, the fact that she might actually have to do a hard day’s/week’s/montn’s/year’s work for once in her life. You really think AJ would be that committed or disciplined. Politics most certainly ain’t all glamour and fucking in trailers on which ever drug you fancy that day in between takes, its fucking hard graft. You really think someone as pampered and spoilt as her could manage that? And wouldn’t there be the tiny issue of her admitted heroin use and fondness for knives? The opposition would have a field day! She may well want to run for office, but get elected and actually do the work she’s required to do? I find it highly unlikely.

    Reply
  14. Keane said on January 26th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    Oh and Kate re: what you were saying about Ian not thinking Brad was bi and could he really disguise it so well that a journo undercover in Hollywood would not have known about it all I can say is this: As a lesbian who has been both out, then in, then out but not to by any means everyone I know, and having had many friends at college who were in to having sex with members of the same sex as much as the opposite but now act straighter than straight, I can tell you that it is the easiest thing in the world to conceal your sexuality from all but your closest friends. People I have known and worked with are still amazed when I tell them I’m gay, they wouldn’t have thought it in a million years. And I have lots of friends who if they came out of the closet would provoke the same reaction. Which is why I am never, or very rarely, surprised to hear someone bats for the other team, there are a lot more gay/bi people out there than most people would ever have imagined, often because they won’t even admit it to themselves half the time.

    Reply
  15. Kate said on January 26th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    Thanks Keanne, I can see that, I know exactly what you are saying. My best friend is a lesbian, but no one in our circle knows (and we have been in that circle for 15 years) but everyone in our travel circle does know. Same with my cousin. But, they are not followed and hunted every minute of the day. Wouldn’t you think someone would have outed him years ago? Remember, it was not until about the last 10 years that he completely controlled the media in his space. He never wanted to live like Cruise. That was not his thing. He and Jen had a much simpler lifestyle, he was the laid back guy, nice, fun, by all accounts. Now those arround say he is controlling, manipulative, and plans everything to the T. Things bother him, he uses big words to try and prove he is not the dumb kid from Missouri. aw shucks! guy He makes a lot of jokes about his sexuality, and always has from day one, I am sure you have heard them. Some graphic,and from the early films. Would a guy deeply in the closet do that and then fight like a sob to keep it hidden? He once said , “I have nothing to hide, and nothing to be ashamed of” about ten years ago. I just happen to read that because someone pulled up some up his old interviews on E. Ted C has said over and over again that he is straight, and only in the last 3 months he is now saying he is bi-so he did not know either? I find that very very hard to believe. Where is the gaydar? I know you work in the business, I have family that does, and one who does some of the event parties. He is gay. I am pretty close to him. He says Jen has never dated any of the guys she has been seen with, all bi or gay. Ian says Jen desperately wants Brad back, and so many on DL say she kicked him to the curb because he was bi, does this make sense to you? At the same time, when Ian reported that Brad was straight, I was surprised, because he was one that I kind of thought was bi, but I am just commenting on rumor vs fact since we have nothing else to really go on unless he comes out or someone else does it for him. Mickey Brett maybe.lol

    Reply
  16. Kate said on January 26th, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    Section9, just wanted to comment, I could see her doing something along that lines, but I would thing it would be more of an ambassadorship. She hates the US, she doesn’t want to live here, and she seems to think she is JB the incarnate. I don’t know what it takes to achieve that, but she seems to work it out. Of course if Mr. Bretts book reveals any heroin use in recent times, and funny adoption tactics, that may be that.

    Reply
  17. section9 said on January 26th, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    There’s a point beyond which Angelina could not rise politically, but remember, she is -extremely-talented and very telegenic. She also has the ability to reinvent herself like Madonna.

    Her best days are behind her. And understand something; politically, the rules are different for California candidates. That state is in such a mess, Ron Jeremy could win statewide on a reform platform.

    The way Angie will handle her past is NOT to run away from it, but to run WITH IT. Most politicians are stupid and try to cover up their past drug use or acoholism like Bush did with his silly DUI back in 1976. Had he simply revealed that in an interview in 1999, it would have been off the table by the closing week of the election with Al Gore. Instead, stupid Bush kept it quiet and got ambushed by Maine Democrats. As a result, a lot of Republicans from the Elmer Gantry wing of my party were shocked, stayed home, and gave Al Gore the popular vote victory in 2000.

    Trust me, Karl Rove was always overrated.

    Reply
  18. Kate said on January 26th, 2009 at 9:05 pm

    She barely made it out of highschool, she had to go into a special program so she could graduate. I hate to think someone absolutely no education would be put in a position of political power. Of course if she gets rid of Brad, (she did say she never saw herself with a actor but a humanitarian or a what was it? was it a politician?) hmmm there ya go.

    Reply
  19. Marina said on January 27th, 2009 at 6:44 am

    Супер, независимое мнение, независимого человека. Классная тема, обязательно это запомню и другим расскажу. Миленькие мои, ну о чем вы говорите, об этом уже столько сказано пересказано.

    Reply
  20. mimi said on February 7th, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    I think you are all a bunch of losers sitting in your private little houses tapping on your keyboard a lot bulshit. Dream on losers about Brad and Angie breaking up and him getting back with maniston —— Not in this lifetime. That boat has sailed. I cannot believe a site like this existed, it is so laughable. One is so hopeful that she will have a party when it happens —– SAD for you dear. It will never happen. the funny thing is that this site background is so dark ——— tells you something about the people here?

    Reply
  21. p said on February 27th, 2009 at 6:09 am

    I doubt anyone is reading this anymore but here goes….I don’t believe TedC EVER said BP was bi. Are you sure you’re not thinking that b/c you assume that FakeAlaF is AJ, and Ted implied Fake’s husband is bi? Otherwise point to the article. And Mimi you loonyTune you, finish polishing your nails, while visions of sugarplums dance in your head..

    Reply
  22. cate said on April 6th, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    Neither of them seem to be particularly bright. A decade ago, I lived and worked in the Third World. There were long weeks and months where there was very little power on any given day and a very limited supply of running water every third day, or so. While walking to work, I usually trekked through a barrio where the children wandered naked amidst metal shacks while rats larger than I had ever seen, scared the living daylights out of me. At night, folks were lulled to sleep by the sounds of machine guns. I doubt that either one of the Brangelina promo team has much experience long term stays wherever they go. Always, they are hopping on a jet, bound for a better place.

    St Brangelina? Every few months they do, what seems to amount to, drive through photo ops. They stay in four or five star hotels and admit to feeling better about their own lives after the drive by events. “I can’t complain about my life after seeing so much pain.” Roughly translated, that seems to mean that your pain makes me feel better about my life. Granted, they do bring cameras into horrible regions, Sadly, it takes multi-millionaires to do that. The cameras don’t seem to want to follow real workers in the field. If there isn’t glitz or glamour, it isn’t newsworthy, it seems. After a harrowing few days, they return to the South of France to recover in billionaireland. Watch how defensive she gets when the conspicuous consumption and affluence are challenged in interviews.

    On top of that, two individuals who had no prior experience with children, are adopting an entire team of children from all over the world? Anyone who has either studied developmental psychology or who has helped to raise younger siblings, knows that children need stability and consistency. They need to have regular periods of play, sleep and socialization. Having a sense of personal space and home is crucial. They are dragging those children through airports as though they were tiny verbalized pieces of luggage. I would remain silent were it not for those beautiful little persons who don’t know any other way. The parents have decided that they will be citizens of the world before they ever know what it means to be a little citizen in a safe little kindergarten. Each of them were in their 30s or 40s when they became interested in “the world”. Their minds are barely developed enough to understand some rather simple consequences in the home.

    As it stands now, all they will remember of childhood will be a blurr of airports and hotel rooms. There will be no favorite hiding place, chair, bed,room, bed or blankey. If the insanity hotel employees complain about is true, it most likely can be ascribed to the rootlessness. I hail from a family of six and I can assure one and all that we were not allowed to run through the house like untrained creatures. The condition of having no limits or boundaries only serves as an impediment to personality development.

    In short, they seem to be zig-zagging through life which is fine if their sole concern were fulfilling their own wishes or finding relationships with other adults of ANY persuation; however, there are children in the mix. If chaos and crazy is what THEY want, then pass the children on to people who can offer a stable and relatively sane home to thrive in.

    Reply
  23. p said on April 7th, 2009 at 11:58 am

    @cate:
    Yeah we’ve discussed this quite a lot. Trying to understand the deprivation of the world whilst living inside a bubble of 5 stars, flurry of airports, ever changing environment, tight security detail and NEVER venturing off even when you’re older to really talk to anyone at length bc it’s dangerous since everyone knows who you are — is bogus. It’s code for the parents don’t REALLY give a shit about what’s good for these kids. I ascribe more to Miss Marple’s philosophy over this one; she felt she had learned a great deal about the world and human nature, by knowing her small village and it’s inhabitants well. Certainly preferable to what they’re doing, where they’re not exposed much if at all to any one person for very long, outside their parents sphere of influence. Cult.

    I doubt either have studied developmental psychology much, or perhaps ignored it, along with common sense, in favor of their very own personal view (excuse) of child rearing.

    Reply
  24. p said on April 7th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    and that’s…subscribe not ascribe.

    Reply
  25. Keane said on April 7th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    @ Cate – that is a fairly definitive account of stuff we’ve been talking about for a long time. I may well re-post it on a later thread to make sure other people read it.

    Reply
  26. care assistant said on January 23rd, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    It’s really a nice and helpful piece of information. I’m glad that you shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

January 2009
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Meta